Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?

Short-term outcomes comparison of KangDuo 2.0 and Da Vinci Xi in radical cystectomy

In urological surgery, the Da Vinci Xi robotic system has many advantages, but it also has limitations such as high equipment costs and the need for professional training. Kangduo is a laparoscopic surgical robot developed in China, and SR2000 is its newly approved four-arm laparoscopic surgical robot. This study compares the short-term outcomes of the two in radical cystectomy. Data from a centre-based randomised non-inferiority trial were used and patients between March 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled and randomised according to criteria. The primary outcome was surgical success, and secondary outcomes included intraoperative variables, surgical outcomes, pathological outcomes, and postoperative outcomes. A total of 34 patients, 16 in the KD group and 18 in the DV group, had no intermediate open or conventional laparoscopic surgery, and the surgical success rate was 100%, with no significant differences between the two groups in many aspects. The effectiveness and safety of the KangDuo SR2000 system were demonstrated. Experienced surgeons confirmed that performing radical cystectomy using the KangDuo SR2000 system yielded results comparable to those achieved using the Da Vinci robotic system.

Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes of New Multiport Robotic Platforms in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background and objective

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has steadily become more prevalent in urology. The Da Vinci multiport surgical robot (DVM-SR) continues to lead the field. In recent years, new multiport surgical robots (NM-SRs) have been introduced to the market; however, their safety and efficacy remain unassessed. This study aims to give a comprehensive evaluation of the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of NM-SRs and a comparison with the DVM-SR.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and clinicaltrial.gov to identify studies that evaluate NM-SRs in major urological surgeries assessing perioperative, functional, and oncological endpoints. A meta-analysis was performed comparing NM-SRs with the DVM-SR for safety, and functional and oncological outcomes.

Key findings and limitations

Seventy-four studies involving 5487 patients were included in the review. Nine platforms were studied: Hinotori, Hugo RAS, Revo-I, Versius, Avatera, Senhance, KangDuo Surgical Robot-01, Dexter, and Toumai. NM-SRs were used to perform robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP; 41 studies), partial nephrectomy (RAPN; 14 studies), radical nephrectomy (RARN; four studies), adrenalectomy (four studies), nephroureterectomy (two studies), RARN and thrombectomy (one study), colpopexy (four studies), pyeloplasty (seven studies), simple nephrectomy (four studies), simple prostatectomy (three studies), and ureteral surgery (four studies). Cystectomies with NM-SRs were described only in case reports and were excluded. The comparative analysis between NM-SRs and the DVM-SR showed similar outcomes in terms of intraoperative SATAVA grade ≥2 complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25, 3.1, p = 0.9 for RARP and OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.11, 3.3, p = 0.5 for RAPN), postoperative high-grade complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa, OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.4, 2, p = 0.7 for RARP and OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.1, 3.3, p = 0.6 for RAPN), and positive surgical margins (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.72, 1.1, p = 0.3 for RARP and OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.3, 9.1, p = 0.6 for RAPN). For patients undergoing RARP, biochemical recurrence and urinary continence rates at 3 mo were comparable (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.5, 1.8, p = 1] and OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.77, 1.3, p = 0.9], respectively). The achievement of the trifecta for RAPN appeared to be similar between the included studies on NM-SRs and the DVM-SR (OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.4, 4.4, p = 0.7). The small sample size of the included studies and the preliminary nature of the results represent the major limitations.

Conclusions and clinical implications

When compared with the DVM-SR, NM-SRs may offer similar safety, and oncological and functional outcomes across most surgeries for both benign and malignant diseases. Further research is needed to explore the potential of NM-SRs, given the promising initial findings.

Patient summary

New multiport surgical robots (NM-SRs) appear to be safe and effective compared with the Da Vinci surgical robotic system. However, further research is required to thoroughly assess their long-term outcomes and cost effectiveness. NM-SRs represent an opportunity to spread the use of robot-assisted surgery globally.

Performance and safety of Kangduo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system for urologic surgeries

OBJECTIVE

Kangduo (KD) surgical robot is a novel robotic system in China, and some animal experiments and single-arm clinical trials have indicated its effectiveness, feasibility, and safety for urologic surgeries. This study intended to compare the performance and safety of the KD surgical robot with the da Vinci (DV) robotic system in patients who received urologic surgeries.

METHODS

A total of 201 patients who received urologic surgeries were divided into the KD group (N = 60) and the DV group (N = 141) according to the actual surgical methods.

RESULTS

The median (range) operation time [180.0 (30.0-540.0) minutes vs. 130.0 (70.0-360.0) minutes] (P < 0.001) and indwelling time of abdominal drainage tube [5.0 (2.0-14.0) days vs. 3.0 (2.0-18.0) days] (P < 0.001) were longer, but the intraoperative blood loss [50.0 (10.0-200.0) mL vs. 50.0 (10.0-400.0) mL] (P < 0.001) was less in the KD group than the DV group. The median values of white blood cells at the 1st (P = 0.032) and 3rd (P = 0.022) day after surgery were decreased in the KD group compared to the DV group. The incidence of infection (11.7% vs. 29.1%) (P = 0.008) and fever (15.0% vs. 30.5%) (P = 0.023) was lower in the KD group compared to the DV group. Postoperative and follow-up parameters, including time of urinary incontinence improvement, administration of hemostatic, pain numeric rating scale score, Barthel's index score, and patient satisfaction, were not different between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The KD surgical robot unveils satisfactory surgical performance compared to the DV robotic system in patients receiving urologic surgeries.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes and prognosis between Da Vinci surgical system and Hinotori system in urologic tumor surgery: evidence from controlled trials

