Single port laparoscopic appendectomy in children using glove port and conventional rigid instruments

Acute Care Surgery: Navigating Recent Developments, Protocols, and Challenges in the Comprehensive Management of Surgical Emergencies

Acute care surgery (ACS) is a crucial medical field that specifically deals with the rapid treatment of surgical emergencies. This investigation encompasses the most recent progress, procedures, and obstacles in ACS, utilizing various sources such as scholarly articles, clinical trials, and expert statements. The development of ACS as a specialized field is a significant area of concentration, particularly emphasizing its contribution to improving patient care. An examination is conducted on the efficacy of contemporary triage systems and prompt response mechanisms, specifically in diminishing the incidence of illness and death rates associated with illnesses such as trauma, acute appendicitis, and obstructed viscera. The emphasis is placed on the surgical protocols and principles that form the basis of ACS. Examining regional and international approaches provides insight into the distinctions and commonalities in surgical techniques. An assessment is conducted to determine the effects of the transition to minimally invasive procedures on patient outcomes, recuperation periods, and healthcare expenses. The assessment also examines the logistical obstacles that ACS encounters, such as resource allocation and managing diverse teams. The examination focuses on the delicate equilibrium between prompt decision-making and care grounded in evidence. It also evaluates the possible contribution of technical breakthroughs such as telemedicine and AI to improving patient care and overcoming current obstacles. The topic of training and education for surgeons in ACS is of utmost importance and requires careful consideration. The evaluation evaluates the sufficiency of existing educational frameworks and the necessity of specific training to equip surgeons for the requirements of ACS. This analysis explores the current discourse surrounding the standardization of ACS training, considering its potential ramifications for the future of surgical procedures. Exploring ethical and legal problems in ACS also includes situations when prompt decision-making may clash with patient autonomy and informed consent. The significance of proficient communication with patients and their families during emergency surgical scenarios is underscored, emphasizing the necessity for ethical awareness and interpersonal aptitude. The investigation of ACS demonstrates its dynamic character, signifying notable advancements while recognizing enduring obstacles. Continual research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and policy adjustments are necessary to improve ACS procedures. This thorough investigation offers valuable insights for professionals and researchers, facilitating future progress in managing surgical crises.

Single-Incision Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery: Surgical Outcomes, Feasibility Indication, and the Systematic Review

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILs) has reported the evidence in basic and advanced pediatric laparoscopy. The objective was to review the feasibility and outcomes between basic and advanced procedures of the conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLs) and the SILs at our institute, and to compare the results with the published studies in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to March 2020. Demographic data, operations, conversion rate, and complications were collected and analyzed. The MEDLINE and PubMed were searched in relation to the pediatric SILs and the pediatric CLs in the published series from 1985 to 2021. We combined our retrospective study with a systematic review for meta-analysis. Results: Two hundred twenty-seven patients underwent pediatric laparoscopic surgery during the study period. The procedures included 199 (87.7%) for basic laparoscopy (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, testicular vessel ligation, closure of indirect inguinal hernia, and hydrocele) and 28 (13.3%) for advanced laparoscopy (Meckel diverticulectomy, pull-through operation for Hirschsprung's disease, choledochal cyst excision, and Nissen fundoplication). There was no statistical significance in operative time, length of stay (LOS), conversion rate, recurrence, and complication. The systematic review demonstrated 19 studies and, combined with our present study, produced 2865 patients for analysis. The meta-analysis reported increased LOS in the SILs group in cholecystectomy (mean difference [MD] 0.23 day, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.02-0.43 day, P = .03 and I² = 0%) and choledochal cyst excision (MD 0.18 day, 95% CI 0.02-0.33 day, P = .03 and I² = 0%). There was no statistical difference in operative time, LOS, conversion, and complication in other procedures. Conclusion: The SILs is a feasible indication and safe for surgical pediatric laparoscopy including basic to advanced procedure laparoscopy. It is demonstrated that there were no statistical differences in the operative time, LOS, and the complication. However, LOS in some procedures seems to be different due to the complexity and guideline.

