Diagnostic Performance of Carbon Monoxide Testing by Pulse Oximetry in the Emergency Department

The diagnostic accuracy of carbon monoxide pulse oximetry in adults with suspected acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Acute carbon monoxide poisoning (COP) is one of the leading causes of intoxication among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). COP symptoms are not always specific and may vary from mild to critical. In the last few years, COHb pulse oximeters have been developed and applied to the setting of suspected COP. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CO pulse oximetry (SpCO) with carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels measured by blood gas analysis, used as a reference standard, in patients with suspected COP.

Methods

We developed our search strategy according to the PICOS framework, population, index/intervention, comparison, outcome, and study, considering the diagnostic accuracy of SpCO compared to COHb levels measured by blood gas analysis, used as a reference standard, in patients with suspected COP enrolled in cross-sectional studies in English. The search was performed on MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE in February 2022. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 methodology. A COHb cutoff of 10% was chosen to test the sensitivity and specificity of the index test. A bivariate model was used to perform the meta-analysis. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022359144).

Results

A total of six studies (1734 patients) were included. The pooled sensitivity of the test was 0.65 (95% CI 0.44-0.81), and the pooled specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.83-0.98). The pooled LR+ was 9.4 (95% CI 4.4 to 20.1), and the pooled LR- was 0.38 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.62).

Conclusion

Our results show that SpCO cannot be used as a screening tool for COP in the ED due to its low sensitivity. Because of its high LR+, it would be interesting to evaluate, if SpCO could have a role in the prehospital setting as a tool to quickly identify COP patients and prioritize their transport to specialized hospitals on larger samples with a prospective design.

Diagnostic accuracy of carboxyhemoglobin saturation with pulse CO-oximetry in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning

Objective

Carboxyhemoglobin saturation (SpCO)with pulse CO-oximetry is an alternative method in CO poisoning; however, the correlation of it with blood carboxyhemoglobin level (COHb) is still debated.The study aimed to evaluate the correlation between SpCO and venous COHb level and factors associated with the diagnostic accuracy of SpCO.

Material and methods

SpCO and venous COHb levels of patients with CO poisoning, according to a COHb level was 3%, were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, 95% CI (confidence interval), and the cut-off value of SpCO were calculated using ROC analysis at a 10% threshold for COHb. Agreement levels were calculated with Bland-Altman analysis. Risk factors affecting diagnostic accuracy were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

If the 10% threshold of COHb was accepted as the diagnostic threshold for CO poisoning, the sensitivity and specificity of SpCO were 98.4% and 100% (95% CI: 0.996-1.000) at the 6.85 cut-off point of SpCO. The scatter plot of COHb and SpCO showed a strong positive relationship at values of presentation and discharge (r = .979, p<0.001; r = .969, p<0.001). With a bias of 3.1% for the mean difference between-COHb and SpCO, the limits of agreement from Bland- Altman analysis were -0.7 to 7.1. For the 10% threshold, age and male gender have significantly increased false negativity rates (B = .074, p = 0.010, and B = 0.252, p = 0.011, respectively).

Conclusion

SpCO is a reliable method with high sensitivity and specificity; therefore, a lower cut-off points of SpCO compared to COHb level may be accepted to diagnose and follow-up CO poisoning.

Accuracy of pulse CO-oximetry to evaluate blood carboxyhemoglobin level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is one of the most common causes of poisoning death and its diagnosis requires an elevated carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) level. Noninvasive CO saturation by pulse oximetry (SpCO) has been available since 2005 and has the advantage of being portable and easy to use, but its accuracy in determining blood COHb level is controversial. To evaluate the accuracy of SpCO (index test) to estimate COHb (reference test). Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies. Four electronic databases were searched (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OpenGrey) on 2 August 2022. All studies of all designs published since the 2000s evaluating the accuracy and reliability of SpCO measurement compared to blood COHb levels in human volunteers or ill patients, including children, were included. The primary outcome was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SpCO for estimating COHb by blood sampling by modeling receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating sensitivity and specificity (primary measures). The secondary measures were to calculate the limits of agreement (LOA) and the mean bias. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-DTA 2018 guidelines and has been registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42020177940). The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Twenty-one studies were eligible for the systematic review; 11 could be included for the quantitative analysis of the primary measures and 18 for the secondary measures. No publication bias was found. The area under the summary ROC curve was equal to 86%. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI, 0.66-0.85) and 0.83, 95% CI (0.74-0.89), respectively (2089 subjects and 3381 observations). The mean bias was 0.75% and the LOA was -7.08% to 8.57%, 95% CI (-8.89 to 10.38) (2794 subjects and 4646 observations). Noninvasive measurement of COHb (SpCO) using current pulse CO oximeters do not seem to be highly accurate to estimate blood COHb (moderate sensitivity and specificity, large LOA). They should probably not be used to confirm (rule-in) or exclude (rule-out) CO poisoning with certainty.

Prise en charge des brûlures en préhospitalier et aux urgences

Une brûlure est une lésion de la peau ou d’un autre tissu organique principalement causée par la chaleur ou les rayonnements, la radioactivité, l’électricité, la friction ou le contact avec des produits chimiques. Les plus fréquentes, les brûlures thermiques (dues à la chaleur), surviennent lorsque certaines cellules ou toutes les cellules de la peau ou d’autres tissus sont détruites par des liquides bouillants, des solides chauds (brûlures de contact), ou des flammes. En France, l’incidence des brûlures prises en charge à l’hôpital est environ de 13 pour 100 000 habitants. La prise en charge en urgence du brûlé grave par lésion thermique est bien décrite, une recommandation de pratique professionnelle a été publiée en 2019 par la Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation, en association avec la Société francophone de brûlologie, la Société française de médecine d’urgence et l’Association des anesthésistes-réanimateurs pédiatriques d’expression française. Pourtant, l’urgentiste va être confronté à de nombreuses brûlures de gravité et de nature différentes. Nous faisons ici une mise au point sur les données connues en termes d’épidémiologie, de manifestations cliniques et des différentes thérapeutiques qui peuvent être proposées dans la prise en charge des brûlures. Nous faisons aussi le point sur les localisations à risque particulier que l’urgentiste doit connaître, ainsi que sur les intoxications qui peuvent être associées aux brûlures. Nous détaillons aussi certains contaminants qui sont à connaître.