The objective is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and compare perioperative outcomes comparing the Da Vinci and Hinotori robotic systems in the treatment of urological tumors. We systematically reviewed an observational controlled study comparing the two systems in urologic tumor surgery. Six studies, published between 2023 and 2024, involving 904 patients, were included. Surgical parameters and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4, p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The Da Vinci system demonstrated significantly shorter operation time (OT) (WMD = 22.48, p < 0.001) and robotic intervention time (RIT) (WMD = 23.35, p < 0.001) compared to the Hinotori system. No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss (EBL), major complications (MC), positive surgical margin rate (PSM), or biochemical recurrence (BCR) between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings, although moderate to high heterogeneity was noted in some outcomes. The Da Vinci robotic system is more efficient in terms of operation and robotic intervention time. However, both the Hinotori and Da Vinci systems provide comparable functional and oncologic outcomes. Given the novelty of the Hinotori system, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Single-port robot-assisted pyeloplasty versus multiport pyeloplasty: evidence from controlled trials

This study evaluates and compares the results of single-port (SP-RAP) versus multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (MP-RAP) for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing SP-RAP and MP-RAP for UPJO treatment were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Key outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, and complication rates. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Both SP-RAP and MP-RAP demonstrated comparable surgical success rates (SP-RAP: 98.85%, MP-RAP: 98.08%), complication rates, and estimated blood loss. In the adult subgroup, SP-RAP was associated with shorter hospital stays (WMD: -0.52 days; P = 0.04). Postoperative morphine consumption was also lower in the SP-RAP group (WMD: -31.02 mg; P = 0.03), reflecting its minimally invasive nature. However, no significant differences were observed in operative time, pain scores, or renal function recovery between the two groups. Additionally, some studies suggested that SP-RAP may offer better cosmetic outcomes due to its single incision; however, due to the lack of standardized cosmetic satisfaction evaluation criteria, this finding is presented as a potential advantage rather than a definitive conclusion. The SP system demonstrates comparable safety and effectiveness to MP-RAP while offering advantages in cosmetic outcomes and recovery. Further long-term studies are needed to validate its benefits and optimize its application.

Fabrication and application of continuous douche for Da Vinci surgical robot arm

BACKGROUND

The use of robotic surgery in hospitals is becoming increasingly widespread.

OBJECTIVE

This research was performed to design a continuous douche for surgical robotic arm operated instruments and evaluate its use.

METHODS

A continuous irrigator was designed for robotic arm operated surgical instruments. A total of 240 recovered robotic-arm instruments were selected from the Disinfection Supply Center of our hospital. These were divided into two groups according to their recycling order, with single number instruments in the control group and even number instruments in the experimental group. Each group included 120 pieces. In the experimental group, continuous douching was used for perfusion and soaking, while control group instruments were infused and soaked using a 50 mL syringe. Data on cleaning quality, accuracy of perfusion tool injection volume, incidence of liquid reverse osmosis during injection and washing, and product satisfaction were collected for both groups.

RESULTS

The qualified manipulator cleaning rate and satisfaction with perfusion tools were higher in the experimental group than in the control group, and incidence of liquid reverse osmosis was lower in the experimental group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-made continuous perfusion device improved the instrument cleaning efficacy of the robotic surgical arm, accuracy of injection volume, and product satisfaction.

Improved positioning in robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the EDGE MP1000 surgical robot

This study investigated the impact of an improved body positioning on the effectiveness of EDGE MP1000 robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We compared clinical data from 39 patients who underwent the procedure at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University between November 2023 and May 2024. The control group (18 patients) received conventional positioning, while the experimental group (21 patients) received precise positioning, which included patient assessments, optimized positioning techniques, and enhanced nursing measures. Key metrics compared between the groups included the duration of postural placement, incidence of intraoperative stress injuries, and patient satisfaction. All procedures were successfully completed. The experimental group had a significantly shorter duration of postural placement (P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of intraoperative stress injuries (P = 0.023) compared to the control group. In addition, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the experimental group (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that the implementation of precise positioning in EDGE MP1000 robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy enhances operational efficiency and surgeon satisfaction, while ensuring patient safety and comfort, supporting its clinical adoption.

Use of omentum during robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery: a systematic review of the current literature

PURPOSE

Due to its biological properties, the omentum is a very useful tool in the hands of reconstructive urologists. The purpose of this systematic review is to present all existing evidence regarding the use of omentum during different robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgeries.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) were systematically screened. The following search string was used: (omentum OR omental) AND robotic. Retrospective studies and case-series were included, while case-reports were not included.

RESULTS

13 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. Seven studies reported robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair, two studies reported robotic vesicouterine or vesicocervical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectovesical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectourethral fistula repair, one study reported ureterolysis with omental wrap and one study reported robotic repair of long ureteral strictures with omental wrap and autologous onlay flap or graft ureteroplasty. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 6.7%. The Grade I-II complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification ranged from 0 to 40%, while no Grade III-IV were reported.

CONCLUSION

Robotic repair with the use of omentum is potentially a feasible, safe and efficient approach for complicated urological surgeries, such as vesicovaginal, vesicouterine, vaginocervical, rectovesical and rectourethral fistulas, idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and long ureteral strictures. Because the evidence is based on small case series, further publications are needed to enhance confidence in omental harvesting and render it a routine component of reconstructive Urology.

Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a hands-on surgical robotics workshop for medical students and early-career doctors

Despite the increased adoption of robotic surgery across various specialities, medical students and early-career doctors have limited exposure. This study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a hands-on surgical robotics workshop for those early-career medics. 26 participants with minimal prior exposure to robotic surgery attended a workshop using the Versius© robotic surgical system and Virtual Reality simulation platforms. We analysed pre-workshop registration form and post-workshop feedback form utilising mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. Pre-workshop registration revealed motivations and barriers to attending surgical robotics courses. Post-workshop evaluations showed significant improvements in self-assessment scores, familiarity with robotic surgery, and confidence in using the technology. All participants expressed a strong enthusiasm for greater access to robotic surgery education and 84% of participants strongly agreed this workshop increased their interests in surgical specialities. The study also highlighted the perceived ease of use of robotic systems compared to laparoscopic instruments and explored the potential of virtual reality in surgical training. Further efforts are needed for better integration of robotic surgery training into medical curricula to prepare future surgeons for the evolving surgical landscape.