Intra-/Extracorporeal Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There are two approaches to single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA): intracorporeal (Intra) and extracorporeal (Extra). However, the differences in the efficacy between these procedures remain unclear. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and usefulness of these techniques with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in children. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases. Studies comparing outcomes of "Intra-SILA and CLA" or "Extra-SILA and CLA" in children aged <18 years were included. Operative time, hospitalization duration, wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, conversion to open, additional ports, and narcotic doses were evaluated. Results: Overall, 20 studies (six randomized controlled trials [RCTs], one prospective non-RCT, and 13 retrospective cohort studies) (Intra-SILA: 322, CLA: 791 cases; Extra-SILA: 1318, CLA: 1313 cases) were included. Compared with CLA, Extra-SILA was associated with a shorter operative time (mean difference, -9.79 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], -18.34 to -1.24) and lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (3.3% versus 4.6%, odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82) and a higher rate of additional port (13.6% versus 0%, OR, 43.93; 95% CI, 14.79 to 130.50). Meanwhile, the outcomes of Intra-SILA were comparable with those of CLA. However, the participants in the Intra-SILA group received significantly lower doses of narcotics than those in the CLA group. Conclusion: Although the evidence was insufficient, both Intra- and Extra-SILA were comparable to CLA with respect to safety. Extra-SILA seems to have an advantage of a shorter operative time, but additional ports may be required.

Laparoscopic appendicectomy without the use of disposable materials - a low-cost alternative - 1,552 cases operated in 20 years

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic appendectomy does not have a single protocol on its technical systematization, access routes, and use of energy and staplers. The cost of disposable materials can prevent its widespread use. Alternatives to decrease cost can help disseminate the laparoscopic access to appendectomy.

OBJECTIVE

to introduce a low-cost laparoscopic appendectomy method with good aesthetic results through the location of incisions; to show its viability through its application in 1,552 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy operated between 2000 and 2019 with three portals and very low-cost regarding materials used.

METHODS

we applied three punctures - an umbilical one for the camera (5 or 10mm in diameter), a 10mm puncture in the right iliac fossa, and one 5mm puncture in the left iliac fossa. The materials used were permanent use trocars, grasping forceps, hook, scissors, and needle holder, without the need for any disposable device.

RESULTS

1.552 patients were operated between 2000 and 2019, 56.2% being female, mean age 32.66 years (9-93), average hospital stay of 1.74 days (1-10), and median of 1.2 days.

CONCLUSION

the technique we describe uses three metallic trocars and four permanent instruments, in addition to a single cotton suture. It is, therefore, a very low-cost laparoscopic procedure. Its application has shown good results and low morbidity, which may become the preferred indication for laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review

The benefits of laparoscopic surgery (LS) include a speedy recovery, shorter duration of hospital stay, minimal postoperative pain, discomfort and disabilities, and better cosmetic outcomes (less scarring) that help an individual to resume normal daily activities and return to work. A comprehensive literature search on laparoscopic surgeries was conducted using different Internet-based search engines and databases from August 2021 to October 2021. The search was limited to articles published in the English language and those published between years 2005 and 2021. A total of 126 articles were initially identified. Two independent reviewers thoroughly examined the quality and content of the articles. Articles with duplicate data were excluded, and the remaining articles were screened and assessed by the titles and abstracts. After a vigorous assessment, we included data from 49 articles for this review process. Bibliographic management was done using the software “EndNote” (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA).

It was concluded that LS has become the technique of choice for virtually every kind of abdominal surgery, evident by numerous scholarly publications in this field. Level I evidence demonstrating the advantage of LS over open surgery has been reported for numerous operations, including fundoplication for gastroesophageal regurgitation disease, bariatric surgery for weight loss, and cancer resection. Advanced LS has subsequently been expanded to include hepatectomy, pancreatectomy, urology, and gynecology. Patients who are at risk of having elevated abdominal pressure during LS, however, should proceed with care. Recent advances in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery are promising.

Easily Applicable Single-incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using Straightforward Instrumental Alignment and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations. As such, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is indicated as a feasible and safe procedure comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). However, novice surgeons face challenges in performing SILA, because the role of the surgeon's hands is reversed. We introduce an easily applicable technique of SILA by adapting the alignment of CLA.

METHODS

A series of 61 consecutive patients underwent SILA between January 2019 and December 2019 by 4 surgeons at Bundang CHA Medical Center. Acute appendicitis was diagnosed preoperatively by abdomino-pelvis computed tomography or ultrasonography. During the operation, a 3-channel Glove port was used with conventional laparoscopic instruments.

RESULTS

The study participants consisted of 32 males and 29 females, with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 4 to 66 y). The mean body mass index was 20.79 kg/m2 (range, 11.89 to 27.04 kg/m2). The mean operation time was 37.5±17.0 minutes. There was only 1 case of conversion with 1 additional port. Eight patients (13.1%) experienced postoperative complications defined by Dindo-Clavien-Strasberg classification: grade 1 wound complication in 7 patients and grade 2 postoperative bowel obstruction in 1 patient. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.5±1.3 days.

