1
|
Zhu L, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Ma W, Guo Y, Wang Q, Guo Y, Lv H, Zhao M. Small intestinal metastasis in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with concurrent EML4-ALK V3 and TP53 mutations after distinct responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A case report. Heliyon 2024; 10:e38839. [PMID: 39430483 PMCID: PMC11489313 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have improved the survival rates of lung cancer patients with ALK fusion mutations, their effectiveness varies significantly across different subtypes. We report a case of small intestine metastasis in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with co-occurring echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusion variant 3 (V3) and tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutations after distinct responses to ALK-TKIs. Case presentation A 45-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis. Next-generation sequencing revealed EML4-ALK V3 and TP53 co-mutations. After the initial treatment with ensartinib, the patient experienced intracranial disease progression. Radiation therapy (RT) was then administered. Despite good response to RT for the intracranial disease, the primary tumor enlarged. Thus, the patient was treated with oral ensartinib concurrent with chemotherapy, with a partial response in both the primary tumor and intracranial metastases. However, after three cycles of treatment, the patient discontinued chemotherapy because of acute kidney injury. Subsequent thoracic RT resulted in a partial response of the primary tumor; however, new brain and bone metastases were detected, prompting a switch to lorlatinib. The patient developed symptoms of intestinal obstruction 14 months after the initial diagnosis. Surgical intervention revealed a poorly differentiated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma of the upper jejunum. Genetic testing confirmed EML4-ALK V3 and TP53 co-mutations and high expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1. Despite pembrolizumab treatment, the patient's condition deteriorated, and she passed away. Conclusion We reported a rare case of small intestinal metastasis in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with concurrent EML4-ALK V3/TP53 mutations after distinct responses to ALK-TKIs in different lesions. Our findings revealed heterogeneity in ALK mutations and responses to ALK-TKIs, necessitating the close monitoring of genetic subtypes and associated mutations for tailored treatment strategies. Maintaining a heightened awareness of potential intestinal metastasis and vigilance in monitoring intestinal symptoms and abdominal metastases are pivotal for managing advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yongqian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhai Liu
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenhua Ma
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Guo
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Guo
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Hengxu Lv
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noronha V, Budukh A, Chaturvedi P, Anne S, Punjabi A, Bhaskar M, Sahoo TP, Menon N, Shah M, Batra U, Nathany S, Kumar R, Shetty O, Ghodke TP, Mahajan A, Chakrabarty N, Hait S, Tripathi SC, Chougule A, Chandrani P, Tripathi VK, Jiwnani S, Tibdewal A, Maheshwari G, Kothari R, Patil VM, Bhat RS, Khanderia M, Mahajan V, Prakash R, Sharma S, Jabbar AA, Yadav BK, Uddin AK, Dutt A, Prabhash K. Uniqueness of lung cancer in Southeast Asia. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. SOUTHEAST ASIA 2024; 27:100430. [PMID: 39157507 PMCID: PMC11328770 DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
Lung cancer varies between Caucasians and Asians. There have been differences recorded in the epidemiology, genomics, standard therapies and outcomes, with variations according to the geography and ethnicity which affect the decision for optimal treatment of the patients. To better understand the profile of lung cancer in Southeast Asia, with a focus on India, we have comprehensively reviewed the available data, and discuss the challenges and the way forward. A substantial proportion of patients with lung cancer in Southeast Asia are neversmokers, and adenocarcinoma is the common histopathologic subtype, found in approximately a third of the patients. EGFR mutations are noted in 23-30% of patients, and ALK rearrangements are noted in 5-7%. Therapies are similar to global standards, although access to newer modalities and molecules is a challenge. Collaborative research, political will with various policy changes and patient advocacy are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanita Noronha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Atul Budukh
- Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Srikanth Anne
- Department of Medical Oncology, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - Anshu Punjabi
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Maheema Bhaskar
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Tarini P. Sahoo
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, Silverline Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Nandini Menon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Minit Shah
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Ullas Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Shrinidhi Nathany
- Molecular Diagnostics Section, Department of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Rajiv Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Omshree Shetty
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Trupti Pai Ghodke
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Abhishek Mahajan
- Department of Imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Nivedita Chakrabarty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Supriya Hait
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | | | - Anuradha Chougule
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Pratik Chandrani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Virendra Kumar Tripathi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Sabita Jiwnani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Anil Tibdewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Guncha Maheshwari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Rushabh Kothari
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, Oncowin Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Vijay M. Patil
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, PD Hinduja Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Khar and Mahim, Mumbai, India
| | - Rajani Surendar Bhat
- Interventional Pulmonology and Palliative Medicine, Sparsh Hospitals, Bangalore, India
| | - Mansi Khanderia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Cancer Centre, Narayana Health City, Bommasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Vandana Mahajan
- PG Integrated Counselling, Cancer Counsellor and Palliative Care Coach and Cancer Survivor, India
| | - Ravi Prakash
- British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Based in Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- NGO Excellence Program, Patient Advocate, Lung Connect, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Birendra Kumar Yadav
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Purbanchal Cancer Hospital, Birtamode Jhapa State, Koshi, Nepal
| | - A.F.M. Kamal Uddin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Institute of Ear Nose and Throat, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Amit Dutt
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
- Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta D, Gupta N, Singh N, Prinja S. Economic Evaluation of Targeted Therapies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase- and ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in India. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300260. [PMID: 38359374 PMCID: PMC10881089 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Targeted therapies, such as crizotinib and ceritinib, have shown promising results in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific oncogenic drivers like anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros (ROS1) oncogene, etc. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of these therapies for patients with NSCLC in India. METHODS The Markov model consisted of three health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease, and death. Lifetime costs and consequences were estimated for three treatment arms: crizotinib, ceritinib, and chemotherapy for patients with ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with crizotinib and ceritinib was compared to chemotherapy and assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time per capita gross domestic product in India. RESULTS The total lifetime cost per patient for ALK-positive NSCLC was ₹332,456 ($4,054 US dollars [USD]), ₹1,284,100 ($15,659 USD), and ₹2,337,779 ($28,509 USD) in the chemotherapy, crizotinib, and ceritinib arms, respectively. The mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.20, 2.21, and 3.34, respectively. For patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC, the total cost was ₹323,011 ($3,939 USD) and ₹1,763,541 ($21,507 USD) for chemotherapy and crizotinib, with mean QALYs lived per patient of 1.16 and 2.73, respectively. Nearly 92% and 81% reduction in the price of ceritinib and crizotinib is required to make it a cost-effective treatment option for ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study findings suggest that the prices of ceritinib and crizotinib need to be reduced significantly to justify their value for inclusion in India's publicly financed health insurance scheme for treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharna Gupta
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Nidhi Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
| | - Navneet Singh
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Shankar Prinja
- Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|