[Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using an intramedullary locking nail]

OBJECTIVE

Arthroscopic tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) aims at reconstructing a pain-free, orthograde, and functional limb with reduced invasiveness and lower complication rates compared to open arthrodesis.

INDICATIONS

Combined osteoarthritis of the ankle and subtalar joint or hindfoot malalignment.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Osteomyelitis/deep soft tissue infections, talus necrosis, severe deformity of hindfoot or distal tibia, pronounced boney defect, indication for combined total ankle replacement and subtalar fusion.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Patient in supine position; arthroscopic debridement of the cartilage and subchondral zone, perforation of the subchondral bone marrow of the ankle and subtalar joint. Foot and hindfoot positioning. Special attention has to be paid to the calcaneus and talus inclination, hindfoot alignment and rotation. Temporary fixation, insertion of the guide wire, reaming and insertion of the retrograde, curved compression arthrodesis nail. If needed, autologous bone grafting. Proximal locking of the nail, application of compression, distal locking, wound closure.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Lymphatic drainage, physical therapy, and restricted bed rest until wound healing. Non-weightbearing, immobilization for 8 weeks, then step-wise increase of weightbearing. Fitting of custom-made shoes.

RESULTS

Retrospectively included were 15 patients treated by arthroscopic TTCA with an intramedullary nail (average age 56 ± 10 years, 93% male, all had risk factors for postoperative complications). Due to a preoperative plantar ulceration, 4 patients (27%) had 3 ± 1.8 conditioning operations. Sufficient hindfoot correction was achieved in all patients. Major complications occurred in 33% (non-unions). In a subgroup analysis, the presence of a plantar ulceration significantly influenced the development of a major complication. In a case-control study, major complications occurred in 63% and wound complications in 50% of patients for the open technique compared to 33% and 0%, respectively, for the arthroscopic technique. Although the current data do not prove superiority of arthroscopic TTCA compared to open TTCA, there appears to be a strong trend towards considerably lower complication rates following arthroscopic TTCA.

Comparison of arthroscopic to open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

Open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is associated to high complication rates, which led to the development of arthroscopic techniques. Aim was to compare complication rates of open to arthroscopic TTCA in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective case-control study. Patients were selected from the authors' TTCA database. Eligible were high-risk patients receiving arthroscopic-, or open TTCA retrospectively suitable for arthroscopic TTCA. Primary outcome were major complications.

RESULTS

Eight open and 15 arthroscopic TTCAs were included. Three open and 4 arthroscopic TTCAs presented preoperative plantar ulceration. Fusion rates were similar (75% vs. 67%; p=0.679). Major complications occurred in 63% of open (80% surgical-site-infections (SSI)) and 33% of arthroscopic (100% non-unions) TTCA. Preoperative plantar ulceration did not affect major SSI in open TTCA (67% vs. 60%) but resulted in a significant increase of non-union rates for arthroscopic TTCA (75% vs. 18%; p=0.039). In patients without plantar ulceration the union-rate was 80% for both, open and arthroscopic TTCA.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic TTCA drastically reduced major SSI. Patients without preexisting ulceration had excellent union-rates for open and arthroscopic TTCA.