CONCLUSION

Alignment of the instruments during CLA was successfully implemented into a SILA. Our new, easily applicable SILA technique will decrease the learning curve for novice surgeons in performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Should single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy be the new standard for pediatric appendicitis?

BACKGROUND

To compare single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) with conventional (CLA) and transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into three groups, SILA, CLA, and TULA. SILA was defined as performing appendectomy extracorporeally or intracorporeally by using a glove-port incorporated with 3 trocars. TULA was defined as exteriorizing appendix and performing extracorporeal appendectomy by using an operative telescope. Statistical analysis was conducted in patients with simple (SA) and complicated appendicitis (CA), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 315 patients were enrolled, including 161 in SILA, 105 in CLA, and 49 in TULA. Demographic data were similar. In patients with simple appendicitis, operation time of SILA was shorter than CLA but longer than TULA (62.8 ± 22.5 vs. 82.2 ± 24.3 and 51.6 ± 22.3 min, p < 0.01). SILA had shorter hospital stay than CLA, and similar to TULA (56.1 ± 20.4 vs. 71.5 ± 37.8 and 56.9 ± 19.0 h, p < 0.01). In patients with complicated appendicitis, SILA had shorter operation time than CLA, but a similar time to TULA (80.9 ± 22.4 vs. 105.7 ± 28.8 and 82.5 ± 31.2 min, p < 0.01). Conversion to open surgery was not required in all groups. The rates of complications, such as wound infection, intraabdominal abscess and adhesion ileus, were similar. SILA required fewer additional ports than TULA in both simple and complicated appendicitis (1.1% vs. 13.5%, and 9.6% vs. 41.7%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SILA has the advantages of shorter operation time and hospital stay over CLA as well as a lower rate of additional ports than TULA.

Single Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery: From Myth to Reality a Case Series

Laparoscopic surgery has continued to evolve to minimize access sites and scars in both the adult and pediatric populations. In children, single-incision pediatric endoscopic surgery (SIPES) has been shown to be effective, feasible, and safe with comparative results to multiport equivalents. Thus, the use of SIPES continues over increasingly complex cases, however, conceptions of its efficacy continue to vary greatly. In the present case series and discussion, we review the history of SIPES techniques and its current application today. We present this in the setting of five common myths about SIPES techniques: limitations against complex cases, restrictions to specialized training, increased morbidity outcomes, increased operative lengths, and increased operative costs. Regarding the myth of SIPES being limited in application to simple cases, examples were highlighted throughout the literature in addition to the authors’ own experience with three complex cases including resection of a lymphatic malformation, splenectomy with cholecystectomy, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. A review of SIPES learning curves shows equivalent operative outcomes to multiport learning curves and advancements towards practical workshops to increase trainee familiarity can help assuage these aptitudes. In assessing comorbidities, adult literature reveals a slight increase in incisional hernia rates, but this does not correlate with single-incision pediatric data. In experienced hands, operative SIPES times average approximate multiport laparoscopic equivalents. Finally, regarding expenses, SIPES represents an equivalent alternative to laparoscopic techniques.

Risk factors for additional port insertion in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Introduction

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) was expected to have reduced risk of wound infection, less postoperative pain, and improved patient’s satisfaction with better cosmesis compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). When SPLA is converted to CLA, the additional incision for another port insertion can lead to a decrease in the surgical advantages and clinical benefit.

Aim

To evaluate risk factors for conversion to CLA during SPLA.

Material and methods

Between August 2015 and December 2016, patients who underwent intended SPLA were retrospectively reviewed. Conversion was defined as any insertion of an additional port, and complicated appendicitis was defined as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, abscess, or peritonitis in preoperative computed tomography. Postoperative complication was defined as any deviation in the routine postoperative course within 30 days postoperatively.

Results

Of 409 patients, 65 (15.9%) were treated with additional port insertion. The overall complication rate was 1.5% in each group, of which 1 patient developed superficial SSI and 4 patients developed deep surgical site infections in the SPLA group. After univariable and multivariable analysis, old age, male sex, increased serum C-reactive protein (OR = 2.944; 95% CI: 1.433–6.047; p = 0.003), and complicated appendicitis (OR = 3.330; 95% CI: 1.304–8.503; p = 0.012) were significant risk factors for conversion to CLA.

