Associating microwave ablation and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for the treatment of huge hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis

Comparison of clinical efficacy between LAPS and ALPPS in the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Insufficient post-operative future liver remnant (FLR) limits the feasibility of hepatectomy for patients. Staged hepatectomy is an effective surgical approach that can improve the resection rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic microwave ablation and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (LAPS) and classical associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC.

Methods

Clinical data of patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent LAPS or ALPPS in our institute between January 2017 and May 2022 were retrospectively analysed.

Results

A total of 18 patients with HBV-related HCC were retrospectively analysed and divided into the LAPS group (n = 9) and ALPPS group (n = 9). Eight patients in the LAPS group and eight patients in the ALPPS group proceeded to a similar resection rate (88.9% vs 88.9%, P = 1.000). The patients undergoing LAPS had a lower total comprehensive complication index than those undergoing ALPPS but there was not a significant different between the two groups (8.66 vs 35.87, P = 0.054). The hypertrophy rate of FLR induced by ALPPS tended to be more rapid than that induced by LAPS (24.29 vs 13.17 mL/d, P = 0.095). The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 0% for ALPPS and 35.7% for LAPS (P = 0.009), whereas the 2-year overall survival for ALPPS and LAPS was 33.3% and 100.0% (P = 0.052), respectively.

Conclusions

LAPS tended to induce lower morbidity and FLR hypertrophy more slowly than ALPPS, with a comparable resection rate and better long-term RFS in HBV-related HCC patients.

Comparison of Treatment Response, Survival Profiles, as Well as Safety Profiles Between CalliSpheres® Microsphere Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

CalliSpheres^® microspheres (CSM) are the first drug-eluting beads (DEB) developed in China. This study aimed to compare treatment response, survival, and safety profiles between DEB transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with CSM and conventional TACE (cTACE) in huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods

A total of 71 patients with huge HCC who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was assessed at first month (M1), third month (M3), and sixth month (M6) after TACE therapy; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated; liver function indexes were recorded before TACE operation (M0), at first week (W1), M1 and M6 after TACE therapy; adverse events which occurred after TACE operation were recorded.

Results

DEB-TACE presented with higher objective response rate (60.0% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.05) and disease control rate (86.7% vs. 59.4%, p < 0.05) compared with cTACE at M3. Regarding survival profiles, PFS [median: 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.8–3.7) vs. 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.7–2.5)] as well as OS [median: 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.6–11.0) vs. 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0–6.3)] were longer in DEB-TACE group compared with cTACE group (both p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox’s regression further illustrated that DEB-TACE vs. cTACE was an independent protective factor for PFS and OS (both p < 0.01). As for safety profiles, patients’ liver function injury was reduced in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group. The incidence of fever was lower, and CINV was less severe in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group (both p < 0.05), while no difference in occurrence of liver abscess, increase of ascites, or moderate pain between two groups was observed.

Conclusion

DEB-TACE with CSM presents with better treatment response, survival profiles, as well as safety profiles compared with cTACE in treatment for huge HCC patients.

Technical modifications and outcomes after Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) for primary liver malignancies: A systematic review

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) represents a novel surgical technique which provides rapid and effective liver regeneration allowing for the resection of lesions initially deemed unresectable. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize all technical modifications of the original ALPPS approach (mALPPS) for primary liver malignancies and evaluate short- and long-term outcomes. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library Central, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov databases until July, 31 2019. The following keywords were utilized: "Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy", "ALPPS", "Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) And In Situ Split", "Portal Vein Ligation (PVL) And In Situ Split". A total of 24 studies were identified incorporating data on 83 patients who underwent a mALPPS for a primary liver malignancy. Median FLR hypertrophy after ALPPS-1 was 54% (range, 6.7-133%) and median EBL during the ALPPS 1 and ALPPS 2 stages was 200 mL (range 0-1000) and 700 ml (range 100-4000), respectively. R0 resections were achieved in all patients (100%). Most complications occurred post ALPPS- 2 (n = 33/72, 45.8%), while overall 30-day mortality was 13.3%. After a median follow up of 7 months (range 3-60), recurrence rate was 18.9%. Disease-free survival ranged from 3 to 60 months with a median of 10 months and overall survival ranged from 3 to 60 months with a median of 11 months. ALPPS with the various technical modifications offers a reasonable chance of complete tumor resection among patients with initially unresectable primary liver tumors. Further advances in patient selection, surgical techniques and perioperative management are required to minimize complications rates. Large scale prospective trials are needed to validate the role of the technical modifications of ALPPS in the treatment of patients with primary liver malignancies in an individualized setting.

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy for Unresectable Hepatitis B Virus-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single Center Study of 45 Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

BACKGROUND

ALPSS allows curative resection of conventionally-unresectable liver tumors. However, its role in HCC is largely unknown.

