Toward highly sensitive and reproducible LC-MS/MS analysis of MK-8591 phosphorylated anabolites in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Multiple-Dose Administration of Islatravir in Adults Without HIV

BACKGROUND

Islatravir (MK-8591) is a novel nucleoside analog in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Islatravir has potent antiviral activity and a long intracellular half-life.

SETTING

A 3-panel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in 36 adults without HIV evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of islatravir after daily administration.

METHODS

Islatravir or placebo was administered orally once daily for 42 days (5 mg) or 28 days (0.25 mg; 0.75 mg). Blood samples were taken at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of islatravir (plasma) and islatravir-triphosphate (ISL-TP; peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]). Rectal and vaginal tissue samples were also collected in a subset of participants. Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of islatravir were approximately dose proportional, with concentrations approaching a steady state between days 14 and 21 in plasma and by day 28 for ISL-TP in PBMCs. Plasma exposure accumulation was 1.5-fold to 1.8-fold, and ISL-TP exposure accumulation was ∼10-fold. The apparent terminal half-life of ISL-TP was 177-209 hours. The ISL-TP pharmacokinetic trough threshold-the minimal concentration required for efficacy-of 0.05 pmol/106 cells was achieved after a single administration at all dose levels. Rectal and vaginal tissue also exhibited potentially therapeutic concentrations. Islatravir was generally well tolerated at all doses.

CONCLUSIONS

ISL-TP levels in PBMCs were above the threshold projected for antiviral efficacy against wild-type HIV after a single 0.25-mg dose. Multiple once-daily dosing of islatravir in adults without HIV was generally well tolerated up to doses of 5 mg administered for up to 6 weeks.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single- and multiple-dose administration of islatravir (MK-8591) in adults without HIV

Islatravir (MK‐8591) is a nucleoside analogue in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV‐1. Two phase 1 trials were conducted during initial evaluation of islatravir: rising single doses (Study 1) and rising multiple doses (Study 2) of oral islatravir in male and female participants without HIV (aged 18–60 years). Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of islatravir (plasma) and islatravir‐triphosphate (peripheral blood mononuclear cells) were assessed. In Study 1, 24 participants, assigned to 1 of 3 panels, received alternating single doses of islatravir in a fasted state from 5 mg to 400 mg, or placebo, over 3 dosing periods; a 30 mg dose was additionally assessed following a high‐fat meal. In Study 2, 8 participants per dose received 3 once‐weekly doses of 10, 30, or 100 mg islatravir or placebo in a fasted state. For each panel in both trials, 6 participants received active drug and 2 received placebo. Islatravir was generally well‐tolerated, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events. Islatravir was rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration 0.5 hours); plasma half‐life was 49–61 h; intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate half‐life was 118–171 h. Plasma exposure increased in an approximately dose‐proportional manner; there was no meaningful food effect. There was a modest degree of intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate accumulation after multiple weekly dosing. After single oral doses of islatravir greater than or equal to 5 mg, intracellular islatravir‐triphosphate levels were comparable to levels associated with efficacy in preclinical studies. These results warrant continued clinical investigation of islatravir.

Direct and indirect quantification of phosphate metabolites of nucleoside analogs in biological samples

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are prodrugs that require intracellular phosphorylation to active triphosphate nucleotide metabolites (NMs) for their pharmacological activity. However, monitoring these pharmacologically active NMs is challenging due to their instability, high hydrophilicity, and their low concentrations in blood and tissues. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the gold standard technique for the quantification of NRTIs and their phosphorylated NMs. In this review, an overview of the publications describing the quantitative analysis of intracellular and total tissue concentration of NMs is presented. The focus of this review is the comparison of the different approaches and challenges associated with sample collection, tissue homogenization, cell lysis, cell counting, analyte extraction, sample storage conditions, and LC-MS analysis. Quantification methods of NMs via LC-MS can be categorized into direct and indirect methods. In the direct LC-MS methods, chromatographic retention of the NMs is accomplished by ion-exchange (IEX), ion-pairing (IP), hydrophilic interaction (HILIC), porous graphitic carbon (PGC) chromatography, or capillary electrophoresis (CE). In indirect methods, parent nucleosides are 1st generated from the dephosphorylation of NMs during sample preparation and are then quantified by reverse phase LC-MS as surrogates for their corresponding NMs. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages associated with them, which are discussed in this review.

Ensuring biological sample integrity from collection to analysis for LC–MS workflows: case studies illustrating challenges in clinical trials

In quantitative bioanalysis, ensuring sample integrity through the life cycle of a sample is crucial for providing reliable data. Sponsors must develop proper collection procedures to ensure high sample quality. Collection procedures should mitigate sample variability and stability concerns. Sample stability concerns can be managed with appropriate stabilization approaches like the addition of preservative, environmental exposure (temperature, humidity, light controls) and timely analysis with more frequent shipping. It is important that the bioanalytical scientist communicates specific needs to internal operations groups, the central laboratory and clinical sites. In large global trials, this is logistically challenging given the large number of sites and the potential language barriers. Several case studies presented below will illustrate logistical challenges with unstable compounds and unique matrices for LC–MS/MS workflows.