TissueWand, a Rapid Histopathology Annotation Tool

MetFinder: A Tool for Automated Quantitation of Metastatic Burden in Histological Sections From Preclinical Models

As efforts to study the mechanisms of melanoma metastasis and novel therapeutic approaches multiply, researchers need accurate, high-throughput methods to evaluate the effects on tumor burden resulting from specific interventions. We show that automated quantification of tumor content from whole slide images is a compelling solution to assess in vivo experiments. In order to increase the outflow of data collection from preclinical studies, we assembled a large dataset with annotations and trained a deep neural network for the quantitative analysis of melanoma tumor content on histopathological sections of murine models. After assessing its performance in segmenting these images, the tool obtained consistent results with an orthogonal method (bioluminescence) of measuring metastasis in an experimental setting. This AI-based algorithm, made freely available to academic laboratories through a web-interface called MetFinder, promises to become an asset for melanoma researchers and pathologists interested in accurate, quantitative assessment of metastasis burden.

PatchSorter: a high throughput deep learning digital pathology tool for object labeling

The discovery of patterns associated with diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response in digital pathology images often requires intractable labeling of large quantities of histological objects. Here we release an open-source labeling tool, PatchSorter, which integrates deep learning with an intuitive web interface. Using >100,000 objects, we demonstrate a >7x improvement in labels per second over unaided labeling, with minimal impact on labeling accuracy, thus enabling high-throughput labeling of large datasets.

DEPICTER: Deep representation clustering for histology annotation

Automatic segmentation of histopathology whole-slide images (WSI) usually involves supervised training of deep learning models with pixel-level labels to classify each pixel of the WSI into tissue regions such as benign or cancerous. However, fully supervised segmentation requires large-scale data manually annotated by experts, which can be expensive and time-consuming to obtain. Non-fully supervised methods, ranging from semi-supervised to unsupervised, have been proposed to address this issue and have been successful in WSI segmentation tasks. But these methods have mainly been focused on technical advancements in algorithmic performance rather than on the development of practical tools that could be used by pathologists or researchers in real-world scenarios. In contrast, we present DEPICTER (Deep rEPresentatIon ClusTERing), an interactive segmentation tool for histopathology annotation that produces a patch-wise dense segmentation map at WSI level. The interactive nature of DEPICTER leverages self- and semi-supervised learning approaches to allow the user to participate in the segmentation producing reliable results while reducing the workload. DEPICTER consists of three steps: first, a pretrained model is used to compute embeddings from image patches. Next, the user selects a number of benign and cancerous patches from the multi-resolution image. Finally, guided by the deep representations, label propagation is achieved using our novel seeded iterative clustering method or by directly interacting with the embedding space via feature space gating. We report both real-time interaction results with three pathologists and evaluate the performance on three public cancer classification dataset benchmarks through simulations. The code and demos of DEPICTER are publicly available at https://github.com/eduardchelebian/depicter.

Quick Annotator: an open-source digital pathology based rapid image annotation tool

Image-based biomarker discovery typically requires accurate segmentation of histologic structures (e.g. cell nuclei, tubules, and epithelial regions) in digital pathology whole slide images (WSIs). Unfortunately, annotating each structure of interest is laborious and often intractable even in moderately sized cohorts. Here, we present an open-source tool, Quick Annotator (QA), designed to improve annotation efficiency of histologic structures by orders of magnitude. While the user annotates regions of interest (ROIs) via an intuitive web interface, a deep learning (DL) model is concurrently optimized using these annotations and applied to the ROI. The user iteratively reviews DL results to either (1) accept accurately annotated regions or (2) correct erroneously segmented structures to improve subsequent model suggestions, before transitioning to other ROIs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of QA over comparable manual efforts via three use cases. These include annotating (1) 337,386 nuclei in 5 pancreatic WSIs, (2) 5,692 tubules in 10 colorectal WSIs, and (3) 14,187 regions of epithelium in 10 breast WSIs. Efficiency gains in terms of annotations per second of 102×, 9×, and 39× were, respectively, witnessed while retaining f-scores >0.95, suggesting that QA may be a valuable tool for efficiently fully annotating WSIs employed in downstream biomarker studies.

Proactive Construction of an Annotated Imaging Database for Artificial Intelligence Training

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds much promise for enabling highly desired imaging diagnostics improvements. One of the most limiting bottlenecks for the development of useful clinical-grade AI models is the lack of training data. One aspect is the large amount of cases needed and another is the necessity of high-quality ground truth annotation. The aim of the project was to establish and describe the construction of a database with substantial amounts of detail-annotated oncology imaging data from pathology and radiology. A specific objective was to be proactive, that is, to support undefined subsequent AI training across a wide range of tasks, such as detection, quantification, segmentation, and classification, which puts particular focus on the quality and generality of the annotations. The main outcome of this project was the database as such, with a collection of labeled image data from breast, ovary, skin, colon, skeleton, and liver. In addition, this effort also served as an exploration of best practices for further scalability of high-quality image collections, and a main contribution of the study was generic lessons learned regarding how to successfully organize efforts to construct medical imaging databases for AI training, summarized as eight guiding principles covering team, process, and execution aspects.