Conclusions

The conversion rate to CLA was 15.9%. Serum C-reactive protein level and complicated appendicitis were strong predictive factors for conversion from SPLA in acute appendicitis.

Outcomes of Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Pediatric Appendicitis in a Single Institution

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is a potentially safe and feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using three ports (CLA). However, the safety and efficacy of SILA for complicated appendicitis (gangrenous and perforated) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) not only for simple appendicitis but also for complicated appendicitis, and to compare them with the outcomes of CLA. Methods: All cases of acute pediatric appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomies in our hospital from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. CLA was performed between January 2007 and October 2011, and TULAA was performed between November 2011 and December 2016. In this study, patients' demographics and operative outcomes for simple appendicitis (catarrhal and phlegmonous) and complicated appendicitis were analyzed, comparing the results of TULAA and CLA. Results: In total, 262 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy: CLA in 103 patients and TULAA in 159 patients. All appendectomies were performed in the acute phase. Complicated appendicitis accounted for 60 CLA cases and 81 TULAA cases. There were no significant differences in patients' demographics. Mean operative time in simple appendicitis was significantly shorter in TULAA than in CLA. In addition, complication rates in complicated appendicitis were significantly lower in TULAA than in CLA. Moreover, in each comparison, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in TULAA than in CLA. Conclusion: In our institution, TULAA has shown to be a safe and effective alternative for both simple and complicated appendicitis in children compared with CLA.

Homemade Glove Port for Single-Incision Pediatric Endosurgery (SIPES) Appendectomy-How We Do It

Introduction  Single-incision pediatric endosurgery (SIPES) for the treatment of acute appendicitis in children has recently gained popularity due to its advantages including minimization of postoperative scars or less incisional pain. The principal disadvantages of SIPES include the limited degrees of freedom of movement and high health care costs. To overcome these issues, some surgeons have reported to use noncommercial ports for SIPES appendectomy.

Case Report  In this report, we present a case of a 10-year-old female patient with acute appendicitis undergoing SIPES appendectomy using own homemade glove port and straight rigid instruments.

Conclusion  SIPES appendectomy using the glove port is a low-cost alternative to commercially available port systems. It is easy to set up and use.

Bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility in patients with acute appendicitis

PURPOSE

Essential treatment of acute appendicitis is surgical resection with the use of appropriate antibiotics. In order to effectively treat acute appendicitis, it is important to identify the microorganism of acute appendicitis and evaluate the effective antibiotics.

METHODS

A total of 694 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis and had positive microbial result between 2006 and 2015 were recruited. For microbial assessment, luminal contents of the appendix were swabbed after appendectomy. In patients with periappendiceal abscess, the specimens were obtained from abscess fluid. The patient characteristics, operative data, use of antibiotics, the results of microbiology, and postoperative morbidities including surgical site infection (SSI) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 38.2 (± 19.8) years, and 422 patients (60.8%) were male. Most of the operations were performed by conventional laparoscopy (83.1%), followed by single-port laparoscopy (11.8%). The most common microorganism was Escherichia coli (64.6%), which was susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, most cephalosporins, piperacillin/tazobactam, and imipenem. The second most common microorganism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.4%), which was resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate and cefotaxime. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 8.6%, and the most common type was superficial SSI (6.2%), followed by ileus (1.2%), gastroenteritis (0.7%), and organ/space SSI (0.3%). P. aeruginosa (odds ratio = 2.128, 95% confidence interval 1.077-4.206, P = 0.030) was the only significant microorganism associated with SSI according to multivariate analysis adjusting for other clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In perforated appendicitis, the use of empirical antibiotics seems to be safe. In some cases of Pseudomonas infection, adequate antibiotics should be considered.

Extracorporeal and intracorporeal approaches of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: is one superior to another?

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been widely popularized for pediatric appendicitis. Various techniques have been proposed with two main approaches: extracorporeal and intracorporeal. The purpose of this study is to compare the result of different approaches in single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

With IRB approval, patients less than 18years of age who underwent SILA were enrolled from July 2012 to December 2015. The patients were divided into three groups based on surgical approach: extracorporeal (Extra), mixed (Mix), and intracorporeal (Intra) approaches. Parameters were retrospectively reviewed, including age, gender, white blood cell (WBC), operation time, operative findings, time to diet, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications. Statistical analysis was performed separately for simple and complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

