Live Cells versus Fixated Cells: Kinetic Measurements of Biomolecular Interactions with the LigandTracer Method and Surface Plasmon Resonance Microscopy

Cell-based kinetic studies of ligand or candidate drug binding to membrane proteins have produced affinity and kinetic values that are different from measurements using purified proteins. However, ligand binding to fixated cells whose membrane constituents (e.g., proteins and their glycosylated forms) are partially connected by a cross-linking reagent has not been compared to that to live cells. Under the same experimental conditions for the LigandTracer method, we measured the interactions of fluorophore-labeled lectins and antibody molecules with glycans at HFF cells and the human epithelial growth receptor 2 at SKBR3 cells, respectively. In conjunction with surface plasmon resonance microscopy, the effects of labels and cell/sub-cell heterogeneity on binding kinetics were investigated. Our results revealed that, for cell constituents whose structures and functions are not closely dependent on cell viability, the ligand binding kinetics at fixated cells is only slightly different from that at live cells. The altered kinetics is explained on the basis of a less mobile receptor confined in a local environment created by partially interconnected protein molecules. We show that cell/sub-cell heterogeneity and labels on the ligands can alter the binding reaction more significantly. Thus, fixating cells not only simplifies experimental procedures for drug screening and renders assays more robust but also provides reliable kinetic information about drug binding to cell constituents whose structures are not changed by chemical fixation.

Simple method to determine the concentration and incorporation ratio of ruthenium-labeled antibodies

Aim: Ruthenium-labeled antibodies are commonly used detection reagents in bioanalysis assays and must be characterized to ensure quality. The aim of this work was to develop a method to determine the concentration and incorporation ratio (the degree of labeling [DOL]) of ruthenium-labeled antibodies by UV/VIS spectroscopy. Materials & methods: Free SULFO-TAG compound was scanned using UV/VIS and showed an absorbance peak at 292 nm. In contrast, antibodies demonstrate UV absorbance at 280 nm. After experimentally determining the extinction coefficients at 280 and 292 nm of free ruthenium and antibody, we generated a formula based on the Beer-Lambert law that calculates both concentration and DOL of these ruthenium-labeled antibodies. Conclusion: The concentration and DOL values determined by our method were comparable to those determined from bicinchoninic acid and LC/MS for the same reagents. This method creates a faster and more accessible reagent characterization process that uses far less reagent than the more traditional alternatives.

The importance of quality critical reagents for the entire developmental lifecycle of a biopharmaceutical: a pharmacokinetic case study

Background: High-quality critical reagents are essential to the successful support of biotherapeutic drug development regardless of the analytical platform used for support. The lack of such a reagent, early in the development lifecycle of a biotherapeutic can have detrimental impact on resource and translation of data across development phases. Results: Here, a pharmacokinetic assay case study is shared that illustrates what can occur when there is a lack of a reproducible and sustainable critical reagent early in the development lifecycle of a biotherapeutic. Various assay formats and critical reagents, as well as reagents generation programs, were initiated to find a reagent and assay format which was fit for purpose. Conclusions: Identification of appropriate critical reagents early in the development lifecycle of a biotherapeutic as advantageous.

Unraveling the Hook Effect: A Comprehensive Study of High Antigen Concentration Effects in Sandwich Lateral Flow Immunoassays

