Immediate dental implant placement with or without autogenous bone graft: A comparative study

Correlation between differences in intraoperative jumping gaps and soft tissue changes around immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the maxillary anterior region

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the correlation between differences in intraoperative jumping gaps and soft tissue changes around immediate implant placement and provisionalization (IIPP) in the maxillary anterior region. Results will provide a basis for clinical evaluation of the change trend and long-term stability of the labial soft tissue contours of patients with different jumping gaps.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with single tooth loss in the maxillary aesthetic area were enrolled, and they all received immediate implant placement and restoration. All patients were divided into three groups: A, B, and C according to the size of the jumping gap, group A: horizontal defect dimension (HDD) ≤2 mm; group B: 2 mm3 mm. Geomagic studio 2013 was used to quantitatively analyze the contour volume of the soft tissue around the implant and the level of the labial gingival margin. The pink esthetic score (PSE) was used for the final aesthetic evaluation.

RESULTS

All implants had osseointegration within 6 months after the surgery. The average thickness of soft tissue contour volume changed by 0.62 mm±0.15 mm, and the average PES was 11.09±0.99. The changes in the gingival mucosa levels in the three groups at 6 months after operation were 0.45 mm±0.11 mm, 0.40 mm±0.12 mm, and 0.35 mm± 0.11 mm, respectively. The changes in the average thickness of the soft tissue contour volume in the three groups at 6 months after the operation were 0.77 mm±0.16 mm, 0.63 mm±0.17 mm, and 0.54 mm±0.11 mm. A moderate negative correlation was found between the jumping gap size and the gingival mucosa level, and the average thickness changed. No significant correlation was found between size of jumping gap and PES.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the contour volume of the labial soft tissue continuously decreased within 6 months after IIPP in the maxillary anterior region, the surgical procedure can achieve a satisfactory aesthetic effect, and the level of soft tissue around the implant can be well maintained.

Buccal bone thickness and mid-facial soft tissue recession after various surgical approaches for immediate implant placement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of controlled trials

AIM

To evaluate the relative efficacy and confidence in the precision of the results of different surgical interventions for immediate implant placement in the anterior area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Randomized controlled trials comparing different surgical techniques in anterior jaws for type 1 implant placement were included. Outcome measures included implant survival (primary outcome), buccal bone thickness (BBT) reduction, and mid-facial soft tissue recession (MSTR). Risks of bias assessment, network meta-analysis (NMA), sensitivity analysis, and quality-of-evidence assessment were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies reporting on 948 subjects and 5 surgical interventions were included. Fourteen early failures were reported. Compared with open-flap surgery without tissue augmentation (F-N) and looking at BBT preservation, NMA showed that there was moderate confidence that flapless surgery with hard tissue augmentation (FL-HTA) was better than flapless surgery without tissue augmentation (FL-N) or open-flap surgery with hard tissue augmentation (F-HTA) (mean difference -0.8 mm, 95% confidence interval: -1.1 to -0.5 mm; -0.6 mm, -0.9 to -0.4 mm; and -0.5 mm, -0.7 to -0.3 mm, respectively). There was moderate confidence that flapless surgery with hard and soft tissue augmentation (FL-HTA&STA) could significantly prevent MSTR compared with FL-HTA (-0.5 mm, -0.7 to -0.3 mm) and FL-N (-0.6 mm, -1.2 to -0.04 mm). However, there was no significant additional benefit in BBT with the FL-HTA&STA approach compared to the FL-HTA approach (-0.30 mm, -0.81 to 0.21 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

For immediate implant placement in the anterior areas, the FL-HTA approach better preserves BBT (moderate confidence); adding STA improves the stability of the mid-facial soft tissue level (moderate confidence) but at the expense of BBT (low confidence).

Bone dimensional changes after flapless immediate implant placement with and without bone grafting: Randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Immediate implant in postextraction sockets requires managing the postextraction alveolar resorption. This randomized clinical trial examined vertical and horizontal changes 1-year following flapless immediate implant with and without xenograft at sites with thin labial plate.

