1
|
Wang R, Wang H, Huang S, Zhao Y, Chen E, Li F, Qin L, Yang Y, Guan Y, Liu B, Zhang H. Assessment of yield performances for grain sorghum varieties by AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1261323. [PMID: 37965005 PMCID: PMC10642804 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1261323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Grain sorghum is an exceptional source of dietary nutrition with outstanding economic values. Breeding of grain sorghum can be slowed down by the occurrence of genotype × environment interactions (GEI) causing biased estimation of yield performance in multi-environments and therefore complicates direct phenotypic selection of superior genotypes. Multi-environment trials by randomized complete block design with three replications were performed on 13 newly developed grain sorghum varieties at seven test locations across China for two years. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype + genotype × environment (GGE) biplot models were adopted to uncover GEI patterns and effectively identify high-yielding genotypes with stable performance across environments. Yield (YLD), plant height (PH), days to maturity (DTM), thousand seed weight (TSW), and panicle length (PL) were measured. Statistical analysis showed that target traits were influenced by significant GEI effects (p < 0.001), that broad-sense heritability estimates for these traits varied from 0.40 to 0.94 within the medium to high range, that AMMI and GGE biplot models captured more than 66.3% of total variance suggesting sufficient applicability of both analytic models, and that two genotypes, G3 (Liaoza No.52) and G10 (Jinza 110), were identified as the superior varieties while one genotype, G11 (Jinza 111), was the locally adapted variety. G3 was the most stable variety with highest yielding potential and G10 was second to G3 in average yield and stability whereas G11 had best adaptation only in one test location. We recommend G3 and G10 for the production in Shenyang, Chaoyang, Jinzhou, Jinzhong, Yulin, and Pingliang, while G11 for Yili.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runfeng Wang
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Hailian Wang
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shaoming Huang
- Crop Development Center, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Yingxing Zhao
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Erying Chen
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Feifei Li
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Ling Qin
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yanbing Yang
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yan’an Guan
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Huawen Zhang
- Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Engineering Research Center for Featured Minor Crops, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yaşar M. Sensitivity of different flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) genotypes to salinity determined by GE biplot. Saudi J Biol Sci 2023; 30:103592. [PMID: 36873576 PMCID: PMC9974426 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Plants respond differently to salt stress depending on their genetic structure and the severity of the stress. Salinity reduces seed germination, delays plant emergence, and inhibits seedling growth. The selection of the tolerant genotypes, however, plays a vital role in increasing agricultural output since various genotypes greatly vary for their tolerance to salinity. Therefore, this study determined the impact of five different NaCl levels (i.e., 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 mM) on seed germination and growth attributes of 10 flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) genotypes. The germination and growth characteristics of the genotypes under study were examined using the biplot approach at varied salt levels. The results indicated that individual and interactive effects of genotypes and salinity levels significantly (p ≤ 0.01 or p ≤ 0.05) affected several seed germination traits. The relations of genotype × germination traits indicated that 'G4' and 'G6' were the most stable genotypes with the highest performance regarding seed germination characteristics. The genotype 'G2' was associated with shoot length, while 'G7' was linked with salinity tolerance index. The biplot divided the germination characteristics into five different groups according to sector analysis. Most of the germination parameters had higher values under 100 mM, while some of the parameters had better values under 0, 50 and 200 mM NaCl levels. The tested genotypes varied for their seed germination and growth response depending on the NaCl levels. The genotypes 'G4', 'G5' and 'G6' proved more tolerant to high NaCl levels. Therefore, these genotypes can be used to improve flax productivity under saline soils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Yaşar
- Muş Alpaslan University, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Plant Production and Technologies, Muş, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gong J, Kong D, Liu C, Li P, Liu P, Xiao X, Liu R, Lu Q, Shang H, Shi Y, Li J, Ge Q, Liu A, Deng X, Fan S, Pan J, Chen Q, Yuan Y, Gong W. Multi-environment Evaluations Across Ecological Regions Reveal That the Kernel Oil Content of Cottonseed Is Equally Determined by Genotype and Environment. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2022; 70:2529-2544. [PMID: 35170322 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cotton is the fifth-largest oil crop in the world. A high kernel oil content (KOC) and high stability are important cottonseed attributes for food security. In this study, the phenotype of KOC and the genotype-by-environment interaction factors were collectively dissected using 250 recombinant inbred lines, their parental cultivars sGK156 and 901-001, and CCRI70 across multi-environments. ANOVA and correlation analysis showed that both genotype and environment contributed significantly to KOC accumulation. Analyses of additive main effect multiplicative interaction and genotype-by-environment interaction biplot models presented the effects of genotype, environment, and genotype by environment on KOC performance and the stability of the experimental materials. Interaction network analysis revealed that meteorological and geographical factors explained 38% of the total KOC variance, with average daily rainfall contributing the largest positive impact and cumulative rainfall having the largest negative impact on KOC accumulation. This study provides insight into KOC accumulation and could direct selection strategies for improved KOC and field management of cottonseed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juwu Gong
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Depei Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Changwen Liu
- Agricultural Technology Popularization Center of Kashi, No. 418 Seman road, Kashi 844000, Xinjiang
| | - Pengtao Li
- College of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Ping Liu
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Xianghui Xiao
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Ruixian Liu
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Quanwei Lu
- College of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Haihong Shang
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
| | - Yuzhen Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Junwen Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Qun Ge
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Aiying Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Xiaoying Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Senmiao Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Jingtao Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| | - Quanjia Chen
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
| | - Youlu Yuan
- Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education; College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, 311 Nongda East Road, Urumqi 830052, China
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
- School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
| | - Wankui Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|