Optimizing neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer using protons

Exogenous HMGB1 Promotes the Proliferation and Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer Cells

Background: Exogenous HMGB1 plays a vital role in tumor recurrence, and HMGB1 is ubiquitous in the tumor microenvironment. However, the mechanism of action is still unclear. We investigated the role of exogenous HMGB1 in tumor proliferation and metastasis using human SW1990 and PANC-1 cells after radiotherapy and explored the possible molecular mechanism. Materials and Methods: Residual PANC-1 cells and SW1990 cells were isolated after radiotherapy. The supernatant after radiotherapy was collected. The relative expression of HMGB1 was evaluated by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Electron microscope (EMS) was used to collect the images of pancreatic cancer cells pre and post radiotherapy treatment. The proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells which were treated with different radiation doses was measured by Carboxy Fluorescein Succinimidyl Ester (CFSE). The migration rates of pancreatic cancer cells were measured by wound healing assays. Subsequently, the expression of related proteins was detected by Western Blot. In vivo, the subcutaneous pancreatic tumor models of nude mice were established, and therapeutic capabilities were tested. Results: HMGB1 was detected in the supernatant of pancreatic cancer cells after radiotherapy. The results of CFSE showed that exogenous HMGB1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells. The western blot results showed activation of p-GSK 3β and up-regulation of N-CA, Bcl-2, and Ki67 in response to HMGB1 stimulation, while E-CA expression was down-regulated in pancreatic cancer cells in response to HMGB1 stimulation. In vivo, ethyl pyruvate (EP, HMGB1 inhibitor) inhibits the growth of tumors and HMGB1 promotes the proliferation of tumors after radiation. Conclusion: Radiotherapy induces HMGB1 release into the extracellular space. Exogenous HMGB1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of PANC-1 cells and SW1990 cells by activation of p-GSK 3β which is mediated by Wnt pathway.

Radioactive 125I seed implantation for pancreatic cancer with unexpected liver metastasis: A preliminary experience with 26 patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative diagnosis rate of pancreatic cancer has increased year by year. The prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with unexpected liver metastasis found by intraoperative exploration is very poor, and there is no effective and unified treatment strategy.

AIM

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation for pancreatic cancer patients with unexpected liver metastasis.

METHODS

The demographics and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent ¹²⁵I seed implantation to treat pancreatic cancer with unexpected liver metastasis between January 1, 2017 and June 1, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, ¹²⁵I seeds were implanted into the pancreatic tumor under the guidance of intraoperative ultrasound, with a spacing of 1.5 cm and a row spacing of 1.5 cm. For patients with obstructive jaundice and digestive tract obstruction, choledochojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy were performed simultaneously. After operation, the patients were divided into a non-chemotherapy group and a chemotherapy group that received gemcitabine combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel treatment.

RESULTS

Preoperative imaging evaluation of all patients in this study showed that the tumor was resectable without liver metastasis. There were 26 patients in this study, including 18 males and 8 females, aged 60.5 ± 9.7 years. The most common tumor site was the pancreatic head (17, 65.4%), followed by the pancreatic neck and body (6, 23.2%) and pancreatic tail (3, 11.4%). Fourteen patients (53.8%) underwent palliative surgery and postoperative pain relief occurred in 22 patients (84.6%). The estimated blood loss in operation was 148.3 ± 282.1 mL and one patient received blood transfusion. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.6 ± 2.8 d. One patient had biliary fistula, one had pancreatic fistula, and all recovered after conservative treatment. After operation, 7 patients received chemotherapy and 19 did not. The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients who received chemotherapy than in those who did not (68.6% vs 15.8%, P = 0.012). The mean overall survival of patients in the chemotherapy group and non-chemotherapy group was 16.3 mo and 10 mo, respectively (χ² = 7.083, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation combined with postoperative chemotherapy can prolong the survival time and relieve pain of pancreatic cancer patients with unexpected liver metastasis.

Radioactive 125I seed implantation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A retrospective analysis of 50 cases

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system, and radical resection is the first choice of treatment for pancreatic cancer. If patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer cannot be treated in time and effectively, their disease often develops rapidly and their survival period is very short.

AIM

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of ¹²⁵I seed implantation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

The demographics and perioperative outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who underwent ¹²⁵I seed implantation to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, the treatment planning system was used to determine the area and number of ¹²⁵I seeds implanted. During the operation, ¹²⁵I seeds were implanted into the tumor under the guidance of intraoperative ultrasound, with a spacing of 1.5 cm and a row spacing of 1.5 cm. For patients with obstructive jaundice and digestive tract obstruction, choledochojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy were performed simultaneously. After operation, the patients were divided into a non-chemotherapy group and a chemotherapy group that received gemcitabine combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 50 patients, there were 29 males and 21 females, with a mean age of 56.9 ± 9.8 years. The main reason for the failure of radical resection was superior mesenteric artery invasion (37, 74%), followed by superior mesenteric vein invasion (33, 66%). Twenty-one (62%) patients underwent palliative surgery and postoperative pain relief occurred in 40 (80%) patients. The estimated blood loss in operation was 107.4 ± 115.3 mL and none of the patient received blood transfusion. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.5 ± 4.2 d; one patient had biliary fistula and three had pancreatic fistula, all of whom recovered after conservative treatment. After operation, 26 patients received chemotherapy and 24 did not. The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients who received chemotherapy than in those who did not (60.7% vs 35.9%, P = 0.034). The mean overall survival of patients of the chemotherapy group and non-chemotherapy group was 14 and 11 mo, respectively (χ² = 3.970, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation combined with postoperative chemotherapy can prolong the survival time, relieve pain, and improve the quality of life of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Development of a Nomogram to Predict Disease-Specific Survival for Patients After Resection of a Non-Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Body and Tail

BACKGROUND

Models for predicting patient survival after resection of a non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail (APBT) are scarce. We wished to establish and validate a nomogram to predict disease-specific survival (DSS) of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 1,435 patients screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included and divided randomly into a training set (TS; n = 1,007) and internal validation set (IVS; n = 428) at a ratio of 7:3. Cox regression analyses were conducted to select independent predictors in the TS, and a nomogram was constructed. The model was subjected to the IVS and an external validation set (EVS) comprising 151 patients from two tertiary hospitals.

RESULTS

Five independent risk factors (age at the diagnosis, chemotherapy, tumor grade, T stage, and the lymph node radio) were identified and integrated into the nomogram. Calibration curves indicated that the nomogram could predict DSS at 1, 2, and 3 years accurately. The nomogram had a higher concordance index for predicting DSS compared with that using the 8th edition of the American Joint 23 Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) stage (TS: 0.681 vs. 0.606; IVS: 0.662 vs. 0.590; and EVS: 0.675 vs. 0.608). The nomogram had better discrimination ability and clinical utility than the AJCC8 stage for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year DSS.

CONCLUSION

Our developed nomogram could accurately predict DSS in patients after resection of a non-metastatic APBT.