Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a surface antigen-negative and antibody-positive patient after rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy

Recurrence and influencing factors of hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance induced by peginterferon alpha-based regimens

BACKGROUND

The long-term stability of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance following peginterferon alpha (peg-IFN-α)-based therapy has not been extensively studied, leaving the full potential and limitations of this strategy unclear.

AIM

To assess HBsAg recurrence after seroclearance achieved by peg-IFN-α regimens.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted from November 2015 to June 2021 at three Chinese hospitals: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Ankang Central Hospital, and The Affiliated Hospital of Yan'an University. Participants who achieved HBsAg seroclearance following peg-IFN-α-based treatments were monitored every 4-12 weeks post-treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers, HBV DNA, and liver function. The primary outcome was HBV recurrence, defined as the reemergence of HBsAg, HBV DNA, or both, at least twice within 4-8 weeks of follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 121 patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 84.0 (48.0, 132.0) weeks, four subjects were lost to follow-up. HBsAg recurrence was detected in 16 patients. The cumulative HBsAg recurrence rate in the intention-to-treat population was 15.2%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that consolidation time < 12 weeks [odds ratio (OR) = 28.044, 95%CI: 4.525-173.791] and hepatitis B surface antibody disappearance during follow-up (OR = 46.445, 95%CI: 2.571-838.957) were strong predictors of HBsAg recurrence. HBV DNA positivity and decompensation of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were not observed.

CONCLUSION

HBsAg seroclearance following peg-IFN-α treatment was durable over 84 weeks of follow-up with a cumulative recurrence rate of 15.2%.

Development and validation of a nomogram for steroid-resistance prediction in immune thrombocytopenia patients

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroid is first-line therapy in immune thrombocytopenia. However, nearly 30% of patients appear in steroid-resistance. Our research analyses the relevant indicators of patients and develops a risk prediction model to predict the poor response to steroid-therapy in ITP patients.

METHODS

We collected data from 111 ITP patients admitted to Xiamen University Zhongshan Hospital from 2013 to 2019 as the training cohort and 65 ITP patients during 2019-2020 as the external validation cohort. Screening significant factors(P < 0.05) in univariate analysis, and further identified to be independent variables in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Incorporated the significant risk factors in and presented them with a nomogram based on independent risk predictors. The nomogram was assessed by receiver operating characteristics curves and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

We constructed a steroid-resistance prediction model based on the potential predictors including age, serum ferritin and expression of HBsAg. As a result, based on the area under the ROC curves, the training cohort (AUC: 0.718, 95% CI: 0.615-0.821) and the external validation cohort (AUC:0.799,95%CI:0.692-0.905), which displayed good discrimination. The decision curve showed that predicting the steroid-refractory risk in ITP patients using this nomogram with a range of the threshold probability between >16% and <70%. The nomogram appears good performance in predicting steroid-refractory ITP patients.

CONCLUSION

Prediction model shows that elder patients with a high level of ferritin and positive expression of HBsAg may appear a high possibility of steroid-resistance. For these patients, TPO-RAs can be considered to help patients to get better treatment effects and develop a better health-related quality of life.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation with corticosteroid therapy in patients with adrenal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Whether or not reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) might occur during corticosteroid therapy in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients with adrenal insufficiency was investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 66 patients with adrenal insufficiency undergoing physiological corticosteroid replacement therapy at Saitama Medical University Hospital between June 2013 and June 2014, and 220 patients with rheumatic disease receiving a pharmacologic dose of corticosteroids served as the positive control group. The latter group was separated into 101 patients treated only with corticosteroids, and 119 patients given corticosteroids plus immunosuppressants and/or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). HBsAg and antibody (Ab) levels against HBs, and hepatitis B core (HBc) were determined in all the patients. In patients with positive HBsAb and/or HBcAb, real-time PCR was performed for HBV-DNA. The incidence rates of conversion to HBV-DNA-positive status were evaluated.

RESULTS

Hepatitis B virus reactivation occurred in six patients with rheumatic disease, three of whom were receiving a pharmacological dose of corticosteroids only, and three who were receiving corticosteroids with immunosuppressants and/or DMARDs. However, no reactivation occurred in patients receiving corticosteroid replacements for adrenal insufficiency. Maintenance and maximum corticosteroid doses administered to patients with rheumatic disease were significantly greater than those in patients with adrenal insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, although corticosteroid replacement therapy for adrenal insufficiency might be safe with respect to HBV reactivation, attention should be paid to HBV reactivation during corticosteroid therapy in rheumatic disease patients, since the dose of corticosteroids administered is usually large, and since other immunosuppressants are co-administered.

Giving rituximab in patients with occult or resolved hepatitis B virus infection: are the current guidelines good enough?

