Practical consensus recommendations on duration of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer

Breast Cancer in India: Screening, Detection, and Management

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in urban Indian women and the second most common cancer in all Indian women. The epidemiology as well as biology of this cancer seems to be different in the Indian subcontinent when compared with the West. The lack of population-based breast cancer screening programs and delay in seeking a medical consult due to financial and social reasons, including lack of awareness and fear related to a cancer diagnosis, results in delayed diagnosis.

Delivery of a Healthy Child Through International Gestational Surrogacy 10 Years Following Female Fertility Preservation and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Case Report

Assisted reproduction technology (ART) has made considerable progress in recent years; in particular with regard to cryopreservation, long-term storage, successful thawing, and embryo transfer of cryopreserved embryos. Regarding gestational surrogacy, progress has been made in the areas of awareness, social acceptance, regulation, legislation, availability, streamlining, and optimization of cross-border care. The above is being highlighted in the current presentation of a particularly challenging and novel case. A 43-year-old woman visited our clinic in Greece, seeking international gestational surrogacy due to recurrent breast cancer which rendered her medically unfit for pregnancy. Ten years before her initial visit to our clinic the patient had undergone fertility preservation due to breast cancer, her oocytes had been fertilized with her husband's sperm, and the embryos were cryopreserved and stored in a fertility clinic based in the United Kingdom. The stored embryos were transported to Greece, thawed, and successfully implanted to the selected gestational surrogate. Following an uneventful pregnancy, the surrogate delivered a healthy girl. This successful outcome exemplified innovation, motivation, and hope and may represent a paradigm of team scientific excellence associated with positive patient outcomes. Furthermore, this case constitutes the successful culmination of major advances made in various different sectors of cross-border reproductive care; laboratory, clinical, legal, ethical, and logistical.

A quality evaluation of the clinical practice guidelines on breast cancer using the RIGHT checklist

Background

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in women. The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on breast cancer has been shown to be heterogeneous. The aim of our study was to evaluate the quality of breast cancer CPGs published in years 2018-2020, using the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist.

Methods

We searched Medline (via PubMed), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) as well as websites of guideline organizations for CPGs on breast cancer published between 2018 and 2020. We used the RIGHT checklist to evaluate the reporting quality of the included guidelines by assessing whether the CPGs adhered to each item of the checklist and calculated the proportions of appropriately reported RIGHT checklist items. We also presented the adherence reporting rates for each guideline and the mean rates for each of the seven domains of the RIGHT checklist.

Results

A total of 45 guidelines were included. Eighteen (40.0%) guidelines had an overall reporting rate below 50% and only three (6.7%) reported more than 80% of the items. The domains “Basic information” and “Background” had the highest reporting rates (75.9% and 62.5%, respectively). The mean reporting rates of the domains “Evidence”, “Recommendation”, “Review and quality assurance”, “Funding and declaration and management of interests” and “Other information” were 42.7%, 53.0%, 33.3%, 45.0%, and 44.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

The reporting quality varied among guidelines for breast cancer, showing the need for improvement in reporting the contents. Guideline developers should pay more attention to reporting the evidence, review and quality assurance, and funding and declaration and management of interests in future.