Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: focus on pazopanib

Combination immune checkpoint and targeted protein kinase inhibitors for the treatment of renal cell carcinomas

Kidney cancers comprise about 3% of all new malignancies in the United States. Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are the most common type of renal malignancy making up about 85% of kidney cancer cases. Signs and symptoms of renal cell carcinomas can result from local tumor growth, paraneoplastic syndromes, or distant metastases. The classic triad of presentation with flank pain, hematuria, and a palpable abdominal mass occurs in fewer than 10% of patients. Most diagnoses result from incidental imaging findings (ultrasonography or abdominal CT imaging) performed for another reason. Localized disease is treated by partial nephrectomy, total nephrectomy, or ablation (tumor destruction with heat or cold). When the tumors have metastasized, systemic therapy with protein-tyrosine kinase antagonists including sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, and tivozanib that target vascular endothelial, platelet-derived, fibroblast, hepatocyte, and stem cell factor growth factor receptors (VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, MET, and Kit) were prescribed after 2005. The monoclonal antibody immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (targeting programed cell death protein 1, PD1) was approved for the treatment of RCCs in 2015. It is usually used now in combination with ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4) or cabozantinib (a multikinase blocker). Other combination therapies include pembrolizumab (targeting PD1) and axitinib (a VEGFR and PDGFR blocker) or lenvatinib (a multikinase inhibitor). Since the KEYNOTE-426 clinical trial, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors is now the standard of care for most patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas and monotherapies are used only in those individuals who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors.

A systematic review to summarize treatment patterns, guidelines, and characteristics of patients with renal cell carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review evaluated treatment patterns and guidelines in advanced/metastatic and adjuvant renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Asia-Pacific region.

AREAS COVERED

Embase, PubMed, and congresses were searched for observational studies and guidelines in accordance with PRISMA. Records published during 2016-2021 (2019-2021 for congresses) were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Nine studies and three guidelines were identified overall. In advanced/metastatic RCC, the most common treatments were tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (notably sunitinib: 33-100%) for first-line, and everolimus (13-85%) or axitinib (2-89%) for second-line therapy. In adjuvant RCC, sunitinib was most used (54%), followed by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis, 27%) with immunotherapy being less common (16%). The guidelines provided varying recommendations for advanced/metastatic RCC. For first-line in advanced/metastatic clear cell RCC (the most common subtype), guidelines recommended mTORis (everolimus for poor-risk patients) (India, 2016); clinical study enrollment for high-risk patients or TKIs for low- to medium-risk patients (China, 2019); or immunotherapy based on survival benefits over sunitinib; dose adjustment was also recommended to manage TKI toxicities (Hong Kong, 2019). The landscape remained more static in the adjuvant setting, but best practice was uncertain. No clear trends were identified in patient characteristics.

Vascular mimicry induced by m6A mediated IGFL2-AS1/AR axis contributes to pazopanib resistance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a lethal sub-type of kidney cancer. Vascular mimicry (VM) has been postulated as an alternative route to supply tumors with nutrients, playing key role in tumor development. Whether VM development is linked to pazopanib efficacy, however, remains unclear. Here, our in vitro and in vivo models identified that VM development was profoundly increased in pazopanib resistant ccRCC as compared to the sensitive controls, which was due to the activation of IGFL2-AS1/AR/TWIST1 signaling. IGFL2-AS1, a m⁶A modified long coding RNA, was demethylated by METTL3/METTL14 complex and stabilized owing to its failing recognition by YTHDF2 upon chronic pazopanib treatment. Further mechanistic dissection illustrated that IGFL2-AS1 physically interacted with the 5'-UTR AR mRNA and neutralized the negative regulation of 5'-uORF (upstream open reading frame) on AR translation. Indeed, IGFL2-AS1 short of AR binding region failed to promote AR expression, VM formation and pazopanib resistance. In vivo xenografted mouse model also elucidated that inhibition of AR activity with enzalutamide or silence of IGFL2-AS1 with siRNAs all led to retarded growth of pazopanib resistant ccRCC tumors. Together, these results suggest that IGFL2-AS1 may represent a key player to mediate pazopanib-induced VM formation of ccRCC cells via regulating AR expression and targeting this newly identified IGFL2-AS1/AR signaling may help us to better suppress ccRCC VM formation and to increase the therapeutic efficacy of pazopanib.

