Efficacy and safety of aflibercept therapy for diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison between intravitreal brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment-naive central involved diabetic macular edema: One-year real-life case series

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections in the management of naive central involved diabetic macular edema (CIDME).

METHODS

This study included 45 treatment-naive eyes with CIDME. A complete ophthalmic examination, including BCVA and SD-OCT was performed. Patients were randomized to (IVB) or (IVA) groups. All participants received a loading phase of three consecutive intravitreal injections, then followed by a personalized treat and extend (T&E) regimen.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, the mean numbers of injections in IVA and IVB groups were 7.25  ±  0.53 and 6.3  ±  0.45, respectively (P < 0.0001). The IVA group showed a significant increase of the mean BCVA from 0.66  ±  0.15 logMAR (50.9  ±  7.7 letters) to 0.41  ±  0.19 logMAR (63.7  ±  10.8 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 441.2  ±  35.7 μm to 281.3  ±  18.4 μm. The IVB group showed a significant increase of mean BCVA from 0.65  ±  0.16 logMAR (52.1  ±  7.9 letters) to 0.39  ±  0.17 logMAR (65.3  ±  8.7 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 437.2  ±  41.9 μm to 275.5  ±  21.7 μm.No significant difference between both groups in terms of the vision improvement and the reduction of CFT was reported, whereas a statistical difference was observed in terms of intravitreal injections (IVI) numbers. No ocular complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the effectiveness of both brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of CIDME with a lower frequency of injection in brolucizumab group lowering the burden of IVI in this cohort.

Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Practice in GREece: Three-Year Outcomes of the ADMIRE Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment in a tertiary referral center in Greece.

METHODS

ADMIRE was a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with DME. Efficacy was assessed by change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to month 36 after treatment with intravitreal aflibercept in treatment-naive patients and previously treated patients. Safety was evaluated by recording any patients-reported events.

RESULTS

Participants in the study were 94 patients with DME, 70 treatment naive and 24 previously treated with ranibizumab. At month 36 of the follow-up period, the mean change in BCVA was +7.4 letters compared to baseline (p < .001). The mean change in BCVA in treatment-naive patients was +8.9 letters and differed significantly compared to previously treated patients (+5.9 letters, p = .041). In addition, patients who received a loading dose of 5 monthly injections at the initiation of treatment provided better VA outcomes (+11.4 vs. +6.1 letters, p < .001). Accordingly, the mean CST at month 36 (369.6 ± 72.8 μm) was significantly decreased compared to baseline (479.2 ± 68.3 μm, p < .001). Overall, the mean number of injections at month 36 was 13.4. Safety analysis showed that the reported ocular adverse events during the 36-month study period were mild and not sight-threatening.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal aflibercept was found to be safe and effective for the treatment of DME in real-life in a Greek population. Treatment-naive patients and those who received a loading dose of five consecutive monthly injections at initiation of treatment exhibited better outcomes, suggesting that early and effective treatment may prevent vision loss.

Real-World Management of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion with Intravitreal Aflibercept: 24-month Results from the AURIGA Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

AURIGA is the largest real-world study to date to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment of diabetic macular edema or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice. Here, we report the 24-month outcomes in the RVO cohort from France, Germany, Italy, and Taiwan.

METHODS

AURIGA (NCT03161912) was a prospective observational study. Eligible patients with RVO were enrolled for whom the decision to treat with IVT-AFL had already been made by the attending physician. Patients were treated with IVT-AFL for up to 24 months at physician discretion according to local practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) from baseline to month (M) 12. All statistical analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

