Low expression of MUC2 is associated with longer disease-free survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma

Levels of Genetic Variants Among Symptomatic Blastocystis Subtypes and their Relationship to Mucosal Immune Surveillance in the Precancerous Colons of Experimentally Infected Rats

PURPOSE

The relationship between the genetic diversity of Blastocystis and immune surveillance in precancerous colons with blastocystosis is still under investigation. This study aimed to identify the genetic Blastocystis variants among 54 symptomatic human isolates and their relationship to mucosal immune surveillance in the precancerous polyps of experimentally infected rats.

METHODS

Polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution melting (PCR/HRM) curves discriminated human symptomatic Blastocystis isolates into subtypes (STs)/intrasubtypes, which were orally administered to rats to induce experimental infection. Then, the mucosal immune responses of the infected colons were evaluated in relation to polyp formation through immunostaining to identify mucus MUC2 and determine mucosal immune cell (goblet, lymphocyte and mast) counts, secretory IgA levels and parasitic intestinal invasion.

RESULTS

ST1, ST3, and ST4 were found in 18.5% (10/54), 54.7% (29/54), and 27.8% (15/54) of the samples, respectively. Then, the HRM curve discriminated ST3 into the wild, mutant, and heterozygous [17/54 (31.5%), 5/54 (9.3%), and 7/54 (12.9%)] intrasubtypes. ST1 and ST4 had no genetic variations. Precancerous polyps were detected in the colons of 40.5% of the infected rats. ST1 constituted 14.7% of these cases, while the wild, mutant, and heterozygous intrasubtypes of ST3 showed polyps in 12.9%, 5.5%, and 5.5% of cases, respectively. Only 1.9% of the polyps were related to ST4. MUC2 showed weak immunostaining in 44.5% of the infected colons, and 38.9% were polyp inducers. Low goblet cell numbers and high interepithelial lymphocyte counts were significantly associated with polyp formation, particularly with ST1 and wild ST3. Among the polyp inducers, high numbers of mast cells were detected in wild ST3 and ST4, while a low number was found with heterozygous ST3. The level of secretory IgA was low in polyp-inducing STs. Most of the results were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Immunosurveillance showed a potential relationship between ST1 and the ST3 intrasubtypes and precancerous polyps. This relationship may provide insight into the prevention and/or development of new immunotherapeutic strategies to combat colorectal cancer.

NICD3 regulates the expression of MUC5AC and MUC2 by recruiting SMARCA4 and is involved in the differentiation of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma is the most prevalent histological subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC), with mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCA) being a unique form. Although the mucinous subtype is known to elicit a worse response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy than the nonmucinous subtype, its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (NOTCH3), a member of the NOTCH subfamilies, is highly expressed in CRC. In the past three decades, many studies have been performed evaluating the biological role of NOTCH3 in CRC. However, the precise activities of NOTCH3 in MCA, as well as the mechanisms involved in its transcriptional control, are yet to be elucidated. Our finding showed that the critical transcriptional regulatory factor transcription activator BRG1 (SMARCA4) directly binds to the intracellular domain of NOTCH3 to control transcriptional regulation. Moreover, RNA‐sequencing results indicated a common targeting effect on the transcriptional activity of mucin‐5AC (MUC5AC) and mucin‐2 (MUC2) in CRC cells by NOTCH3 and SMARCA4. Furthermore, NOTCH3 was found to control the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC2 in a SMARCA4‐dependent manner. MUC5AC and MUC2, which encode two secreted mucins, are located on chromosome 11p15.5, and are linked to the development of MCA. This finding suggests that the interaction between NOTCH3 and SMARCA4 may be involved in MCA differentiation by jointly targeting MUC5AC and MUC2. Patients with MCA are often treated in accordance with CRC guidelines. Determining the relationship between NOTCH3 and SMARCA4 by demonstrating their interactions in the pathophysiology of MCA could provide novel therapeutic targets and help identify potential prognostic markers for MCA.

