1
|
Astley RA, Mursalin MH, Coburn PS, Livingston ET, Nightengale JW, Bagaruka E, Hunt JJ, Callegan MC. Ocular Bacterial Infections: A Ten-Year Survey and Review of Causative Organisms Based on the Oklahoma Experience. Microorganisms 2023; 11:1802. [PMID: 37512974 PMCID: PMC10386592 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11071802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Ocular infections can be medical emergencies that result in permanent visual impairment or blindness and loss of quality of life. Bacteria are a major cause of ocular infections. Effective treatment of ocular infections requires knowledge of which bacteria are the likely cause of the infection. This survey of ocular bacterial isolates and review of ocular pathogens is based on a survey of a collection of isolates banked over a ten-year span at the Dean McGee Eye Institute in Oklahoma. These findings illustrate the diversity of bacteria isolated from the eye, ranging from common species to rare and unique species. At all sampled sites, staphylococci were the predominant bacteria isolated. Pseudomonads were the most common Gram-negative bacterial isolate, except in vitreous, where Serratia was the most common Gram-negative bacterial isolate. Here, we discuss the range of ocular infections that these species have been documented to cause and treatment options for these infections. Although a highly diverse spectrum of species has been isolated from the eye, the majority of infections are caused by Gram-positive species, and in most infections, empiric treatments are effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger A Astley
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Md Huzzatul Mursalin
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Phillip S Coburn
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Erin T Livingston
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - James W Nightengale
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Eddy Bagaruka
- Department of Biology, Oklahoma Christian University, Edmond, OK 73013, USA
| | - Jonathan J Hunt
- Department of Biology, Oklahoma Christian University, Edmond, OK 73013, USA
| | - Michelle C Callegan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
- Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Selva Pandiyan A, Siva Ganesa Karthikeyan R, Rameshkumar G, Sen S, Lalitha P. Identification of Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens by rDNA Gene Barcoding in Vitreous Fluids of Endophthalmitis Patients. Semin Ophthalmol 2021; 35:358-364. [PMID: 33390091 DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2020.1864416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the bacterial and fungal pathogens in ocular samples of clinically suspected endophthalmitis patients by conventional culture methods and 16S and 28S rDNA gene sequencing respectively. Methods: A total of 88 patients with clinically suspected endophthalmitis were included in this study. Under sterile operating conditions, a vitreous fluid (0.1-0.2 ml) was obtained by pars plana vitrectomy procedure. The samples were processed for conventional microbiology methods and PCR. PCR targeting 16S rDNA gene for bacteria and 28S rDNA gene for fungus were performed individually using the MightyAmp DNA Polymerase Ver. 2 (TaKaRa China) kit. The PCR amplified samples were sequenced and aligned using CLUSTAL-W tool. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by Neighborhood joining along with the reference sequences downloaded from NCBI database using MEGA X software. Results: 67 Post-operative, 12 Endogenous and 9 traumatic endophthalmitis patients were included as study subjects. By the direct culturing bacterial growth was observed in 17 samples and fungal growth in three samples. PCR was positive for all the culture positive samples, in addition 14 were positive in culture negative samples. The predominant species identified in gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus spp., and Pseudomonas spp. in the gram-negative group. Both PCR and culture identified only three samples positive for fungal pathogens which were identified as Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, and Exerohilum rostratum. Conclusions: PCR based molecular diagnosis is more sensitive than the conventional gold standard culture methods in endophthalmitis. Bacterial pathogens were found to be the predominant in causing endophthalmitis than fungal pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sagnik Sen
- Department of Vitreoretinal Services, Aravind Eye Hospital , Madurai, India
| | - Prajna Lalitha
- Department of Ocular Microbiology, Aravind Eye Hospital , Madurai, India
| |
Collapse
|