Analytical interference of Burosumab therapy on intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF23) measurements using an immunoassay: preliminary evaluation

Our study evaluated the possible interference of Burosumab (human recombinant monoclonal antibody directed against N-terminal domain of FGF23) on the immunoassay of intact FGF23 (iFGF23) with the Liaison XL. The analytical method uses three different antibodies, one of which directed against the N-terminal portion of FGF23. The evaluation of the method accuracy involved the fully automated execution of a dilution test on EDTA plasma from 5 subjects who had not received any monoclonal antibody (mAb), 20 EDTA plasma from patients treated with Burosumab, and 2 EDTA plasma from subjects who had not received any mAb in witch an adequate volume of Burosumab had been added in vitro. One sample with specific diluent (LIAISON® FGF 23) with an adequate volume of Burosumab had been added in vitro. The dilution assay provided highly inaccurate iFGF23 results in samples with therapeutic concentrations of Burosumab and in samples with concentrations below the LoQ (6.5 pg/mL). The addition of Burosumab to the diluent did not produce any analytical interference. Dissociation of iFGF23 from the mAb-target complex in diluted sample could explain the loss of accuracy in the iFGF23 immunoassay using the Liaison XL analyzer. Burosumab could be an interferent in immunoassay procedures of iFGF23.

Characterizing the Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Therapeutic Proteins: An Industry White Paper

Characterization of the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of therapeutic proteins (TPs) is a hot topic within the pharmaceutical industry, particularly with an ever-increasing catalog of novel modality TPs. Here, we review the current practices, and provide a summary of extensive cross-company discussions as well as a survey completed by International Consortium for Innovation and Quality members on this theme. A wide variety of in vitro, in vivo and in silico techniques are currently used to assess pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of TPs, and we discuss the relevance of these from an industry perspective, focusing on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic understanding at the preclinical stage of development, and translation to human. We consider that the 'traditional in vivo biodistribution study' is becoming insufficient as a standalone tool, and thorough characterization of the interaction of the TP with its target(s), target biology, and off-target interactions at a microscopic scale are key to understand the overall biodistribution on a full-body scale. Our summary of the current challenges and our recommendations to address these issues could provide insight into the implementation of best practices in this area of drug development, and continued cross-company collaboration will be of tremendous value. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The Innovation and Quality Consortium Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group working group for the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of therapeutic proteins evaluates the current practices and challenges in characterizing the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of therapeutic proteins during drug development, and proposes recommendations to address these issues. Incorporating the in vitro, in vivo and in silico approaches discussed herein may provide a pragmatic framework to increase early understanding of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships, and aid translational modeling for first-in-human dose predictions.

Simple method to determine the concentration and incorporation ratio of ruthenium-labeled antibodies

Aim: Ruthenium-labeled antibodies are commonly used detection reagents in bioanalysis assays and must be characterized to ensure quality. The aim of this work was to develop a method to determine the concentration and incorporation ratio (the degree of labeling [DOL]) of ruthenium-labeled antibodies by UV/VIS spectroscopy. Materials & methods: Free SULFO-TAG compound was scanned using UV/VIS and showed an absorbance peak at 292 nm. In contrast, antibodies demonstrate UV absorbance at 280 nm. After experimentally determining the extinction coefficients at 280 and 292 nm of free ruthenium and antibody, we generated a formula based on the Beer-Lambert law that calculates both concentration and DOL of these ruthenium-labeled antibodies. Conclusion: The concentration and DOL values determined by our method were comparable to those determined from bicinchoninic acid and LC/MS for the same reagents. This method creates a faster and more accessible reagent characterization process that uses far less reagent than the more traditional alternatives.

The role of ligand-binding assay and LC-MS in the bioanalysis of complex protein and oligonucleotide therapeutics

Ligand-binding assay (LBA) and LC-MS have been the preferred bioanalytical techniques for the quantitation and biotransformation assessment of various therapeutic modalities. This review provides an overview of the applications of LBA, LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS for the bioanalysis of complex protein therapeutics including antibody-drug conjugates, fusion proteins and PEGylated proteins as well as oligonucleotide therapeutics. The strengths and limitations of LBA and LC-MS, along with some guidelines on the choice of appropriate bioanalytical technique(s) for the bioanalysis of these therapeutic modalities are presented. With the discovery of novel and more complex therapeutic modalities, there is an increased need for the biopharmaceutical industry to develop a comprehensive bioanalytical strategy integrating both LBA and LC-MS.

Evaluation of homogeneous proximity immunoassays for preclinical bioanalysis

Drug discovery is moving at a rapid pace and a fast turnaround of bioanalytical data is needed to sustain this pace. This article focuses on the evaluation of time-saving homogeneous proximity immunoassays such as Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay, Time-Resolved Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Spatial Proximity Analyte Reagent Capture Luminescence as an alternative to industry popular platforms like mesoscale discovery (MSD) and Gyrolab^®. Our evaluation showed that no one platform can be considered the best for all the parameters assessed. Homogeneous proximity platforms were found to be advantageous over MSD and Gyrolab for certain applications and are herein discussed. The factors affecting the performance of homogeneous assays and appropriate corrections are discussed. The homogeneous assays, due to their flexibility, hold a lot of untapped potential for the future of bioanalysis.