Investigating the Relationship Between the Expression Level of Mucin Gene Cluster (MUC2, MUC5A, and MUC5B) and Clinicopathological Characterization of Colorectal Cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the world and has a high mortality rate. It is accepted that dysfunction in the expression of mucins are associated with the occurrence and development of CRC. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the expression of MUC2, MUC5A, and MUC5B genes in CRC and their relationship with clinicopathological variables.

Materials and Methods

The population included 28 patients after a colonoscopy and confirmation of the results. Tumors and parallel adjacent normal tissues from CRC patients were collected. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed using the corresponding kits. The gene primer was designed and RT-PCR was used to evaluate gene expression. The t-test and ANOVA were used to examine the differences between the different groups. Data analysis was performed using Prism8 software. Tumors from CRC patients were retrospectively collected from Taleghani Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Results

The results showed that the expression of MUC2, MUC5A, and MUC5B genes was lower in patients with CRC aged 50 years or younger than was in older patients (P<0.05). Only the MUC5B gene expression was associated with tumor grades, which was higher in poorly differentiated tumors. The expression of MUC5A and MUC2 genes was higher in stage IV of the tumor than in other stages (P<0.05). Conclusion: Among the changes in the expression of MUC secretory genes, including MUC2, MUC5A, and MUC5B and clinicopathological variables, there was a relationship that could have prognostic and diagnostic value in CRC.

Conclusion

None.

A Novel Prognostic Biomarker Panel for Early-Stage Colon Carcinoma

Molecular characterization of colorectal cancer has helped us understand better the biology of the disease. However, previous efforts have yet to provide significant clinical value in order to be integrated into clinical practice for patients with early-stage colon cancer (CC). The purpose of this study was to assess PD-L1, GLUT-1, e-cadherin, MUC2, CDX2, and microsatellite instability (dMMR) and to propose a risk-panel with prognostic capabilities. Biomarkers were immunohistochemically assessed through tissue microarrays in a cohort of 144 patients with stage II/III colon cancer. A biomarker panel consisting of PD-L1, GLUT-1, dMMR, and potentially CDX2 was constructed that divided patients into low, medium, and high risk of overall survival or disease-free survival (DFS) in equally sized groups. Compared with low-risk patients, medium-risk patients have almost twice the risk of death (HR = 2.10 (0.99-4.46), p = 0.054), while high-risk patients have almost four times the risk (HR = 3.79 (1.77-8.11), p = 0.001). The multivariate goodness of fit was 0.756 and was correlated with Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.002). Consistent results were found for DFS. This study provides a critical basis for the future development of an immunohistochemical assessment capable of discerning early-stage CC patients as a function of their prognosis. This tool may aid with treatment personalization in daily clinical practice and improve survival outcomes.

Consequence of distinctive expression of MUC2 in colorectal cancers: How much is actually bad?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits complex pathogenesis via compromised intestinal mucosal barrier. It is accepted that goblet cells secrete mucin which line the intestinal mucosal barrier and offer wide range protection and maintain the gut integrity. The principal mucin in the small and large intestine which is Mucin2 (MUC2) is predominantly expressed in the goblet cells which play a pivotal role in intestinal homeostasis. Its disruption is associated with diverse diseases and carcinomas. MUC2 has lately been identified as a principal marker in various mechanisms and secretory cell lineage. While MUC2 expression is regulated by various modulators, alterations in its expression are associated with immunomodulation, differences in tumor immunity and also regulation of microbiota. In the light of current literature, the present review explicates the regulation, functional mechanisms and essential role of MUC2 in colorectal cancer and aids in providing deep understanding of pathogenesis of the disease and also specifies the importance of the MUC2 in gaining more insights about the subtypes of colorectal cancer and how it can succour in approximating the prognosis and survival of the patients.

