MicroRNA and hyperaggregability of platelets in women with sticky platelet syndrome and pregnancy complications

DNA Polymorphisms in Pregnant Women with Sticky Platelet Syndrome

Sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) is a thrombophilia caused by the increased aggregability of platelets in response to the addition of low concentrations of epinephrine (EPI) and/or adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Some of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), alleles and haplotypes of platelet glycoprotein receptors were proved to have a role in the etiology of thrombotic episodes When comparing SPS and the control group, in VEGFA rs3025039, the p value for both CC vs. TT and CT vs. TT analyses was <0.001. Interestingly, no minor TT genotype was present in the SPS group, suggesting the thrombotic pathogenesis of recurrent spontaneous abortions (RSA) in these patients. Moreover, we found a significant difference in the presence of AT containing a risky A allele and TT genotype of ALPP rs13026692 (p = 0.034) in SPS patients when compared with the controls. Additionally, we detected a decreased frequency of the GG (CC) genotype of FOXP3 rs3761548 in patients with SPS and RSA when compared with the control group (p value for the CC (GG) vs. AA (TT) 0.021). This might indicate an evolutionary protective mechanism of the A (T) allele in the SPS group against thrombotic complications in pregnancy. These results can be used for antithrombotic management in such pregnant patients.

A new decade awaits sticky platelet syndrome: where are we now, how do we manage and what are the complications?

INTRODUCTION

Sticky platelet syndrome is a less known platelet function disorder with a familiar occurrence and likely genetic background. Clinically, it is characterized by an increased risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events and obstetric placenta-mediated complications. The increased aggregation after low-dose ADP and/or epinephrine is its distinctive laboratory feature. Though described for almost 40 years, several issues regarding its etiology, involved pathomechanisms, genetic background, optimal diagnostic and treatment approach remain controversial.

AREAS COVERED

The work aims to summarize published studies, the actual definition of the syndrome, and point out its drawbacks. A literature search on Medline, Embase, and archives from EHA congresses was performed (terms: 'sticky platelet syndrome' - 'platelet hyperreactivity' - 'platelet hyperaggregability'). The authors added in their unpublished data. The introductory overview of the present understanding is followed by the discussion of the pathophysiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic problems.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the growing evidence provided by case reports and series, the lack of robust studies limits the decision-making on diagnostics and management. The diagnostic issues, particularly the standardization of light transmission aggregometry, represent the crucial problem for the broader acceptance of the syndrome.

Primary Thrombophilia XVI: A Look at the Genotype of the Sticky Platelet Syndrome Phenotype

The sticky platelet syndrome (SPS) was described by Mammen in 1983. Since then, scientists in several countries have identified the condition and published cases or series of patients, thus enabling the description of the prevalence of the inherited condition, its salient clinical features, and the treatment of the disease. The diagnosis of the SPS phenotype requires fresh blood samples and special equipment which is not available in all coagulation laboratories. In the era of molecular biology, up to now it has not been possible to define a clear association of the SPS phenotype with a specific molecular marker. Some molecular changes which have been described in platelet proteins in some persons with the phenotype of the SPS are here discussed. Nowadays, the SPS phenotype may be considered as a risk factor for thrombosis and most cases of the SPS developing vaso-occlussive episodes are the result of its coexistence with other thrombosis-prone conditions, some of the inherited and some of them acquired, thus leading to the concept of multifactorial thrombophilia. Ignoring all these evidence-based concepts is inappropriate, same as stating that the SPS is a nonentity simply because not all laboratories are endowed with adequate equipment to support the diagnosis.