First-line management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: An Indian perspective

Prevalence of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: Treatment implications for resource-constrained settings

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are common in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, routine neuroimaging in asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC is controversial as there is no conclusive evidence of benefit from the detection and treatment of asymptomatic BM. Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic BM and its treatment implications in a resource-limited setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) were included. Subjects who already had clinical or radiological features suggestive of BM were excluded from the study. All eligible subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Management of the detected BM was at the discretion of the treating clinicians.

RESULTS

Among 809 subjects who were screened, 100 (12.4%) were included in the study and underwent MRI. BM was present in 30 (30%) of the subjects and absent in the remaining 70 subjects. A majority of BM were multiple (70%), involved the frontal lobe commonly (73.3%), and had a mean (standard deviation) size of 13.2 (7.3) mm. Detection of BM resulted in a treatment alteration in 17 (17%) of the study subjects (brain irradiation, n = 17, change in targeted therapy, n = 3) with BM. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent treatment alteration for management of BM compared to those who did not ( P = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-third of patients with metastatic NS-NSCLC had BM in MRI despite the absence of symptoms. Despite treatment of the majority of the patients with BM with brain irradiation, there was no demonstrable survival benefit. Hence, we conclude that although routine neuroimaging of asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC may result in treatment alteration (primarily brain irradiation) in a small proportion of patients, it may not influence outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Lung Cancer Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries

Lung cancer is an increasing problem in the developing world due to rising trends in smoking, high incidence of air pollution, lack of awareness and screening, delayed presentation, and diagnosis at the advanced stage. Even after diagnosis, there are disparities in access to health care facilities and inequitable distribution of resources and treatment options. In addition, the shortage of trained personnel and infrastructure adds to the challenges faced by patients with lung cancer in these regions. A multi-pronged effort targeting tobacco cessation, health promotion and awareness, capacity building, and value-based care are the need of the hour.

Association Between PDL1 Genetic Variation and Efficacy of Apatinib Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Background

This study aimed to explore associations between PDL1 polymorphisms and efficacy of apatinib for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a real-world setting.

Methods

We retrospectively recruited 148 patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2019 continuously. Clinical efficacy in patients receiving apatinib treatment was evaluated. Adverse reactions were documented during treatment. Biological specimens of peripheral blood and cancer tissue biopsies were obtained for the genotyping of genetic variations in PDL1 and corresponding gene-mRNA expression, respectively. Univariate association analysis between the status of PDL1 genetic variations and survival was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

The objective response rate of the 148 patients was 17.6% and disease-control rate 68.9%. Prognostic data suggested that median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 (95% CI 3.13-4.47) months and median overall survival (OS) 10.5 (95% CI 9.06-11.95) months. Regarding PDL1 genetic variation, only rs2297136 was of clinical significance. Prognosis analysis revealed that PFS and OS for the rs2297136 genotype were significantly different. Median PFS of patients with TC/CC and TT genotypes was 3 and 4.5 months, respectively (P=0.006). Median OS of the two genotypes was 9 and 11.6 months, respectively (P=0.04). Furthermore, the safety profile suggested that the most common adverse reactions were hypertension, dermal toxicity, fatigue, and oral toxicity. This study failed to find any significant association between adverse reactions and rs2297136. Interestingly, mRNA-expression analysis demonstrated that mRNA expression of PDL1 in biopsy cancer-tissue specimens was significantly different based on rs2297136-genotype status (P<0.001).

Conclusion

The PDL1 polymorphism rs2297136 could be used as a potential biomarker for the prognosis of patients with NSCLC receiving apatinib monotherapy.

WZ4003 sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cells to gefitinib via inhibition of ARK5 and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is used as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its utility is hampered by the development of chemoresistance. This study aimed to investigate the synergistic role of WZ4003, a novel (nua) kinase (NUAK) inhibitor, in enhancing gefitinib sensitivity in NSCLC cells. Our data indicated WZ4003 enhances the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to gefitinib. We also found ARK5 knockdown in NSCLC cell lines increased their sensitivity to gefitinib. However, WZ4003 did not affect gefitinib sensitivity when ARK5 was knocked down in NSCLC cell lines (using siRNA). Both WZ4003 and ARK5 inhibition suppressed epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by reducing the expression of vimentin and increasing E-cadherin expression. Together, our results demonstrate WZ4003 plays a vital role in releasing acquired resistance to gefitinib by inhibiting ARK5 and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Therefore, synergistic use of WZ4003 and gefitinib may prevent the development of gefitinib resistance in NSCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib for Patients with Advanced NSCLC Who Progressed After Standard Regimens and the Preliminary Analysis of an Efficacy Predictor

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed after standard regimens in real world situations and the preliminary analysis of an efficacy predictor.

Methods

A total of 118 patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after standard regimens were included in this retrospective study. Efficacy was evaluated and toxicity profile was recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival curve and multivariate analysis was adjusted using Cox regression analysis.

Results

All of the 118 patients with NSCLC were available for evaluation of efficacy. Complete response (CR, 0 case), partial response (PR, 10 cases), stable disease (SD, 79 cases) and progressive disease (PD, 29 cases) were evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1. In consequence, objective response rate (ORR) was 8.47% and disease control rate (DCR) was 75.42%. The median PFS of the 118 patients with NSCLC was 4.3 months and the median OS was 10.3 months. The results of Cox regression analysis suggested that ECOG score was an independent factor for PFS. The toxicity profile indicated that hypertension and hand-foot syndrome were the most common adverse reactions. Additionally, the preliminary analysis of an efficacy predictor suggested that the PFS of patients with hypertension was superior to those without hypertension.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and safe for patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after standard regimens in real world situations. Hypertension may be a biomarker for efficacy prediction.