Umbilical cord blood quality and quantity: Collection up to transplantation

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an attractive source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation in some blood disorders. One of the major factors that influence on transplantation fate is cord blood (CB) cell count, in addition to human leukocyte antigen similarity and CD34+ cell number. Here, we review the factors that could effect on quality and quantity of CBUs. Relevant English-language literatures were searched and retrieved from PubMed using the terms: CB, quality, collection, and transplantation. The numbers of total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34+ cells are good indicators of CB quality because they have been associated with engraftment; thereby, whatever the TNCs in a CB unit (CBU) are higher, more likely they led to successful engraftment. Many factors influence the quantity and quality of UCB units that collect after delivery. Some parameters are not in our hands, such as maternal and infant factors, and hence, we cannot change these. However, some other factors are in our authority, such as mode of collection, type and amount of anticoagulant, and time and temperature during collection to postthaw CBUs and freeze-and-thaw procedures. By optimizing the CB collection, we can improve the quantity and quality of UCB for storage and increase the likelihood of its use for transplantation.

Factors which can influence the quality related to cell viability of the umbilical cord blood units

Cell viability is an important indicator for the quality of umbilical cord blood (UCB) units that can influence the transplant final outcome. Thus, it is particularly important to identify the factors that may affect the cell quality during the banking process. The present study is a first attempt to correlate the impact of exogenous factors (time from collection to processing, collected UCB volume) and endogenous factors (TNCC--total nucleated cell count, CD34(+)cell count) on cell viability assessed before UCB units cryopreservation within a banking standardized process. Three thousand UCB units collected in 35 ml CPDA containing bags were processed by HES sedimentation within 48 h. TNCC, CD34(+) cell counts and total cell viability were determined after processing. Cell viability of 94.37 ± 4.67%, TNCC of 73.17 ± 36.73 × 10(7) and CD34(+)cell count of 2.61 ± 2.29 × 10(6) was obtained after processing of units with UCB collected volume of 80.23 ± 28.52 ml. A significant negative correlation was found between cell viability and the time from collection to processing (r = -0.7228; P < 0.0001). The cell viability decreasing rate of 20.54%, 15.18% and 3-10% were achieved for units with collected UCB volume <40 ml, (40-80 ml) and >80 ml, to 48 h versus 12 h. There were no differences considering cell viability for the UCB units with similar collected UCB volume that had various CD34(+)cell count or TNCC (P > 0.05). The extension of the time from collection to processing of UCB units can reduce the quality by decreasing cell viability. The cell viability decreasing rate owing to the time influence is determined by the collected UCB volume being inversely proportional to it. Endogenous factors do not affect the cell viability.