Novel dendritic cell-based vaccination in late stage melanoma

A universal anti-cancer vaccine: Chimeric invariant chain potentiates the inhibition of melanoma progression and the improvement of survival

For many years, clinicians and scientists attempt to develop methods to stimulate the immune system to target malignant cells. Recent data suggest that effective cancer vaccination requires combination immunotherapies to overcome tumor immune evasion. Through presentation of both MHC-I and II molecules, DCs-based vaccine platforms are effective in generating detectable CD4 and CD8 T cell responses against tumor-associated antigens. Several platforms include DC transfection with mRNA of the desired tumor antigen. These DCs are then delivered to the host and elicit an immune response against the antigen of interest. We have recently established an mRNA genetic platform which induced specific CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cell response by DC vaccination against melanoma. In our study, an MHC-II mRNA DCs vaccine platform was developed to activate CD4⁺ T cells and to enhance the anti-tumor response. The invariant chain (Ii) was modified and the semi-peptide CLIP was replaced with an MHC-II binding peptide sequences of melanoma antigens. These chimeric MHC-II constructs are presented by DCs and induce proliferation of tumor specific CD4⁺ T cells. When administered in combination with the MHC-I platform into tumor bearing mice, these constructs were able to inhibit tumor growth, and improve mouse survival. Deciphering the immunological mechanism of action, we observed an efficient CTLs killing in addition to higher levels of Th1 and Th2 subsets in the groups immunized with a combination of the MHC-I and MHC-II constructs. These universal constructs can be applied in multiple combinations and offer an attractive opportunity to improve cancer treatment.

Killed Propionibacterium acnes enhances immunogenicity and tumor growth control of a dendritic-tumor cell hybrid vaccine in a murine melanoma model

Hybrid vaccines have been investigated in clinical and experimental studies once expresses total antigens of a tumor cell combined with the ability of a dendritic cell (DC) to stimulate immune responses. However, the response triggered by these vaccines is often weak, requiring the use of adjuvants to increase vaccine immunogenicity. Killed Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) exerts immunomodulatory effects by increasing the phagocytic and tumoricidal activities of macrophages, promoting DC maturation, inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines production and increasing the humoral response to different antigens. Here, we evaluated the effect of P. acnes on a specific antitumor immune response elicited by a hybrid vaccine in a mouse melanoma model. Hybrid vaccine associated with P. acnes increased the absolute number of memory T cells, the IFN-γ secretion by these cells and the IgG-specific titers to B16F10 antigens, polarizing the immune response to a T helper 1 pattern. Furthermore, the addition of P. acnes to a hybrid vaccine increased the cytotoxic activity of splenocytes toward B16F10 in vitro and avoided late tumor progression in a pulmonary colonization model. These results revealed the adjuvant effect of a killed P. acnes suspension, as it improved specific humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by DC-tumor cell hybrid vaccines.

Initial phase I/IIa trial results of an autologous tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine in patients with solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

Tumor vaccines use various strategies to generate immune responses, commonly targeting generic tumor-associated antigens. The tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is produced from DC loaded with autologous tumor antigens, creating a patient-specific vaccine. Here, we describe initial phase I/IIa trial results.

METHODS

This trial includes patients with any stage solid tumors, ECOG ≤1, and >4 months life-expectancy. A personalized vaccine is created using 1 mg of tumor and 120 ml blood (to isolate DC). Primary vaccination series (PVS) is four monthly inoculations. Patients are followed per standard of care (SOC). Endpoints include safety and tumor response (RECIST v1.1).

RESULTS

44 patients were enrolled and vaccinated consisting of 31 late stage patients with residual/measurable disease, and 13 disease-free patients after SOC therapies. While 4 patients progressed before completing the PVS, 12/31 (39%) demonstrated clinical benefit (2 complete responses, 4 partial responses, 6 stable disease). In the adjuvant setting, 46% of late stage patients remain disease free at a median of 22.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The TLPLDC vaccine is scalable, generates a personalized DC vaccine, and requires little autologous tumor tissue and few DC. The vaccine is safe, with primarily grade 0-2 toxicities, and nearly 40% clinical benefit rate in varied tumors, warranting further study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN81339386, Registered 2/17/2016.