Medtronic's Hugo™ robotic surgery system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of current worldwide experiences

Urology's pioneering role in surgical innovations, from cystoscopy to laparoscopic surgery, culminated in the twenty-first-century advent of robotic surgery. The dominant da Vinci® system faced new competition following its 2019 patent expiration. Medtronic's Hugo™ system emerged. Its growing global adoption, especially in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), necessitates a systematic review, evaluating safety, feasibility, and comparison with established systems. A comprehensive search identified eligible studies of the Hugo™ robotic platform for RARP, presenting their current experiences. Following systematic screening, quality of eligible studies was assessed using ROBINS-I. Results then underwent a narrative synthesis. This systematic review analysed 19 eligible studies, consisting of 9 comparative and 10 single arm studies. Due to the non-randomised nature of the studies, a moderate risk of bias was concluded in most. On account of the high heterogeneity between studies, a narrative synthesis of data was enacted; categorised into themes relating to operative timings, transfer of skills, patient demographics, plus safety and feasibility. Eligible studies demonstrated the promise of the Hugo™ platform within these themes, in comparison to currently available platforms. Despite a paucity of high-quality randomised controlled trials, available evidence indicates Hugo™ as a promising, safe alternative for RARP. Positive experiences across diverse centres and surgeons revealed minimal differences in surgical outcomes compared to the established da Vinci® system, fostering global Hugo™ adoption. Despite evidence demonstrating Hugo™ safety and comparability, the review underscores the scarcity of high-quality evidence, attributing it to early stage implementation challenges.

Design and navigation method of a soft robot for single-port transvesical radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Currently, the rigid instruments used for laparoscopic radical resection of prostate cancer not only have the risk of damage to tissues, blood vessels, and nerves, but their limited freedom will also cause surgical blind areas. Soft robots are expected to solve these issues due to inherent flexibility, compliance, and safe interaction with tissues and organs. In addition, to achieve high surgical accuracy and provide precise guidance for surgeons, the navigation method should be studied for the soft robot.

METHODS

A soft robot system for single-port transvesical radical prostatectomy (STRP) is developed, and a navigation method combining fiber Bragg gratings and electromagnetic tracking is proposed for the soft robot. To validate the soft robot design and the effectiveness of the navigation method, different groups of experiments are conducted.

RESULTS

The proposed navigation method can achieve accurate location and shape sensing of the soft manipulator. The experiments show that the maximum tip sensing error is 2.691 mm, which is 5.38 % of the robot length for static configurations, and that the average tip sensing error is 1.966 mm, which corresponds to 3.93 % of the robot length for dynamic scenarios. Additionally, phantom tests demonstrate that the designed soft robot can enter the prostate through navigation guidance in a master-slave control mode and cover the entire prostate space.

CONCLUSIONS

The designed soft robot system, due to its soft structure, good flexibility, and accurate navigation, is expected to improve surgical safety and precision, thereby exhibiting significant potential for STRP.

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal resections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD].

METHODS

Comparative studies of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal resections in patients with IBD were included. The primary outcome was total post-operative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, conversion to open surgery, anastomotic leaks, intra-abdominal abscess formation, ileus occurrence, surgical site infection, re-operation, re-admission rate, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

Eleven non-randomized studies [n = 5566 patients] divided between those undergoing robotic [n = 365] and conventional laparoscopic [n = 5201] surgery were included. Robotic platforms were associated with a significantly lower overall post-operative complication rate compared with laparoscopic surgery [p = 0.03]. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a significantly shorter operative time [p = 0.00001]. No difference was found in conversion rates to open surgery [p = 0.15], anastomotic leaks [p = 0.84], abscess formation [p = 0.21], paralytic ileus [p = 0.06], surgical site infections [p = 0.78], re-operation [p = 0.26], re-admission rate [p = 0.48], and 30-day mortality [p = 1.00] between the groups. Length of hospital stay was shorter following a robotic sub-total colectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy [p = 0.03].

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in the surgical management of IBD are comparable between traditional laparoscopic techniques and robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery, demonstrating the safety and feasibility of robotic platforms. Larger studies investigating the use of robotic technology in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis separately may be of benefit with a specific focus on important IBD-related metrics.

Navigating challenges in anesthesia for robotic urological surgery: a comprehensive guide

Robotic surgery has emerged as a cornerstone in urological interventions, offering effectiveness and safety for patients. For anesthesiologists, this technological advancement presents a myriad of new challenges, spanning from patient selection and assessment to intraoperative dynamics and post-surgical pain management. This article aims to elucidate these challenges and provide guidance for anesthesiologists in navigating the complexities of anesthesia administration in robotic urological procedures. Through a detailed exploration of patient optimization, team coordination, intraoperative adjustments, and post-surgical care, this article serves as a valuable resource for ensuring the success of such interventions.

Novel Robotic Platforms for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Narrative Review

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has been integrated into clinical practice to overcome several limitations of conventional open or laparoscopic surgery. After the expiration of the long key patent period of Intuitive Surgical, various robotic systems (RSs) have been developed aiming at improving certain characteristics of the first robotic platform, the Da Vinci RS. This narrative review provides an overview of the current RSs used in urology along with the initial results from their application in urologic procedures. Nine robotic platforms are being analyzed regarding their unique characteristics as well as their efficacy, safety, feasibility, and outcomes in urologic, oncological, or non-oncological operations. The main barrier to the wide application of RAS has been the increased cost that refers to both acquisition and maintenance costs. Besides, the health inequality resulting from the lack of expert robotic surgeons and the difficulty of performing robot-assisted procedures in provincial hospitals should be overcome. However, large properly designed comparative studies are required to establish the role of newly introduced RSs. In addition, urologists should keep abreast of new developments and research in robot-assisted urologic procedures.

Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Undeniably, robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has become very popular in recent decades, but it has introduced challenges to the workflow of the surgical team. Non-technical skills (NTS) have received less emphasis than technical skills in training and assessment. The systematic review aimed to update the evidence on the role of NTS in robotic surgery, specifically focusing on evaluating assessment tools and their utilisation in training and surgical education in robotic surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was conducted to identify primary articles on NTS in RAS. Messick's validity framework and the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument were utilised to evaluate the quality of the validity evidence of the abstracted articles.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were eligible for the final analysis. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation and teamwork were key NTS for RAS. Team-related factors such as ambient noise and chatter, inconveniences due to repeated requests during the procedure and constraints due to poor design of the operating room may harm patient safety during RAS. Three novel rater-based scoring systems and one sensor-based method for assessing NTS in RAS were identified. Anticipation by the team to predict and execute the next move before an explicit verbal command improved the surgeon's situational awareness.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review highlighted the paucity of reporting on non-technical skills in robotic surgery with only three bespoke objective assessment tools being identified. Communication, environmental factors, anticipation, and teamwork are the key non-technical skills reported in robotic surgery, and further research is required to investigate their benefits to improve patient safety during robotic surgery.

Emerging multi-port soft tissue robotic systems: a systematic review of clinical outcomes

Multiple novel multi-port robotic surgical systems have been introduced into clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these novel robotic systems to conventional laparoscopic technique and established da Vinci robotic surgical platforms. A literature search of Embase, Medline, Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines from 2012 to May 2023. Studies comparing clinical outcomes of novel multi-port robotic surgical systems with laparoscopic or the da Vinci platforms were included. Case series with no comparison groups were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to report patient and outcome data. A systematic narrative review was provided for each outcome. Twelve studies comprised of 1142 patients were included. A total of 6 novel multi-port robotic systems: Micro Hand S, Senhance, Revo-i MSR-5000, KangDuo, Versius, and Hugo™ RAS were compared against the laparoscopic or the da Vinci robotic platforms. Clinical outcomes of these novel robotic platforms were comparable to the established da Vinci platforms. When compared against conventional laparoscopic approaches, the robotic platforms demonstrated lower volume of blood loss, shorter length of stay but longer operative time. This systematic review highlighted the safe implementation and efficacy of 6 new robotic systems. The clinical outcomes achieved by these new robotic systems are comparable to the established da Vinci robotic system in simple to moderate case complexities. There is emerging evidence that these new robotic systems provide a viable alternative to currently available robotic platforms.

Extraperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with Versius system: single centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Versius Surgical System (CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK) is a novel tele-operated robotic surgical system designed to assist surgeons for minimally invasive surgery which is gaining momentum in the world of robotic surgery. We describe our single centre experience with Versius and report the advantages and challenges posed by this new robotic system in a series of 53 extraperitoneal robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (eRALP) for prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 53 eRALP performed with Versius in our centre were collected and analysed, Descriptive statistics were used to report our results.

RESULTS

In 16 months we performed 53 eRALP: 18 (34%) with PLND, 33 (62%) nerve sparing cases. Mean setup time was 15 min, mean console time was 100 min and mean operative time was 130 min. We observed a substantial reduction of console time and set-up time after only 5 procedures. In the first 4 procedures, the dissection of the neurovascular bundle was performed laparoscopically, to switch back to robotic assisted approach afterwards. No major system failures were observed. No major intra-operative and post-operative complications occurred. Mean follow-up time was 9 months (range 3-15 months); no patients experienced biochemical recurrence or metastatic progression over this period, 8 (15%) patients had adjuvant radiotherapy based on unfavourable pathology report (positive surgical margins or positive limphnodes).

CONCLUSION

This represents to our knowledge the largest extraperitoneal RALP case series with Versius, and it aims to provide solid clinical proof of the safety, effectiveness and versatility of this innovative system. In our experience, this platform represents a good option for every urologic surgeon who wants to start a robotic programme and it appears particularly suitable for urologists with a large laparoscopic expertise.

Revolutionizing urology: the advancements and applications of robotic platforms

Robot-assisted surgery is developing as an acme of minimally invasive surgery, given its utmost dominance over laparoscopic surgery. The objective was to review the status of robotic surgery in urological practice with its advantages and disadvantages in current scenario. We conducted a literature search using MEDLINE and identified 72 articles which were relevant to urology. Single-port and various multiport robotic platforms like Da Vinci, Versius, Hugo RAS, Revo-I, Senhance, Mantra, Avatera, Hinotori, and MicroSurge are described with pros and cons. With a surge in different medical surgical robots purging into the market and a race to become the next standard of care in robotic surgery, it is only a matter of time when robotic surgery becomes financially comparable to laparoscopic surgeries.

Analysis of KangDuo-SR-1500 and KangDuo-SR-2000 robotic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: a prospective controlled study in porcine models

The objective of this study is to explore the safety and effectiveness of two new models of KangDuo surgical robots for partial nephrectomy in porcine models, and evaluate the ergonomic characteristics from both subjective and objective perspectives. Twelve porcine models were equally divided for KD-SR-1500 (three-arm) and KD-SR-2000 (four-arm). The perioperative outcomes, and physical and mental workload of the surgeon were compared. Physical workload was evaluated with surface electromyography. Mental workload was evaluated with NASA-TLX. All surgeries were performed successfully. There were no differences in perioperative variables (p > 0.05). There were no perioperative complications. The mental workload in both groups was at a low level. KD-SR-2000 showed advantages in physical workload (p < 0.01). KD-SR-1500 and KD-SR-2000 are technically feasible, valid, and safe for RAPN in porcine models. KD-SR-2000 had ergonomic advantages over KD-SR-1500.

