Clinical and pathological factors predicting axillary nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients of central Sudan: A single institution experience

Observational Study to Determine the Involvement of Level III Lymph Nodes in Case of Clinically Positive Level II Nodes in Carcinoma Breast

Management of breast cancer has gradually shifted from era of radical surgery to present days of multimodality management and conservatism. Management of carcinoma breast is primarily multimodality of which surgery is one of the important roles to play. Our study is a prospective observational study to determine the involvement of level III axillary lymph nodes in clinically involved axilla with grossly involved lower-level axillary nodes. Underestimation of a number of involved nodes at level III shall result in inaccuracy of subset risk stratification leading to substandard prognostication. The enigma of not addressing presumably involved nodes thereby altering the staging vs acquired morbidity has always been a contentious issue. Mean lymph node harvest at the lower level (I and II) was 17.9 ± 6.3 (range: 6-32) while positive lower-level axillary lymph node involvement was 6.5 ± 6.5 (range: 1-27). The mean ± SD for level III positive lymph node involvement was 1.46 ± 1.69 (range: 0-8). Our prospective observational study though limited by the number and years of follow-up has demonstrated that the presence of more than three positive LN at a lower level increases the risk for higher nodal involvement substantially. It is also evident in our study that PNI, ECE, and LVI increased the probability of stage up-gradation. LVI was found to be a significant prognostic factor for apical LN involvement in multivariate analysis. On multivariate logistic regression > 3 pathological positive lymph nodes at the level I and II and LVI involvement elevated the risk of involvement at level III by 11 and 46 times, respectively. It is recommended that patients who have a positive pathological surrogate marker of aggressiveness should be evaluated perioperatively for level III involvement, especially in the setting of visible grossly involved nodes. The patient should be counseled and informed decision to perform complete axillary lymph node dissection with the added risk of morbidity should be contemplated.

Association between axillary lymph node involvement and clinicopathological features of breast cancer among Indonesian women

BACKGROUND Some clinicopathological features play roles in the spread of breast cancer to axillary lymph node (ALN). However, their roles as predictive factors are not well-established. This study was conducted to determine the correlation between the clinicopathological features of breast cancer and the risk of ALN involvement in Indonesian women. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in Margono Soekarjo Hospital using archival data from January 2017 to June 2018. All subjects with breast cancer who had undergone modified radical mastectomies without any evidence of distant metastasis were included. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to assess the relationship between ALN involvement and age, menopausal status, laterality, tumor size, tumor stage, histological type, tumor grade, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), skin or nipple infiltration, perineural invasion, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. The odds ratio of each variable was evaluated using ordinal regression analysis. RESULTS Stage 3 breast cancer had the worst status of ALN involvement compared with stage 1 (OR = 3.49; 95% CI = 1.51–8.08) and stage 2 (OR = 3.04; 95% CI = 1.32–6.98). Likewise, positive LVSI also had the worst status of ALN involvement compared with negative LVSI (OR = 8.68; 95% CI = 4.23–17.81). CONCLUSIONS Tumor stage and LVSI could be considered as independent predictive factors of ALN involvement in patients with breast cancer, especially among Indonesian women.