Could neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase postoperative complication risk of laparoscopic total gastrectomy? A mono-institutional propensity score-matched study in China

Impact of preoperative therapy on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

Objective

As laparoscopic surgery is widely applied for primarily treated gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) and gains many advantages, the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for GC/GEJC patients who have received preoperative therapy (PT) has come to the fore. This study aims to analyze the safety and feasibility of LTG after PT for GC/GEJC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 511 patients with GC/GEJC undergoing LTG, of which 405 received LTG (LTG group) and 106 received PT+LTG (PT-LTG group) at Nanfang Hospital between June 2018 and September 2022. The surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The surgical duration was significantly longer in the PT-LTG group (P<0.001), while the incidence of intraoperative complications (P=1.000), postoperative complications (LTG group vs. PT-LTG group: 26.2% vs. 23.6%, P=0.587), the classification of complication severity (P=0.271), and postoperative recovery was similar between two groups. Notably, the incidence of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy was also comparable between the two groups (LTG group vs. PT-LTG group: 5.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.918). The univariate and multivariate analysis confirmed that positive proximal margin [positive vs. negative: odds ratio (OR)=14.094, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.639-75.260, P=0.002], rather than PT, has an impact on anastomotic complications after LTG (OR=0.945, 95% CI: 0.371-2.408, P=0.905).

Conclusions

PT did not increase the surgical risk of LTG for GC/GEJC. Therefore, considering the positive effect of PT on long-term survival, the broader application of PT and LTG for GC/GEJC is supported by our findings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in upfront resectable gastric cancers compared to surgery alone in phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality globally. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upfront resectable gastric cancer is a subject of ongoing research. In recent meta-analyses, R0 resection rate and superior outcomes were not consistently observed in such regimens.

AIM

To describe the outcomes following phase III randomised control trials; comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery against upfront surgery with and without adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancers.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science was searched from January 2002 to September 2022.

RESULTS

13 studies were included (3280 participants). R0 resection rates were in neoadjuvant therapy arms as compared to adjuvant therapy with odds ratio (OR) 1.55[95% CI: 1.13, 2.13](p=0.007) and compared to surgery alone OR 2.49[95% CI: 1.56, 3.96](p=0.0001). 3-year and 5-year progression-, event- and disease-free survival in neoadjuvant therapy as compared to adjuvant therapy were not significantly increased, 3-year OR 0.87[0.71, 1.07](p=0.19). Meanwhile, comparing neoadjuvant therapy to adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival (OS) hazard ratio was 0.88[95% CI: 0.70, 1.11](p=0.71) while 3- and 5-year OS OR was 1.18[95% CI: 0.90, 1.55], p=0.22 and 1.27[95% CI: 0.67, 2.42](p=0.47) respectively. Surgical complications were also more common with neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy yields higher rates of R0 resection. However, improved long-term survival was not seen as compared to adjuvant therapy. Large multi-centred randomised control trials with D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed to better evaluate the treatment modalities.

Assessment of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A prospective single-armed clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgical approaches for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are increasing, yet there is limited evidence of their safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

This prospective single-armed clinical trial enrolled 80 neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. In addition, to better analyze the outcomes of this study, 1:2 propensity score matching was performed, and a contemporaneous historic control group containing 160 laparoscopic gastrectomy patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy was established.

RESULTS

Analyses were performed to compare the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n = 80) and the control group (n = 160). The general clinical data of both groups were comparable. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group showed less intraoperative bleeding (P = .029) and recovered more quickly than the control group (all P < .05). The 2 groups did not exhibit major differences in terms of postoperative complications (P = .679) or severe complications (P = .055). The proportion of patients with ypT4 stage and ypN3 stage disease in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group totaled 20.7% and 23.8%, respectively, which was significantly lower than that observed in the control group (P < .05). The number of metastatic lymph nodes was 4.8 ± 7.0 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, which was lower than that in the control group (P < .001). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, the major pathological regression rate was 27.5%, while the objective radiologic response rate (complete response + partial response) was 64.0%. In contrast to nonresponding patients, the patients who experienced an objective response had a shorter operation time (P < .001), less intraoperative bleeding (P < .001), and fewer metastatic lymph nodes (P = .005). The short-term effects observed in the nonresponding patients were similar to those observed in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic gastrectomy could achieve improved short-term outcomes through NACT tumor downstaging without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. Further multicenter and prospective clinical trials are warranted.