1
|
Mishra V, Thakur S, Patil A, Shukla A. Quality by design (QbD) approaches in current pharmaceutical set-up. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2018; 15:737-758. [DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1504768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Mishra
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
| | - Sourav Thakur
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
| | - Akshay Patil
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
| | - Anshuman Shukla
- Product Development Cell 2, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The application of control charts in regulated bioanalysis for monitoring long-term reproducibility. Bioanalysis 2017; 9:1955-1965. [DOI: 10.4155/bio-2017-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
In regulated bioanalysis, the acceptance of results is batch-wise. When during clinical development derived pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic results from different studies will be combined or compared, it is recommendable to monitor the long-term reproducibility of bioanalytical assays. Long-term reproducibility can be evaluated by control charts generated from control samples included in each batch. We present a methodology for the implementation, construction and evaluation of control charts next to the regular batch acceptance of bioanalytical results. Decision rules can be set up for a statistical evaluation of the results. Violation of a decision rule may lead to a root-cause investigation and corrective actions to improve assay robustness. Three examples of control charts, for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analytes are presented.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Background: Dilution bias is a major cause of immunoassay variability due to the lack of an internal standard to determine the true versus the expected dilution value. Methodology: We used an internal control to measure dilution bias in an ELISA. Acridine-orange was added at the first dilution step and monitored throughout dilutions. Assay results were corrected using the fluorescent signal ratio between samples and reference. Acridine dilution correlated with analyte-specific assay measurements (R2 = 0.987). Correction of assay results with the measured dilution factor improved both accuracy and precision resulting in a reduction of >50% %CV reduction. Conclusion: Dilution correction can significantly improve accuracy and precision of immunoassays. Additional control strategies may further mitigate other sources of variability.
Collapse
|