METHODS

Forty patients with hopeless teeth in maxillary esthetic zone were randomly assigned to receiving either one immediate implant without bone graft (control) or with bone graft (intervention). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained pre-extraction and 1-year postoperatively to measure thickness and dimensional changes of the labial bone.

RESULTS

Cone beam computed tomography measurements revealed that a xenograft, when compared to no xenograft, led to 0.2 mm increased fill of the horizontal gap (95% confidence interval (CI): -1.1, 0.7). In both groups, there was a significant reduction in the labio-palatal bone width after 1 year compared to baseline (P ≤ 0.05). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the xenograft when compared to no xenograft regarding the labio-palatal bone collapse % at 0 mm (-0.2, 95% CI: -4.8, 4.5) and 2 mm apical to the labial crest (1.9, 95% CI: -1.8, 5.6). While at 5 mm the ridge was significantly reduced (P ≤ 0.05) in the no xenograft when compared to xenograft (4.5, 95% CI: 0.7, 8.2). The xenograft when compared to no xenograft, led to 1.1 mm less vertical bone changes (95% CI: 0.4, 1.9). Both groups revealed significant positive correlation between labio-palatal socket dimension and bone formed labial to the implant (P ≤ 0.05). [Correction added on 7 February 2023, after first online publication: In the 8th line of this section, the word "collapse" was changed to "ridge" in this version.] CONCLUSION: This investigation suggested that immediate implants with or without grafting the labial gap preserved alveolar bone dimension and that bone formation labial to the implant was related to initial labio-palatal socket dimension.

Dimensional changes of peri-implant tissue following immediate flapless implant placement and provisionalization with or without xenograft in the anterior maxilla: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Dental implant therapy requires the preservation of peri-implant tissue in the cosmetic zone. Various surgical procedures have been presented, including ridge preservation, flapless method, and quick provisionalization. The goal of this research was to assess the buccal bone dimensional changes following immediate flapless implant implantation in the front maxilla, with or without xenografting.

Method and design

Thirty patients who meet the inclusion criteria and have maxillary teeth (numbers 14 to 24) are candidates for the immediate implant with immediate provisionalization. Participants will be assigned randomly to one of two groups: (1) an immediate implant with xenograft and (2) an immediate implant without bone grafting. For 3 months, the temporary prosthesis will be installed shortly before the final restoration. Following temporary prosthesis insertion and 6 months after surgery, a CBCT radiograph will be used to examine bone tissue. Soft tissue will be assessed at three points: baseline, 3 months, and 6 months following implant therapy. Patients’ satisfaction, implant failure, prosthesis failure, and complications will be assessed as secondary outcomes after 6 months.

Discussion

The outcomes of this randomized clinical research will show if buccal bone augmentation with xenograft reduces vertical bone and gingiva recession. The findings and patient-reported outcomes will aid in the selection of therapy alternatives for implant treatment patients.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20211119053106N1. Registered on 6 December 2021 and Open Science Framework (OSF) on May 20, 2022. Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VUGFQ.

Immediate implant placement with or without socket grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of grafting the gap (SG) between the implant surface and alveolar socket on hard and soft tissue changes following single immediate implant placement (IIP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic literature search in Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies up to August 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IIP with and without SG were included for a qualitative analysis. Meta-analyses were performed when possible.

