Multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) polymorphisms may not be directly associated with response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

Molecular Mechanisms of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The hematopoietic neoplasm chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare disease caused by chromosomal reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34:q11) with subsequent formation of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. This fusion gene encodes a constitutively active tyrosine kinase, which results in malignant transformation of the cells. Since 2001, CML can be effectively treated using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, which prevent phosphorylation of downstream targets by blockade of the BCR-ABL kinase. Due to its tremendous success, this treatment became the role model of targeted therapy in precision oncology. Here, we review the mechanisms of TKI resistance focusing on BCR-ABL1-dependent and -independent mechanisms. These include the genomics of the BCR-ABL1, TKI metabolism and transport and alternative signaling pathways.

Pharmacogenomics of Impaired Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Response: Lessons Learned From Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

The use of small molecules became one key cornerstone of targeted anti-cancer therapy. Among them, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are especially important, as they were the first molecules to proof the concept of targeted anti-cancer treatment. Since 2001, TKIs can be successfully used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). CML is a hematologic neoplasm, predominantly caused by reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) leading to formation of the so-called BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. By binding to the BCR-ABL1 kinase and inhibition of downstream target phosphorylation, TKIs, such as imatinib or nilotinib, can be used as single agents to treat CML patients resulting in 80 % 10-year survival rates. However, treatment failure can be observed in 20-25 % of CML patients occurring either dependent or independent from the BCR-ABL1 kinase. Here, we review approved TKIs that are indicated for the treatment of CML, their side effects and limitations. We point out mechanisms of TKI resistance focusing either on BCR-ABL1-dependent mechanisms by summarizing the clinically observed BCR-ABL1-mutations and their implications on TKI binding, as well as on BCR-ABL1-independent mechanisms of resistances. For the latter, we discuss potential mechanisms, among them cytochrome P450 implications, drug efflux transporter variants and expression, microRNA deregulation, as well as the role of alternative signaling pathways. Further, we give insights on how TKI resistance could be analyzed and what could be learned from studying TKI resistance in CML in vitro.

MDR1 gene polymorphisms and imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to investigate the association between multidrug resistance (MDR1) C1236T, C3435T and G2677T/A polymorphisms and the response to imatinib (IM) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic databases in PubMed, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Cochrane were searched using combinations of keywords relating to MDR1 polymorphisms and the response to IM in CML. Studies retrieved from database searches were screened using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 37 studies were initially identified, and 17 studies, involving 4494 CML patients, were eventually included in this meta-analysis.Results of our study revealed significant association between MDR1 G2677T/A and C3435T polymorphisms and response to IM in Caucasian population under recessive model (T or A vs G; OR = 1.43,95%CI [1;06-1.93]; T vs C;OR = 1.13; 95%IC [0.79; 1.63]), dominant (T or A vs G; OR = 0.94; 95%CI [0.74-1.21]; T vs C; OR = 1.49; 95%CI [1.02-2.17]) and heterozygous models (T or A vs G; OR = 0.83; 95%CI [0.64; 1.09]; T vs C; OR = 1.52; 95%CI [1.01-2.28]); respectively. However, never significative association was found between IM response and the MDR1 C1236T polymorphism (OR = 1.25; 95%CI [0.46; 3.33]).

CONCLUSION

The MDR1 G2677T/A and C3435T polymorphisms might be a risk factor for resistance to IM in Caucasian CML patients.

ABCB1, ABCG2, ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 drug transporter polymorphisms and their impact on drug bioavailability: what is our current understanding?

INTRODUCTION

Interindividual differences in drug response are a frequent clinical challenge partly due to variation in pharmacokinetics. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are crucial determinants of drug disposition. They are subject of gene regulation and drug-interaction; however, it is still under debate to which extend genetic variants in these transporters contribute to interindividual variability of a wide range of drugs.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current literature on the impact of genetic variants in ABCB1, ABCG2 as well as ABCC1, ABCC2, and ABCC3 on pharmacokinetics and drug response. The aim was to evaluate if results from recent studies would increase the evidence for potential clinically relevant pharmacogenetic effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Although enormous efforts have been made to investigate effects of ABC transporter genotypes on drug pharmacokinetics and response, the majority of studies showed only weak if any associations. Despite few unique results, studies mostly failed to confirm earlier findings or still remained inconsistent. The impact of genetic variants on drug bioavailability is only minor and other factors regulating the transporter expression and function seem to be more critical. In our opinion, the findings on the so far investigated genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters are not suitable as predictive biomarkers.

Pharmacology of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia; a clinician's perspective

OBJECTIVE

In this review, we have summarized the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and adverse effects of imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, ponatinib and radotinib with focus on pharmacogenomic studies with clinical end points. We have discussed the key phase 3 trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) comparing with each other, treatment free remission (TFR) and selection of TKI. Upcoming concepts and related trials in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) along with future directions have been touched upon.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Embase, Google, Cochrane library and Medline were searched to identify relevant literature for the review. Clinicaltrial.gov was searched for upcoming data and trials.

