The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study (KROG 11-06) Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Age is a significant biomarker for the selection of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of combined chemotherapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

Five hundred and thirty-eight patients diagnosed with LA-NPC and treated with NACT + RT or CCRT alone were enrolled in the study. Restricted cubic spline regression (RCS) was used to determine the relationship between age and the hazard Ratio of death. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) related to NACT + RT or CCRT alone. Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Compared with the CCRT alone regimen, the NACT + RT regimen showed a significantly better OS rate with a 62% decreased risk of death in a subgroup of patients aged ⩾ 45 years (hazard ratio, HR: 0.38; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.24-0.61). In patients aged < 45 years, the risk of death was significantly increased when NACT + RT was chosen compared with CCRT (HR: 4.10; 95% CI: 2.09-8.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Age is a significant biomarker when selecting NACT + RT or CCRT alone in patients with advanced NPC.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with additional chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of propensity score-matching studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy (IC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on propensity score-matching (PSM) studies.

METHODS

Eligible PSM studies were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from inception to September 1, 2020. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials consisting of 4086 participants were included. Significant benefits were observed between IC + CCRT and CCRT for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91) and DMFS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) with the exception of LRFS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI: 0.90-1.43). However, CCRT + AC did not achieve significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

IC with CCRT yields significant survival benefits in terms of OS and DMFS, whereas CCRT with AC fails to achieve any additional benefit in all endpoints.

Effect of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background

Previous meta-analysis had evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. But two trials with opposite findings were not included and the long-term result of another trial significantly differed from the preliminary report. This updated meta-analysis was thus warranted.

Methods

Literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on the additional efficacy of induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Trial-level pooled analysis of hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival and overall survival and risk ratio (RR) for locoregional control rate and distant control rate were performed.

Results

Twelve trials were eligible. The addition of induction chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression free survival (HR=0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.76, p<0.001) and overall survival (HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.80, p<0.001), with 5-year absolute benefit of 11.31% and 8.95%, respectively. Locoregional (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.92, p=0.002) and distant control (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.62–0.80) rates were significantly improved as well. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events during the concurrent chemoradiotherapy was higher in leukopenia (p=0.028), thrombocytopenia (p<0.001), and fatigue (p=0.038) in the induction chemotherapy group.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis supported that induction chemotherapy could benefit patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in progression free survival, overall survival, locoregional, and distant control rate.

Less is more: role of additional chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer management

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) has played the most important and central role in the definitive therapy for the patients with locoregionally advanced stage nasopharynx cancer. The addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to CCRT have been widely accepted with the rationale of improving distant control in the clinical practices. This review article investigated the role of IC and AC based on 11 recent meta-analysis publications, and found that the clinical benefits obtained by the additional IC or AC to CCRT, at the cost of the increased risks of more frequent and more severe side effects, seemed not big enough. More intervention is not always better, however, less seems frequently good enough. The author would speculate that 'less is more' and would advocate CCRT alone as the current standard.

A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma has high risk of distant metastasis and mortality. Induction chemotherapy is commonly administrated in clinical practice, but the efficacy was quite controversial in and out of randomized controlled trials. We thus conducted this pairwise meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Trials that randomized patients to receive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy were identified via searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

A total of ten trials (2,627 patients) were included. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) based on fixed effect model were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.80, p < .001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.61-0.79, p < .001) for progression-free survival (PFS), which strongly favored the addition of induction chemotherapy. The absolute 5-year survival benefits were 8.47% in OS and 10.27% in PFS, respectively. In addition, based on the available data of eight trials, induction chemotherapy showed significant efficacy in reducing locoregional failure rate (risk ratio [RR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96, p = .017) and distant metastasis rate (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.82, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This pairwise meta-analysis confirms the benefit in OS, PFS, and locoregional and distant controls associated with the addition of induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

According to the results of this meta-analysis of ten trials, induction chemotherapy can prolong overall survival and progression-free survival and improve locoregional and distant controls for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Longitudinal Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Evaluating the Radio-sensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI)was evaluated regarding its ability to preliminarily predict the short-term treatment response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) following intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Materials and Methods

IVIM-DWI with 14 b-factors (0-1,000 sec/mm²) was performed with a 3T MR system on 47 consecutive NPCs before, during (end of the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, and 25th fractions), and after fractional radiotherapy. IVIM parametrics (D, f, and D*) were calculated and compared to the baseline and xth fraction. Patients were categorized into responders and non-responders after radiotherapy. IVIM parametrics were also compared between subgroups.

