KAAACI Guidelines for Allergen Immunotherapy

Comparative safety analysis of coseasonal versus preseasonal Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis

PURPOSE

Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) usually seek treatment when symptoms become unbearable during the pollen season. It remains unclear whether initiating sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during the pollen season affects patients' safety. This study aims to compare the tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season versus before the season.

METHODS

Ninety patients with Artemisia-induced SAR were recruited and equally randomized into the coseasonal initiation treatment (COS-SLIT) group and the preseasonal initiation treatment (PRE-SLIT) group. The COS-SLIT group started SLIT when allergic symptoms occurred during the 2022 pollen season, while the PRE-SLIT group began SLIT four months before the expected season in 2022. Patients were categorized as mild symptoms or moderate-severe symptoms group based on the level of visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated during the 2021 pollen season. The incidence, frequency, performance, and alleviating measures of adverse events (AEs) were analyzed after the up-dosing phase (5 weeks), at three months (13 weeks), six months (26 weeks), and twelve months (52 weeks).

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients (32 patients in the COS-SLIT group and 40 patients in the PRE-SLIT) were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 33 reported a total of 78 AEs. No significant difference was found in the frequency and number of patients experiencing AEs between the COS-SLIT and PRE-SLIT groups during the four follow-up periods (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the symptoms or alleviating measures of AEs between the two groups in general (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, the most common AEs in the COS-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 14), lip edema (n = 10), and cough (n = 4), while in the PRE-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 12), lip edema (n = 8), and ocular pruritus (n = 6). Symptomatic drugs were the most common alleviating measures in both groups (61.29% in COS-SLIT and 64.52% in PRE-SLIT, p > 0.05). Patients with mild and moderate-severe symptoms showed comparable tolerability at different initiation timing (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This prospective study demonstrates the comparable safety and tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season and before the season.

Changes of Clinical Practice Patterns of Allergen Immunotherapy in Korea

This study aimed to identify recent changes of AIT treatment behaviors in real-world clinical practice using a questionnaire survey in Korea. The questionnaire on AIT prescriptions and practical experiences was distributed to all members of the Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology in June 2022. The responses were analyzed and compared with the results from 2009 and 2017. In total, 115 responses (10.1%) were collected; 58 (50.4%) from internal medicine, 34 (29.6%) from pediatricians, and 21 (18.3%) from otolaryngologists. The prescription rate for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was 53.8%, showing a decrease from those in 2009 and 2017; however, that for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) increased steadily, reaching 17.9% in 2009, 40.3% in 2017, and 46.2% in 2022. The prescription rates for asthma and atopic dermatitis increased by 4.6% and 7.9%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed allergens for SCIT in 2022 were house dust mites (32.9%), pollen (30.6%), and animal dander (28.2%), with the rate for animal dander showing a significant increase from 10.3% in 2009. Most physicians (93%) used mixed allergens for SCIT, with 42.8% using a combination of 5 or more allergens. Fifty-eight (67.4%) respondents reported cases of anaphylaxis during SCIT and 36.2% reported systemic adverse reactions during SLIT. In conclusion, SLIT prescriptions, AIT for asthma and atopic dermatitis, and AIT with animal dander increased significantly from 2009 to 2022. Serial surveys of AIT practices are helpful in identifying the changes of real-world clinical practice of AIT.

Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy altered gut microbiota in patients with allergic rhinitis

Introduction

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) induces long-term immune tolerance to allergens and is effective for treating allergic rhinitis (AR). However, the impact of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on gut microbiota from AR patients and its correlation with treatment efficacy remains unclear.

Methods

In the present study, we enrolled 24 AR patients sensitized to Dermatophagoides farinae (Der-f) and 6 healthy donors (HD). All AR patients received SLIT treatment using standardized Der-f drops. Stool samples were collected from AR patients before treatment, and 1- and 3-months post-treatment, as well as from HD, for metagenomic sequencing analysis.

Results

AR patients had significantly lower richness and diversity in gut microbiota compared to HD, with notable alterations in composition and function. Besides, three months post-SLIT treatment, significant changes in gut microbiota composition at the genus and species levels were observed in AR patients. Streptococcus parasanguinis_B and Streptococcus parasanguinis, which were significantly lower in AR patients compared to HD, increased notably after three months of treatment. LEfSe analysis identified these species as markers distinguishing HD from AR patients and AR patients pre- from post-SLIT treatment. Furthermore, changes in the relative abundance of S. parasanguinis_B were negatively correlated with changes in VAS scores but positively correlated with changes in RCAT scores, suggesting a positive correlation with effective SLIT treatment.

Discussion

SLIT treatment significantly alters the gut microbiota of AR patients, with S. parasanguinis_B potentially linked to its effectiveness. This study offers insights into SLIT mechanisms and suggests that specific strains may serve as biomarkers for predicting SLIT efficacy and as modulators for improving SLIT efficacy.

Recent developments in immunotherapy approaches for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) poses a significant global health burden, with the potential to progress to asthma, thereby impacting patients' quality of life. Immunotherapy has demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating clinical symptoms by altering the underlying disease mechanisms of AR. This article provides a thorough review of the current state of immunotherapy for AR, encompassing various facets of immunotherapeutic strategies, elucidating their mechanisms and clinical implications. By presenting a nuanced understanding of the present landscape of immunotherapy for AR, this review aims to serve as a valuable reference for informing clinical treatment strategies. The subsequent analysis of diverse immunotherapeutic pathways offers a comprehensive understanding of their mechanisms and clinical implications. A meticulous examination is conducted on subcutaneous immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, oral immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy, and innovative intravenous gold-induced autologous serum injection therapy. Each pathway is systematically elucidated, with its distinctive features and potential contributions to managing AR emphasized. In conclusion, synthesizing epidemiological insights, immunotherapeutic nuances, and pathway-specific analyses encapsulates a profound understanding of immunotherapy for AR.

