Noninvasive measurement of lower limb outflow resistance andimplications for stenting

Diagnosis of chronic iliac venous obstruction

Stenting has become the first line of treatment for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in patients with quality-of-life-impairing clinical manifestations who have failed conservative therapy. Patient selection for such intervention is, however, dependent on clear identification of relevant clinical manifestations and subsequent testing to confirm the diagnosis. In this regard, the physician engaged in management of such patients needs to be well-aware of symptoms and signs of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction, and instruments used to grade chronic venous insufficiency and determine quality of life, in addition to diagnostic tests available and their individual roles. This review serves to provide an overview of the diagnosis of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and patient selection for stenting.

Residual volume fraction during walking using wireless air plethysmography in patients with chronic deep venous disease

OBJECTIVE

Traditional air plethysmography (APG) provides a quantitative measure of the residual volume fraction (RVF) after 10 tiptoe movements. The recent development of a wireless Bluetooth (Bluetooth SIG, Inc, Kirkland, Wash) APG device, the PicoFlow (Microlab Elettronica, Padua, Italy), enabled us to measure RVF during normal walking. The aim of our study was to compare the RVF obtained during tiptoeing with RVF obtained during normal walking in patients with deep venous pathology (ie, reflux and/or obstruction).

METHODS

A total of 61 consecutive symptomatic patients (27 women and 34 men; median age, 46 years; range, 18-79 years) with chronic venous disease due to deep venous pathology (venous reflux or obstruction, or both) before treatment or persisting after intervention were included in the present study. Of the 122 total limbs examined, 79 were affected by deep chronic venous disease and 43 contralateral limbs were normal with normal deep veins and acted as controls. The APG examination was performed using the PicoFlow device using the standard examination technique. The RVF was calculated from the residual volume at the end of 10 tiptoe movements and also during normal walking.

RESULTS

At the end of the 10 tiptoe movements, the mean ± standard deviation RVF was 27.0% ± 13.2% in the limbs with normal deep veins and 38.8% ± 16.9% in the limbs with deep chronic venous disease (P < .001). During walking, when a steady state in volume was reached, the RVF was 26.3% ± 17.8% in the limbs with normal deep veins and 43.1% ± 18.6% in limbs with deep venous disease (P < 0.001). A significant difference was found between limbs with normal deep veins and limbs with deep venous reflux, irrespective of which exercise was performed. However, the mean RVF between the limbs with normal deep veins and those with outflow obstruction in the absence of reflux was significant during walking (P = .012) but not during tiptoeing (P = .212). The mean RVF was higher in the C3 to C6 limbs than in the C0 to C2 limbs with tiptoeing (29.9% ± 14.5% vs 38.3% ± 17.0%; P < .006). Similar results were obtained with walking (29.2% ± 18.0% vs 42.4% ± 18.8%; P < .004).

CONCLUSIONS

In limbs with normal deep veins and deep veins with reflux, the RVF measured during walking with wireless APG was similar to the RVF obtained during tiptoeing. However, in the limbs with outflow obstruction in the absence of reflux, the RVF during walking was higher than the RVF after tiptoeing. Our results have shown that the evaluation of RVF during walking is feasible and practical.