Exposed versus Buried Kirschner Wires Used in Displaced Pediatric Fractures of Lateral Condyle of Humerus

Open reduction of pediatric lateral condyle fractures: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Lateral condyle fractures are the second most common pediatric elbow fracture. There exist multiple options for internal fixation including buried K-wires, unburied K-wires, and screw fixation. Our study aims to review the current literature and determine if fixation strategy affects outcomes to include fracture union, postoperative range of motion, and need subsequent surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of Pubmed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was performed. Included articles involve pediatric patients with displaced lateral condyle fractures treated with internal fixation that reported outcomes to include union rates and complications.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria for a total of 1299 patients (472 buried K-wires, 717 unburied K-wires, and 110 screws). The patients' average age was 5.8 ± 0.6 years, male (64%), and had 16.3 months of follow-up. No differences in union and infection rates were found. Unburied K-wires had the shortest time to union and the greatest elbow range of motion postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review demonstrates similar outcomes with union and infection rates between all fixation techniques. Unburied K-wires demonstrated a shorter time to union and the greatest postoperative range of motion. Additionally, unburied K-wires may be removed in clinic, decreasing the cost on the healthcare system.

EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Exposed versus buried K-wire fixation in paediatric lateral condyle humerus fractures: preliminary communication of a prospective comparative study

Buried Kirschner's wires (K-wires) following internal fixation of paediatric Lateral condyle fracture of humerus allow them to hold the bone until radiological consolidation but requires another surgical procedure for implant removal. Exposed wires need meticulous pin tract care, earlier implant removal and may carry a higher risk of infection. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of buried versus exposed K-wires for these fractures. This prospective comparative(nonrandomised) study was conducted from July 2016 to April 2020 at a tertiary care level I trauma centre on 80 children, <12 years of age, divided into group 1(n = 40), where K-wires were left exposed, and group 2 (n = 40), where K-wires were buried. Functional outcome and complications were compared between the two groups with at least 3 months follow-up. Infection rate was significantly lower in buried K-wire group with 7 patients (17.5%) compared to 15 (37.5%) in exposed group, P = 0.045. Four out of those 15 patients needed debridement suggesting that exposed K-wires carry a higher risk of bone infection and subsequent morbidities. There was no significant difference in union time, range of motion (mean flexion 135.3° in exposed vs. 132.5° in buried, P = 0.988), carrying angle (8.5° vs. 8.6°, P = 0.981), or lateral condyle hypertrophy; 12 (30%) vs. 9 (22.5%), P = 0.446. Skin pigmentation was more in the exposed group; 13 (32.5%) vs. 10 (25%), P = 0.459. We recommend that K-wires should be buried subcutaneously, particularly when meticulous pin tract care is doubtful.