Breaking the mold: nontraditional approaches to allergen immunotherapy for environmental allergens

Allergen immunotherapy is a disease-modifying treatment for allergic diseases. The predominant traditional immunotherapy is through subcutaneous administration of allergens to gradually desensitize allergic individuals. While effective, traditional allergen immunotherapy approaches are often lengthy, time consuming for patients and can result in local or systemic adverse reactions. Nontraditional immunotherapies are emerging as promising alternatives, offering potentially more convenient, safe and efficacious treatment options. This review sought to comprehensively examine the safety, efficacy and performance of various nontraditional immunotherapies for environmental allergens. Nontraditional immunotherapy approaches covered in this review include sublingual, local nasal, intralymphatic rush and ultra-rush immunotherapy, allergoid, microbial and anti-IgE immunotherapies. Nontraditional immunotherapies show significant promise in addressing the limitations of traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy. Methods like intralymphatic and rush immunotherapy offer shorter treatment regimens, enhancing patient adherence and convenience. The co-administration of probiotics or monoclonal antibodies, like omalizumab, with AIT appears to improve treatment efficacy and safety. Despite these advancements, further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to establish standardized protocols, dosing and validate long-term effects of these nontraditional immunotherapies. Standardizing outcome measurements across studies is crucial for accurate comparisons of nontraditional immunotherapies prior to widespread clinical adoption of these innovative techniques.

Management of Allergic Rhinitis in the United Arab Emirates: Expert Consensus Recommendations on Allergen Immunotherapy

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the upper airways caused by a type I hypersensitivity reaction triggered by environmental allergens. AR is associated with significant morbidity and affects patients' quality of life, emotional well-being, productivity, and cognitive functioning. As AR prevalence and morbidity have increased significantly worldwide, similar observations have been noted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) with AR becoming a potential public health issue. Management of AR in the UAE is mainly provided by non-allergy specialists relying on first-line treatments such as intranasal steroids and antihistamines, with often suboptimal and short-term efficacy. Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) is the only currently available disease-modifying treatment option in the form of either subcutaneous or sublingual allergen immunotherapy that has been proven to have long-term benefits. This article aims to provide recommendations regarding the use of AIT for managing AR in the UAE, considering both the current landscape in the Emirati healthcare system and local experience.

Alternaria Allergy and Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only known causative treatment for Alternaria allergy, but the difficulty in standardizing Alternaria extracts hampers its effectiveness and safety.

SUMMARY

Alternaria, a potent airborne allergen, has a high sensitization rate and is known to trigger the onset and exacerbation of respiratory allergies, even inducing fungal food allergy syndrome in some cases. It can trigger a type 2 inflammatory response, leading to an increase in the secretion of type 2 inflammatory cytokines and eosinophils, which are the culprits behind allergic symptoms. Diagnosing Alternaria allergy is a multistep process, involving a careful examination of clinical symptoms, medical history, skin prick tests, serum-specific IgE detection, or provocation tests. Alt a1, the major component of Alternaria, is a vital player in diagnosing Alternaria allergy through component-resolved diagnosis. Interestingly, Alternaria can reduce the protein activity of other allergens like pollen and cat dander when mixed with them. In order to solve the problems of standardization, efficacy and safety of traditional Alternaria AIT, novel AIT methods targeting Alt a1 and innovative vaccines such as epitope, DNA, and mRNA vaccines seem promising in bypassing the standardization issue of Alternaria extracts. But these studies are in early stages, and most researches are still focused on animal models, calling for more evidence to validate their use in humans.

KEY MESSAGES

This review delves into the various aspects of Alternaria allergy, including characteristics, epidemiology, immune mechanisms, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and the application and limitations of Alternaria AIT, aiming to provide a foundation for the management of patients with Alternaria allergy.

Allergen immunotherapy in China

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an etiological treatment strategy that involves administering escalating doses of clinically relevant allergens to desensitize the immune system. It has shown encouraging results in reducing allergy symptoms and enhancing patients' quality of life. In this review, we offer a thorough overview of AIT in China, examining its efficacy, safety, current practices, and prospects. We further underscore the progress made in AIT research and clinical applications, as well as the distinct challenges and opportunities that China faces in this area.

The KAAACI Guidelines for Sublingual Immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy is regarded as the only disease-modifying treatment option for various allergic conditions, including allergic rhinitis and asthma. Among the routes of administration of allergens, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has gained clinical interest recently, and the prescription of SLIT is increasing among patients with allergies. After 30 years of SLIT use, numerous pieces of evidence supporting its efficacy, safety, and mechanism allows SLIT to be considered as an alternative option to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Based on the progressive development of SLIT, the current guideline from the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Clinical Immunology aims to provide an expert opinion by allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology specialists with an extensive literature review. This guideline addresses the use of SLIT, including 1) mechanisms of action, 2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, 3) the currently available SLIT products in Korea, and 4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. This guideline will facilitate a better understanding of practical considerations for SLIT.