Rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection: Prevention and management

Short-term outcomes of transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative safety and specimen characteristics after transanal endoscopic intersphincteric resection (taE-ISR) versus classical intersphincteric resection (cISR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 145 patients (75 undergoing taE-ISR and 70 undergoing cISR after nCRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, perioperative details, and pathological specimen quality of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss was lower in the taE-ISR group compared to cISR (50.0 (40.0-100.0) ml vs. 70.0 (50.0-100.0) ml, P = 0.034). Two patients (2.6 %) in the taE-ISR group and eight patients (11.4 %) in the cISR group sustained adjacent organ injury (P = 0.037). There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of postoperative complications between the two groups (17.3 % vs. 30.0 %, P = 0.072). However, pelvic abscess (1.3 % vs. 8.6 %, P = 0.042) and rectovaginal fistula (0.0 % vs. 5.7 %, P = 0.036) occurred less often in taE-ISR compared to cISR. The complete resection rate was higher in taE-ISR compared to cISR (98.7 % vs. 91.4 %, P = 0.042). No patients in taE-ISR had positive distal resection margins (DRM), while four patients in cISR had positive DRM (0.0 % vs. 5.7 %, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

taE-ISR after nCRT was associated with higher-quality specimens, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and fewer perioperative complications, attesting to the feasibility and safety of taE-ISR In low-LARC patients.

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: stoma may not be necessary-a French retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula leads to a loss of patients' quality of life and presents significant challenges to the surgeon. The literature focusing specifically on postoperative rectovaginal fistulas is limited. The objective of the present study is to identify factors that can enhance the success of the management of this postoperative rectovaginal fistula.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study included all patients undergoing surgery for rectovaginal fistulas, excluding those for whom the etiology of rectovaginal fistula was not postoperative. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients with postsurgical fistulas were identified, of whom 70 were successfully treated, giving a success rate of 85.4%. On average, these patients required 3.04 ± 2.72 interventions. The creation of a diversion stoma did not increase the success rate of management [odds ratio (OR) = 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.107-2.220]. Among the 217 procedures performed, 69 were successful, accounting for a 31.8% success rate. The number of interventions and the creation of a diversion stoma did not correlate with the success of management. However, direct coloanal anastomosis was significantly associated with success (OR = 35.06; 95% CI 1.271-997.603; p = 0.036) as compared with endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). Other procedures such as Martius flap did not show a significantly higher success rate.

CONCLUSION

The creation of a diversion stoma is not necessary in closing a fistula. ERAF should be considered as a first-line treatment prior to proposing more invasive approach such as direct coloanal anastomosis.

Successful omental flap coverage repair of a rectovaginal fistula after low anterior resection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is a troublesome and refractory complication after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. An omental flap repair was performed for the RVF caused due to Crohn's disease and childbirth trauma. However, there are few cases of an omental flap repair for RVF after LAR. Herein, we present a successfully repaired case of RVF by omental flap coverage after LAR for rectal cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old female patient with advanced rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic LAR with double-stapling technique anastomosis and achieved curative resection. She complained of a stool from the vagina and was diagnosed with RVF on the postoperative day (POD) 18. Conservative therapy was ineffective. We performed laparoscopic fistula resection and direct closure of the vagina and rectum, designed the omentum that could reach the pelvis, repaired RVF by omental flap coverage, and performed transverse colostomy on POD 25. She was discharged on initial POD 48. Seven months after the initial operation, colostomy closure was administered. There was no recurrence of RVF found 1 year after the initial operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient achieved an omental flap coverage for RVF. We successfully performed the omental flap coverage repair in patients with RVF after the leakage of LAR. An omental flap may become an alternative treatment for muscle flap or an effective treatment for RVF.

The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge

Colorectal anastomosis is a sophisticated problem that demands an elaborate discussion and an elegant solution. "Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana, Life of Reason , 1905.