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after 'resolved' infection can occur in the setting of immunosuppression, including iatrogenically induced by anti-CD20 antibodies. The presence of antibodies against the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) is a marker of risk for this phenomenon. The risk of this occurring in patients with circulating HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) is well characterized, but is less well characterized in patients who are HBsAg negative.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the literature regarding HBV reactivation in the context of rituximab therapy. We have limited our review to HBsAg-negative patients, and clinical outcomes following HBV reactivation.

EXPERT OPINION

We have recommended prophylactic anti-viral therapy for all HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients undergoing rituximab therapy in combination with other immunosuppressive therapy.

A Case of Reactivation of Hepatitis B and Fulminant Hepatitis which developed 3 months following Chemotherapy Including Rituximab in a Patient with Lymphoma

<title>Abstract Since Wands et al. reported for the first time in 1975 the reactivation of the hepatitis B virus in hematologic disease patients who had been receiving chemotherapy, the efficacy of chemotherapy and immunosuppressants has improved. As a result, the frequency of the reactivation of hepatitis B is increasing. Reported herein is a case of a non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient in her 70s who was suspected to have had HBsAg negative/anti-HBs negative occult HBV infection. The patient experienced fulminant hepatitis caused by the reactivation of hepatitis B, and died three months after the R-CHOP regimen was completed. In the HBsAg negative plus HBV DNA-negative case, there were few instances of viral activation of HBV. In this case, antiviral therapy was needed when the patient was confirmed to have become HBV DNA positive through regular monitoring, but its necessity is often overlooked, unlike the preemptive antiviral treatment in the HBsAg positive cases.</p>

[Occult hepatitis B virus infection: transmission and reactivation]

Occult HBV infection (OBI) is defined as presence of HBV DNA in the liver tissue in patients with serologically undetectable HBsAg. There are differences in virologic and serological profiles of OBI. Majority of OBI are positive for anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc and minor portion are negative for all HBV markers. However, there are no HBV mutations in the surface and its regulatory regions. HBV infection persists by the presence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) within the infected hepatocytes, which serves as a reservoir for future infection. OBI increases the risk of HBV transmission through transfusion, hemodialysis, and organ transplantation. Therefore effective measures should be employed to screen OBI. Antiviral therapy is needed in HBsAg-negative transplant patients who are anti-HBc positive to prevent the recurrence of HBV infection. Since HBV replication is strongly suppressed by immune surveillance system in OBI patients, immunosuppression results in massive HBV replication. This leads to acute hepatitis and sometimes mortality when immune surveillance is recovered after stopping immunosuppressive drugs/anticancer chemotherapy. Therefore, narrow surveillance is required to recognize the viral reactivation and start antiviral agents during immunosuppressive therapy/anticancer chemotherapy in patients with OBI.

Highly sensitive detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen by use of a semiautomated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay

The performance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening assays is continuously improved to reduce the risk of transfusion-associated hepatitis B. In this study, a semiautomated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (ICT-CLEIA) for the detection of HBsAg, which is as sensitive as hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA PCR, was developed; the ICT-CLEIA assay performance was compared with the performance of the Architect HBsAg QT assay and HBV DNA PCR. The specificities in the initial assay and after retesting were 99.50% (1,988/1,998 samples) and 99.95% (1,997/1,998 samples), respectively. The analytical detection limit was determined to be 0.2 mIU/ml using the 2nd International WHO HBsAg standard, and the cutoff value (0.5 mIU/ml) of the ICT-CLEIA assay was 8.0 standard deviations (SD) above the mean of the HBsAg-negative specimens. The ICT-CLEIA assay could detect HBsAg even in the presence of anti-HBs antibodies and demonstrated a 23.6-day-shorter window period using commercially available HBsAg seroconversion panels than the Architect HBsAg QT assay. Furthermore, the monitoring of the viral kinetics by the ICT-CLEIA assay and the HBV DNA PCR produced very similarly shaped curves during both the HBsAg seroconversion and reverse seroconversion periods. Therefore, the ICT-CLEIA assay may be useful not only for an earlier detection of HBV reactivation but also for the monitoring of hepatitis B patients.

Occult hepatitis B: clinical viewpoint and management

Occult HBV infection (OBI) is defined as HBV DNA detection in serum or in the liver by sensitive diagnostic tests in HBsAg-negative patients with or without serologic markers of previous viral exposure. OBI seems to be higher among subjects at high risk for HBV infection and with liver disease. OBI can be both a source of virus contamination in blood and organ donations and the reservoir for full blown hepatitis after reactivation. HBV reactivation depends on viral and host factors but these associations have not been analyzed thoroughly. In OBI, it would be best to prevent HBV reactivation which inhibits the development of hepatitis and subsequent mortality. In diverse cases with insufficient data to recommend routine prophylaxis, early identification of virologic reactivation is essential to start antiviral therapy. For retrieving articles regarding OBI, various databases, including OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, were used.

