Midterm Results of Conversion from Failed Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty

The outcomes of conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular erosion is an important complication in hemiarthroplasty and may lead to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion. The results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with primary total hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were used and Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane libraries were searched. Both, studies comparing the outcome of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion with the outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty and the outcome of cohort studies limited to total hip arthroplasty as a conversion, were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies checklist. Meta-analysis was performed concerning pooled annual revision, dislocation and infection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies were available for analysis; four comparative studies and 23 cohort studies. Comparative studies were defined as high quality and cohort studies as medium quality. Analysis revealed a significantly higher overall revision risk (Hazard Ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.14) after total hip arthroplasty as a conversion compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. The annual revision rate of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion was 1.63% (95% confidence interval 1.14 to 2.33) in the comparative studies and 1.40% (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.66) in the cohort studies. A pooled infection rate of 4.34% (95% confidence interval 2.66 to 7.01) and dislocation rate of 4.79% (95% confidence interval 3.02 to 7.53), was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature concerning the results of total hip arthroplasty as a conversion is limited. The risk of revision after conversion of hemiarthroplasty is higher compared to primary total hip arthroplasty.

A Case of a Failed Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip Treated by an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy

Hip bipolar hemiarthroplasty, a widely employed surgical intervention for managing hip fractures and degenerative hip diseases, can pose significant challenges when revisions become necessary due to complications such as implant loosening, instability, or breakage. This case report presents the intricate management of a 58-year-old male who presented with worsening left hip pain a decade after undergoing hip replacement surgery. Despite a thorough preoperative assessment ruling out infection, intraoperative complexities included the necessity for extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) to address a broken stem and associated metallosis. Successful revision surgery was meticulously executed, incorporating techniques for implant removal, femoral shaft augmentation, and postoperative rehabilitation. The ensuing discussion explores the multifaceted aspects of failed hemiarthroplasty, emphasizing the critical roles of surgical precision, judicious patient selection, and ongoing research endeavors aimed at refining surgical strategies to optimize patient outcomes. This case underscores the imperative of a multidisciplinary approach and the continued imperative for advancements in surgical methodologies for effectively managing revision hip arthroplasty cases, thus enhancing the quality of patient care in this intricate clinical domain.

Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement for Failed Hemiarthroplasty

Aim

Our study aims to analyze the outcomes of conversion total hip replacement (THR) done for failed hemiarthroplasty.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive patients who underwent conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2018. The patient's records were analyzed for demographic information, index surgery details, preoperative functional status, and perioperative complications. Patients were analyzed according to the various modes of failure of hemiarthroplasty. The radiographs were analyzed for any progressive osteolysis, cup migration and stem subsidence. All the patients were evaluated using the modified Harris hip score (HHS) for clinical outcome. Complications, revision or reoperation in the follow-up period was recorded.

Results

A total of 73 patients were included in the study for final analysis after exclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 48.2 ± 29.6 months. There was a significant improvement in mean HHS from 38.5 ± 9.1 preoperatively to 80.9 ± 4.3 at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The different modes of failure had no statistically significant difference in the postoperative Harris hip score (p = 0.393). None of the patients had progressive radiolucent lines more than 2 mm or significant subsidence in the final follow-up compared to the initial postoperative radiograph. There was one deep infection, one patient had grade 2 heterotopic ossification, intraoperative calcar fracture was fixed with cerclage wiring in 11 patients, and postoperative periprosthetic fracture in two patients was treated with plate osteosynthesis. There were no neurovascular complications or dislocation during the follow-up.

Conclusion

Conversion THR for failed hemiarthroplasty is a challenging procedure and results in good functional outcome and provides reliable pain relief. Conversion THA for septic loosening by two stage revision have comparable postoperative outcomes like THA for aseptic loosening. Caution is required owing to high incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture during conversion THA. Dislocation rate is negligible even with smaller head provided the prosthesis is implanted in the proper orientation and adequate soft tissue balancing is achieved.

Fatigue Failure of Outer Metal Dome of Bipolar Monoblock Shell in Hemiarthroplasty Hip: Case Report and Review of Literature

Introduction

We report a rare case of transmural wear-through of the polyethylene inner liner leading to fatigue failure of polished outer metallic dome of bipolar monoblock shell in cemented hemiarthroplasty 5-years after the index surgery.

Case Presentation

A 62-year-old active man reported with 6 months of worsening right hip pain. He had undergone cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for sub-capital fracture of the right femur 5 years back. Radiographs demonstrate significant full-thickness wear-through of the Cobalt-Chromium head through the polyethylene inner liner and outer metal dome into the acetabulum. Biomechanics study revealed inadequate thickness of outer metallic dome of monoblock shell. Revision Total hip arthroplasty was performed. At the 5-year follow-up, radiographs show stable components and no clinical abnormality.

Conclusion

Albeit rare, this failure mode aimed to raised awareness, routine follow-up, and quality assurance.