Results

After fractional radiations, the D (except D₅ and D at the end of the 5th fraction) after radiations were larger than the baseline D₀ (p < 0.05), and the post-radiation D* (except D*₅ and D*10) were smaller than D*₀ (p < 0.05). f₀ was smaller than f₅ and f₁₀ (p < 0.001) but larger than f_end (p < 0.05). Furthermore, greater D₅, D₁₀, D₁₅, and f₁₀ coupled with smaller f₀, D*₂₀, and D*₂₅ were observed in responders than non-responders (all p < 0.01). Responders also presented larger ΔD₁₀, Δf₁₀, ΔD*₂₀, and δD*₂₀ than non-responders (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the D₅, D*₂₀, and f₁₀ could better differentiate responders from non-responders.

Conclusion

IVIM-DWI could efficiently assess tumor treatment response to fractional radiotherapy and predict the radio-sensitivity for NPCs.

TPF induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Long term results of a Tunisian series

PURPOSE

We represent in this study the long term results of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Tunisian patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The objective of our study is to analyse the efficacy as well as the toxicity of this therapeutic protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2008, 32 patients with locoregional advanced non metastatic disease (T2b or above and/or N1 or above AJCC 2002) were treated in our institution by three cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy every 21 days followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Conventional radiotherapy was delivered using a cobalt 60 machine during 7 weeks with weekly cisplatin (40mg/m²).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (90%) had presented an objective clinical response in lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a complete response in 28%. Acute toxicity of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy was dominated by vomiting (59%), asthenia (40.6%), diarrhea (34.4%) and febrile neutropenia (15.6%). The complete response rate after the end of treatment was around 80%. The 5 years overall survival and disease-free survival were respectively 68.2% and 67.5%.

CONCLUSION

Our results, in this field of study, are encouraging with acceptable toxicity despite the lack of intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique in our institution during the period of study.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT-AC) is currently recommended as the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NAC-CCRT) is an alternative strategy for decreasing tumor size and controlling micrometastases before main treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare survival outcomes between LA-NPC patients treated with CCRT-AC and those treated with NAC-CCRT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive histologically confirmed LA-NPC patients that were treated with NAC-CCRT or CCRT-AC at Siriraj Hospital during the March 2010 to October 2014 study period. CCRT in both protocols consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m² with concurrent radiotherapy. Either NAC or AC consisted of 3-week cycles of cisplatin on day 1 and fluorouracil/leucovorin on days 1-4 for a maximum three cycles. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Flexible parametric survival analysis was used, because the proportional hazards assumption of Cox regression was violated.

RESULTS

Of the 266 LA-NPC patients that received treatment during the study period, 79 received NAC-CCRT and 187 received CCRT-AC. Median follow-up was 37 months. Significantly more patients with advanced clinical stage (stage IVA-IVB) received NAC-CCRT (86% in NAC-CCRT vs. 29% in CCRT-AC; p < 0.001). Compared to CCRT-AC in crude analysis, 3-year and 5-year OS of NAC-CCRT were 72% vs. 86% and 62% vs. 75% respectively (p = 0.059). Interestingly, the 3-year and 5-year post-estimation adjusted OS was 84% and 74% for NAC-CCRT and 81% and 70% for CCRT-AC, respectively (HR: 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.56; p = 0.571). Also, adjusted analysis of distant-metastasis survival, NAC-CCRT showed HR was 0.79 (95% CI:0.37-1.72, p = 0.557). Conversely, adjusted analysis of locoregional relapse (LLR)-free survival revealed NAC-CCRT to have a significantly higher risk of LRR (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.98-4.87; p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that prognosis in the NAC-CCRT treated patients was not superior to that of the CCRT-AC treated individuals. In patients that receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, locoregional relapse should be of concern. High-risk distant metastasis patients (N3 stage) that could achieve survival advantage from NAC-CCRT is an interesting and important topic for further study.

Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine if the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) to concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) can improve survival.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OBS) to compare the effects of addition of IC to CCRT versus (vs) CCRT alone on overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and adverse events (AE) in LA-NPC. We searched MEDLINE for eligible studies comparing IC plus CCRT vs CCRT for LA-NPC from Jan 1996 to May 2017. We selected RCTs and OBS that included patients with non-metastatic, LA-NPC who received IC followed by CCRT or CCRT alone. Three reviewers independently assessed the abstracts for eligibility. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the MERGE criteria. We performed the meta-analysis with random effects model. We used the GRADE approach to appraise the quality of evidence from RCTs. The primary outcome was OS; secondary outcomes included PFS, DMFS and AE.

RESULTS

We found six RCTs and five OBS including 2802 patients with low to moderate risk of bias in their methodological quality. There was high quality evidence from the RCTs that IC improved PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.84, P = 0.0003, I² = 0%) and OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98, P = 0.03, I² = 0%) significantly and was associated with more frequent AE. The estimates of IC effects from RCTs and OBS were similar (PFS HR 0.69 vs 0.71, interaction P (IP) = 0.92; OS HR 0.77 vs 0.58, IP = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

IC delays disease progression and improves survival significantly for LA-NPC treated with CCRT, and was associated with more toxicity. There were no divergent results between RCTs and OBS. IC followed by CCRT can be considered one of the standard treatment options for LA-NPC.