Knowledge mapping of telemedicine in urology in the past 20 years: A bibliometric analysis (2004-2024)

Telemedicine refers to the process of utilizing communication technologies to exchange disease information, perform surgery and educate care providers remotely, breaking through the distance limit and promoting the health of individuals and communities. The fifth-generation (5G) technology and the COVID-19 pandemic have greatly boosted studies on the application of telemedicine in urology. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive overview of the knowledge structure and research hotspots of telemedicine in urology through bibliometrics. We searched publications related to telemedicine in urology from 2004 to 2024 on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. VOSviewer, CiteSpace and R package "bibliometrix" were employed in this bibliometric analysis. A total of 1,357 articles from 97 countries and 2,628 institutions were included. The number of annual publications on telemedicine in urology witnessed a steady increase in the last two decades. Duke University was the top research institution. Urology was the most popular journal, and Journal of Medical Internet Research was the most co-cited journal. Clarissa Diamantidis and Chad Ellimoottil published the most papers, and Boyd Viers was co-cited most frequently. Effectiveness evaluation of telemonitoring, cost-benefit analysis of teleconsultation and exploration of telesurgery are three main research hotspots. As the first bibliometric analysis of research on telemedicine in urology, this study reviews research progress and highlights frontiers and trending topics, offering valuable insights for future studies.

Senhance robotic radical prostatectomy: A single-centre, 3-year experience

BACKGROUND

Senhance Surgical System is a novel robotic platform used in University Hospital Centre Zagreb since February 2019. In this study, we present our 3-year experience with this platform.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were prospectively collected for 200 patients who underwent extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP) from May 2019 to March 2022.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 65 years, and the prostate-specific antigen was 6.9 ng/mL. Clinically, most of the patients had T1c stage. The estimated blood loss was 250 mL, and there were 6 conversions to laparoscopic and 2 to open prostatectomy. There were 15 early postoperative complications, 11 Clavien-Dindo classification grade I, 3 grade II and 1 grade IV. Functional outcomes in the first 150 patients: 140 patients (93.3%) had good urinary control. Thirteen patients underwent additional oncological treatment.

CONCLUSION

RRP performed with the Senhance robotic platform is a feasible and safe procedure with good initial results.

Soft tissue surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: a review

Purpose

The current state of soft tissue surgery robots is surveyed, and the key technologies underlying their success are analyzed. State-of-the-art technologies are introduced, and future directions are discussed.

Methods

Relevant literature is explored, analyzed, and summarized.

Results

Soft tissue surgical robots had rapidly spread in the field of laparoscopic surgery based on the multi-degree-of-freedom movement of intra-abdominal surgical tools and stereoscopic imaging that are not possible in conventional surgery. The three key technologies that have made surgical robots successful are wire-driven mechanisms for multi-degree-of-freedom movement, master devices for intuitive remote control, and stereoscopic imaging technology. Recently, human-robot interaction technologies have been applied to develop user interfaces such as vision assistance and haptic feedback, and research on autonomous surgery has begun.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery not only replaces conventional laparoscopic surgery but also allows for complex surgeries that are not possible with laparoscopic surgery. On the other hand, it is also criticized for its high cost and lack of clinical superiority or patient benefit compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. As various robots compete in the market, the cost of surgical robots is expected to decrease. Surgical robots are expected to continue to evolve in the future due to the need to reduce the workload of medical staff and improve the level of care demanded by patients.

Visualisation ergonomics and robotic surgery

Stereopsis may be an advantage of robotic surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Other ergonomic factors relating to visualisation include stereo-acuity, vergence-accommodation mismatch, visual-perception mismatch, visual-vestibular mismatch, visuospatial ability, visual fatigue, and visual feedback to compensate for lack of haptic feedback. Visual fatigue symptoms may be related to dry eye or accommodative/binocular vision stress. Digital eye strain can be measured by questionnaires and objective tests. Management options include treatment of dry eye, correction of refractive error, and management of accommodation and vergence anomalies. Experienced robotic surgeons can use visual cues like tissue deformation and surgical tool information as surrogates for haptic feedback.

Current urological applications of the Hugo™ RAS system

PURPOSE

To provide an update on the diverse, contemporary urological applications of the Hugo™ RAS system.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies that described the clinical applications of the Hugo™ RAS system in Urology. The Hugo™ RAS is a new multi-modular robotic platform created by Medtronic, which offered new innovations, including an open surgical console and individual modular and extendable robotic arms that come in their own movable platforms. Since obtaining regulatory approval in Europe in October 2021, the novel platform has been increasingly used in various urologic and gynecologic procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies were included, which involved 176 patients who underwent varying urological procedures. These included radical and simple prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical and simple nephrectomy, ureterolithotomy, ureteral reimplant, pyeloplasty, and adrenalectomy. The different docking configurations, operating room set-ups, and early perioperative outcomes were described for the respective procedure.

CONCLUSION

Based on the existing literature, the Hugo™ RAS system can be safely and effectively utilized for various urological procedures. The novel technology provided additional value in enriching the repertoire of urological minimally invasive surgical options. Further research with larger cohort of patients will be required to better refine the operating techniques and understand the perioperative outcomes of the Hugo™ RAS, especially when compared to other robotic surgical platforms.

Construction of redundant communications to enhance safety against communication interruptions during robotic remote surgery

It is important to ensure the redundancy of communication during remote surgery. The purpose of this study is to construct a communication system that does not affect the operation in the event of a communication failure during telesurgery. The hospitals were connected by two commercial lines, a main line and a backup line, with redundant encoder interfaces. The fiber optic network was constructed using both guaranteed and best-effort lines. The surgical robot used was from Riverfield Inc. During the observation, a random shutdown and restoration process of either line was conducted repeatedly. First, the effects of communication interruption were investigated. Next, we performed a surgical task using an artificial organ model. Finally, 12 experienced surgeons performed operations on actual pigs. Most of the surgeons did not feel the effects of the line interruption and restoration on still and moving images, in artificial organ tasks, and in pig surgery. During all 16 surgeries, a total of 175-line switches were performed, and 15 abnormalities were detected by the surgeons. However, there were no abnormalities that coincided with the line switching. It was possible to construct a system in which communication interruptions would not affect the surgery.

