Phenotypic classification of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and its relationship with K-ras mutation

A Rare Case of Primary Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: a Review of Guidelines for the Management of Gastric Cancer

Gastric carcinoma is the fifth most common and the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The incidence of diffuse-type gastric cancer, of which signet ring cell carcinoma is a subtype, is rising in the world. Due to non-specific gastritis-like symptoms, difficulty in assessing true tumor characteristics owing to its horizontal spread, and non-distinguishable endoscopic appearance from other gastric pathologies, the diagnosis of this subtype is challenging. We present a case of a 67-year-old woman with progressively worsening abdominal pain who came for an endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of an incidentally noted pancreatic cyst on a previous MRI. During endoscopy, a 1-cm gastric ulcer was noted along the lesser curvature of the gastric body. Biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) with CDX-2 and keratin positivity. The patient underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Gross specimen revealed a diffuse SRCC invading the muscularis propria, along with lymphovascular and perineural invasion. In the context of our case, we discuss the morphological features of SRCC and the effectiveness of treatment options based on existing literature. Early accurate diagnosis and staging play an important role in determining treatment options as well as the clinical course of gastric SRCC.

The Role of Mucin Expression in the Diagnosis of Oesophago-Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

Survival in oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC) is poor due to early diagnostic challenges. Non-invasive risk stratification may identify susceptible patients with pre-malignant or benign disease. Following diagnostic confirmation with endoscopic biopsy, early OGC may be treated sooner. Mucins are transmembrane glycoproteins implicated in OGC with potential use as biomarkers of malignant transformation. This systematic review defines the role of mucins in OGC diagnosis. A literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed following PRISMA protocols for studies published January 1960-December 2022. Demographic data and data on mucin sampling and analysis methods were extracted. The review included 124 studies (n = 11,386 patients). Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAc) was the commonest OG malignancy (n = 101) followed by oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAc, n = 24) and squamous cell carcinoma (OSqCc, n = 10). Mucins MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6 were the most frequently implicated. High MUC1 expression correlated with poorer prognosis and metastases in OSqCc. MUC2 expression decreases during progression from healthy mucosa to OAc, causing reduced protection from gastric acid. MUC5AC was upregulated, and MUC6 downregulated in GAc. Mucin expression varies in OGC; changes may be epigenetic or mutational. Profiling upper GI mucin expression in OGC, with pre-malignant, benign and healthy controls may identify potential early diagnostic biomarkers.

[Mucins expression in gastric cancer: connection of MUC status with clinical, morphological and prognostic characteristics of the tumor]

OBJECTIVE

Clarification of the prognostic value and relationship of MUC-phenotypes of gastric cancer with clinical and morphological parameters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Surgical material from 310 patients with a verified diagnosis of gastric cancer was studied. Samples were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to MUC2, CD10, MUC5AC. The results were compared with clinical and morphological characteristics of gastric cancer and patient survival data.

RESULTS

The MUC-null and MUC-mix groups significantly differ in the prevalence of subtotal/total tumors from the MUC-I group (p=0.022 and p=0.007, respectively), where there are significantly fewer such tumors. Tubular tumors were more common in the MUC-null group compared to the MUC-G (p=0.026) and MUC-mix (p=0.006) groups, and there were fewer cases with the presence of "signet-ring" cells in the MUC-null group (p=0.000). When studying the discohesive histological type, the literature data on smaller tumor sizes and a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis for MUC-G status were not confirmed, but a more frequent proximal localization of MUC-I tumors was found (p=0.003). No statistically significant differences in survival were found in the analysis of the total sample. Differences in survival were found only in discohesive cancers, where the best survival was recorded for the MUC-null group, and the worst for the MUC-mix group (p=0.022). MUC status is not an independent predictor of gastric cancer (HR=1.662, p=0.093).

CONCLUSION

Between tumors with different MUC statuses, there were differences in localization and belonging to individual histological types. Significant differences in survival were found only for discohesive cancers with MUC-null and MUC-mix statuses. Separation of gastric cancers according to MUC status may have only limited predictive value in selected histological forms of cancer.

Glycan expression profile of signet ring cell gastric cancer cells and potential applicability of rBC2LCN-targeted lectin drug conjugate therapy

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) is a distinct subtype of gastric cancer (GC); however, the specific characteristics of cancer cell surface glycans and glycosylation remain unclear. In this study, we investigated SRC-specific glycans using lectin microarray and evaluated the potential applicability of a glycan-targeting therapy.

