Patient and nonradiographic tumor characteristics predicting lipid-poor angiomyolipoma in small renal masses: Introducing the BEARS index

Treatment of fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma with ectopic blood supply by fluorescent laparoscopy: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Renal angiomyolipoma and renal cell carcinoma are the most common benign and malignant tumors of the kidney respectively, and the preoperative differential diagnosis is crucial due to the wide difference in treatment methods. Fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma is a relatively rare type of in renal angiomyolipoma. Its fat imaging features are not obvious, and it is easily misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma.

CASE SUMMARY

We report the case of a 41-year-old man who complained of osphyalgia. Subsequent abdominal computed tomography scans revealed that a heterogeneous mass was seen in the lower pole of the right kidney, with the size of about 53 mm × 47 mm. And showed two right renal arteries, with the mass supplied by an ectopic vessel from the abdominal aorta. Fluorescent laparoscopic blockade of the right renal heterotopic artery and partial nephrectomy was performed. Based on histological and immunohistochemical findings, the tumor was diagnosed as fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma.

CONCLUSION

The use of fluorescent laparoscopy can effectively help intraoperative management, and the fluorescence pattern provided by intravenous indocyanine green can help suggest the final diagnosis, effectively guide the surgical decision-making, and avoid preoperative imaging diagnosis leading to nephrectomy for benign renal tumors, through fluorescent navigation of tumor supply vessel precise block, minimize the loss of renal function.

Is Size All That Matters? New Predictors of Complications and Bleeding in Renal Angiomyolipoma

Purpose

Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) is the most common benign renal tumor. Whilst generally asymptomatic, they can cause life-threatening bleeding. Selective angioembolization (SAE) may be used to treat large symptomatic and asymptomatic AMLs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SAE for symptomatic and asymptomatic renal AMLs and determine characteristics that predict spontaneous bleeding.

Patients and Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database from July 2011 to April 2022. Patients were included if AML was >4cm and they underwent subsequent SAE. Follow-up imaging was analyzed to calculate mean reduction in AML size. Clinical notes were reviewed to analyze lesion characteristics including vascularity, fat content and presence of aneurysm as well as post-procedural complications.

Results

26 patients with 30 AMLs were identified. Interval of follow-up imaging ranged from 1 to 60 months. 25 AMLs were embolized electively with 5 emergency embolizations performed for bleeding. Mean reduction in AML volume was 41% at 3 months (p=0.013) and 63% at 12 months (p=0.007). All 5 bleeding AMLs had a rich vascularity with 60% also having either aneurysms or a low fat content. Complications included post-embolic syndrome (n=9), segmental renal parenchyma devascularization (n=3), acute bleeding requiring re-embolization (n=2), nephrectomy for ongoing bleeding (n=1) and delayed bleeding managed conservatively (n=1). No deterioration in renal function was observed.

Conclusion

SAE is an effective procedure for managing symptomatic and asymptomatic renal AML, with minimal significant complications. AML vascularity, fat content and aneurysms may be useful characteristics to assess future risk of bleeding in patients with renal AML.

The Risks of Renal Angiomyolipoma: Reviewing the Evidence

Renal angiomyolipoma (RAML), though a rare benign tumor, may impose a significant morbidity or even mortality due to its unique characteristics and the complications subsequent to its treatment. The classic tumor variant is composed of smooth muscular, vascular, and fatty components. The most straightforward diagnosis is when the fat component is abundant and gives a characteristic appearance on different imaging studies. In fat-poor lesions, however, the diagnosis is difficult and presumed a renal cell carcinoma. Yet, some variants of RAML, though rare, express an aggressive behavior leading to metastasis and mortality. The challenge lies in the early detection of benign variants and identifying aggressive lesions for proper management. Another challenge is when the vascular tissue component predominates and poses a risk of hemorrhage that may extend to the retroperitoneum in a massive life-threatening condition. The predicament here is to identify the characteristics of tumors at risk of bleeding and provide a prophylactic treatment. According to the clinical presentation, different treatment modalities, prophylactic or therapeutic, are available that span the spectrum of observation, embolization, or surgery. Renal impairment may result from extensive tumor burden or as a complication of the management itself. Improvement of diagnostic techniques, super-selective embolization, nephron-sparing surgery, and late treatment with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have provided more effective and safe management strategies. In this review, we examine the evidence pertaining to the risks imposed by RAML to the patients and identify merits and hazards associated with different treatment modalities.