Tumor lysate particle loaded dendritic cell vaccine: preclinical testing of a novel personalized cancer vaccine

Aim: We developed a novel approach to efficiently deliver autologous tumor antigens to the cytoplasm of dendritic cells (DC) using yeast cell wall particles (YCWP). Materials and Methods: Loading of YCWP, leakage of protein from loaded YCWP and cytoplasmic delivery of YCWP content was assessed using fluorescent-tagged experiments. Spectrophotometric analysis compared the epitope-specific T-cell responses following antigen presentation via YCWP versus exogenous loading. The in vivo effectiveness of tumor lysate (TL) particle loaded DC (TLPLDC) vaccine was assessed using murine melanoma models. Results: In fluorescence-tagged experiments, YCWP efficiently delivered antigen to the cytoplasm of DC. TLPLDC loading was more effective than conventional exogenous loading of DC. Finally, in murine melanoma models, TLPLDC outperformed an analogous dendritoma vaccine. Conclusion: The TLPLDC vaccine is commercially scalable and holds the potential of producing personalized vaccines.

Gene-modified dendritic cell vaccines for cancer

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are an immunotherapeutic approach to cancer treatment that use the antigen-presentation machinery of DCs to activate an endogenous anti-tumor response. In this treatment strategy, DCs are cultured ex vivo, exposed to tumor antigens and administered to the patient. The ex vivo culturing provides a unique and powerful opportunity to modify and enhance the DCs. As such, a variety of genetic engineering approaches have been employed to optimize DC vaccines, including the introduction of messenger RNA and small interfering RNA, viral gene transduction, and even fusion with whole tumor cells. In general, these modifications aim to improve targeting, enhance immunogenicity, and reduce susceptibility to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. It has been demonstrated that several of these modifications can be employed in tandem, allowing for fine-tuning and optimization of the DC vaccine across multiple metrics. Thus, the application of genetic engineering techniques to the dendritic cell vaccine platform has the potential to greatly enhance its efficacy in the clinic.

Dendritic cell vaccines for melanoma: past, present and future

Administering dendritic cells (DC) loaded with tumor-associated antigens (TAA) ex vivo is a promising strategy for therapeutic vaccines in advanced melanoma. To date the induction of immune responses to specific TAA has been more impressive than clinical benefit because of TAA limitations, suboptimal DC and possibly immune-checkpoint inhibition. Various products, antigen-loading techniques, treatment schedules, routes of administration and adjunctive agents continue to be explored. Biologic heterogeneity suggests autologous tumor as the optimal TAA source to induce immune responses to the entire repertoire of unique patient-specific neoantigens. Many questions remain regarding the optimal preparation of DC and strategies for antigen loading. Effective DC vaccines should result in additive or synergistic effects when combined with checkpoint inhibitors.

Enhancing the treatment effect on melanoma by heat shock protein 70-peptide complexes purified from human melanoma cell lines

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are currently one of the most effective approaches to treat melanoma. The immunogenicity of antigens loaded into DCs determines the treatment effects. Patients treated with autologous antigen-loaded DC vaccines achieve the best therapeutic effects. In China, most melanoma patients cannot access their autologous antigens because of formalin treatment of tumor tissue after surgery. In the present study, we purified heat shock protein 70 (HSP70)-peptide complexes (PCs) from human melanoma cell lines A375, A875, M21, M14, WM‑35, and SK‑HEL‑1. We named the purified product as M‑HSP70‑PCs, and determined its immunological activities. Autologous HSP70‑PCs purified from primary tumor cells of melanoma patients (nine cases) were used as controls. These two kinds of tumor antigenic complexes loaded into DCs were used to stimulate an antitumor response against tumor cells in the corresponding patients. Mature DCs pulsed with M‑HSP70‑PCs stimulated autologous T cells to secrete the same levels of type I cytokines compared with the autologous HSP70‑PCs. Moreover, DCs pulsed with M‑HSP70‑PCs induced CD8+ T cells with an equal ability to kill melanoma cells from patients compared with autologous HSP70‑PCs. Next, we used these PC‑pulsed autologous DCs and induced autologous specific CD8+ T cells to treat one patient with melanoma of the nasal skin and lung metastasis. The treatment achieved a good effect after six cycles. These findings provide a new direction for DC-based immunotherapy for melanoma patients who cannot access autologous antigens.