METHODS

SRC cell lines (NUGC-4 and KATO-III) and non-SRC (NSRC) cell lines (NCI-N87, SNU-1, and MKN-45) were subjected to lectin microarray analysis to identify the SRC-specific glycans. Additionally, we performed immunohistochemical lectin staining and evaluated the anti-tumor effects of lectin drug conjugates (LDCs) using high-affinity lectins for SRC.

RESULTS

Among the 96 lectins tested, 11 high-affinity and 8 low-affinity lectins were identified for SRC. Glycan-binding motifs varied in the high-affinity lectins, but 5 (62.5%) low-affinity lectins bound the same glycan structure, α2-6-linked sialic acids. The ratio of signal intensity in SRC to NSRC (SRC/NSRC) was highest in the rBC2LCN lectin (1.930-fold), followed by the BPL lectin (1.786-fold). rBC2LCN lectin showed high affinity for both SRC cell lines and one of the three NSRC cell lines (NCI-N87). The therapeutic effects of the LDC, rBC2LCN-PE38 (rBC2LCN, and Pseudomonas exotoxin A), showed cytocidal effects in vitro and tumor regression in in vivo mouse xenograft models.

CONCLUSION

We reported specific glycan profiles in SRC cells, showing reduced α2-6-linked sialic acids. Additionally, we found a targeted therapy using rBC2LCN lectin might be applicable as an alternative treatment option for patients with SRC.

Development of prognostic predictive model with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with gastric signet ring carcinoma

The risk factors have not been well-defined for prognosis in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) patients. This study is designed to prognosticate survival in GSRC patients by establishing and verifying a predictive model with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).A total of 147 GSRC patients from Department of Surgical Oncology, Neimenggu Baogang Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. A predictive model was established using Cox proportional hazards. The performance of the model was evaluated by ROC curves.In present study, we found that overall survival (OS) (P < .001, Fig. 1A) and tumor recurrence rate (P = .036, Fig. 1B) in the NLR ≤ 2.8 group were significantly better than those in the NLR > 2.8 group. These results showed that NLR ≤ 2.8 was significant prognostic factor related with both OS and tumor recurrence in patients with GSRC. After adjusting for competing risk factors, NLR ≤ 2.8 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.625, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.505-5.3166, P = .003), tumor size (HR: 3.024, 95% CI: 1.521-4.186, P = .005), and tumor metastasis (HR: 3.303, 95% CI: 1.25-4.525, P = .012) remained independent predictors of tumor recurrence rate and OS. Our results showed that comparing with the model without NLR (area under ROC curve: 0.798), the model with NLR (area under ROC curve: 0.826) had significant better predictive power than the model without NLR, which further confirmed the value of NLR in predicting prognosis of patients with GSRC.In conclusion, a high NLR value independently predicts poor survival in patients with GSRC after surgery. The NLR may help oncologists evaluate outcomes of patients received surgical resection and chemotherapy in order to choose alternative therapies for patients with high NLR value.

Mucin expression in gastric- and gastro-oesophageal signet-ring cell cancer: results from a comprehensive literature review and a large cohort study of Caucasian and Asian gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature on the prognostic relevance of signet-ring cell (SRC) histology in gastric cancer (GC) is controversial which is most likely related to inconsistent SRC classification based on haematoxylin-eosin staining. We hypothesised that mucin stains can consistently identify SRC-GC and predict GC patient outcome.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review on mucin stains in SRC-GC and characterised the mucin expression in 851 Caucasian GC and 410 Asian GC using Alcian Blue (AB)-Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS), MUC2 (intestinal-type mucin), and MUC5AC (gastric-type mucin). The relationship between mucin expression and histological phenotype [poorly cohesive (PC) including proportion of SRCs, non-poorly cohesive (non-PC), or mucinous (MC)], clinicopathological variables, and patient outcome was analysed.

RESULTS

Depending on mucin expression and cut-offs, the positivity rates of SRC-GC reported in the literature varied from 6 to 100%. Patients with MUC2 positive SRC-GC or SRC-GC with (gastro)intestinal phenotype had poorest outcome. In our cohort study, PC with ≥ 10% SRCs expressed more frequently MUC2, MUC5AC, and ABPAS (p < 0.001, p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Caucasians with AB positive GC or combined ABPAS-MUC2 positive and MUC5AC negative had poorest outcome (all p = 0.002). This association was not seen in Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to suggest that mucin stains do not help to differentiate between SRC-GC and non-SRC-GC. However, mucin stains appear to be able to identify GC patients with different outcome. To our surprise, the relationship between outcome and mucin expression seems to differ between Caucasian and Asian GC patients which warrants further investigations.