In 554 treatment-naïve and 65 previously treated patients with RVO, the respective mean (95% confidence interval) change in VA from baseline was + 12.5 (10.8, 14.3) and + 7.9 (3.3, 12.6) letters by M12 and + 11.4 (9.4, 13.3) and + 4.4 (- 0.6, 9.5) letters by M24 (baseline mean ± standard deviation: 51.0 ± 21.9 and 51.9 ± 20.4 letters); 44.0% of treatment-naïve and 27.9% of previously treated patients reported ≥ 15-letter gains by M24. By M24, the mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline was - 247 (- 267, - 227) µm in treatment-naïve patients and - 147 (- 192, - 102) µm in previously treated patients. From baseline to M6, M12, and M24, treatment-naïve patients received a total of 4.0 ± 1.3, 5.5 ± 2.5, and 6.9 ± 4.2 injections, respectively, and previously treated patients received 3.8 ± 1.5, 5.0 ± 2.2, and 6.3 ± 3.7 injections, respectively. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with that of previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In AURIGA, patients with RVO experienced clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements following IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice. These improvements were largely maintained in treatment-naïve patients over the 24-month study despite the decreasing treatment frequency, suggesting long-term durability of IVT-AFL treatment outcomes. Infographic available for this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03161912 (May 19, 2017). INFOGRAPHIC.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Routine Clinical Practice: Results from the 24-Month AURIGA Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

AURIGA is the largest real-world study to date to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) or macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in routine clinical practice. The 24-month outcomes in the DME cohort from across 11 participating countries are reported here.

METHODS

AURIGA (NCT03161912) was a prospective observational study. The study enrolled eligible patients with DME for whom the decision to treat with IVT-AFL had previously been made by the attending physician. Patients were treated with IVT-AFL for up to 24 months at physician discretion according to local practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) from baseline to month 12 (M12). All statistical analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

In 1478 treatment-naïve and 384 previously treated patients with DME, the mean (95% confidence interval) change in VA from baseline was +6.7 (5.7, 7.6) and +7.4 (5.5, 9.4) letters by M12 and +5.9 (4.9, 6.9) and +8.1 (6.1, 10.1) letters by M24 (baseline [mean ± standard deviation]: 56.0 ± 19.8 and 50.8 ± 19.5 letters), respectively; 25.9% of treatment-naïve and 32.8% of previously treated patients achieved ≥ 15-letter gains by M24. The mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline to M24 was -110 (-119, -102) µm in treatment-naïve patients and -169 (-188, -151) µm in previously treated patients. By M6, M12, and M24, treatment-naïve patients had received 3.8 ± 1.7, 4.9 ± 2.8, and 5.7 ± 3.9 injections, respectively, and previously treated patients had received 3.9 ± 1.5, 4.9 ± 2.4, and 6.2 ± 3.6 injections, respectively. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with previous studies.

CONCLUSION

In AURIGA, treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with DME achieved clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements following IVT-AFL treatment for up to 24 months in routine clinical practice. Even with the decreasing injection frequency observed, these gains were largely maintained throughout the study, suggesting long-term durability of the positive effects of IVT-AFL treatment. Infographic available for this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03161912 (May 19, 2017). INFOGRAPHIC.

Protective Effect of Topiramate against Diabetic Retinopathy and Computational Approach Recognizing the Role of NLRP3/IL-1β/TNF-α Signaling

The possible impact of topiramate against diabetic retinopathy (DREN) and its molecular mechanisms in relation to the nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has not been studied before. Thus, in the present study, we aimed to utilize a computational approach to investigate the possible protective effect of topiramate on experimental DREN and explore its impact on NLRP3/interlukin-1β signaling and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. Male albino mice were distributed to four experimental groups and assigned the following categorizations: (i) saline, (ii) diabetic, (iii) diabetic + topiramate 10 mg/kg and (iv) diabetic + topiramate 30 mg/kg. We observed shrinkage of total retinal thickness and elevation in retinal glutamate, malondialdehyde, NLRP3 and interlukin-1β but decreased glutathione (GSH) levels in the diabetic mice. Additionally, retinal ultra-structures in the diabetic group showed abnormalities and vacuolations in the pigmented epithelium, the photoreceptor segment, the outer nuclear layer, the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer (GCL). Mice treated with topiramate 10 or 30 mg/kg showed downregulation in retinal malondialdehyde, NLRP3 and interlukin-1β levels; improvements in the retinal pathologies; enhanced immunostaining for BDNF and improved ultra-structures in different retinal layers. Overall, the current results suggest topiramate as a neuroprotective agent for DREN, and future studies are warranted to further elucidate the mechanism of its protective action.