Compliance with National Guidelines on the Treatment of Stage II–IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Regional Cancer Center of Southern China

Objective: It is unknown whether the treatment provided to patients with stage II-IVB NPC in southern China adheres to the 2015 NCCN guidelines. Consequently, a retrospective analysis was conducted, in order to evaluate the compliance with NCCN guidelines and identify the areas for improvement. Methods: The present study was a retrospective study that included patients with stage II-IVB NPC in southern China during the period 2013 and 2014. The treatment regimens were compared with the 2015 NCCN guidelines in order to identify potential noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II–IVB NPC. The statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, univariate and/or multivariate analysis using SPSS version 16.0.0. Results: A total of 215 patients, including 166 men (77.21%) and 49 women (22.79%), were involved in the analysis. Although the overall rate of noncompliance with the NCCN recommendations was 23.26%, the noncompliance rate of concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT), induction of chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT and CCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was 7.02%, 39.76% and 50.00%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that NCCN noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II-IVB NPC did not exhibit a significant correlation with the parameters age, gender, insurance status, education profile, first clinic department, careers, comorbidities and overall clinical stage, but it indicated a significant association with the therapeutic schedule (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis indicated that the NCCN noncompliance regarding the treatment for stage II–IVB NPC exhibited a statistically significant difference between CCRT and CCRT followed by AC (OR=0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, P<0.05 ), although the difference noted between CCRT and IC followed by CCRT was not significantly different (OR=1.71, 95% CI 0.50-5.87,P=0.40). Conclusions: The use of specific therapeutic schedules may affect the noncompliance with NCCN guidelines regarding the treatment for stage II–IVB NPC in southern China, notably with regard to the treatment schedule of CCRT followed by AC.

Cycle number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy might influence survival of patients with T1-4N2-3M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Objective

Stage N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) shows a high risk of distant metastasis, which will finally cause death. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of various cycles before radical radiotherapy on distant metastasis and survival of patients with stage N2-3 diseases.

Methods

In this study, a total of 1,164 consecutive patients with non-metastatic N2-3 NPC were recruited and prospectively observed. Then 231 patients who received NACT of 4 cycles (NACT=4 group) were matched 1:2:1 to 462 patients treated with NACT of 2 cycles (NACT=2 group) and 231 patients treated without NACT (NACT=0 group), according to age, histological subtype, N stage and NACT regimen. Five candidate variables (sex, T stage, concurrent chemotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and cycle number of NACT) were analyzed for their association with patients' survival.

Results

After matching, the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant-metastasis-free survival (MFS) of the NACT=4 group (89.2%, 81.0%, 83.3% and 84.8%, respectively) were better than those of the NACT=2 group (83.3%, 72.5%, 81.2% and 77.9%, respectively) and the NACT=0 group (74.0%, 63.2%, 74.0% and 68.8%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the cycle number of NACT maintained statistical significance on the OS, DFS, RFS and MFS (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

For N2-3 NPC, cycle number of NACT appeared to be an independent factor associated with an improvement of survival.

Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs CCRT alone for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy using propensity score matching method

PURPOSE

Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) could improve survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains controversial especially in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and we explored the role of NCT for NPC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 255 NPC patients treated with NCT+CCRT (n=67) or CCRT alone (n=188) based on IMRT between December 2006 and December 2012. To control the imbalance, a 1:2 match was performed using propensity score matching (PSM) method based on patient's heterogeneity and regimens of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT). The long-term treatment outcomes and toxicity between NCT group (n=67) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group (n=134) after PSM were compared.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were 78.8%, 69.1%, 90.0%, 90.0%, 100% and 78.3% for NCT group, while 79.5%, 75.7%, 92.7%, 94.2%, 96.1% and 82.7% for CRT group (P=0.305, 0.448, 0.790, 0.512, 0.104 and 0.671). It indicated that the treatment method (NCT+CCRT vs CCRT) was not the independent prognostic factor for the survival in NPC patients, and only patients who had completed at least two cycles of CCT got better OS, RFS and DFFS (P=0.009, 0.016 and 0.043), whether to receive NCT or not. No difference in the incidences of any acute and most late toxicity between the two groups was shown.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not show the exact advantage of NCT followed by CCRT compared with CCRT alone or higher incidences of toxicity in NCT group. It suggests that NCT might not be necessary if two or more cycles of CCT are finished well in the era of IMRT, and when NCT is finished well, less than two cycles of CCT with IMRT could be enough. However, in the era of IMRT, the role of NCT still needs to be further explored.

