A 2017 SURVEY OF THE CLINICAL PRACTICE PATTERNS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSING GRAVES DISEASE

Outcomes of Radioactive Iodine Versus Surgery for the Treatment of Graves’ Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Graves’ disease (GD) is a systemic autoimmune disorder mainly affecting the thyroid gland. During GD management, the principal target is to control the hyperthyroid state. There have been three rather similarly effective modalities: medical therapy with antithyroid drugs (ATD), radioactive iodine (RAI), or surgical excision of the thyroid tissue (thyroidectomy). Defining the relative risks and benefits of each of the two potential definitive treatment options (RAI or thyroidectomy) is crucial for creating evidence-based therapy algorithms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these two treatment options. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis that analyzed the studies comparing RAI and thyroidectomy to treat GD. Studies were obtained by searching on Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed central database. The surgically treated group showed significantly lower failure rates, non-significantly lower cardiovascular morbidities, non-significantly higher complication rates, and significantly lower mortality rates. The RAI-related complications were mostly the development or worsening of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. This review and meta-analysis comparing surgery and radioactive iodine for the treatment of Grave’s disease from 16 well-conducted trials has shown that although surgery viz., total thyroidectomy was less frequently utilized for the treatment of Grave’s disease, it controlled the symptoms with greater success and without any worsening of Grave’s ophthalmopathy.

Revisiting the role of surgery in the treatment of Graves' disease

Graves' disease (GD) can be managed by antithyroid drugs (ATD), radioactive iodine (RAI) and surgery. Thyroidectomy offers the highest success rates for both primary and persistent disease, yet it is the least recommended or utilized option reaching <1% for primary disease and <25% for persistent disease. Several surveys have found surgery to be the least recommended by endocrinologists worldwide. With the development of remote access thyroidectomies and intraoperative nerve monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, combined with current knowledge of possible risks associated with RAI or failure of ATDs, revaluation of the benefit to harm ratio of surgery in the treatment of GD is warranted. The aim of this review is to discuss possible reasons for the low proportion of surgery in the treatment of GD, emphasizing an evidence-based approach to the clinicians' preferences for surgical referrals, surgical indications and confronting traditional reasons and concerns relating to the low referral rate with up-to-date data.

Benefits of Long-Term Continuation of Low-Dose Methimazole Therapy in the Prevention of Recurrent Hyperthyroidism in Graves' Hyperthyroid Patients: A Randomized Prospective Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

The long-term continuation of the low-dose antithyroid drug (ATD) beyond the standard duration of ATD therapy of 12-18 months to prevent recurrent hyperthyroidism (RH) is recommended with low quality of evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether long-term continuation of low-dose ATD beyond the recommended duration of treatment would provide a benefit in the prevention of RH in patients with Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH) who achieved euthyroid status with a standard course of ATD therapy.

METHODS

A 36-month prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in 184 patients who had first diagnosed GH and were treated with a standard regimen of ATD therapy using methimazole (MMI) until achieving euthyroidism that was stably maintained for at least 6 months with a low-dose of (2.5-5 mg/day) MMI. All patients had neither a history of adverse effects from MMI, recurrent GH, severe and active ophthalmopathy nor conditions known to affect thyroid function before randomization. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: one group (92 cases) was assigned to discontinue (DISCONT-MMI) and the other (92 cases) was assigned to continue low-dose MMI (CONT-MMI) that was taken at the time of enrollment. The patients in both groups were followed up at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. The rate of RH was compared between both groups, and the adverse effects and risk factors of RH were also studied.

RESULTS

At the end of the 36-month study, 83 cases in CONT-MMI and 90 cases in DISCONT-MMI were eligible for analysis. The cumulative rates of RH in CONT-MMI were significantly lower than those in DISCONT-MMI at every follow-up time point (1.2% vs. 11.2%, 6.8% vs. 18.4%, 11.0% vs. 27.2%, 11.0% vs. 35.0%, and 11.0% vs. 41.2% at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months, respectively; p < 0.01). Cox proportional hazard multivariate analysis showed that there were 2 factors independently associated with the risk of RH, including continuation of low-dose MMI therapy, which decreased the risk of RH by 3.8 times (HR = 0.26, p = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.10-0.70) and age onset of hyperthyroidism before 40 years, which increased the risk of RH by 2.9 times (HR = 2.9, p = 0.015, 95% CI = 1.23-6.88). Neither minor nor major adverse effects of low-dose MMI therapy were observed during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In Graves' hyperthyroid patients with no or nonsevere ophthalmopathy who have completed a standard course of methimazole therapy without an adverse effect and have achieved an euthyroid status that is stably maintained with low-dose methimazole, a long-term continuation of the low-dose methimazole of 2.5-5 mg daily is effective and safe in the prevention of recurrent hyperthyroidism or maintenance of euthyroid status as long as the low-dose methimazole is continued. (TCTR20170705002).

Gender differences in clinical presentation and prognosis of thyroid eye disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical differences in manifestation, treatment, and prognosis of thyroid-eye-disease (TED) between men and women.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal cohort study. Men and women, who diagnosed with TED and treated at a multidisciplinary TED clinic, were compared regarding differences in demographics, eye examination, disease activity, and quality of life evaluation.

RESULTS

TED was diagnosed in 132 patients during the study period, and they included 38 men (28.78%) and 94 women (71.21%). There were six men and 20 women with active disease (Clinical-Activity-Score (CAS) ⩾ 3) during the entire follow-up period (p < 0.01). The mean time from TED diagnosis to CAS ⩾ 3 was 4.50 years for men and 2.35 years for women (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean total Graves' Orbitopathy-Quality-of-Life questionnaire (GO-QOL) score. However, mean GO-QOL subtotal score of external appearance of women was significantly lower compare to men in the first and last visit (p = 0.04, 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Active disease was more common in women and the time-from-diagnosis of TED to CAS ⩾ 3 was shorter among women. Moreover, the appearance QOL score of women was poorer. These findings should be taken into consideration when planning the timing of treatment and when choosing the best treatment for TED patients.

Graves' disease

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the thyroid gland. It is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism and occurs at all ages but especially in women of reproductive age. Graves' hyperthyroidism is caused by autoantibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) that act as agonists and induce excessive thyroid hormone secretion, releasing the thyroid gland from pituitary control. TSHR autoantibodies also underlie Graves' orbitopathy (GO) and pretibial myxoedema. Additionally, the pathophysiology of GO (and likely pretibial myxoedema) involves the synergism of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) with TSHR autoantibodies, causing retro-orbital tissue expansion and inflammation. Although the aetiology of GD remains unknown, evidence indicates a strong genetic component combined with random potential environmental insults in an immunologically susceptible individual. The treatment of GD has not changed substantially for many years and remains a choice between antithyroid drugs, radioiodine or surgery. However, antithyroid drug use can cause drug-induced embryopathy in pregnancy, radioiodine therapy can exacerbate GO and surgery can result in hypoparathyroidism or laryngeal nerve damage. Therefore, future studies should focus on improved drug management, and a number of important advances are on the horizon.