METHODS

Consecutive HCC patients who underwent ALPPS at our center between April 2013 and September 2017 were retrospectively studied. The oncological results were compared with patients receiving transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and patients undergoing one-stage resection by using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

The median tumor diameter was 13 cm (range: 6-22 cm) in patients with a single tumor (n = 28), whereas the median total tumor diameter was 12 cm (range: 9-31 cm) in patients with multiple tumors (n = 17). After stage-1 ALPPS, the median future liver remnant (FLR) increased by 56.8%. The stage-2 ALPPS was completed in 41 patients (91.1%) after a median of 12 days. The 90-day mortality rate was 11.1% (5/45). The overall survival (OS) rates at 1- and 3-year were 64.2% and 60.2%, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 1 and 3 years were 47.6% and 43.9%, respectively. On PSM analysis, the long-term survival of patients undergoing ALPPS was significantly better than those receiving TACE (OS, P = 0.004; DFS, P < 0.0001) and similar to those subjected to one-stage liver resection (OS, P = 0.514; DFS, P = 0.849).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term survival after ALPPS was significantly better than TACE, and similar to those after one-stage liver resection. ALPPS is a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC in selected patients.

ALPPS for hepatocarcinoma under cirrhosis: a feasible alternative to portal vein embolization

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and malignant tumors. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is currently the most accepted treatment before major hepatic resection for HCC in patients with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis and associated insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). In the last decade, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique has been described to obtain an increase of volume regarding PVE and a decrease of drop out. The initial excessive morbidity and mortality of this technique have decreased drastically due to a better selection of patients, the learning curve and the use of less aggressive variations of the original technique in the first stage. For both techniques a complete preoperative assessment of the FLR is the most important issue and only patients with and adequate FLR should be resected. ALPPS could be a feasible technique in very selected patients with HCC and cirrhosis. As long as it is performed in an experienced center could be used as a first choice technique versus PVE or could be used as a rescue technique in case of PVE failure.

A preliminary study of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in a rat model of liver cirrhosis

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in a rat model of liver cirrhosis has not, to the best of our knowledge, been previously investigated. The present study therefore aimed to establish a model of ALPPS in cirrhotic rats and to assess liver regeneration. Rats were randomly divided into an ALPPS group with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis (group A) and a normal liver (group B). Rat weight, cytokine levels, biochemical parameters and histopathology were assessed 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 days after ALPPS. Higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels were detected in group A on the first postoperative day. On the first, second and third days, hepatocyte proliferation rate was higher in group B than in group A. After 3 days, hepatocyte proliferation rate in group B began to decrease, but the rate in group A continued to increase until the 14th day. Higher levels of hepatocyte growth factor, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α were detected in group A compared with group B, but the differences were not significant. The present study demonstrated that ALPPS promoted liver regeneration in a rat model of cirrhosis, but significantly impaired liver function. Compared with the ALPPS model, group B exhibited a delayed peak of proliferation. The mechanism of liver regeneration induced by ALPPS in cirrhotic rats may be associated with increased cytokine levels.

Tourniquet-ALPPS is a promising treatment for very large hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

When very large hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCs) with insufficient future liver remnants are treated using associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), the outcome is often poor. We therefore tested the efficacy of a modified version of that technique, tourniquet-ALPPS. A review of the literature examining outcomes of HCC and IHCC patients treated with ALPPS revealed the incidences of morbidity ≥ III and postoperative mortality to be respectively 20.7% and 16.1% among HCC patients and 50% and 45.4% among IHCC patients. In the present case series, in which HCC and IHCC patients were treated with tourniquet-ALPPS, median tumor size was 100 mm (range: 70-200 mm). After surgical stage I, there was no morbidity, no mortality and the median future liver remnant had increased at day 7 by 76%. In surgical stage II, 100% of tumors were resectable (8 right trisectionectomies, 5 with inferior vena cava resection). Two patients experienced serious morbidity ≥ IIIB and 1 patient died (11%). One- and 3-year overall survival was 75% and 60%, respectively. Thus tourniquet-ALPPS appears to be an effective alternative to classical ALPPS for the treatment of patients with HCC or IHCC.

Clinical significance of post-hepatectomy hepatic failure in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Backgrounds/Aims

This study attempted to identify risk factors for development of post-hepatectomy hepatic failure (PHF) and its effect on long-term survival of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective study of 143 patients who had been diagnosed with liver metastases from colorectal cancer and who had undergone hepatectomy between 2003 and 2010. We allocated these patients to PHF and non-PHF groups, using the definition of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery, and compared the clinical factors of the two groups, using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between these groups.

Results

The PHF group comprised 19 patients (13.3%); all had Grade A PHF. Independent risk factors for development of PHF were metachronous liver metastases and major hepatectomy. The differences between the PHF and non-PHF groups in OS or RFS were not statistically significant; however, the PHF group tended to have a worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between OS and the factors of poor differentiation of the primary colorectal cancer, major hepatectomy, and positive resection margin.

Conclusions

Major hepatectomy is an important risk factor for PHF in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The pathological characteristics of the primary tumor are more important as predictors than is Grade A PHF.

