18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues

Background

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established imaging modality for a wide variety of solid malignancies. Currently, only limited data exists regarding the utility of PET/CT imaging at very extended injection-to-scan acquisition times. The current retrospective data analysis assessed the feasibility and quantification of diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals.

Methods

¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions (not surgically manipulated or altered during ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgery, and visualized both on preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging) and corresponding background tissues were assessed for ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation on same-day preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Multiple patient variables and ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion variables were examined.

Results

For the 32 ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions making up the final ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion data set (from among 7 patients), the mean injection-to-scan times of the preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were 73 (±3, 70-78) and 530 (±79, 413-739) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values were 7.7 (±4.0, 3.6-19.5) and 11.3 (±6.0, 4.1-29.2), respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean background SUV_max values were 2.3 (±0.6, 1.0-3.2) and 2.1 (±0.6, 1.0-3.3), respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative and postoperative mean lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios were 3.7 (±2.3, 1.5-9.8) and 5.8 (±3.6, 1.6-16.2), respectively, (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging can be successfully performed at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals of up to approximately 5 half-lives for ¹⁸F-FDG while maintaining good/adequate diagnostic image quality. The resultant increase in the ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values, decreased background SUV_max values, and increased lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios seen from preoperative to postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging have great potential for allowing for the integrated, real-time use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging in conjunction with ¹⁸F-FDG-directed interventional radiology biopsy and ablation procedures and ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgical procedures, as well as have far-reaching impact on potentially re-shaping future thinking regarding the “most optimal” injection-to-scan acquisition time interval for all routine diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging.

Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules among patients living in a coccidioidal endemic region

BACKGROUND

Within a coccidioidal endemic region, pulmonary nodules due to coccidioidomycosis are common. Uptake of (18)fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)FDG) by positron emission tomography with computed axial tomography (PET/CT) has been used to assess whether pulmonary nodules are malignant but inflammatory lesions can be positive. The purpose of this study was to compare by PET/CT the (18)FDG uptake in pulmonary nodules likely due to coccidioidomycosis to that of nodules shown to be malignant among patients living in a coccidioidal endemic region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a PET/CT at the Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System between January 2008 and March 2012 who were subsequently found on biopsy to have pulmonary nodules that were coccidioidal or granulomatous or were due to malignancy.

RESULTS

Among 245 diagnostic biopsies where the subject had a previous PET/CT, 15 (6.1 %) were either coccidioidal (n = 12) or granulomatous without an identified organism (n = 3). The median maximum standard unit of uptake (SUV(max)) on PET/CT of coccidioidal or granulomatous lesions was 2.0 compared to 9.8 for malignant lesions (P < 0.001). The maximum diameter of the coccidioidal or granulomatous nodules was 2.1 cm compared to 3.0 cm for the malignant lesions (P = 0.009). On multivariable analysis, an elevated SUV(max) was the only distinguishing feature between the malignant and the granulomatous lesions (OR 1.28, 95 % CI 1.05-1.55; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Coccidioidal pulmonary nodules take up significantly less (18)FDG than those due to malignancies, but there is considerable overlap between granulomatous and malignant lesions at lower SUV(max).

Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT versus single time point 18FDG-PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancer types in the world. An accurate diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for early treatment and management.

PURPOSE

To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual time point 18F-fluorodexyglucose position emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed (1966-2011.11), EMBASE (1974-2011.11), Web of Science (1972-2011.11), Cochrane Library (-2011.11), and four Chinese databases - CBM (1978-2011.11), CNKI (1994-2011.11), VIP (1989-2011.11), and Wanfang Database (1994-2011.11) - were searched. Summary sensitivity, summary specificity, summary diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and summary positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were obtained using Meta-Disc software. Summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by eight articles, with a total of 415 patients and 430 pulmonary nodules. Compared with the gold standard (pathology or clinical follow-up), the summary sensitivity of dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT was 79% (95%CI, 74.0-84.0%), and its summary specificity was 73% (95%CI, 65.0-79.0%); the summary LR+ was 2.61 (95%CI, 1.96-3.47), and the summary LR- was 0.29 (95%CI, 0.21-0.41); the summary DOR was 10.25 (95%CI, 5.79-18.14), and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.8244. The summary sensitivity for single time point 18FDG-PET/CT was 77% (95%CI, 71.9-82.3%), and its summary specificity was 59% (95%CI, 50.6-66.2%); the summary LR+ was 1.97 (95%CI, 1.32-2.93), and the summary LR- was 0.37 (95%CI, 0.29-0.49); the summary DOR was 6.39 (95%CI, 3.39-12.05), and the AUC was 0.8220.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT have similar accuracy in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT appears to be more specific than single time point 18FDG-PET/CT.

