1
|
Belloni S, Magon A, Giacon C, Savioni F, Conte G, Caruso R, Arrigoni C. Peripheral Neuropathy Instruments for Individuals with Cancer: A COSMIN-Based Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:7828-7851. [PMID: 39727700 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31120577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2024] [Revised: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Although the literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) continues to expand, challenges persist in selecting reliable and valid instruments for assessing peripheral neuropathy (PN) in patients with cancer. This systematic review aimed to identify all validated self-report PN scales and critically appraise their measurement properties. This review was conducted using the COSMIN methodology for PROMs and the PRISMA statement. Five databases were searched from inception to August 2024, identifying 46 eligible studies and 16 PROMs. Evidence quality ranged from "very low" to "moderate", with notable inconsistencies in the content and structural validity phases of most instruments. Instruments such as the Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment tool and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity demonstrated moderate quality and potential utility in clinical practice, while others, including the Location-based assessment of sensory symptoms in cancer and the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment, had insufficient evidence to support their use. Importantly, all PROMs focused on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, highlighting a significant gap in instruments addressing other PN causes, such as radiotherapy or tumor-related nerve damage. Further research should prioritize developing and validating instruments for distinct cancer populations, ensuring robust psychometric properties and clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Belloni
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Arianna Magon
- Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Giacon
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Conte
- Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy
| | - Rosario Caruso
- Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Arrigoni
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Hygiene, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moss CL, Guerrero-Urbano T, White I, Taylor B, Kristeleit R, Montes A, Fox L, Beyer K, Sztankay M, Ratti MM, Sisca ES, Derevianko A, MacLennan S, Wood N, Wintner LM, Van Hemelrijck M. Assessing the quality of patient-reported outcome measurements for gynecological cancers: a systematic review. Future Oncol 2023; 19:663-678. [PMID: 37128990 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To provide perspective on patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) instruments to adopt in patients diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Methods: A systematic search was conducted to identify PROMs developed for or applied in gynecological cancer populations. PROMs identified in more than one study subsequently underwent assessment according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Results: Overall, 55 PROMs were identified within the gynecological cancer setting, and 20 were assessed according to COSMIN guidelines. Most PROMs had limited information reported, but a best fit approach was adopted to recommend a number of instruments for use in patients with gynecological cancer. Conclusion: Further study to assess the methodological quality of each PROM utilized in gynecological cancers is warranted to endorse the recommendations of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L Moss
- Translational & Oncology Research (TOUR), King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, UK
| | - Teresa Guerrero-Urbano
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Ingrid White
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Benjamin Taylor
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Rebecca Kristeleit
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Ana Montes
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Louis Fox
- Translational & Oncology Research (TOUR), King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, UK
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Translational & Oncology Research (TOUR), King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, UK
| | - Monika Sztankay
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria M Ratti
- Clinical & Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Olgettina Street, 60 - 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena S Sisca
- Clinical & Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Olgettina Street, 60 - 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandra Derevianko
- Clinical & Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Olgettina Street, 60 - 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicholas Wood
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, PR2 9HT, Lancashire, UK
| | - Lisa M Wintner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational & Oncology Research (TOUR), King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li T, Park SB, Battaglini E, King MT, Kiernan MC, Goldstein D, Rutherford C. Assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with patient reported outcome measures: a systematic review of measurement properties and considerations for future use. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3091-3107. [PMID: 35596913 PMCID: PMC9546984 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03154-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common toxicity of cancer treatment, with potential to significantly impact cancer survivors' long-term quality of life. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilised to evaluate CIPN. However, guidance remains lacking on how to identify fit for purpose PROMs with considerations necessarily differing when used in various research and in-clinic contexts. This study aimed to evaluate evidence about CIPN PROMs measurement properties and propose considerations to optimize CIPN PROM selection for each purpose. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify literature assessing measurement properties of CIPN PROMs. These were evaluated against Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria and International Society for Quality of Life minimum standards. Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using the COSMIN RoB checklist. RESULTS Thirty-nine papers evaluating measurement properties of 13 PROMs were included. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) were the most commonly investigated PROMs and had the most measurement properties meeting established criteria. CONCLUSION The use of the QLQ-CIPN20 and FACT/GOG-Ntx to assess CIPN in research settings has the most supporting evidence. However other considerations including study aims, endpoints and target population also factor into PROM selection and need to be considered more often when determining the most suitable outcome measure. Evidence of CIPN PROMs use in clinical practice is limited and their adoption to individual-patient level management requires more evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Li
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Susanna B Park
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Eva Battaglini
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
| | - Madeleine T King
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew C Kiernan
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney Quality of Life Office, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Cancer Nursing Research Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reinmann A, Bruyneel AV, Gligorov J, Mesure S, Combescure C, Koessler T, Bodmer A. Influence of chemotherapy on postural control and quality of life in women with gynaecological cancer: a protocol of a prospective observational study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061664. [PMID: 36691184 PMCID: PMC9454005 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a frequent side effect of some chemotherapies that can cause postural control disorders and has a serious impact on quality of life (QoL). An enhanced understanding of postural control dysfunction could help build a systematic and accurate assessment as well as specific exercises to limit the impact on QoL. This study aims to assess the influence of chemotherapy on postural control and the QoL for women with gynaecological cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective observational study will include 37 participants with cancer treated using neurotoxic chemotherapy. Their postural control in various conditions (rigid and foam surfaces, eyes open and closed, with and without tendon vibration, and dual tasks), limits of stability, QoL and modified Total Neuropathy Score will be assessed. A linear mixed model will compare postural control pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by an ethical review board in Geneva (CCER-2020-01639). The study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04692168.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Reinmann
- Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne-Violette Bruyneel
- Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Department of Oncology, AP-HP. Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Serge Mesure
- Institute of Movement Sciences, National Centre of Scientific Research, Aix-Marseille-University, Marseille, France
| | - Christophe Combescure
- CRC & Division of clinical epidemiology, Department of health and community medicine, University of Geneva & University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Service of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Bodmer
- Service of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|