RESULTS

Out of 3627 records, 15 RCTs were selected and reported on 577 patients who received 604 single immediate implants (IIP + SG: 298 implants in 292 patients; IIP: 306 implants in 285 patients) with a mean follow-up ranging from 4 to 36 months. Two RCTs showed low risk of bias. Meta-analysis revealed 0.59 mm (95% CI [0.41; 0.78], p < 0.001) or 54% less horizontal buccal bone resorption following IIP + SG when compared to IIP alone. In addition, 0.58 mm (95% CI [0.28; 0.88], p < 0.001) less apical migration of the midfacial soft tissue level was found when immediate implants were installed with SG. A trend towards less distal papillary recession was found (MD 0.60 mm, 95% CI [-0.08; 1.28], p = 0.080) when SG was performed, while mesial papillae appeared not significantly affected by SG. Vertical buccal bone changes were also not significantly affected by SG. Insufficient data were available for meta-analyses on horizontal midfacial soft tissue changes, pink esthetic score, marginal bone level changes, probing depth and bleeding on probing. Based on GRADE guidelines, a moderate recommendation for SG following IIP can be made.

CONCLUSION

SG may contribute to horizontal bone preservation and soft tissue stability at the midfacial aspect of immediate implants. Therefore, SG should be considered as an adjunct to IIP in clinical practice.

The healing pattern of a 4 mm proximal infrabony defect was not significantly different from a 2 mm defect adjacent to dental implant in a canine mandible

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the healing patterns of 2-mm and 4-mm proximal infrabony defects adjacent to dental implants in canine mandibles.

Methods

Four male beagles were used. Two groups were created: a 2-mm group (n=4) and a 4-mm group (n=4) depending on the horizontal dimension of proximal infrabony defects adjacent to implants. Bone healing patterns between the 2 groups were evaluated and compared at 8 and 16 weeks using radiographic, histological, histomorphometric, and fluorescent labelling analyses.

Results

According to microcomputed tomography, the median bone volume fraction, bone mineral density, and the percentage of radiographic distance from the defect bottom to the most coronal bone-to-implant contact (radio-mcBIC) were 32.9%, 0.6 g/cm³, and 73.7% (8 weeks) and 45.7%, 0.7 g/cm³, and 76.0% (16 weeks) in the 2-mm group and 57.7%, 0.8 g/cm³, and 75.7% (8 weeks) and 50.9%, 0.8 g/cm³, and 74.7% (16 weeks) in the 4-mm group, respectively. According to histomorphometry, the median bone area fraction, mcBIC and the percentage of BIC amounted to 36.7%, 3.4 mm, and 58.4% (8 weeks) and 49.2%, 3.4 mm, and 70.2% (16 weeks) in the 2-mm group and 50.0%, 3.0 mm, and 64.8% (8 weeks) and 55.7%, 3.0 mm, and 69.6% (16 weeks) in the 4-mm group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for any variables (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The proximal defects that measured 2 mm and 4 mm showed similar healing patterns at 8 and 16 weeks, and the top of bone formation in the defects was substantially limited to a maximum of 1.6 mm below the implant shoulder in both groups.

Bone quality and quantity of the mandibular symphyseal region in autogenous bone grafting using cone-beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Bone volume plays a pivotal role in the success of dental implant treatment. Autogenous bone grafts should be harvested from reliable sites in the maxillofacial region. This study sought to assess the quantity and quality of bone in the mandibular symphysis for autogenous bone graft harvesting using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study evaluated the CBCT scans of 78 adults presenting to three oral and maxillofacial radiology centers. The vertical (VD) and horizontal (HD) alveolar bone dimensions, cortical thickness (CT), and cancellous to cortical bone ratio (C/C) were measured in the interforaminal region of the mandible at the sites of central incisor to first premolar teeth. The interforaminal distance (ID) and the anterior loop length were also measured. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to analyze the data with respect to sex, age, and tooth position.

RESULTS

The median VD, HD, and CT of the symphysis were 20.21 (3.26), 4.13 (0.37), and 2.25 (0.23) mm, respectively. The median C/C was 1.51 (0.11). The median ID was 52.24 (8.24) mm, and the median anterior loop length was 1.82 (1.06) mm. Significant differences were observed in all parameters among different teeth. Most of the measured parameters were greater in males compared with females. There were significant differences in ID, VD, and CT between different age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantity and quality of the available bone in the mandibular symphysis for bone graft harvesting vary by gender, age, and harvesting site, necessitating careful preoperative evaluation.