Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjuvant to standard therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers

Negative-pressure wound therapy compared with advanced moist wound therapy: A comparative study on healing efficacy in diabetic foot ulcers

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy with advanced moist wound therapy in managing diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

A total of 450 participants with diabetic foot ulcers were randomized to receive either negative-pressure wound therapy (n = 204) or advanced moist wound therapy (n = 246) over 18 months. The primary outcome was complete ulcer closure, with secondary outcomes including time to closure, wound size reduction, infection rates, recurrence, and amputation rates. Wound dimensions were measured using digital planimetry, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to assess time to closure.

RESULT

Analysis revealed statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between treatment modalities. In the negative-pressure wound therapy group (n = 204), complete ulcer closure was achieved in 177 patients (87%), which was significantly greater than the advanced moist wound therapy group (n = 246) with 72 patients (29%) (P < .001). Although the mean time to wound closure was marginally extended in the negative-pressure wound therapy group (73 ± 45 days vs 64 ± 49 days; P = .045), this cohort demonstrated substantially more significant wound area reduction (48% ± 15 vs 25% ± 30; P < .001). Secondary outcome analysis revealed that negative-pressure wound therapy was associated with markedly reduced adverse events: wound infection (40 patients [20%] vs 95 patients [39%]; P < .001), ulcer recurrence (40 patients [20%] vs 113 patients [46%]; P < .001), and amputation rates (30 patients [15%] vs 132 patients [54%]; P < .001). Longitudinal assessment through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly greater wound closure probability and reduced complication risk in the negative-pressure wound therapy group throughout the follow-up period (log-rank P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Negative-pressure wound therapy is significantly more effective than advanced moist wound therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcers, demonstrating superior outcomes in wound closure, infection control, and amputation prevention. This study highlights negative-pressure wound therapy as the preferred treatment option for complex diabetic foot ulcers, warranting further research into its long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Effectiveness of most common adjuvant wound treatments (skin substitutes, negative pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma/fibrin, and growth factors) for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome

AIM

To assess the effects of several adjuvant therapies (AT) commonly used in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). The present meta-analysis was designed to support the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.

METHODS

A Medline and Embase search were performed up to May 20th, 2024 collecting all RCTs including diabetic patients or reporting subgroup analyses on diabetic patients with DFU comparing AT with placebo/standard of care (SoC), with a duration of at least 12 weeks. Prespecified endpoints were: ulcer healing (principal), time-to-healing, major and minor amputation, serious adverse events (SAE), and all-cause mortality. AT assessed were: growth factors (GF), Platelet-rich plasma and fibrin (PRP/F), skin substitutes (SS), negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Mantel-Haenzel Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (MH-OR, 95% CIs) were either calculated or extracted directly from the publications. Weighted mean differences and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria (3, 5, 27, 8, and 8 with GF, PRP/F, SS, NPWT, and HBOT, respectively). Participants treated with any of the explored AT had a significantly higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR ranging from 2.17 to 4.18) and shorter time-to-healing in comparison with SoC/placebo. Only PRP/F and HBOT showed a significantly lower risk of major amputation (MH-OR: 0.32(0.11;0,93; p = 0.04 and 0.28(0.10;0,79; p = 0.02, respectively), despite a higher risk of SAE. No other significant effects on the above-reported prespecified endpoints were observed. For the primary endpoint, the quality of evidence was rated as "high" for all the AT, except for NPWT ("moderate").

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, AT can actively promote wound healing and shorten time-to-healing in patients with DFU. HBOT and PRP/F also showed a reduction of the risk of major amputation, despite a higher rate of SAE.

Effects of Oxygen Therapy on Patients with a Chronic Wound: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the effects of oxygen-based therapy on patients with a chronic wound.

DATA SOURCES

The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials from database inception. Investigators measured risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool.

STUDY SELECTION

The included randomized controlled trials focused on the effects (short- or long-term wound healing, amputation rate, percentage of reduction in ulcer size, and poststudy transcutaneous oxygen measurement [TcPO2]) of oxygen-based therapy (including hyperbaric oxygen therapy, topical oxygen therapy, and continuous diffusion of oxygen) on patients with a chronic wound.

DATA EXTRACTION

Researchers extracted information regarding participant characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes from the included studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pooled effects of 31 included studies showed that patients treated with oxygen had better short-term wound healing (risk ratio [RR], 1.544; 95% CI, 1.199 to 1.987), a higher percentage reduction in the ulcer area (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.999; 95% CI, 0.439 to 1. 599), lower amputation rates (RR, 0.529; 95% CI, 0.325 to 0.862), shorter wound healing time (SMD, -0.705; 95% CI, -0.908 to -0.501), and higher poststudy TcPO2 (SMD, 2.128; 95% CI, 0.978 to 3.278) than those in the control group. For long-term wound healing, there was no statistically significant difference (RR, 1.227; 95% CI, 0.976 to 1.542).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxygen-based therapy improves short-term parameters of wound healing in patients with chronic wounds.