Research progress on advanced renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a malignant tumor and the third most common urinary disease. It was estimated that RCC affected over 350,000 individuals in 2013, and there are nearly 140,000 deaths annually due to this disease. The initial masses in RCC patients are mostly confined to a single organ. However, due to the metastatic spread of cancer cells through the circulatory system, more than 30% of RCC patients relapse after surgery. The appearance of distant metastases often means that patients enter the advanced stage of cancer with low quality of life and a short expected survival time. This review aims to describe the extant research on advanced RCC, including its pathophysiology, heterogeneity, diagnosis, treatment, and prospects. We try to highlight the most suitable means of treating advanced RCC patients, focusing on comprehensive personalized treatments.

Systemic treatment of the metastatic renal cell carcinoma: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion-weighted MRI in prediction of early therapeutic response

Accurate prediction of early treatment response to systemic therapy (ST) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) could help avoid ineffective and expensive treatment with serious side effects. Neither RECIST v.1.1 nor Choi criteria successfully discriminate between patients with mRCC who received ST having a short or long time to progression (TTP). There is no biomarker, which is able to predict early therapeutic response to TKIs application in patients with mRCC. The goal of our study was to investigate the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of MRI in prediction of early therapeutic response to ST with pazopanib in patients with mRCC. The retrospective study enrolled 32 adult patients with conventional mRCC who received pazopanib (mean duration-7.5 ± 3.45). The mean duration of follow-up was 11.85 ± 4.34 months. In all patients as baseline examination and 1 month after treatment, 1.5T MRI including DWI sequence was performed followed by ADC measurement of the main renal lesion. For assessment of the therapeutic response, RECIST 1.1 is used. Partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were observed in 12 (37.50%), 10 (31.25%) and 10 (31.25%) cases with mean TTP of 10.33 ± 2.06 months (95% confidence interval, CI = 9.05-11.61), 7.40 ± 2.50 months (95% CI = 5.61-9.19) and 4.20 ± 1.99 months (95% CI = 2.78-5.62) accordingly (p < 0.05). There was no difference in change of main lesions' longest size 1 month after ST in patients with PR, SD and PD. Comparison of mean ADC values before and 1 month after systemic treatment showed significant decrease by 19.11 ± 10.64% (95% CI = 12.35-25.87) and by 7.66 ± 6.72% (95% CI = 2.86-12.47) in subgroups with PR and SD, respectively (p < 0.05). There was shorter TTP in patients with mRCC if ADC of the main renal lesion 1 month after the ST increased from the baseline less than 1.73% compared to patients with ADC levels above this threshold: 5.29 ± 3.45 versus 9.50 ± 2.04 months accordingly (p < 0.001). Overall, our findings highlighted the use of ADC as a predictive biomarker for early therapeutic response assessment. Use of ADC will be effective and useful for reliable prediction of responders and non-responders to systemic treatment with pazopanib.

Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Carcinoma: an Update

Conventional chemotherapy is associated with poor outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Advances in the understanding of tumor molecular biology and the implementation of new drugs that target these molecular pathways have increased the arsenal against advanced RCC and improved outcomes in these patients. Herein, we briefly describe the latest data on targeted therapies used in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Search strategy was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts of relevant studies published in PubMed between 2000 and 2014 were analyzed by two authors. Abstracts were selected if they were published in English, data reported was of phase II or III clinical trials, and outcomes followed FDA approval. If consensus between the two authors was achieved, they were included in the review. Key words used were “target therapy” and “metastatic renal cell carcinoma”. The results of the studies analyzed in this review support the benefits of targeted therapy in metastatic RCC. These include improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life as well as reduced toxicities compared to immunotherapy. The improvement in outcomes in metastatic RCC makes these drugs a preferred option as a primary treatment for these patients.

Evaluation of acute locoregional toxicity in patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in combination with pazopanib

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze acute locoregional toxicity in patients with breast cancer receiving concurrent pazopanib and RT. Materials and Methods. Patients with breast cancer who received pazopanib in combination with radiation were identified and matched (2 : 1) to patients with breast cancer who did not receive pazopanib by use of chemotherapy, radiation field design, and radiation dose. Toxicity was scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and statistical analysis was performed. Results. Grade 1 or 2 radiation dermatitis was seen in 100% and 84% of pazopanib and RT patients and matched controls respectively (P = NS). None of the patients receiving pazopanib and RT experienced ≥ grade 3 toxicity within the irradiated volume; three (16%) matched patients experienced a grade 3 skin reaction (P = 0.05). Interestingly, grade 1 or 2 hyperpigmentation was seen in 17% of pazopanib and RT patients and 60% of matched controls (P = 0.005). Conclusion. The addition of concurrent pazopanib and RT when treating the intact breast, chest wall, and associated nodal regions in breast cancer seems to be safe and well tolerated.