There were 32, 32, and 24 patients with simple appendicitis in Extra, Mix, and Intra respectively. There were 27, 15, and 31 patients with complicated appendicitis in the three groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted in the mean age, gender distribution, or WBCs between the different groups. A higher percentage of patients with complicated appendicitis received intracorporeal approach than those with simple appendicitis (42.5% vs. 27.3%, p=0.044). In simple appendicitis, the LOS was significantly longer in Extra as compared to Mix (p=0.043). Otherwise, the mean LOS, time to diet, and complications were not significantly different. The mean operation time was similar between groups of simple appendicitis (56.5±19.5, 63.6±23.5, and 70.1±23.1 min, p=0.08), whereas it was significantly shorter in Extra of complicated appendicitis (67.6±16.4, 86.6±19.0, and 89.9±23.4 min, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that intracorporeal approach is an independent factor for prolonged operation time in both simple and complicated appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Different approaches of SILA in children have similar outcomes for both simple and complicated appendicitis. Extracorporeal is the most time efficient; however, intracorporeal can be helpful to deal with complex situations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Applying vacuum to accomplish reduced wound infections in laparoscopic pediatric surgery

INTRODUCTION

The prevention of surgical site infections has received little attention in pediatric surgery. Negative pressure wound therapy is used to treat complex wounds. We hypothesized that this principle could reduce wound infection rates following laparoscopic surgery. We tested this in a randomized controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We randomized pediatric patients with an umbilical port site to a standard dressing or a vacuum dressing. The dressings were removed 48h after surgery. A nurse blinded for the treatment inspected the umbilical wound between post-operative days 7-10 for infection. Data comparison was performed using a Fisher exact test with p<0.05 defined as significant.

RESULTS

We recruited 90 patients over 2 years and randomized 44 to the vacuum dressing arm and 42 to the control arm. We observed a 2.8% (n=1/35) infection rate in the vacuum dressing group and 3.3% (n=1/30) in the control group (p=1.0).

DISCUSSION

We ended our study early when an interim analysis showed an impractical number of patients would be required to achieve sufficient power. We did not find a significant difference between the control and vacuum dressings in reducing post-operative wound infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy by Surgical Trainees

Background:

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is one of the most commonly performed single port surgeries in the world. However, there are few publications documenting a young resident’s experience. The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes of SILA performed by a surgical trainee and to evaluate its feasibility and safety compared with conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA) when performed by a surgical trainee and SILA by surgical staff.

Methods:

Between September 2014 and August 2015, clinical data were retrospectively collected for SILA and TPLA cases performed at Chung-Ang University Hospital. Three surgical residents who have assisted at least 50 cases of TPLA and 30 cases of SILA performed by gastrointestinal surgery specialists performed the surgeries. The indication of SILA by surgical trainees was noncomplicated appendicitis with no comorbidity.

Results:

In total, 47 patients underwent SILA by surgical residents, 98 patients underwent TPLA by surgical residents and 137 patients underwent SILA by surgical staff. In comparing SILA and TPLA performed by surgical residents, the mean age was younger (26 vs. 41 y, P<0.005) in the SILA group, the operative time (47.2 vs. 61.5 min, P<0.010) and hospital stay (2.3 vs. 2.7 d, P=0.003) were shorter in SILA group. In the SILA group, 2 cases of postoperative fluid collection (5.7%) occurred, necessitating antibiotic treatment. In TPLA group, 1 postoperative abscess occurred, requiring drainage. When comparing SILA performed by surgical residents and SILA performed by surgical staff, there were no significant differences in operation time, and postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

Surgical residents safely performed SILA with good postoperative outcomes after short learning curve.

A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy

BACKGROUND

For appendicitis, single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SIA) has been proposed as an alternative to 3-port appendectomy (3PA). However, there remains controversy regarding outcomes and cost of SIA. We sought to review our experience with these two techniques to identify differences in these factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The charts of children (0-17 y) who underwent appendectomy at a tertiary pediatric hospital from 2011-2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Appendectomy was either performed through traditional 3PA or SIA (laparoscopically assisted via externalization through an umbilical incision). Demographic data including age, body mass index, comorbidities, and gender were examined. Information on perforation, operative time and cost, length of stay, and infectious complications for both SIA and 3PA was identified. Data were analyzed using student t tests and chi square analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 337 patients underwent appendectomy (141 SIA and 197 3PA), 35.6% of whom (40 SIA, 80 3PA) had perforated appendicitis. For nonperforated appendicitis, SIA had significantly shorter operative times, decreased operative costs, and length of stay. However, these differences were not found for perforated appendicitis. Regardless of appendicitis severity, there was no difference in rates of wound infection, abscess, or readmission between the two techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that SIA is a faster, more cost effective alternative than 3PA for acute appendicitis. SIA did not result in increased infection rates for acute or perforated appendicitis and can be considered an equivalent alternative to 3PA in the surgical management of appendicitis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in children

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence has indicated that single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) is a safe procedure that has a comparable clinical outcome to conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) in adult patients. Nevertheless, the use of SILA in pediatric patients is still controversial, and systematic reviews that compare SILA and CLA in children are lacking in the current literature.