The fate of positive intraoperative cultures following conversion total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study are to report the rates of positive intraoperative cultures obtained during conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) according to index surgery, and to describe the natural history of treatment for a consecutive series of patients with unexpected positive intraoperative cultures during conversion THA.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients at 2 institutions undergoing conversion THA from prior open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular and hip fractures or hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures from 2011 to 2018. Intraoperative cultures were taken in 105 patients. Positive intraoperative cultures during conversion were recorded and managed with an infectious diseases consult. The outcomes including PJI at 90 days and 1 year follow-up were documented.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 of 105 patients (18%) undergoing conversion THA had positive intraoperative cultures, with the highest rates in the hemiarthroplasty 7/16 (44%) and acetabular ORIF 9/48 (19%) groups. All 19 patients were initially treated conservatively: 8 received IV antibiotics, 10 received no additional therapy, and 1 received oral antibiotics. 4/9 acetabular fracture conversions developed PJI at 1 year, with 3 requiring multiple irrigation and debridement/polyethylene exchanges to control the infection while the 4th patient required 2-stage exchange. There were no 1-year PJI from any of the other index procedures after conversion. All 7 hemiarthroplasty patients with positive cultures were treated to resolution with 4-8 weeks IV antibiotics alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing conversion THA from prior hip or acetabular fracture have a high rate of positive intraoperative cultures. As such, all patients undergoing conversion THA from prior hip or acetabular fracture fixation should undergo thorough diagnostic workup prior to surgery, and have intraoperative cultures obtained during surgery if infection remains suspicious. Further work should be performed to develop MSIS criteria for preoperative management of patients undergoing conversion THA.

How Does Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compare to Primary?

BACKGROUND

Recent institutional evidence suggests that conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) incurs higher complication rates and costs when compared to primary THA. These findings contrast with the current reimbursement system as conversion and primary THAs are classified under the same diagnosis-related group. Thus, a national all-payer database was utilized to compare complication rates up to 2 years, 30-day readmission rates, and 90-day costs between conversion THA and matched primary THA patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the PearlDiver database between 2010 and second quarter of 2018 was performed using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to compare conversion THA (CPT 27132) to primary THA (CPT 27130). Patients were matched at a 1:3 ratio based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes (conversion = 8369; primary = 25,081 patients).

RESULTS

Conversion THA had higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections (conversion: 7.7% vs primary: 1.4%), hip dislocations (4.5% vs 2.0%), blood transfusions (2.0% vs 1.0%), mechanical complications (5.5% vs 1.0%), and revision surgeries (4.0% vs 1.5%) (P < .001 for all) by 90 days. The 30-day readmission rate for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to the primary group (7.3% vs 3.3%) (P < .001). Median cost at 90 days for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to primary THA ($18,800 vs $13,611, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed increased complication rates, revisions, readmissions, and costs among conversion THA patients compared to matched primary THA patients. These results support the reclassification of conversion into a diagnosis-related group separate from primary THA.

Outcomes and survivorship after conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. When compared to total hip arthroplasty (THA), higher revision rates have been reported for hemiarthroplasty (HA). Conversion of failed HA to THA can be complex, especially in the elderly population at risk for revision surgery complications. We report a single institution's experience with conversion of failed HA to THA at mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

We identified patients converted from failed HA to THA from 2006 to 2016. Clinical data including indication for index and conversion surgery, maintenance or revision of femoral component during conversion, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and need for revision surgery were collected. Descriptive statistics were analysed in SPSS.

RESULTS

The cohort included 21 men and 39 women (mean age of 74.5 years). The mean follow-up after conversion HA to THA was 2.8 years. During conversion surgery, the femoral component was revised in 75.0% and retained in 25.0% of cases. After conversion HA to THA, the rate of major complications and re-revision at 2 years was 11.7% and 10.0%, respectively. Femoral revision versus retention did not affect complication rates (11.1% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.31) or re-revision rates (8.9% vs. 13.3%; p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

In this high-risk population, mid-term follow-up demonstrated tolerable complication and re-revision rates, the majority of which were for instability. We observed high rates of femoral component revision during conversion THA, although this did not increase the likelihood of postoperative complications or need for future surgery.

Hemiarthroplasty Conversion: A Comparison to Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthroplasty is the standard of care for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, with viable options including hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). With time, HA may need to be converted to THA, but it is unclear whether this is more similar to primary or revision THA. We compare complication and revision rates between these groups within 90 days and 2 years postoperatively.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 3 cohorts of patients treated at our institution: primary, conversion, and revision THA. Outcomes studied included intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and revision rates. We analyzed the groups using both parametric (analysis of variance test) and nonparametric (chi-squared test) statistics.

RESULTS

Operative time between primary THA (108.0 minutes), conversion HA (147.9 minutes), and revision THA (160.1 minutes) cohorts differed significantly (P = .011). Estimated blood loss was also different between primary THA (386 mL), conversion HA (587 mL), and revision THA cohorts (529 mL) (P = .011). At 2 years, major complication rates between primary THA (6.2%), conversion HA (11.7%), and revision THA (26.7%) cohorts also differed significantly (P = .003), as was the revision rate in the primary THA (4.6%), conversion HA (10.0%), and revision THA (18.3%) cohorts (P = .043).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare short-term and midterm complications between primary, conversion, and revision THA. We observed conversion HA had similar operative time and estimated blood loss to revision THA, which was significantly higher than primary THA. However, we found that conversion HA more closely resembled primary THA with respect to perioperative complications rates.