Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal intracranial aneurysm clipping: a systematic review

Once considered far-fetched, endoscopic endonasal clipping (EEC) has been reported as a feasible alternative route for treating intracranial aneurysms located in the midline. Appropriately, debates regarding EEC applicability have arisen amongst the neurosurgical community. We aim to define the safety, effectiveness, and current state-of-art in the use of EEC for intracranial aneurysms. Two databases (PubMed, Cochrane) were queried for intracranial aneurysms that underwent EEC between inception and 2019. Literature review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Data regarding clinical presentation, radiological imaging, and outcome were extracted and analyzed from selected publications. Nine studies with 27 patients (8 males, 19 females), harboring 35 aneurysms (9 ruptured, 26 nonruptured), met the predetermined inclusion criteria. Patient age range is from 34 to 70 (median = 50) years old. Four aneurysms were considered not suitable for EEC during the procedure, and two aneurysms required additional treatment, leading to an overall treatment success (obliteration) rate of 86%. Complications occurred in 7 patients (26%), including CSF leakage in 5 patients (18%) and ischemic complications in 4 (15%). Among the cases reported, complications occurred more frequently in posterior circulation aneurysms in comparison with anterior circulation aneurysms (62.5 vs 10.5%). Ischemic complications occurred in 4 out of 8 posterior circulation aneurysms. Although feasible, EEC is associated with a significant risk of complications, with rates identified that are significantly higher than established open clipping or endovascular management. The current data suggest that transcranial clipping and endovascular occlusion are still the primary indication for treating intracranial aneurysms.

Transclival approaches for intradural pathologies: historical overview and present scenario

Recently, endoscopic transsphenoidal transclival approaches have been developed and their role is widely accepted for extradural pathologies. Their application to intradural pathologies is still debated, but is undoubtedly increasing. In the past five decades, different authors have reported various extracranial, anterior transclival approaches for intradural pathologies. The aim of this review is to provide a historical overview of transclival approaches applied to intradural pathologies. PubMed was searched in October 2018 using the terms transcliv*, cliv* intradural, transsphenoidal transcliv*, transoral transcliv*, transcervical transcliv*, transsphenoidal brainstem, and transoral brainstem. Exclusion criteria included not reporting reconstruction technique, anatomical studies, reviews without new data, and transcranial approaches. Ninety-one studies were included in the systematic review. Since 1966, transcervical, transoral, transsphenoidal microsurgical, and, recently, endoscopic routes have been used as a corridor for transclival approaches to treat intradural pathologies. Each approach presents a curve that follows Scott's parabola, with evident phases of enthusiasm that quickly faded, possibly due to high post-operative CSF leak rates and other complications. It is evident that the introduction of the endoscope has led to a significant increase in reports of transclival approaches for intradural pathologies. Various reconstruction techniques and materials have been used, although rates of CSF leak remain relatively high. Transclival approaches for intradural pathologies have a long history. We are now in a new era of interest, but achieving effective dural and skull base reconstruction must still be definitively addressed, possibly with the use of newly available technologies.

Vascular Complications of Intercavernous Sinuses during Transsphenoidal Surgery: An Anatomical Analysis Based on Autopsy and Magnetic Resonance Venography

Purpose

Vascular complications induced by intercavernous sinus injury during dural opening in the transsphenoidal surgery may contribute to incomplete tumour resections. Preoperative neuro-imaging is of crucial importance in planning surgical approach. The aim of this study is to correlate the microanatomy of intercavernous sinuses with its contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography (CE-MRV).

Methods

Eighteen human adult cadavers and 24 patients were examined based on autopsy and CE-MRV. Through dissection of the cadavers and CE-MRV, the location, shape, number, diameter and type of intercavernous sinuses were measured and compared.

Results

Different intercavernous sinuses were identified by their location and shape in all the cadavers and CE-MRV. Compared to the cadavers, CE-MRV revealed 37% of the anterior intercavernous sinus, 48% of the inferior intercavernous sinus, 30% of the posterior intercavernous sinus, 30% of the dorsum sellae sinus and 100% of the basilar sinus. The smaller intercavernous sinuses were not seen in the neuro-images. According to the presence of the anterior and inferior intercavernous sinus, four types of the intercavernous sinuses were identified in cadavers and CE-MRV, and the corresponding operative space in the transsphenoidal surgical approach was implemented.

Conclusion

The morphology and classification of the cavernous sinus can be identified by CE-MRV, especially for the larger vessels, which cause bleeding more easily. Therefore, CE-MRV provides a reliable measure for individualized preoperative planning during transsphenoidal surgery.