Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer: 2-year follow-up results at a single institution in Korea

Long-term survival of a patient with colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis and low completeness of cytoreduction score: A case report

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastasis occurs in about 20% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with a 5-year survival rate of only 6%. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy reportedly improves survival in selected patients. Achieving complete cytoreduction, indicated by a low completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) score, is a key factor in extending survival. Here, we present a case in which multimodal therapy yielded long-term survival in a patient, even though she had a CCR score of 3.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old female with CRC and extensive peritoneal metastases presented with abdominal distention. Cytoreductive surgery was not completed due to the extent of the disease (CCR score: 3). The patient underwent palliative omentectomy, followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin C, and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. She subsequently received systemic chemotherapy, which was terminated after 19 cycles and two dose reductions due to side effects. She was in good health without distant metastases or peritoneal recurrence at the 6-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive multimodal treatment may yield long-term survival and quality of life improvement in patients with advanced disease, even with high CCR scores.

Triphasic Learning Curve of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective but costly procedure for select patients with peritoneal malignancies. The impact of progression along a learning curve on the cost of these procedures is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from 2016 to 2022 at a single quaternary center. Our study cohort was temporally divided into four equally sized volume quartiles (A, B, C, and D). We utilized cumulative sum plots and split-group analysis to characterize the institutional learning curve based on cost, operative time, length of stay, and morbidity. Multivariable linear regression was performed to estimate costs after adjusting for covariates. Bivariate analysis was performed using a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare continuous variables and a χ2 test to compare categorical variables.

RESULTS

Of 201 patients, the median age [interquartile range (IQR)] was 57 (47-65) years, 113 (56%) patients were female, 143 (71%) were white, and 107 (53%) had private insurance. Median operating room charge [US$42,639 (US$32,477-54,872), p < 0.001] varied between volume quartiles, peaking in quartile C. Stabilization was achieved for 86 cases for operating room cost, 88 cases for routine cost, 96 cases for length of stay, 103 cases for operative time, 120 cases for intensive care unit length of stay, and 150 cases for overall and serious morbidity. The actual operating room and routine costs were similar to predicted costs at the end of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRS-HIPEC learning curve is triphasic, with cost stability achieved relatively early compared with other markers of surgical proficiency.

Comparison of EPIC Versus HIPEC in the Treatment of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases and Appendix Tumors Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting

BACKGROUND

The selection of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer or appendiceal neoplasms following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) depends on the surgeon's discretion. This study was designed to compare postoperative and oncologic outcomes of HIPEC and EPIC using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

METHODS

This study included 175 patients who received HIPEC or EPIC following CRS at a single tertiary university hospital between December 1999 and December 2020. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to control for pretreatment characteristics between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with postoperative and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

After IPTW, no significant differences in baseline demographics and tumor characteristics were observed between the two groups. The HIPEC group had a significantly longer operation time than the EPIC group. The EPIC group showed a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate than the HIPEC group. Operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02; p < 0.001), bowel anastomosis (OR 7.25; 95% CI 1.16-45.2; p = 0.034), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 7.62; 95% CI 1.85-31.4; p = 0.005), and EPIC (OR 8.76; 95% CI 2.16-35.5; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for major surgical complications. No association was observed between intraperitoneal chemotherapy type and major hematologic toxicity, overall survival, progression-free survival, or peritoneal progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

EPIC was a risk factor for major surgical complications. Survival outcomes were similar between the two types of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results at a single institution in Korea

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the 7-year follow-up results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed 54 cases of CRS and IPC in 53 patients with PM of colorectal cancer from December 2011 to December 2013. We prospectively collected data and analyzed peritoneal carcinomatosis grade, completeness of cytoreduction, and long-term follow-up (median, 10 [range, 2-92] months) results.

RESULTS

The mean peritoneal cancer index was 15 (1 ~ 35), and complete cytoreduction was possible in 35 (64.8%) patients. Excluding the four patients who died, 11 (22.4%) out of the 49 patients were alive at the time of the last follow-up, and the overall median survival period was 10.3 months. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 31% and 17%, respectively. Patients with complete cytoreduction had a median survival period of 22.6 months, which was significantly longer than that for patients without complete cytoreduction (3.5 months) (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate for patients with complete cytoreduction was 24%, and four patients were still alive without disease.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and IPC show a 5-year survival rate of 17% in patients with PM of colorectal cancer. A possibility of long-term survival is observed in a selected group. Multidisciplinary team evaluation for careful patient selection and CRS training program to achieve complete cytoreduction are significantly important factors in improving survival rate.

Treatment options for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: experience from a single institution in Korea

Purpose

This study aimed to compare treatment options and outcomes based on peritoneal cancer index (PCI) among patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

Between January 2016 and July 2019, clinicopathological data of patients with AGC diagnosed with PM were reviewed. Different treatment methods were performed according to the PCI score: (1) group A (PCI ≤ 13) received cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with postoperative intraperitoneal (IP) and systemic chemotherapy (n = 29), while (2) group B (PCI > 13) received IP chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy (n = 22).

Results

Clinical outcomes of 51 patients at the Dankook University Hospital were reviewed. Group A had a significantly lower mean PCI score (9.8 ± 6.9 vs. 32.6 ± 7.1, P < 0.01) than group B, with 25 patients (86.2%) achieving complete cytoreduction. Complications occurred in 16 patients (31.4%), none of who suffered mortality (group A: 11 patients, 37.9% vs. group B: 5 patients, 22.7%; P = 0.25). Among the morbidity, 5 cases (17.2%) and 2 cases (9.1%) exhibited a Clavien-Dindo grade greater than III in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.04). Groups A and B had an overall median survival time of 34.0 and 16.0 months, respectively (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Patients with PM of AGC received different treatments according to their PCI score. When accompanied with careful patient selection, our approach may be considered an acceptable option for the treatment of PM of AGC.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy as Treatment Options for Peritoneal Metastasis of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to examine the outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Materials and Methods

Between May 2015 and June 2017, 38 CRS and HIPEC procedures were performed in patients with PM of AGC at the Dankook University Hospital. We prospectively collected and analyzed data regarding PM grade, morbidity and mortality rates, and short-term follow-up results (median, 13.5 months).

Results

The mean peritoneal cancer index was 15 (range, 0-39). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 21 patients (55.2%), whereas complications occurred in 16 (42.1%) and 2 (5.7%) patients died. The overall median patient survival time was 19 months. The patients who underwent complete cytoreduction had a median survival time of 26 months, which was significantly longer than the median survival time of 16 months in the patients who did not undergo complete cytoreduction (P=0.006).

Conclusions

CRS with HIPEC may have a beneficial effect in patients with PM of AGC. However, the rates of complications and mortality associated with this combined therapeutic approach are high. Therefore, this treatment should be performed only in selected patients by surgeons experienced in the field of gastric cancer with PM.