The experience of transumbilical endoscopic appendectomies

Single-Incision, Two-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy as an Alternative to Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Purpose

We designed a modified technique to perform an advanced procedure using conventional instruments and did not employ specialized single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port equipment. We compared postoperative results for transumbilical, single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) and single-incision, 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SITPLA).

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 77 patients who underwent TUSPLA or SITPLA to provide more minimally invasive surgery between May 2017 and April 2018. TUSPLA was performed in 39 patients and 38 underwent SITPLA. In the SITPLA group, two 5-mm trocars were inserted through the umbilicus and an extra puncture site was used for a left-handed instrument. Demographic characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared between the groups.

Results

The mean total operative time in the SITPLA group was shorter than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.003). The mean laparoscopic instrumental time was also shorter (p<0.001) in the SITPLA. The number of postoperative analgesics in the SITPLA group was less than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.002). The length of hospital day after surgery was shorter in the SITPLA group than in the TUSPLA group (p=0.008). There were no other significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion

SITPLA had a shorter operative time, required less pain management, and had a similar cosmetic outcome when compared with TUSPLA.

Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

Purpose

The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device.

Methods

Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated.

Results

One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports.

Transumbilical thoracic sympathectomy: a single-centre experience of 148 cases with up to 4 years of follow-up†

OBJECTIVES

Thoracic sympathectomy is considered as the most effective method to treat palmar hyperhidrosis (PH). Here, we report our experience of transumbilical thoracic sympathectomy with an ultrathin flexible endoscope for PH in a series of 148 patients with up to 4 years of follow-up.

METHODS

A prospective database was used in this retrospective analysis of 148 patients (61 males, 87 females, with a mean age of 21.3 years) with PH who were operated on by the same surgeon in a single institution from April 2010 to March 2014. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia involving intubation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Demographic, postoperative and long-term data of patients were recorded and statistical analyses were performed. All patients were followed up at least 6 months post procedure through clinic visits or telephone/e-mail interviews.

RESULTS

The procedure was performed successfully in 148 of the 150 patients. Two patients had to be converted to conventional thoracoscopic procedure because of severe pleural adhesions. The mean operating time was 43 min (ranging from 39 to 107 min) and the mean postoperative length of stay was 1 day (range 1-4 days). All patients were interviewed 6-48 months after surgery and no diaphragmatic hernia or syndrome was observed. The rate of resolution of PH and axillary hyperhidrosis was 98 and 74.6%, respectively. Compensatory sweating was reported in 22.3% of patients. Almost all of the patients were satisfied with the surgical results and the cosmetic outcome of the incision.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary human experience suggested that transumbilical thoracic sympathectomy was a safe and efficacious alternative to the conventional approach. This technique avoided the chronic pain and chest wall paraesthesia that are associated with the chest incision. In addition, this novel procedure afforded maximum cosmetic benefits.