Potential value of dual-time-point ¹⁸F-FDG PET compared with initial single-time-point imaging in differentiating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the potential value of dual-time-point (DTP) imaging as compared with initial single-time-point (STP) scanning with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET in differentiating malignant from benign single pulmonary nodules. Data on the performance of DTP 18F-FDG PET imaging in assessing lung nodules were extracted from articles of prospective or retrospective original research published between January 2001 and April 2010. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used to assess the quality of study methodology. Heterogeneity in the results of the studies was assessed, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed. Eleven studies comprising a total of 788 patients who underwent initial scanning, 778 of whom also underwent DTP imaging, were included in the final analysis. The quality of study methodology was judged to be moderate. Substantial heterogeneity in the results of the studies, with inconsistency (I2) index values above 85%, reflected important differences in study methods and populations, including varying lesion sizes, 18F-FDG avidity, uptake interval for delayed imaging, and threshold for positive result on DTP imaging. SROC curve analysis revealed a statistically nonsignificant trend toward higher sensitivity with DTP imaging, at moderate levels of specificity, when compared with initial STP scanning. The area under the curve (SE) values for DTP and initial STP imaging were 0.839 (0.079) and 0.757 (0.074), respectively. Although the results of our analysis do not support the routine use of DTP imaging with 18F-FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, this technique may provide additional information in selected cases with equivocal results from initial scanning. Further prospective research is required to better define the potential benefits of DTP 18F-FDG PET imaging.

(18)F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications

AIM

To evaluate the effect of the 18F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating (4D) study in the correct documentation of pulmonary lesions with faint uptake in standard PET-CT.

METHODS

Forty-two pulmonary lesions with a low or no detectable uptake of FDG (SUV(max) < 2.5) in 3D PET-CT were prospectively evaluated in 28 patients (19 males and 9 females), mean age 66.5 years (41-81). 22 patients had neoplastic background. A conventional PET-CT (3D) total body scan was performed approximately 60 min after iv injection of a mean dose of 370 MBq. Furthermore, a 4D PET-CT (synchronized with respiratory movement) thorax study was acquired. SUV(max) was determined for each lesion in both studies. For the 4D studies, we selected the SUV(max) in respiratory period with the highest uptake ("best bin"). We calculated the SUV(max) percentage difference between 3D and 4D PET-CT (% difference = SUV(max) 4D - SUV(max) 3D/SUV(max) 3D x 100) and the relation of this value with the size and locations of the lesions. In 4D study, any lesion with SUV(max) > or = 2.5 was classified as malignant. We assessed the changes of lesion classification (from benign to malignant) applying the 4D technique. The final diagnosis was obtained by histological assessment or clinical and radiological follow-up longer than 12 months.

RESULTS

Forty out of 42 lesions showed an increase of SUV(max) in the 4D study with respect to 3D. The mean SUV(max) in the 3D and 4D PET-CT studies were 1.33 (+/-0.59) and 2.26 (+/-0.87), respectively. The SUV(max) percentage difference mean between both techniques was 83.3% (+/-80.81).The smaller the lesion the greater was the SUV(max) percentage difference (P < 0.05). No differences were observed depending on the location of the lesion. In 40% of cases, there was a change in the final classification of lesions from benign to malignant. In the final diagnosis, 24 lesions were malignant. 4D PET-CT diagnosed correctly the 52% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4D PET-CT study permitted a better characterization of malignant lung lesions compared with the standard PET-CT, because of its higher sensitivity. 4D PET-CT is a recommendable technique in the early diagnosis of malignant lesions.