Nanosecond pulsed electric fields impair viability and mucin expression in mucinous colorectal carcinoma cell

Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) are a non-thermal technology that can induce a myriad of biological responses and changes in cellular physiology. nsPEFs have gained significant attention as a novel cancer therapy. However, studies investigating the application of nsPEF in mucinous carcinomas are scarce. In this study, we explored several biological responses in two mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines, LS 174T and HT-29, to nsPEF treatment. We determined the overall cell survival and viability rates following nsPEF treatment using CCK-8 and colony formation assays. We measured the intracellular effects of nsPEF treatment by analyzing cell cycle distribution, cell apoptosis and mitochondrial potential. We also analyzed mucin production at both mRNA and protein levels. Our results showed that nsPEF treatment significantly reduced mucinous cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. nsPEF treatment increased cell cycles arrest at G₀/G₁ while the proportion of G₂/M cells gradually decreased. Cell apoptosis increased following nsPEF treatment with a clear loss in mitochondrial membrane potential. Furthermore, the protein expression of functional mucin family members decreased after nsPEF treatment. In conclusion, nsPEF treatment reduced MCRC cell viability, cell proliferation, and mucin protein production while promoted apoptosis. Our work is a pilot study that projects some insights into the potential clinical applications of nsPEFs in treating mucinous colorectal carcinoma.

Mucin expression, epigenetic regulation and patient survival: A toolkit of prognostic biomarkers in epithelial cancers

Twenty mucin genes have been identified and classified in two groups (encoding secreted and membrane-bound proteins). Secreted mucins participate in mucus formation by assembling a 3-dimensional network via oligomerization, whereas membrane-bound mucins are anchored to the outer membrane mediating extracellular interactions and cell signaling. Both groups have been associated with carcinogenesis progression in epithelial cancers, and are therefore considered as potential therapeutic targets. In the present review, we discuss the link between mucin expression patterns and patient survival and propose mucins as prognosis biomarkers of epithelial cancers (esophagus, gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, lung, breast or ovarian cancers). We also investigate the relationship between mucin expression and overall survival in the TCGA dataset. In particular, epigenetic mechanisms regulating mucin gene expression, such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modification, are interesting as they are also associated with diagnosis or prognosis significance. Indeed, mucin hypomethylation has been shown to be associated with carcinogenesis progression and was linked to prognosis in colon cancer or pancreatic cancer patients. Finally we describe the relationship between mucin expression and non-coding RNAs that also may serve as biomarkers. Altogether the concomitant knowledge of specific mucin-pattern expression and epigenetic regulation could be translated as biomarkers with a better specificity/sensitivity performance in several epithelial cancers.

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Significance of MUC Family Members in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To assess the association between MUC expression levels in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and prognosis and investigate the associations between MUC expression levels and CRC clinicopathological characteristics.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception through September 13, 2019, to identify studies investigating the association between MUC expression levels in CRC tissues and prognosis. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate associations between MUC expression levels and prognosis or clinicopathological characteristics, respectively. The heterogeneity between studies was assessed by the I² values, whereas the likelihood of publication bias was assessed by Egger's linear regression and Begg's rank correlation test.

Results

Among 33 included studies (n = 6032 patients), there were no associations between combined MUC phenotype expression levels and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS)/relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with CRC. In subgroup analyses, the upregulated MUC1 expression (HR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29–1.74; P < 0.00001) was associated with poor OS. However, the upregulated MUC2 expression (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52–0.79; P < 0.00001) was associated with better OS. Furthermore, a high level of MUC1 expression (HR = 1.99; 95% CI, 0.99–3.99; P = 0.05) was associated with shorter DFS/RFS. However, patients with a low level of MUC2 tumors showed better DFS/RFS than patients with a high level of MUC2 tumors (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49–1.04; P = 0.08; P = 0.0.009, I² = 67%) and MUC5AC expression (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.82; P = 0.003) was associated with longer DFS/RFS. In addition, a high level of MUC1 expression was associated with CRC in the rectum, deeper invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, advanced tumor stage, and lymphatic invasion. A high level of MUC2 expression had a protective effect. High secretion of MUC5AC is associated with colon cancer compared with rectal cancer.

Conclusion

The protein expression of MUC1 might be a poor biomarker in colorectal cancer and might play a role in tumor transformation and metastasis. However, the protein expression of MUC2 expression might have a protective effect. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of large patients are needed to confirm the results.