Does concurrent chemoradiotherapy preceded by chemotherapy improve survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer patients? Experience from Ghana

Background

To find out how chemotherapy given prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy compares with concurrent chemoradiation alone in the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Methods

Patient charts were examined and found to have submitted to one of two regimes as follows: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin (group1), or concurrent cisplatin based chemoradiotherapy only (group 2). Radiation treatment dose of 70Gy in 35 fractions was given in each group.

Results

Forty-seven patients were evaluated with 68% male. Stage 4 disease comprised 83%, WHO type 3 was the commonest histologic type (53.2%). Median follow up period was 20 months (4–129). The 3-year overall survival for group 1 was 52.1%, and for group 2:65.7% (p = 0.47). The 3-year disease free survival for group 1 was 61.4, and 81.4% for group 2 (p = 0.03).

Conclusion

The study revealed that concurrent chemoradiation alone yields better disease free survival compared to chemotherapy given prior to it. There is however no difference in overall survival between the two regimes.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis

The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who presented with cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) is unknown. A total of 792 patients with stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC and presented with CNN based on magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching method was used to balance treatment arms for baseline characteristics. Eventually, 508 patients were propensity-matched on a 1:1 basis to create two groups (NACT + CCRT and CCRT groups). Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. The 5-year disease specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly higher in NACT + CCRT group relative to the matched CCRT group (82.1% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.021; 70.3% vs. 54.1%, P < 0.001; 81.9% vs. 67.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). Although the rates of grade 3-4 leucopenia and mucositis were higher in NACT + CCRT group than CCRT group, compliance with the combined treatment was good and no significant difference was observed between two groups. NACT followed by CCRT was relatively safe and could achieve better survival than CCRT alone in NPC patients with CNN by reducing the risk of death, tumor progression and distant metastasis.

Association between VEGF-460T/C gene polymorphism and clinical outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent angiogenic factor that plays a critical role in the development, metastasis, and recurrence of tumors. This study aims to determine the correlation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the VEGF gene with the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The VEGF -460T/C gene polymorphisms in the genomic DNA of the blood samples of 338 patients with NPC were investigated through polymerase chain reaction and direct DNA sequencing. Results showed a significant association between the -460C-allele carriers and the aggressive forms of NPC as defined by stages N2-3 (odds ratio =1.820, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.118-2.962, P=0.015). Furthermore, the VEGF -460T/C polymorphism was significantly associated with 3-year overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) (T/C + C/C vs T/T: 3-year OS 78.8% vs 95.1%, P=0.003; 3-year DMFS 80.2% vs 90.6%, P=0.036; 3-year PFS 73.9% vs 86.7%, P=0.042) but was not associated with the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of the patients. The multivariate analysis indicated that the VEGF -460C-allele carrier was an independent significant prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 4.096, 95% CI: 1.333-12.591, P=0.014). N classification was an independent significant prognostic factor for DMFS in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC (HR 3.674, 95% CI: 1.144-11.792, P=0.029). However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was not superior to CCRT alone in terms of the 3-year OS, LRFS, DMFS, and PFS of patients with VEGF -460T/C polymorphism. In conclusion, the VEGF -460T/C gene polymorphism may negatively affect the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC and may be considered a potential prognostic factor for this disease.

A retrospective paired study: efficacy and toxicity of nimotuzumab versus cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare efficacy and toxicity of nimotuzumab versus cisplatin (CDDP) concurrent with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with NPC from September 2008 to November 2013. The synchronous regimens included h-R3/RT (nimotuzumab and radiotherapy) one time per week for 6-8 weeks and CDDP/RT (cisplatin and radiotherapy) every three weeks for 2-3 cycles. All patients in our analysis completed the planned IMRT and received TPF (docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for two cycles.

RESULTS

Among the 302 NPC patients who were treated definitively with TPF neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by IMRT concurrent with nimotuzumab or cisplatin at West China Hospital Sichuan University, 52 patients received h-R3/RT with complete clinical and follow-up data. Based on age, sex and tumor stage, 104 eligible patients were propensity-matched, with 52 patients in each treatment group (h-R3/RT and CDDP/RT). With a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the h-R3/RT vs. CDDP/RT treatment groups were 63.9% vs. 81.4% (p = 0.024) and 58.0% vs. 80.6% (p = 0.028), respectively. The h-R3/RT patients experienced less leukopenia and milder nausea and vomiting. In our sub-analysis, for stage II patients, no significant differences were found in OS and PFS, whereas milder nausea and vomiting were found in the h-R3/RT group (p = 0.046). Moreover, for patients older than 60 years, there were no statistically significant differences in OS and PFS, whereas milder nausea and vomiting was observed in the h-R3/RT group (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Although CDDP/RT remains the preferred choice for most patients with NPC, h-R3/RT may be a treatment option for the patients with stage II, older than sixty years old, and who are intolerable to cisplatin.