METHODS

A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify eligible studies that were conducted between January 1998 and September 2014. Primary outcome measures were total postoperative complications, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, ileus, and wound hematoma. Secondary outcome measures were operative time, length of hospital stay and the frequency of use of additional analgesics. The random effect model was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 2 randomized clinical trials and 12 nonrandomized clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. These studies included a total of 2249 patients: 744 who underwent SILA and 1505 who underwent CLA. No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to the incidence of total postoperative complications, intraabdominal abscess, ileus, wound hematoma, length of hospital stay, or the frequency of use of additional analgesics. However, SILA was associated with a higher incidence of wound infection (OR=2.25; 95%=1.21-4.17; P=0.01) compared with CLA and required a longer operative time (WMD=5.73 minutes; 95% CI=4.17-7.28; P<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

SILA seems to be a relatively feasible and safe procedure without any superiority to CLA. Thus, SILA may not be a better approach for pediatric patients.

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) has been considered as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy in children.

METHODS

An electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE was performed. Operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications including wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, ileus in SILA and CLA were pooled and compared by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 1 prospective study and 7 retrospective studies) that included 2,109 pediatric patients were studied. Of these patients, 933 and 1,176 patients had undergone SILA and CLA, respectively. There was significant shorter length of hospital stay for SILA compared with CLA in children; however, pooling the results for SILA and CLA revealed no significant difference in operative time and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CLA, SILA has the advantage of shorter hospital stay. However, SILA failed to show any obvious advantages over CLA in operative time and postoperative complications including wound infection, intra-abdominal infection, and ileus.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery in children: A new alternative in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a technique in laparoscopic surgery, which is based on the idea that all the laparoscopic trocars are inserted through a single umbilical incision. This paper documents a single-centre experience, which performed the single-port surgery in children using an improvised trans-umbilical glove-port with conventional rigid instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively studied the outcomes of SILS procedures between January 2013 and June 2014. Materials required making our homemade trans-umbilical port consisted on: A flexible ring, a rigid larger ring, one powder-free surgical glove, a wire-to-skin and standard standards laparoscopic trocars.

RESULTS

A total of 90 consecutive procedures had been done in our institution: 15 girls and 75 boys (mean age: 7.5 years). We used SILS on 59 appendectomies with an average operative time of 48 minutes. We needed conversion to conventional surgery in three cases (two with perforated appendicitis and one for difficulty to mobilize the appendix). SIL cholecystectomy was performed for four patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis; mean operative time was 60 min. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 2. Eighteen boys with non-palpable testis were explored and treated. Other procedures included: Varicocelectomy (n = 2), intra-abdominal lymph node biopsies (n = 2), ovarian cystectomy (n = 1), ovarian transposition (n = 1), aspiration of renal hydatid cyst (n = 1), explorative laparoscopy in research to Meckel's diverticulum (n = 1) and intestinal intussusceptions (n = 1). No post-operative complications were seen in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SILS in the paediatric population using conventional rigid instruments is feasible, safe and effective. It may be an alternative to the costly commercially available single-port systems especially in a developing country like Tunisia.

Three port laparoscopic appendectomy technique with low cost and aesthetic advantage

INTRODUCTION

Despite dating more than 30 years after the first laparoscopic appendectomy, ileocecal appendix resection is still performed by laparotomy in more than 90% of cases, in our country.

AIM

To describe a technique for laparoscopic removal of the ileocecal appendix with three portals, at low cost and very good aesthetic appearance.

TECHNIQUE

Three incisions, one umbilical and two suprapubic are made; permanent material used comprises: grasping forceps, hook, scissors, needle holders, three metal trocars and four other usual instruments, and a single strand of cotton. There is no need to use of operative extractors bags, clips, endoloops, staples or bipolar or harmonic energy instruments. Allows triangulation and instrumentation in the conventional manner.

CONCLUSION

The proposed technique is safe and reproducible, easily teachable, at very low cost and can be applied in general hospitals with conventional laparoscopic equipment.