Cellular machinery to fuse antimicrobial autophagosome with lysosome

Another longin SNARE for autophagosome-lysosome fusion-how does Ykt6 work?

Formation of the autolysosome involves SNARE-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion, which is mediated by a combination of the Qa SNARE STX17 (syntaxin 17), the Qbc SNARE SNAP29 and the R-SNAREs VAMP7/8. 2 very recent reports have now implicated another R-SNARE with a longin domain, YKT6, in this fusion process. Interestingly, these reports painted two different pictures of YKT6's involvement. Studies in HeLa cells indicated that YKT6, acting independently of STX17, could form a separate SNARE complex with SNAP29 and another Qa SNARE to mediate autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Conversely, work in Drosophila larvae fat cells showed that while Ykt6 could form a SNARE complex with Snap29 and Syx17/Stx17, it is readily outcompeted by lysosomal Vamp7 in this regard. Moreover, its activity in autophagosome-lysosome fusion is not impaired by mutation of the supposedly critical ionic zero-layer residue from R to Q. In this regard, YKT6 may therefore act in a noncanonical way to regulate fusion. Here, we ponder on the fresh mechanistic perspectives on the final membrane fusion step of macroautophagy/autophagy offered by these new findings. Further, we propose another possible mechanism as to how YKT6 might act, which may provide some reconciliation to the differences observed. Abbreviations: LD: longin domain.

Defining and measuring autophagosome flux—concept and reality

The autophagic system is involved in both bulk degradation of primarily long-lived cytoplasmic proteins as well as in selective degradation of cytoplasmic organelles. Autophagic flux is often defined as a measure of autophagic degradation activity, and a number of methods are currently utilized to assess autophagic flux. However, despite major advances in measuring various molecular aspects of the autophagic machinery, we remain less able to express autophagic flux in a highly sensitive, robust, and well-quantifiable manner. Here, we describe a conceptual framework for defining and measuring autophagosome flux at the single-cell level. The concept discussed here is based on the theoretical framework of metabolic control analysis, which distinguishes between the pathway along which there is a flow of material and the quantitative measure of this flow. By treating the autophagic system as a multistep pathway with each step characterized by a particular rate, we are able to provide a single-cell fluorescence live-cell imaging-based approach that describes the accurate assessment of the complete autophagosome pool size, the autophagosome flux, and the transition time required to turn over the intracellular autophagosome pool. In doing so, this perspective provides clarity on whether the system is at steady state or in a transient state moving towards a new steady state. It is hoped that this theoretical account of quantitatively measuring autophagosome flux may contribute towards a new direction in the field of autophagy, a standardized approach that allows the establishment of systematic flux databases of clinically relevant cell and tissue types that serve as important model systems for human pathologies.

Ethanol-induced oxidant stress modulates hepatic autophagy and proteasome activity

In this review, we describe research findings on the effects of alcohol exposure on two major catabolic systems in liver cells: the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy. These hydrolytic systems are not unique to liver cells; they exist in all eukaryotic tissues and cells. However, because the liver is the principal site of ethanol metabolism, it sustains the greatest damage from heavy drinking. Thus, the focus of this review is to specifically describe how ethanol oxidation modulates the activities of the UPS and autophagy and the mechanisms by which these changes contribute to the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced liver injury. Here, we describe the history and the importance of cellular hydrolytic systems, followed by a description of each catabolic pathway and the differential modulation of each by ethanol exposure. Overall, the evidence for an involvement of these catabolic systems in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease is quite strong. It underscores their importance, not only as effective means of cellular recycling and eventual energy generation, but also as essential components of cellular defense.

Endosome–lysosome fusion

The delivery of endocytosed cargo to lysosomes occurs through kissing and direct fusion of late endosomes/MVBs (multivesicular bodies) and lysosomes. Live-cell and electron microscopy experiments together with cell-free assays have allowed us to describe the characteristics of the delivery process and determine the core protein machinery required for fusion. The ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) machinery is required for MVB biogenesis. The HOPS (homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting) complex is required for endosome–lysosome tethering and a trans-SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor-attachment protein receptor) complex including the R-SNARE VAMP7 (vesicle-associated membrane protein 7) mediates endosome–lysosome membrane fusion. Protein-binding partners of VAMP7 including the clathrin adaptors AP-3 (adaptor protein 3) and Hrb (HIV Rev-binding protein) are required for its correct intracellular localization and function. Overall, co-ordination of the activities of ESCRT, HOPS and SNARE complexes are required for efficient delivery of endocytosed macromolecules to lysosomes. Endosome–lysosome fusion results in a hybrid organelle from which lysosomes are re-formed. Defects in fusion and/or lysosome reformation occur in a number of lysosome storage diseases.