RESULTS

There are lot of gap in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of TKI. Imatinib appears to be the safest TKI. Newer TKI's achieve better achievement of therapeutic milestones, deeper molecular response and less chances of progression of CML compared to imatinib. Newer TKI appears to be better choice for achieving TFR. When the objective is survival, imatinib is still the TKI of choice. Primary prophylaxis with antiplatelet drugs for TKI having cardiovascular and thromboembolic side effects should be considered.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacogenetic data of TKI is still immature to guide in therapeutic decision making in clinical practice. There is need for further research in pharmacology and pharmacogenomics of newer TKI's. Randomized controlled trials are required to decide the optimum TKI for TFR. Safe and effective TKI for targeting T315I mutation, CML accelerated phase and blast crisis are an active area of research.

Association between C1236T Genetic Variant of ABCB1 Gene and Molecular Response to Imatinib in Indonesian Chronic Myeloid Patients

Objective:

Imatinib is the first-line drug used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients due to high molecular response and overall survival rate. However, some patients develop resistance to imatinib even after attaining a response. Mutation in ABCB1 efflux transporters is one of the known mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. This study was aimed to investigate the association of ABCB1 C1236T polymorphism in Indonesian chronic myeloid patients with molecular response to imatinib treatment.

Methods:

We analyzed 120 samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the chronic phase, who had been on imatinib treatment for at least 12 months. We analyzed the C1236T variant of the ABCB1 gene using PCR, followed by direct sequencing, and associate them with the achievement of major molecular response (MMR).

Results:

The major molecular response was achieved in 28% of patients. The frequencies of the SNPs were CC (40%), CT (46%), and TT (14%). Our result showed that there was a lack of association between polymorphism of ABCB1 C1236T and imatinib response in Indonesian patients, with OR = 0.646 (95% CI: 0.283, 1.471; p>0.05).

Conclusion:

There was no association between ABCB1 C1236T variants with the major molecular response in Indonesian chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving imatinib treatment.

The significance of enzyme and transporter polymorphisms for imatinib plasma levels and achieving an optimal response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients

INTRODUCTION

Imatinib mesylate is the drug of choice for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib pharmacokinetics is affected by a number of transport proteins and enzymes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the present study we evaluated the association of eight polymorphisms in the seven genes CYP3A5*3 (rs776746), CYP3A4*1 (rs2740574), CYP2C9*3 (rs1057910), SLC22A1 (rs683369), ABCB1 (rs1045642, rs1128503), ABCG2 (rs2231142) and ABCC2 (rs717620) with imatinib plasma level and achieving an optimal clinical response in 112 CML patients (53 men and 59 women).

RESULTS

No association was found between the examined polymorphisms in rs776746, rs2740574, rs1057910, rs683369, rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2231142, rs717620 and the achieved imatinib plasma level. The influence of rs776746 (CYP3A5*3) on the achievement of a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 months was borderline non-significant (p = 0.06). Furthermore, no association was demonstrated between rs776746 polymorphisms and the achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) at 12 or 18 months. Polymorphisms rs776746, rs2740574, rs1057910, rs683369, rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2231142, rs717620 showed no impact on the optimal therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the results of some other studies, no other polymorphism we analyzed was associated with imatinib plasma level or clinical response. The treatment outcomes cannot be predicted using the candidate gene approach and treatment decisions cannot be made according to the polymorphisms investigated in this study.

Trough concentration and ABCG2 polymorphism are better to predict imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis

AIM

The present study aimed to conduct a series of meta-analyses to investigate the influence of imatinib trough concentration (C₀), as well as ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms, on the clinical response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane electronic databases to locate relevant papers from 2003 onward. Then, an initial meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 2184 patients was conducted to understand the effect of imatinib mesylate (IM) C₀ on clinical outcome in CML patients. Subsequently, a series of meta-analyses were performed, including up to 23 studies with 2577 patients, on the effect of genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1 and ABCG2 on the clinical response to IM.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed that patients who achieved a major molecular response (MMR) have a significantly higher IM C₀ than those who failed to achieve an MMR. We also found that the patients who achieved a complete cytogenic response (CCyR) have a significantly higher IM C₀ than those who did not achieve a CCyR. However, no significant difference in IM C₀ was found between the complete molecular response and non-complete molecular response groups. Additional analysis showed that ABCG2 421 variant A allele was significantly associated with a higher rate of MMR and overall response, especially in Asian patients. Meta-analysis did not reveal a correlation between ABCB1 C3435T and C1236T polymorphisms with any clinical response to IM. However, the G2677T/A polymorphism could play a role in IM response in the recessive model.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates that there was a significant correlation between the IM trough concentration and clinical responses, especially MMR and CCyR, in CML patients. Furthermore, we found that the probability of successful treatment was correlated with the ABCG2 C421A polymorphism, at least within the Asian population. We failed to determine an association between ABCB1 polymorphisms and IM response, although the G2677T/A polymorphism might be involved. However, further large-scale investigations using more sensitive genotyping methods would be required to confirm this.