NO BENEFIT OF DEDICATED THYROID NODULE SCREENING IN PATIENTS WITH ACROMEGALY

Acromegaly and Cancer: An Update

Acromegaly is a chronic and rare disease. The diagnosis usually takes several years. Multiple comorbidities are associated with acromegaly. Long-term exposure to growth factors may lead to complications such as the development of benign or malignant tumors. However, the association between acromegaly and cancer remains a matter of debate due to multiple limitations in epidemiological data. There is controversy between acromegaly and mortality, but evidence shows a significant improvement in mortality rates with disease control and careful management of comorbidities. Older age, increased growth hormone levels (GH) at last follow-up, higher insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels at diagnosis, malignancy and radiotherapy were proposed as independent predictors of mortality. In this review we summarize the current state of knowledge in this field. Incidence of different cancer types is described. Rigorous surveillance of endocrine diseases may contribute to increased tumor detection. Personalized screening should probably be recommended.

Incidence and risk factors of cancers in acromegaly: a Chinese single-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of malignancies in acromegaly and to identify risk factors for newly-diagnostic cancers, especially the excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort including 1738 consecutive hospitalized patients with acromegaly in a single referral center between 2012 and 2020 (mean follow-up 4.3 years). A gender- and age-matched case-control study (280 patients from the cohort) was performed for risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen malignancies (67 diagnosed after acromegaly) were observed. The overall newly-diagnostic cancer risk of acromegaly was higher than the general population (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 2.81; 95% CI 2.18-3.57). The risk of thyroid cancer (n = 33, SIR 21.42; 95% CI 13.74-30.08) and colorectal cancer (n = 8, SIR 3.17; 95% CI 1.37-6.25) was elevated. In the overall cohort, IGF-1 (ULN: 1.27 vs. 0.94, p = 0.057), GH (1.30 vs. 1.00 ng/ml, p = 0.12), and disease-controlled rate (34.9% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.203) at the last visit did not reach significance between patients with and without post-diagnostic cancer. In the case-control study, GH (1.80 vs. 0.90 ng/ml, p = 0.018) and IGF-1 (ULN: 1.27 vs. 0.91, p = 0.003) at the last visit were higher in patients with post-diagnostic cancers, with a lower disease-controlled rate. Elder age was a risk factor for cancer. Other metabolic comorbidities and the size of pituitary tumors were similar.

CONCLUSION

The risk of malignancies, especially thyroid cancer, was increased in patients with acromegaly in our center. More cancer screening should be considered when managing acromegaly, especially in patients with higher posttreatment GH and IGF-1.

Covert actions of growth hormone: fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancer

Since its discovery nearly a century ago, over 100,000 studies of growth hormone (GH) have investigated its structure, how it interacts with the GH receptor and its multiple actions. These include effects on growth, substrate metabolism, body composition, bone mineral density, the cardiovascular system and brain function, among many others. Recombinant human GH is approved for use to promote growth in children with GH deficiency (GHD), along with several additional clinical indications. Studies of humans and animals with altered levels of GH, from complete or partial GHD to GH excess, have revealed several covert or hidden actions of GH, such as effects on fibrosis, cardiovascular function and cancer. In this Review, we do not concentrate on the classic and controversial indications for GH therapy, nor do we cover all covert actions of GH. Instead, we stress the importance of the relationship between GH and fibrosis, and how fibrosis (or lack thereof) might be an emerging factor in both cardiovascular and cancer pathologies. We highlight clinical data from patients with acromegaly or GHD, alongside data from cellular and animal studies, to reveal novel phenotypes and molecular pathways responsible for these actions of GH in fibrosis, cardiovascular function and cancer.

A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines

Guidelines and consensus statements ensure that physicians managing acromegaly patients have access to current information on evidence-based treatments to optimize outcomes. Given significant novel recent advances in understanding acromegaly natural history and individualized therapies, the Pituitary Society invited acromegaly experts to critically review the current literature in the context of Endocrine Society guidelines and Acromegaly Consensus Group statements. This update focuses on how recent key advances affect treatment decision-making and outcomes, and also highlights the likely role of recently FDA-approved therapies as well as novel combination therapies within the treatment armamentarium.

Prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with acromegaly and non-growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: A prospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in patients with non-GH secreting pituitary adenomas [NGHPA group: non-functioning (NFPA), prolactin (PRL) and corticotropin (ACTH)-secreting adenomas] compared to patients with acromegaly, a pituitary disease that has been associated with increased risk for thyroid cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, cross-sectional study involving consecutive outpatients followed in our institution with diagnosis of acromegaly (n = 71; 43 women, median age 57 yrs) and NGHPA (n = 57; 38 women, median age 48 yrs.; PRL (n = 35), ACTH (n = 7), NFPA (n = 15). All participants were subjected to thyroid ultrasound (US) by the same examiner, and US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy when indicated.

RESULTS

Thyroid volume was higher in acromegaly than in NGHPA (median 12.5 ml vs 6.3 ml; p < 0.0001), and thyroid nodules were present in 27/71 (38.0%) of acromegaly patients and in 14/57 (24.6%) of NGHPA group. FNA was indicated in 15/27 (55.5%) of acromegaly patients [Bethesda I (n = 1); II (n = 11), III (n = 1), two patients refused FNA], and in 8/14 (57.1%) of the NGHPA group [Bethesda I (n = 2); II (n = 4); V (n = 1); VI (n = 1)]. The two patients of NGHPA group with Bethesda V and VI were operated and papillary carcinoma was confirmed histologically.

CONCLUSION

DTC was not detected in our acromegaly patients and its presence in patients with NGHPA suggests that DTC predisposition is not related to GH excess.

THE PREVALENCE OF CANCER AND ITS RELATION TO DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACROMEGALY: TWO CENTERS' EXPERIENCE

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is characterized by increased serum concentrations of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Although animal studies have demonstrated a relationship between these hormones and cancer risk, the results of human studies evaluating cancer prevalence in acromegaly are inconsistent. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of malignant neoplasms in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Cancer risk was evaluated in a cohort of 280 patients (male/female: 120/160; mean age: 50.93 ± 12.07 years) with acromegaly. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of cancer. Standard incidence ratios were calculated as compared to the general population.

RESULTS

From 280 patients, cancer was diagnosed in 19 (6.8%) patients; 9 (47%) of them had thyroid cancer, which was the most common cancer type. Standard incidence ratios of all cancers were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1) and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in men and women, respectively. Compared to patients without cancer, the current age was higher in patients with cancer (59 [49-65] to 51 [42-59], P = .027). In contrast, the age at diagnosis was similar in both groups. Not only was the time to diagnosis and disease duration similar in both groups but also the basal and current GH and IGF-1 levels. The prevalence of active disease was also similar between the groups (32% to 23%, P = .394).

CONCLUSION

Our findings were not consistent with the studies suggesting that patients with acromegaly encounter an increased cancer risk. Furthermore, there were similar basal and current GH and IGF-1 levels in patients with acromegaly, both with and without cancer.

The role of AIP variants in pituitary adenomas and concomitant thyroid carcinomas in the Netherlands: a nationwide pathology registry (PALGA) study

PURPOSE

Germline mutations in the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) have been identified often in the setting of familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA). To date there is no strong evidence linking germline AIP mutations to other neoplasms apart from the pituitary. Our primary objective was to investigate the prevalence of AIP gene mutations and mutations in genes that have been associated with neuroendocrine tumors in series of tumors from patients presenting with both pituitary adenomas and differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs).

METHODS

Pathology samples were retrieved from all pituitary adenomas in patients with concomitant DTCs, including one with a known germline AIP variant. Subsequently, two additional patients with known germline AIP variants were included, of which one presented only with a follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC).

RESULTS

In total, 17 patients (14 DTCs and 15 pituitary adenomas) were investigated by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). The pituitary tumor samples revealed no mutations, while among the thyroid tumor samples BRAF (6/14, 42.9%) was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by NRAS (3/11, 27.3%). In one AIP-mutated FIPA kindred, the AIP-variant c.853C>T; p.Q285* was confirmed in the FTC specimen, including evidence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the AIP locus in the tumor DNA.

CONCLUSION

Although most observed variants in pituitary adenomas and DTCs were similar to those of sporadic DTCs, we confirmed in one AIP mutation-positive case the AIP-variant and LOH at this locus in an FTC specimen, which raises the potential role of the AIP mutation as a rare initiating event.