Prior Robotic Console Expertise May Improve Basic Skills at the New Hugo RAS Simulator: Results from a Cohort Trial and Implications for Skill Transference Across Platforms

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted surgery ensures minimal invasiveness; since the expiry of the Da Vinci patent, new robotic systems have entered the market. Recently, the Hugo RAS received CE approval for several surgical procedures. However, more is needed to know about skill acquisition at the new simulator.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyse the factors impacting basic surgical skills at the Hugo RAS simulator.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We present a cross-sectional study involving 71 participants of different backgrounds invited to a hands-on session with the Hugo RAS simulator voluntarily. All of them had no prior expertise with the system. Participants were recruited among medical/nurse students, residents, and laparoscopic and robotic surgeons.

INTERVENTION

All participants underwent a hands-on "pick and place" exercise at the Hugo RAS simulator; the metrics of a second-round pick and place exercise were recorded.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Metrics were analysed with regard to the following variables: demographics, videogame use, and prior surgical experience (no surgical expertise, experience with laparoscopy, and experience with robotic console).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

All participants completed the test. Of them, 77.5% were naïve to surgery, 8.5% had prior laparoscopic expertise, and 14.1% had prior robotic console experience. The time to complete the pick and place exercise was significantly lower (p < 0.001) among prior robotic surgeons (38 s, interquartile range [IQR] 34-45) compared with both naïve participants (61 s, IQR 53-71) and laparoscopists (93 s, IQR 53-162). The overall score of the exercise decreased with age (p = 0.046); however, the overall scores were significantly and steadily higher among surgeons experienced in robotic consoles across all age groups (p = 0.006). Neither gender (p = 0.7) nor videogame use (p = 0.9) correlated significantly with the metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study analysing factors impacting basic skill acquisition at a new robotic simulator. Experience with robotic consoles may represent a major factor, raising the hypothesis of the transferability of basic robotic skills across different robotic systems. Further studies are required to explore this issue.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In the present study, we analysed which characteristics may affect the basic surgical skills at a novel robotic platform.

Pose Tracking of Supermicrosurgical Robot Towards Multi-User Teleoperation

This paper presents pose tracking experiments using a supermicrosurgical robot designed to consider teleoperation with multiple surgeons. Currently, existing supermicrosurgical robots assist only the primary surgeon. However, both primary and assistant surgeons need a high-precision motion for critical tasks that can easily damage microtissue. To assist multiple surgeons in supermicrosurgery with a surgical robot, dynamic collision avoidance becomes a critical issue due to the operation in a narrow surgical site. As a milestone to overcome this issue, we first developed a pose tracking algorithm by analyzing the inverse kinematics based on null-space control and a weighting matrix. Moreover, we also developed a control framework based on fully open-source software to run the pose tracking algorithm. Finally, we validated the proposed pose tracking algorithm by performing line tracing and rubber ring transferring experiments.

User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

A variety of human computer interfaces are used by robotic surgical systems to control and actuate camera scopes during minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this review is to examine the different user interfaces used in both commercial systems and research prototypes.

METHODS

A comprehensive scoping review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases to identify user interfaces used in commercial products and research prototypes of robotic surgical systems and robotic scope holders. Papers related to actuated scopes with human-computer interfaces were included. Several aspects of user interfaces for scope manipulation in commercial and research systems were reviewed.

RESULTS

Scope assistance was classified into robotic surgical systems (for multiple port, single port, and natural orifice) and robotic scope holders (for rigid, articulated, and flexible endoscopes). Benefits and drawbacks of control by different user interfaces such as foot, hand, voice, head, eye, and tool tracking were outlined. In the review, it was observed that hand control, with its familiarity and intuitiveness, is the most used interface in commercially available systems. Control by foot, head tracking, and tool tracking are increasingly used to address limitations, such as interruptions to surgical workflow, caused by using a hand interface.

CONCLUSION

Integrating a combination of different user interfaces for scope manipulation may provide maximum benefit for the surgeons. However, smooth transition between interfaces might pose a challenge while combining controls.

Transferability of robotic console skills by early robotic surgeons: a multi-platform crossover trial of simulation training

Robotic surgical training is undergoing a period of transition now that new robotic operating platforms are entering clinical practice. As this occurs, training will need to be adapted to include strategies to train across various consoles. These new consoles differ in multiple ways, with some new vendors using flat screen open source 3D enhanced vision with glasses and differences in design will require surgeons to learn new skills. This process has parallels with aviation credentialling across different aircraft described as type rating. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that technical robotic console operating skills are transferrable across different robotic operating platforms. Ten participants sequentially completed four Mimic®(Surgical Science) simulation exercises on two different robotic operating platforms (DaVinci®, Intuitive Surgical and HUGO™ RAS, Medtronic). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained for this study. Groups were balanced for key demographics including previous robotic simulator experience. Data for simulation metrics and time to proficiency were collected for each attempt at the simulated exercise and analysed. Qualitative feedback on multi-platform learning was sought via unstructured interviews and a questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups of 5. Group 1 completed the simulation exercises on console A first then repeated these exercises on console B. Group 2 completed the simulated exercises on console B first then repeated these exercises on console A. Group 1 candidates adapted quicker to the second console and Group 2 candidates reached proficiency faster on the first console. Participants were slower on the second attempt of the final exercise regardless of their allocated group. Quality and efficiency metrics and risk and safety metrics were equivalent across consoles. The data from this investigation suggests that console operating skills are transferrable across different platforms. Overall risk and safety metrics are within acceptable limits regardless of the order of progression of console indicating that training can safely occur across multiple consoles contemporaneously. This data has implications for the design of training and certification as new platforms progress to market and supports a proficiency-based approach.

New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology

Over the past 20 years, the field of robotic surgery has largely been dominated by the da Vinci robotic platform. Nevertheless, numerous novel multiport robotic surgical systems have been developed over the past decade, and some have recently been introduced into clinical practice. This nonsystematic review aims to describe novel surgical robotic systems, their individual designs, and their reported uses and clinical outcomes within the field of urologic surgery. Specifically, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of the Senhance robotic system, the CMR-Versius robotic system, and the Hugo RAS in urologic procedures. Systems with fewer published uses are also described, including the Avatera, Hintori, and Dexter. Notable features of each system are compared, with a particular emphasis on factors differentiating each system from the da Vinci robotic system.