Application of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been used in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) for many years, but its clinical efficacy is still controversial. Therefore, this study explored the efficacy of HBOT applied to DFU by means of meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched, from database inception to October 2023, and published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of HBOT in DFU were collected. Two investigators independently screened the collected literature, extracted relevant data and assessed the quality of the literature. Review Manager 5.4 software was applied for data analysis. Twenty-nine RCTs with 1764 patients were included. According to the combined results, when compared with conventional treatment, HBOT significantly increased the complete healing rate of DFUs (46.76% vs. 24.46%, odds ratio [OR]: 2.83, 95% CI: 2.29-3.51, p < 0.00001) and decreased the amputation rate (26.03% vs. 45.00%, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, p = 0.04), but the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in patients (17.37% vs. 8.27%, OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.35-4.57, p = 0.003), whereas there was no significant difference in the mortality (6.96% vs. 12.71%, OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.21-1.28, p = 0.16). Our results suggest that HBOT is effective in increasing the complete healing rate and decreasing the amputation rate in patients with DFUs, but increases the incidence of adverse events, while it has no significant effect on mortality.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Wagner Grading: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus that can result in infection and amputation of the lower extremities. This study compared the benefits and risks of hyperbaric oxygen therapy with those of other DFU treatments, based on the Wagner grading system.

Methods

Systematic searches for randomly controlled trials using hyperbaric oxygen therapy for DFUs were performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Data regarding demographics, wound healing, minor and major amputations, operative debridement, nonhealing wounds, and adverse effects were analyzed based on Wagner grades, using RevMan 5.4.1 and Microsoft Excel.

Results

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was significantly superior to other treatments for wound healing rates 8 or more weeks after the final treatment (RR = 2.39; 1.87-3.05; P < 0.00001) minor/distal amputations (RR = 0.58; 0.43-0.80; P < 0.007), and major/proximal amputations (RR = 0.31; 0.18-0.52; P < 0.00001) for the 14 studies analyzed. In addition, this therapy increased the rate of complete wound healing for Wagner grades II (RR = 21.11; 3.05-146.03; P = 0.002), III (RR = 19.58; 2.82-135.94, P = 0.003), and IV (RR = 17.53; 2.45-125.44; P = 0.004); decreased the minor/distal amputation rate for grade III (RR = 0.06; 0.01-0.29; P = 0.0004) and the major/proximal amputation rate on for grade IV (RR = 0.08; 0.03-0.25; P < 0.0001); and decreased the operative debridement rate for Wagner grade II (RR = 0.09; 0.01-0.60; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

Moderate-quality evidence revealed that adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy improved DFU wound healing for Wagner grades II, III, and IV; prevented minor and major amputations for grades III and IV, respectively; and prevented operative debridement in grade II wounds.

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and other databases through November 2020. A total of 20 randomized clinical trials and 1263 trials were included in the meta-analysis. For each trial, the average difference, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated to evaluate the efficacy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy increased the healing rate of diabetic foot ulcers (relative risk, 1.901; 95% CI = 1.484-2.435, p < 0.0001), shortened the healing time (MD = -19.360; 95% CI = -28.753~-9.966, p < 0.001), and reduced the incidence of major amputation (relative risk, 0.518, 95% CI = 0.323-0.830, P < 0.01). In summary, our meta-analysis confirmed that hyperbaric oxygen therapy offers great benefits in the treatment of DFU and the reduction of amputation. In addition, larger and well-designed randomized controlled trials need to be planned and conducted to verify this conclusion.

Hyperbaric oxygen enhances collagen III formation in wound of ZDF rat

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a serious complication of diabetes and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is also considered in comprehensive treatment. The evidence supporting the use of HBOT in DFU treatment is controversial. The aim of this work was to introduce a DFU model in ZDF rat by creating a wound on the back of an animal and to investigate the effect of HBOT on the defect by macroscopic evaluation, quantitative histological evaluation of collagen (types I and III), evaluation of angiogenesis and determination of interleukin 6 (IL6) levels in the plasma. The study included 10 rats in the control group (CONT) and 10 in the HBOT group, who underwent HBOT in standard clinical regimen. Histological evaluation was performed on the 18th day after induction of defect. The results show that HBOT did not affect the macroscopic size of the defect nor IL6 plasma levels. A volume fraction of type I collagen was slightly increased by HBOT without reaching statistical significance (1.35+/-0.49 and 1.94+/-0.67 %, CONT and HBOT, respectively). In contrast, the collagen type III volume fraction was ~120 % higher in HBOT wounds (1.41+/-0.81 %) than in CONT ones (0.63+/-0.37 %; p=0.046). In addition, the ratio of the volume fraction of both collagens in the wound ((I+III)w) to the volume fraction of both collagens in the adjacent healthy skin ((I+III)h) was ~65 % higher in rats subjected to HBOT (8.9+/-3.07 vs. 5.38+/-1.86 %, HBOT and CONT, respectively; p=0.028). Vessels density (number per 1 mm2) was found to be higher in CONT vs. HBOT (206.5+/-41.8 and 124+/-28.2, respectively, p<0.001). Our study suggests that HBOT promotes collagen III formation and decreases the number of newly formed vessels at the early phases of healing.