A phase I/IIa clinical trial in stage IV melanoma of an autologous tumor-dendritic cell fusion (dendritoma) vaccine with low dose interleukin-2

BACKGROUND

Stage IV melanoma has high mortality, largely unaffected by traditional therapies. Immunotherapy including cytokine therapies and checkpoint inhibitors improves outcomes, but has significant toxicities. In this phase I/IIa trial, we investigated safety and efficacy of a dendritoma vaccine, an active, specific immunotherapy, in stage IV melanoma patients.

METHODS

Autologous tumor lysate and dendritic cells were fused creating dendritoma vaccines for each patient. Phase I patients were vaccinated every 3 months with IL-2 given for 5 days after initial inoculation. Phase IIa patients were vaccinated every 6 weeks with IL-2 given on days 1, 3 and 5 after initial inoculation. Toxicity and clinical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled and inoculated. All dendritoma and IL-2 toxicities were

CONCLUSIONS

The dendritoma vaccine has minimal toxicity profile with potential clinical benefit. There was OS advantage for NED stage IV patients, those receiving higher number of doses and increased frequency. Based on these results, we initiated a phase IIb trial utilizing improved dendritoma technology in the adjuvant setting for NED stage III/IV melanoma patients.

Collapse

Key Words

• Adjuvant
• Dendritic cell
• Dendritoma
• Melanoma
• Vaccine

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Aged
• Arthralgia/chemically induced
• Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects
• Cancer Vaccines/immunology
• Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use
• Chills/chemically induced
• Combined Modality Therapy
• Dendritic Cells/immunology
• Dendritic Cells/metabolism
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Erythema/chemically induced
• Female
• Humans
• Interleukin-2/adverse effects
• Interleukin-2/immunology
• Interleukin-2/therapeutic use
• Kaplan-Meier Estimate
• Male
• Melanoma/immunology
• Melanoma/therapy
• Middle Aged
• Nausea/chemically induced
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
• Neoplasm Staging
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants

• Greenville Hospital System

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Julia M Greene General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Erika J Schneble General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Doreen O Jackson General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Diane F Hale General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Timothy J Vreeland General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Madeline Flores General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Jonathan Martin General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Garth S Herbert General Surgery Department, San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Joint Base San Antonio-Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA
Mark O Hardin General Surgery Department, Madigan Army Medical Center, 9040 Jackson Ave., Tacoma, 98431, WA, USA
Xianzhong Yu Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
Thomas E Wagner Perseus PCI, Greenville, SC, USA
George E Peoples Cancer Vaccine Development Program, 600 Navarro Street, Suite 500, San Antonio, TX, 78205, USA. Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Personalized cell-mediated immunotherapy and vaccination: combating detrimental uprisings of malignancies

A large number of researchers worldwide have conducted various investigations to advance the cell-based immunotherapies and to examine their clinical benefits as an ultimate prevention and/or treatment modalities against life-threatening malignancies. This dominion needs integration of science and technology to change the face of treatment of diseases towards much more personalized medicines. It is now plausible to reprogram the human cells for the prevention and treatment of diseases through various mechanisms such as modulation of immune system, nonetheless we should understand the complexity of biological functions of the cells in a holistic way to be able to manipulate the central dogma of the life to prevent any inadvertent mistake. We should, if not must, comprehend the interrelations of the cellular components (e.g., transport machineries) in the developmental processes of diseases. Still, we do not have a complete image of life, perhaps as expressive barcodes, and many pieces are missing. While completing this puzzle to picture the whole image and examine new treatment modalities, we should take extra caution upon unknown/little-known biological phenomena because trifling modulation/ alteration in the complex systems of the life may result in tremendous impacts. In short, it seems we need to consider malignancies as complex systems and treat them in a holistic manner by targeting its hallmarks. Taken all, the immune system reinforcement would be one of the main foundations in combating detrimental malignancy uprising.