Sandwich lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) are limited at high antigen concentrations by the hook effect, leading to a contradictory decrease in the test line (T) intensity and false-negative results. The hook effect is mainly associated with the loss of T, and research focuses on minimizing this effect. Nevertheless, the control line (C) intensity is also affected at higher analyte concentrations, undesirably influencing the T/C ratio in LFIA readers. The main aim of this work is to identify and understand these high antigen concentration effects in order to develop ubiquitous strategies to interpret and mitigate such effects. Four complementary experiments were performed: performance assessment of three different allergen LFIAs (two for hazelnut, one for peanut) over 0.075-3500 ppm, LFIAs with C only, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) binding experiments on the immobilized control antibody, and smartphone video recording of LFIAs during their development. As antigen concentrations increase, the C signal decreases before the T signal does, suggesting that distinct mechanisms underlie these intensity reductions. Reduced binding at the C occurred even in the absence of T, so the upfront T does not explain the loss of C. SPR confirmed that the C antibody favors binding with free labeled antibody compared with a labeled antibody-analyte complex, indicating that in antigen excess, binding is reduced at C before T. Finally, a smartphone-based video method was developed for dynamically monitoring the LFIA development in real time to distinguish between different concentration-dependent effects. Digitally analyzing the data allows clear differentiation of highly positive samples and false-negative samples and can indicate whether the LFIA is in the dynamic working range or at critically high concentrations. The aim of this work is to identify and understand such high antigen concentration effects in order to develop ubiquitous strategies to interpret and mitigate such effects.

A Tiered Approach for Characterization to Ensure Quality, Reproducibility, and Long-Term Stability of Critical Reagents in Regulated Bioanalysis to Support PK/ADA/NAb Assays for Biologics and Vaccines Programs

The robustness of good laboratory practice and clinical data is reliant upon a clear understanding of the bioanalytical assays. One of the most important components of ligand-binding based assays is critical reagents used to directly or indirectly measure biologic markers or signals. High quality, reproducible, sustainable critical reagents through the development lifecycle could avoid unnecessary rework, multiple validations, cross-validations, and ensure consistency of the data. Numerous analytical methods (UPLC-size exclusion chromatography, cation exchange chromatography, biacore/octet, and high-resolution mass spectrometry) have been evaluated by using current critical reagents. A comprehensive analytical toolbox of biochemical and biophysical methods has been employed to evaluate the quality of critical reagents and explore potential issues if there are any. Moving forward, this "tiered approach" of critical reagents characterization will be used not only to establish critical quality attributes for new reagents but also to evaluate stability in support of reagents recertification.

Critical reagent screening and characterization: benefits and approaches for protein biomarker assays by hybrid LC–MS

In recent years, hybrid ligand-binding assays (LBAs)/LC–MS assays have been increasingly used for quantitation of protein biomarkers in biological matrices. However, unlike in LBAs where the importance of critical reagent screening and characterization is well understood and widely reported, benefits of well-characterized hybrid LC–MS assay reagents are frequently underestimated. Two groups of analyte-specific reagents, binding reagents and assay calibrators, are considered the critical reagents for biomarker assays. In this article, we summarize the similarities and differences of critical reagents used in LBAs and hybrid LC–MS assays, overview the benefits and approaches of critical reagent screening, characterization, antibody conjugation and discuss bioanalytical considerations in hybrid LC–MS assay development for robust measurements of protein biomarkers in biological matrices.

Critical considerations for immunocapture enrichment LC–MS bioanalysis of protein therapeutics and biomarkers

In recent years, immunocapture enrichment coupled with LC–MS technology has seen more applications for the measurement of low abundant protein therapeutics and biomarkers in biological matrices. In this article, several critical considerations for the application of immunocapture enrichment to LC–MS bioanalysis of protein therapeutics and biomarkers, including reagent selection, reagent characterization, designing of capture format, etc. are discussed. All these considerations are critical in developing reliable and robust bioanalytical assays with high assay specificity and sensitivity. Successful examples using the immunocapture LC–MS approach in the quantification of biotherapeutic and low abundant protein biomarkers will also be discussed.

Surface plasmon resonance as a tool for ligand-binding assay reagent characterization in bioanalysis of biotherapeutics

Ligand-binding assay (LBA) performance depends on quality reagents. Strategic reagent screening and characterization is critical to LBA development, optimization and validation. Application of advanced technologies expedites the reagent screening and assay development process. By evaluating surface plasmon resonance technology that offers high-throughput kinetic information, this article aims to provide perspectives on applying the surface plasmon resonance technology to strategic LBA critical reagent screening and characterization supported by a number of case studies from multiple biotherapeutic programs.