Modifications of ALPPS - from complex to more complex or from complex to less complex operations

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently been developed to induce rapid liver hypertrophy to reduce the chance of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with borderline or insufficient future liver remnant. ALPPS is still in an early developmental stage and its techniques have not been standardized. This study aimed to review the technical modifications of the conventional ALPPS procedure.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed for articles published from January 2007 to December 2016 using the keywords "associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy" and "ALPPS". Additional articles were identified by a manual search of references from key articles.

RESULTS

There have been a lot of modifications of the conventional ALPPS. These are classified as: (1) modifications aiming to improve surgical results; (2) modifications aiming to expand surgical indications; (3) salvage ALPPS; (4) ALPPS using the minimally invasive approach. Some of these modifications have made the conventional ALPPS procedure to become even more complex, although there have also been other attempts to make the procedure less complex. The results of most of these modifications have been reported in small case series or case reports. We need better well-designed studies to establish the true roles of these modifications. However, it is interesting to see how this conventional ALPPS procedure has evolved since its introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a trend for the use of minimally invasive procedure in the phase 1 or 2 of the conventional ALPPS procedure. Some of these modifications have expanded the use of ALPPS in patients who have been considered to have unresectable liver tumors. The long-term oncological outcomes of these modifications are still unknown.

A new technique for accelerated liver regeneration: An experimental study in rats

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is used to accelerate growth of the future liver remnant. We investigated alternative methods for increasing the future liver remnant.

METHODS

A total of 152 rats were randomized as follows: (1) sham; (2) portal vein ligation; (3) portal vein ligation/surgical split (ALPPS); (4) portal vein ligation/split of the liver with a radiofrequency ablation needle; (5) portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation of the deportalized liver (portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation necrosis in the deportalized liver); (6) portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation of the future liver remnant (portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation-future liver remnant); and (7) controls. Animals were evaluated on postoperative days 2 and 4. Bodyweight, liver parameters, hepatic regeneration rate, proinflammatory cytokines, hepatocyte proliferation, and gene expression were measured.

RESULTS

Hepatic regeneration rate indicated a steady increase in all intervention groups compared with sham rats (P < .001). At postoperative day 2, the hepatic regeneration rate was significantly higher in the portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation necrosis in the deportalized liver group than in the portal vein ligation group (P = .039). On postoperative day 4, we found significant differences between the portal vein ligation group and the ALPPS (P = .015), portal vein ligation/split of the liver with a radiofrequency ablation needle (P = .010), and portal vein ligation/radiofrequency ablation necrosis in the deportalized liver (P = .046) groups. Hepatocyte proliferation was significantly higher at all times compared with sham rats. On postoperative day 4, we found a significantly higher proliferation in groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 compared to portal vein ligation. Gene analysis revealed upregulation of genes involved in cellular proliferation and downregulation of genes involved in cellular homeostasis in all intervention groups. Between the intervention groups, gene expression was nearly identical. Biochemical markers and proinflammatory cytokines were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

The surplus liver regeneration after ALPPS is probably mediated through parenchymal damage and subsequent release of growth stimulators, which again upregulates genes involved in cellular regeneration and downregulates genes involved in cellular homeostasis. We also demonstrate that growth of the future liver remnant, comparable to that seen after ALPPS, could be achieved by radiofrequency ablation treatment of the deportalized liver, that is, a procedure in which the initial step in humans can be performed percutaneously.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: the current role and development

BACKGROUND

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has recently been developed to induce rapid liver hypertrophy and reduce post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). ALPPS is still considered to be in an early developmental phase because surgical indications and techniques have not been standardized. This article aimed to review the current role and future developments of ALPPS.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed for articles from January 2007 to October 2016 using the keywords "associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy" and "ALPPS". Additional papers were identified by a manual search of references from key articles.

RESULTS

ALPPS induces more hypertrophy of the FLR in less time than portal vein embolization or portal vein ligation. The benefits of ALPPS include rapid hypertrophy 47%-110% of the liver over a median of 6-16.4 days, and 95%-100% completion rate of the second stage of ALPPS. The main criticisms of ALPPS are centered on its high morbidity and mortality rates. Morbidity rates after ALPPS have been reported to be 15.3%-100%, with ≥ the Clavien-Dindo grade III morbidity of 13.6%-44%. Mortality rates have been reported to be 0%-29%. The important questions to ask even if oncologic long-term results are acceptable are: whether the gain in quality and quantity of life can be off balance by the substantial risks of morbidity and mortality, and whether stimulation of rapid liver hypertrophy also accelerates rapid tumor progression and spread. Up till now, the documentations of the ALPPS procedure come mainly from case series, and most of these series include heterogeneous groups of malignancies. The numbers are also too small to separately evaluate survival for different tumor etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, knowledge on ALPPS is limited, and prospective randomized studies are lacking. From the reported preliminary results, safety of the ALPPS procedure remains questionable. ALPPS should only be used in experienced, high-volume hepatobiliary centers.