Comparison of medial and posterior surgical approaches in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures

Fracture obliquity is a predictor for loss of reduction in supracondylar humeral fractures in older children

Supracondylar humeral fractures in older children have different biomechanical characteristics and surgical outcomes when compared to the same fractures in younger children. We aimed to analyze the fracture's architecture in a large group of older children and investigate the correlation between patients' variables, fracture patterns, fixation techniques and the rate of loss of reduction (LOR). A retrospective review study was conducted. We collected the records of 240 consecutive patients aged 8-14 years that sustained Gartland type 2/3 supracondylar humeral fractures between 2004 and 2014 and were operated at our hospital. We excluded patients with intra-articular or pathological fractures. Following the radiographical analysis and chart review, we conducted a multivariable regression analysis. Fracture obliquity on the sagittal plane ( > 20°) occurred in 33% of the cases and was found to be the only factor related to LOR (P = 0.01). Gartland type 3 fractures and more than two lateral pin configuration did not correlate to fixation failure (P = 0.69 and 0.14, respectively). The incidence of flexion-type fractures (5.8%) was found to be higher than in the total pediatric population. The sagittal oblique supracondylar humeral fracture is common and is related to fixation instability and LOR. This pattern needs to be considered when investigating different pin configurations, complication rates, and biomechanical properties. Subclassifying Gartland type 2/3 supracondylar humeral fractures as 'oblique' or 'transverse' might offer more comprehensive information about the anticipated operative results, lead to applying more stable pin constructs to these fractures and allow improved outcomes following surgical fixation.

Supracondylar humeral fractures in children: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons appropriate use criteria versus actual management in a teaching hospital

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to explore whether there were any differences between the theoretical recommendations for children's supracondylar humeral fractures (CSHF) according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines and the treatments they actually received in our institution.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and radiographs of all CSHFs at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2018. In all, 301 children meeting our inclusion criteria were identified and evaluated using the AAOS-Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) application for supracondylar humerus fractures. Actual treatment was then compared with the treatment recommended by the AUC.

RESULTS

Actual operative management was undertaken in 0/58 (0%) Gartland type I fractures, 61/108 (56.5%) type II fractures and 98/135 (72.6%) type III fractures. Actual nonoperative management was undertaken in 58/58 (100%) Gartland type I fractures, 47/108 (43.5%) type II fractures and 37/135 (27.4%) type III fractures. Surgeon decisions for nonoperative treatment were in agreement with the AUC recommendations 100% of the time, whereas surgeon decisions for surgery matched the AUC recommendations 65.4% of the time. Predictors of actual operative management were age (p =0.003), fracture classification (p =0.000), associated orthopaedic injury requiring surgery (p =0.025) and anterior humeral line (AHL) not intersecting the capitellum (p =0.008).

CONCLUSION

We found low agreement between actual treatments and the AUC-recommended 'appropriate' treatments. The AUC favoured operative intervention more frequently largely on the basis of fracture classification while we emphasized age, fracture classification, associated orthopaedic injury requiring surgery and alignment of the AHL with the capitellum in our operative decision-making process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of two different managements for supracondylar humeral fractures in children

Background

The objective of this meta-analysis was to illustrate the clinical outcomes and safety of two different managements for supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Methods

In January 2018, a systematic computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google database. Data on patients prepared for two different managements for supracondylar humeral fractures in children were retrieved. The primary endpoint was the cosmetic and clinical outcomes based on the criteria of Flynn, ulnar nerve injury, and the occurrence of infection. After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity between studies, data were aggregated for random-effects models when necessary.

Results

Six clinical studies with 581 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the closed reduction and percutaneous cross-pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation in terms of the cosmetic and clinical outcomes based on the criteria of Flynn, ulnar nerve injury, and the occurrence of infection (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, and open reduction and internal fixation of supracondylar humeral fractures in children result in similar construct stability and functional outcome. More high quality randomized controlled trials are needed to identify this conclusion.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-018-0806-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.