Index cost comparison of laparoscopic vs robotic surgery in colon and rectal cancer resection: a retrospective financial investigation of surgical methodology innovation at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Robotic assisted colorectal cancer resection (R-CR) has become increasingly commonplace in contrast to traditional laparoscopic cancer resection (L-CR). The aim of this study was to compare the total direct costs of R-CR to that of L-CR and to compare the groups with respect to costs related to LOS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colon and/or rectal cancer resection via R-CR or L-CR instrumentation between January 1, 2015 and December 31 2018, at our institution, were evaluated and compared. Primary outcomes were overall cost, supply cost, operating time and cost, postoperative length of stay (LOS), and postoperative LOS cost. Secondary outcomes were readmission within 30 days and mortality during the surgery.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty R-CR (mean age 64.9 ± 12.4 years) and 258 L-CR (mean age 66.4 ± 15.5 years) patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall mean direct cost between R-CR and L-CR was significantly higher ($8756 vs $7776 respectively, p=0.001) as well as the supply cost per case ($3789 vs $2122, p < 0.001). Operating time was also higher for R-CR than L-CR (224 min vs 187 min, p = 0.066) but LOS was slightly lower (5.08 days vs 5.55 days, p = 0.113).

CONCLUSIONS

Cost is the main obstacle to easy and widespread use of the platform at this junction, though new developments and competition could very well reduce costs. Supply cost was the main reason for increased costs with robotic resection.

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with the Newly Developed KangDuo Surgical Robot Versus the da Vinci Si Surgical System: A Double-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

The KangDuo surgical robot (KD-SR) was recently developed in China.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of the KD-SR versus the da Vinci Si Surgical System (DV-SS-Si) for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A double-center prospective randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients aged 18-75 yr with a suspicion of T1a N0M0 renal cancer (RENAL nephrometry score ≤9) was conducted.

INTERVENTION

RAPN with the KD-SR versus the DV-SS-Si.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was the success rate of operation. The operation was successful if (1) there was no open or laparoscopic conversion, (2) the warm ischemia time was <30 min for RENAL nephrometry scores of 4-6 or 40 min for RENAL nephrometry scores of 7-9, and (3) the pathological margin was negative. The secondary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). A threshold of 10% was set to demonstrate noninferiority.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

From September 2020 to March 2021, 100 participants were enrolled, of whom 99 (49 in the KD-SR group and 50 in the DV-SS-Si group) were finally included in the full analysis set and 98 (49 in the KD-SR group and -49 in the DV-SS-Si group) in the per-protocol set. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. All surgeries were completed successfully. The eGFR at postoperative weeks 4-12 and adverse events were similar between the two groups. The docking time and suture time per stitch were longer in the KD-SR group. The main limitation was that a negative margin was considered as the primary outcome rather than survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The KD-SR achieved noninferior outcomes as compared with the DV-SS-Si regarding safety and efficacy for T1a tumors.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The first trial comparing the KangDuo surgical robot (KD-SR) versus the da Vinci Si Surgical System for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy showed that the KD-SR is a viable option for minimally invasive treatment of T1a renal tumors.

Advanced surgical tool: Progress in clinical application of intelligent surgical robot

Surgical robot is a revolutionary tool conceived in the progress of clinical medicine, computer science, microelectronics and biomechanics. It provides the surgeon with clearer views and more comfortable surgical postures. With the assistance of computer navigation during delicate operations, it can further shorten the patient recovery time via reducing intraoperative bleeding, the risk of infection and the amount of anesthesia needed. As a comprehensive surgical revolution, surgical robot technique has a wide range of applications in related fields. This paper reviews the development status and operation principles of these surgical robots. At the same time, we also describe their up-to-date applications in different specialties and discusses the prospects and challenges of surgical robots in the medical area.

Robotic Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Journey from "Back to the Future"

The introduction of robotics has revolutionized surgery. Robotic platforms have also recently been introduced in clinical practice specifically for flexible ureteroscopy. In this paper, we look at the robotic platforms currently available for flexible ureteroscopy, describing their advantages and limitations. The following robotic platforms are discussed: Roboflex Avicenna^®, EasyUretero^®, and ILY^® robot. Finally, potential future advancements in this field are presented.

Robotics in laparoscopic surgery - A review

Because of the increasing use of laparoscopic surgeries, robotic technologies have been developed to overcome the challenges these surgeries impose on surgeons. This paper presents an overview of the current state of surgical robots used in laparoscopic surgeries. Four main categories were discussed: handheld laparoscopic devices, laparoscope positioning robots, master–slave teleoperated systems with dedicated consoles, and robotic training systems. A generalized control block diagram is developed to demonstrate the general control scheme for each category of surgical robots. In order to review these robotic technologies, related published works were investigated and discussed. Detailed discussions and comparison tables are presented to compare their effectiveness in laparoscopic surgeries. Each of these technologies has proved to be beneficial in laparoscopic surgeries.

Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in Minimal Access Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background: Despite the superiority of minimal access surgery (MAS) over open surgery, MAS is difficult to perform and has a demanding learning curve. Robot-assisted surgery is an advanced form of MAS. The Versius® surgical robot system was developed with the aim of overcoming some of the challenges associated with existing surgical robots. The present study was designed to investigate the feasibility, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the Versius system in MAS. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search was carried out in the Medline, Web of Science Core Collection (Indexes = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A & HCI Timespan), and Scopus databases for articles published until February 2022. The keywords used were Versius robot, visceral, colorectal, gynecology, and urologic surgeries. Articles on the use of the Versius robot in minimal access surgery (MAS) were included in the review. Results: Seventeen articles were reviewed for the study. The investigation comprised a total of 328 patients who had been operated on with this robot system, of which 48.3%, 14.2%, and 37.5% underwent colorectal, visceral, and gynecological procedures, respectively. Postoperative and major complications within 30 days varied from 7.4% to 39%. No major complications and no readmissions or reoperations were reported in visceral and gynecological surgeries. Readmission and reoperation rates in colorectal surgeries were 0–9%. Some procedures required conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) or open surgery, and all procedures were completed successfully. Based on the studies reviewed in the present report, we conclude that the Versius robot can be used safely and effectively in MAS. Conclusions: A review of the published literature revealed that the Versius system is safe and effective in minimal access surgery. However, the data should be viewed with caution until randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed. Studies on the use of this robotic system in oncological surgery must include survival as one of the addressed outcomes.

