1
|
Porreca A, Colicchia M, Tafuri A, D'Agostino D, Busetto GM, Crestani A, Odorizzi K, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Gozzo A, Gallina S, Bianchi L, Ferro M, Falabella R, Romagnoli D, Antonelli A, Corsi P, Schiavina R. Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review. Urol Int 2021; 106:979-991. [PMID: 34569529 DOI: 10.1159/000518560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to systematically review the literature and describe perioperative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), including the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. METHODS All English language publications on HoLEP were evaluated. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to evaluate PubMed®, Scopus®, and Web of Science™ databases from January 1, 1998, to June 1, 2020. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies were included, for a total of 10,371 procedures. We distinguished between intra-, peri-, and postoperative complications. Overall, the rate of complications is 0-7%. Intraoperative complications include incomplete morcellation (2.3%), capsular perforation (2.2%), bladder (2.4%), and ureteric orifice (0.4%) injuries. Perioperative complications include postoperative urinary retention (0.2%), hematuria and clot retention (2.6%), and cystoscopy for clot evacuation (0.7%). Postoperative complications include dysuria (7.5%), stress (4.0%), urge (1.8%), transient (7%) and permanent (1.3%) urinary incontinence, urethral stricture (2%) and bladder neck contracture (1%). CONCLUSIONS HoLEP is a safe procedure, with a satisfactory low complication rate. The most common reported perioperative complications are not severe (Clavien-Dindo classification grades 1-2). Further randomized studies are certainly warranted to fully determine the predictor of surgical complications in order to prevent them and improve this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Colicchia
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme (PD), Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniele D'Agostino
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme (PD), Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Falabella
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Regionale di Potenza, Potenza, Italy
| | - Daniele Romagnoli
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme (PD), Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Corsi
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Franz J, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Pütz P, Sigle A, Lusuardi L, Netsch C, Lehrich K, Herrmann TRW, Gratzke C, Miernik A. Morcellation After Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: Efficiency and Safety of Currently Available Devices. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:532-544. [PMID: 33858810 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although several studies have compared different morcellators and enucleation techniques for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), there is sparse literature on morcellation, so further experimental and clinical research is required for its optimization. OBJECTIVE To critically appraise the contemporary literature on prostate morcellation and to evaluate the safety and efficiency of currently available morcellators for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) in the context of BPH. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive review of the English and French literature relevant to prostate morcellation was performed using the PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library database from 1998 to 2020 using PICOS (patient population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design) criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrieved 26 studies involving 5652 patients treated with a morcellator that were eligible for data extraction and analysis. The mean patient age was 67.4 (range 61.4-72.8) yr. The weighted mean efficiency of Piranha, VersaCut, and DrillCut morcellators was 5.29, 3.95, and 5.3 g/min, respectively. Several approaches, such as en bloc, two-lobe, inverse, and improved techniques, may increase morcellation efficiency and safety. The lowest weighted mean rate of bladder wall injury was 1.24% for Piranha, followed by 1.98% for DrillCut, and 5.23% for VersaCut, while the VersaCut morcellator had the lowest weighted mean rate of device malfunction at 0.74%, compared to 2.07% for Piranha and 7.86% for DrillCut. CONCLUSIONS All three morcellators are efficient and safe for prostatic morcellation after EEP. Further development of devices and techniques may improve the efficiency and safety profile of morcellation. To increase safety, surgeon expertise, technical equipment, and patient characteristics should be considered. Therefore, interdisciplinary exchange of knowledge and further technological innovations are strongly encouraged. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the safety and efficacy of devices called morcellators. These devices cut tissue into small pieces that are easier to remove from the body, and are used during laser surgery for benign enlargement of the prostate. Three morcellators are currently available on the market and are comparable in safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Franz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Pütz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Karin Lehrich
- Department of Urology, Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arkadiusz Miernik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Joshi H, Sali G, Paramore L, Jones R, Lazarowicz H, Kujawa ML, Pandit A, David R, Wilson K, Bates C, Shergill I, Gan C, El-Husseiny T, Mukhtar B, Appanna T, Veeratterapillay R, Harding C, Crockett M, Dawson C, Simpson R, Zelhof B, Starmer B, Mukherjee R, Bourdoumis A, Jelski J, Hashim H, McCabe J, Shaw G, Chow K, Betts C. Current process and outcomes of the surgical management of LUTS due to benign prostatic enlargement: how consistent are we? - results from the multi-institutional audit of surgical management of BPE (AuSuM BPE) in the United Kingdom. Scott Med J 2021; 66:58-65. [PMID: 33459189 DOI: 10.1177/0036933020977295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In view of changing landscape of surgical treatment for LUTS secondary to BPE, this audit was undertaken to assess key aspects of the processes and outcomes of the current interventional treatments for BPE, across different units in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHOD A multi-institutional snapshot audit was conducted for patients undergoing interventions for LUTS/BPE over 8-week period. Using Delphi process two-part proforma was designed to capture data. RESULTS 529 patients were included across 20 NHS trusts in England and Wales. Median age was 73 years. Indications for surgery were acute retention (47%) and LUTS (45%). 80% of patients had prior medical therapy. TURP formed the commonest procedure. 27% patients had <23 hour hospital stay. Immediate (21%) and delayed (18%) complications were Clavien-Dindo <2 category. High proportion of patients reported residual symptoms. Type and indication of surgery were significant predictor of complications, length of stay and failure of TWOC outcomes, on multivariate analyses. There were variations in departmental processes, 50% centres used PROMs. CONCLUSION Monopolar TURP still remains the commonest intervention for BPE. Most departments are adopting newer technologies. The audit identified opportunities for development of consistent, effective and patient centric practices as well as need for large-scale focused studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hrishi Joshi
- Consultant Urological Surgeon and Honorary lecturer, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, UK
| | - Gaurav Sali
- Clinical Fellow in Urology, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, UK
| | - Louise Paramore
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Wales, UK
| | - Richard Jones
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Henry Lazarowicz
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Magda Lucia Kujawa
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Stepping Hill Hospital, UK
| | - Amol Pandit
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Morriston Hospital, UK
| | - Rotimi David
- Clinical Fellow in Urology , Department of Urology, Morriston Hospital, UK
| | - Katherine Wilson
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, Royal Gwent Hospital, UK
| | - Christopher Bates
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Royal Gwent Hospital, UK
| | - I Shergill
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, UK
| | - Christine Gan
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital - Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - Tamer El-Husseiny
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital - Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - Bashir Mukhtar
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board Royal Glamorgan Hospital, UK
| | - Timson Appanna
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board Royal Glamorgan Hospital, UK
| | - Rajan Veeratterapillay
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christopher Harding
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Matthew Crockett
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christopher Dawson
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Richard Simpson
- Specialist Registrar in Urology, Department of Urology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Bachar Zelhof
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - B Starmer
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rono Mukherjee
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Andreas Bourdoumis
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Penine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Oldham Hospital, UK
| | - Joseph Jelski
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK
| | - H Hashim
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, UK
| | - John McCabe
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Karyee Chow
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christopher Betts
- Consultant Urological Surgeon, Department of Urology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Gabbay G, Bernhard JC, Renard O, Ballanger P, Ferriere JM, Fallot J, Comat V, Robert G. Énucléation de la prostate au laser Holmium en chirurgie ambulatoire : évaluation prospective des 30 premiers patients. Prog Urol 2015; 25:34-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Revised: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|