Fatal hepatitis B reactivation treated with entecavir in an isolated anti-HBs positive lymphoma patient: a case report and literature review

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-recognized complication that occurs in lymphoma patients who undergo chemotherapy. Only very few cases of HBV reactivation in patients with isolated antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) have been reported. We present a case of a 78-year-old woman diagnosed with diffuse large B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who only displayed a positive anti-HBs, as the single possible marker of occult HBV infection, before starting therapy. She was treated with several chemotherapeutic regimens (including rituximab) for disease relapses during 3 years. Forty days after the last cycle of chemotherapy, she presented with jaundice, markedly elevated serum aminotransferase levels, and coagulopathy. HBV serology showed positivity for HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs. HBV DNA was positive. Antiviral treatment with entecavir was promptly initiated, but the patient died from liver failure. A review of the literature of HBV reactivation in patients with detectable anti-HBs levels is discussed.

Choice of Biologic Therapy for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Infection Perspective

Biologicals revolutionized the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). The targeted suppression of key inflammatory pathways involved in joint inflammation and destruction allows better disease control, which, however, comes at the price of an elevated infection risk due to relative immunosuppression. The disease-related infection risk and the infection risk associated with the use of TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab and certolizumab pegol), rituximab, abatacept and tocilizumab are discussed. Risk factors clinicians need to take into account when selecting the most appropriate biologic therapy for RA patients, as well as precautions and screening concerning a number of specific infections, such as tuberculosis, intracellular bacterial infections, reactivation of chronic viral infections and HIV are reviewed.

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus following rituximab-plus-steroid combination chemotherapy

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been reported as a fatal complication following systemic chemotherapy or other immunosuppressive therapy. The risk of HBV reactivation differs according to both the patient's HBV infection status prior to systemic chemotherapy and the degree of immunosuppression due to chemotherapy. For establishing an optimal strategy for hepatitis prevention and treatment, it is necessary to understand the characteristics, the clinical course and the risk factors for HBV reactivation and to recognize the difference between hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and -negative patients with HBV reactivation. Among the important viral risk factors, HBV-DNA level and HBV-related serum markers have been reported to be associated with HBV reactivation in addition to cccDNA, genotypes and gene mutations. Rituximab-plus-steroid combination chemotherapy has recently been identified as a host risk factor for HBV reactivation in hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive and/or hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) positive--but nonetheless HBsAg-negative--lymphoma patients. For these patients with resolved hepatitis B, preemptive therapy guided by serial HBV-DNA monitoring is a reasonable strategy to enable early diagnosis of HBV reactivation and initiation of antiviral therapy. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of HBV reactivation following rituximab-plus-steroid combination chemotherapy, mainly in HBsAg-negative lymphoma patients, and propose a strategy for managing HBV reactivation.

[Fulminant hepatic failure with hepatitis B virus reactivation after rituximab treatment in a patient with resolved hepatitis B]

It is well known that the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) may occur as an acute hepatitis after chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Although most of these cases have been reported in HBsAg-positive patients, there have been a few reports of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative patients. There have been concerns for the need to screen the reactivation as well as anti-viral prophylaxis in HBsAg-negative patients with possible HBV occult infection who are planning to undergo chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is effective in the treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. However, rituximab can affect the immunity against HBV, consequently increasing viral replication. In fact, there have been reports of HBV reactivation after treatment with rituximab. Here, we report a case of HBV reactivation following rituximab plus systemic chemotherapy in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patient who was HBsAg negative, anti-HBs positive, and anti-HBc positive, ultimately leading to treatment-unresponsive fulminant hepatic failure.

Exacerbation of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura following reactivation of an occult hepatitis B

Immune thrombocytopenia is a disease mediated by platelet autoantibodies that accelerate platelet destruction and inhibit their production. Most cases are considered idiopathic, whereas others are secondary to coexisting conditions such as infectious diseases. All hepatotropic viruses seem able to cause thrombocytopenia. The advent of molecular techniques has revealed the possible persistence of hepatitis B virus genome in HBsAg-negative individuals with or without serologic markers of previous infection. This form of infection is named occult. We report a case of autoimmune thrombocytopenia associated with acute reverse seroconversion of hepatitis B in a patient who was initially hepatitis B virus surface antigen negative and hepatitis B virus surface antibody positive. The search for occult HBV infection before immunosuppressive therapy and monitoring for reactivation is today diagnostic standard and several reports have been presented in literature about HBV reactivation following immunosuppressive therapy. In our patient, reactivation of dormant HBV happened prior to any immunosuppressive therapy. The case we report offers the occasion to emphasize the importance of medium-term and long-term hemovigilance also in other kind of patients than in subjects on immunosuppressive therapy. A deeper follow-up is advisable even in patients showing an unexplainable worsening of their hematological conditions.