Treatment options for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: experience from a single institution in Korea

Outcomes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal metastasis is common in gastric cancer and linked to poor survival. Treatment of peritoneal metastasis with intraperitoneal chemotherapy has become an accepted practice in some centres. This systematic review and meta-analysis intends to provide a comprehensive evaluation of published evidence for the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for studies reporting the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment gastric cancer with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis was performed up until June 2024. Studies were not eligible for inclusion if they described the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy solely as an adjunct to gastrectomy or cytoreductive surgery. Pooled- and meta-analysis was used to summarise study outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies reporting the outcomes of 2446 gastric cancer patients who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastasis, were included. Three principal methods of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration were described: catheter based (normothermic) intraperitoneal chemotherapy (n = 28); pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (n = 14), and; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (n = 11). The proportion of patients with complete peritoneal disease regression after receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy was 27 % (95%CI, 14-41). Median overall survival determined was 16.4 months (95%CI, 14.4-18.4). Meta-analysis of data from eight studies comparing combined intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy with systemic chemotherapy alone identified a survival benefit for patients receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy (Hazard ratio 0.57 [95%CI, 0.48-0.67],P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite variation in published treatment approaches and a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials, intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be considered safe and in selected circumstances efficacious.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results at a single institution in Korea

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the 7-year follow-up results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed 54 cases of CRS and IPC in 53 patients with PM of colorectal cancer from December 2011 to December 2013. We prospectively collected data and analyzed peritoneal carcinomatosis grade, completeness of cytoreduction, and long-term follow-up (median, 10 [range, 2-92] months) results.

RESULTS

The mean peritoneal cancer index was 15 (1 ~ 35), and complete cytoreduction was possible in 35 (64.8%) patients. Excluding the four patients who died, 11 (22.4%) out of the 49 patients were alive at the time of the last follow-up, and the overall median survival period was 10.3 months. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 31% and 17%, respectively. Patients with complete cytoreduction had a median survival period of 22.6 months, which was significantly longer than that for patients without complete cytoreduction (3.5 months) (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate for patients with complete cytoreduction was 24%, and four patients were still alive without disease.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and IPC show a 5-year survival rate of 17% in patients with PM of colorectal cancer. A possibility of long-term survival is observed in a selected group. Multidisciplinary team evaluation for careful patient selection and CRS training program to achieve complete cytoreduction are significantly important factors in improving survival rate.