BRCA1/2 status and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with double primary breast and ovarian cancer

Synchronous and Metachronous Breast and Ovarian Cancers: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Cancer Centre in India

Women with either breast cancer (BC) or ovarian cancer (OC) have a 1.5-2 times higher risk of developing the other. Discerning discrete primaries versus metastases from either can be challenging. Clinico-pathological and outcome details of patients diagnosed with both BC and OC from December 1994 to August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated at a single tertiary cancer centre. We report the pattern of presentation and recurrences with case-based illustrations. Out of 139 patients, presentation was BC-first in 66.2%, OC-first in 24.5% and synchronous cancers (SC) in 9.3% of women. The median age at diagnosis in BC-first, OC-first and SC was 42 years, 48 years and 49 years, respectively. The most common histological subtype was invasive breast carcinoma-no special type (74.8%) in BC and serous cystadenocarcinoma (81.3%) in OC. BC presented at an early stage in 67.6% while OC presented at an advanced stage in 48.2% of patients. Germline mutation results were available in 82% with 61.4% of the cohort exhibiting a mutation- BRCA1 mutation being the most common. The median time to development of second cancer was 77.4 months and 39.4 months in BC-first and OC-first, respectively. At a median follow-up of 9.47 years, disease-free survival was 32.6%, 32.4% and 30.8% in BC-first, OC-first and SC, respectively (p < 0.001). In hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, BC-first patients have a better prognosis while synchronous malignancies have worse oncological outcomes. Deaths are mainly due to OC progression. Appropriate surveillance and prophylactic intervention in young patients with breast cancer may improve overall outcomes.

Time Intervals between Double Primary Breast and Ovarian Cancers and Survival Outcomes of Patients with Both Cancers: A SEER Database Analysis

Background

The time interval rules and survival outcomes of individuals with synchronous and metachronous breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) were examined in this retrospective population-based investigation.

Methods

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to create a cohort of people diagnosed with BC and OC between 1973 and 2015. Patients were separated into three groups: those with main BC followed by primary OC (group 1), those with synchronous primary breast and ovarian cancer (group 2), and those with OC prior to BC (group 3). The Kaplan-Meier technique was used to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 4,975 patients were identified: 2,929 patients in group 1, 680 patients in group 2, and 1,366 patients in group 3. The average duration between these tumors was 60 months (range 0-499). Approximately 50% of second primary cancer cases occurred during the first 60 months of the first primary cancer diagnosis, and more than 70% occurred within the first 120 months. The median survival time for 4,975 individuals was 140 months. Group 2 had the smallest median OS (35 months), whereas group 3 had the longest (45 months) (239 months).

Conclusions

The majority of second primary cancer cases occurred during the first 120 months following the diagnosis of the first original malignancy. Individuals who had primary OC prior to BC had better prognoses, whereas patients who had synchronous BC and OC had worse prognoses.

Genetic Counselling, BRCA1/2 Status and Clinico-pathologic Characteristics of Patients with Ovarian Cancer before 50 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

In Slovenia like in other countries, till recently, personal history of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has not been included among indications for genetic counselling. Recent studies reported up to 17% rate of germinal BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2m) within the age group under 50 years at diagnosis. The original aim of this study was to invite to the genetic counselling still living patients with EOC under 45 years, to offer gBRCA1/2m testing and to perform analysis of gBRCA1/2m rate and of clinico-pathologic characteristics. Later, we added also the data of previously genetically tested patients with EOC aged 45 to 49 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All clinical data have to be interpreted in the light of many changes happened in the field of EOC just in the last few years: new hystology stage classification (FIGO), new hystology types and differentiation grades classification, new therapeutic possibilities (PARP inhibitors available, also in Slovenia) and new guidelines for genetic counselling of EOC patients (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN), together with next-generation sequencing possibilities.

RESULTS

Compliance rate at the invitation was 43.1%. In the group of 27 invited or previously tested patients with EOC diagnosed before the age of 45 years, five gBRCA1/2 mutations were found. The gBRCA1/2m detection rate within the group was 18.5%. There were 4 gBRCA1 and 1 gBRCA2 mutations detected. In the extended group of 42 tested patients with EOC diagnosed before the age of 50 years, 14 gBRCA1/2 mutations were found. The gBRCA1/2m detection rate within this extended, partially selected group was 33.3%. There were 11 gBRCA1 and 3 gBRCA2 mutations detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of gBRCA1/2 mutation in tested unselected EOC patients under the age of 50 years was higher than 10%, namely 18.5%. Considering also a direct therapeuthic benefit of PARP inhibitors for BRCA positive patients, there is a double reason to offer genetic testing to all EOC patients younger than 50 years. Regarding clinical data, it is important to perform their re-interpretation in everyday clinical practice, because this may influence therapeutic possibilities to be offered.

Examining the common aetiology of serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast cancers using double primaries

BACKGROUND

The somatic molecular profiles of basal-like breast cancers and high-grade serous ovarian cancers share many similarities, leading to the hypothesis that they have similar aetiologies, in which case they should occur together in the same patient more often than expected.

METHODS

We identified 545 women with double independent primary cancers of the breast and ovary reported to the California Cancer Registry from 1999 to 2013 and examined the coincidence of subtype combinations.

RESULTS

For most subtype combinations the observed frequencies were similar to their expected frequencies, but in 103 observed cases vs 43.8 expected (O/E=2.35; 95% CI 1.90-2.81) a triple-negative breast tumour (typically basal-like) was matched with a serous ovarian tumour (typically high-grade).

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide compelling evidence that basal-like breast cancer and high-grade serous ovarian cancer share a much more similar aetiology than breast and ovarian cancers more broadly. Further research is needed to clarify the influence of germ-line BRCA1 mutations and other risk factors on these results.

The KRAS-variant is associated with risk of developing double primary breast and ovarian cancer

Purpose

A germline microRNA binding site-disrupting variant, the KRAS-variant (rs61764370), is associated with an increased risk of developing several cancers. Because this variant is most strongly associated with ovarian cancer risk in patients from hereditary breast and ovarian families (HBOC), and with the risk of premenopausal triple negative breast cancer, we evaluated the association of the KRAS-variant with women with personal histories of both breast and ovarian cancer, referred to as double primary patients.

Experimental Design

Germline DNA from double primary patients was tested for the KRAS-variant (n = 232). Confirmation of pathologic diagnoses, age of diagnoses, interval between ovarian cancer diagnosis and sample collection, additional cancer diagnoses, and family history were obtained when available. All patients were tested for deleterious BRCA mutations.

Results

The KRAS-variant was significantly enriched in uninformative (BRCA negative) double primary patients, being found in 39% of patients accrued within two years of their ovarian cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, the KRAS-variant was found in 35% of uninformative double primary patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer post-menopausally, and was significantly associated with uninformative double primary patients with a positive family history. The KRAS-variant was also significantly enriched in uninformative patients who developed more then two primary cancers, being found in 48% of women with two breast primaries plus ovarian cancer or with triple primary cancers.

Conclusions

These findings further validate the importance of the KRAS-variant in breast and ovarian cancer risk, and support the association of this variant as a genetic marker for HBOC families previously considered uninformative.