A Historical Perspective of The Evolution of Laparoscopic Surgeries in Urology

Recent decades have seen the rapid progression of minimally invasive surgery in urology with continuing developments in robotic technology paving ways into a new era. In addition to these technological innovations, interests from urologists in developing and embracing new techniques have become a forefront in the ongoing evolution of the field allowing for improvement intraoperative experience as well as morbidity and mortality outcomes. This article aims to provide an overview of the historical development of laparoscopic surgery in urology whilst also providing a brief look into its future.

The Role of the Versius Surgical Robotic System in the Paediatric Population

The uptake of robot-assisted surgery has continuously grown since its advent in the 1990s. While robot-assisted surgery is well-established in adult surgery, the rate of uptake in paediatric surgical centres has been slower. The advantages of a robot-assisted system, such as improved visibility, dexterity, and ergonomics, could make it a superior choice over the traditional laparoscopic approach. However, its implementation in the paediatric surgery arena has been limited primarily due to the unavailability of appropriately sized instruments as per paediatric body habitus, therefore, requiring more technologically advanced systems. The Versius surgical robotic system is a new modular platform that offers several benefits such as articulated instruments which pass through conventional 5 mm ports, compact arms for easier manoeuvrability and patient access, the ability to mimic conventional port placements, and adaptive machine learning concepts. Prior to its introduction to paediatric surgery, it needs to go through a careful pre-clinical and clinical research program.

Telemedicine and Telementoring in Urology: A Glimpse of the Past and a Leap Into the Future

Telemedicine is the process of utilizing telecommunications and digital relay to perform, teach, or share medical knowledge. The digital era eased the incorporation of telemedicine to different areas of medical care, including the surgical care of Urologic patient mainly through telementoring, telesurgery, and telerobotics. Over the years, Telemedicine has played an integral part in a physicians' ability to provide high quality medical care to remote patients, as well as serve as an educational tool for trainee physicians, in the form of telementoring. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has played a vital role in combatting the health implications of confinements. Challenges of telemedicine implementation include cost, ethical considerations, security, bandwidth, latency, legal, and licensure difficulties. Nevertheless, the future of telemedicine, specifically telementoring, promises several improvements and innovative advancements that aim to bridge the gap in technological divides of urologic care. In this review, we build on what is already known about telemedicine focusing specifically on aspects related to telementoring, telestration, and telesurgery. Furthermore, we discuss its historical role in healthcare with a special emphasis on current and future use in urology.

Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: A real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures

OBJECTIVES

Comparison of retrospective, learning curve benign hysterectomy cost and case time data from Senhance total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) cases with similar da Vinci robot cases and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) cases.

METHODS

Instrument costs, console time, and case time analysis from six surgeons at four U.S. and European hospitals compared with retrospective, sequential da Vinci TLH and standard laparoscopic LAVH cases extracted from the CAVAlytics database.

RESULTS

Senhance Gyn surgeons in their learning curve when compared to da Vinci learning curve Gyn surgeons achieved lower median instrument costs ($559 vs. $1393, respectively, p < 0.001) with comparable console times (91.5 vs. 96 min, p = 0.898); Senhance and LAVH case costs were comparable ($559 vs. $498, p = 0.336).

CONCLUSION

In benign hysterectomy, the Senhance system may present a lower-cost approach with equivalent case times compared with similar da Vinci robotic cases.

Robotics-Assisted Pediatric Oncology Surgery-A Preliminary Single-Center Report and a Systematic Review of Published Studies

AIM

The use of robotics-assisted surgery in oncology has been proved effective and safe in adults. Despite these results, the use of robotics has been rarely reported for pediatric oncology. Our review aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotics-assisted surgery in this field, analyzing our experience and performing a systematic review of the most recent studies.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients affected by an oncological disease who underwent a robotics-assisted procedure at our institute. We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2012 to 2021 on the subjects.

FINDINGS

A total of 14 patients underwent robotics-assisted tumor resection. Eleven procedures (median age 13.2-years old) were carried out in children with adnexal lesions (seven tumor excision and four ovariectomies). Histological diagnosis was mature teratoma (six), serous papillary cystadenofibromas of the fallopian tube (two), ovarian serous cystadenoma (one), ovarian mucinous cystadenoma (one), and ovarian seromucinous cystadenoma. The median length of stay was 2 days. No recurrences or complications at a median follow-up of 2.1-years were observed. A 5-year-old girl underwent a complete posterior resection of a type 3 sacrococcygeal tumor with a robotics-assisted approach for the dissection of a possible intraabdominal residual component of the lesion. No intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. Complete excision of a recurrent differentiating neuroblastoma of the left para-renal region was performed on a 9-year-old girl. An idiopathic anaphylactic shock occurred 1 day after the procedure. At 9 months' follow-up, no local recurrences of the lesion were observed. Overall, we reported no conversion to open surgery. Lastly, a robotic excision of a growing left superior mediastinal intermixed ganglioneuroblastoma was performed on an 8-year-old girl with no postoperative complications. Follow-up was uneventful (7 months). In the literature, the rate of complications ranges from 0 to 28%, mainly related to difficult dissection and impaired anatomy. Conversion is reported in 5% of all oncological procedures, due to more invading tumors and altered anatomical features. No robotics-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Robotics-assisted surgery in pediatric oncology has proven to be feasible. Nevertheless, its use should be limited to selected cases and performed by highly trained oncological surgeons. Preparation and patient positioning, alongside a correct port placement, are crucial to carrying out these procedures. Further innovations in robotics may allow a wider application of this technology in pediatric oncology.