Incidence, progression, and predictors of left atrial appendage sealing after Watchman FLX device implantation with computed tomographic assessment

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists regarding incidence, progression, and predictors of left atrial appendage (LAA) sealing after transcatheter LAA closure. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, progression, and predictive factors associated with LAA sealing after LAA closure.

METHODS

This study includes patients who underwent successful LAA closure with Watchman FLX device and had both pre- and postprocedural computed tomography (CT). Postprocedural CT was performed 45 days after LAA closure and used to evaluate residual LAA patency. Patient who had residual LAA patency at 45 days underwent 1-year follow-up CT.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (mean age: 75.2 ± 9.6 years; 53.3% female) who underwent successful LAA closure with Watchman FLX device and had pre- and postprocedural CT at 45 days were included. Residual patency was observed in 35 (33.3%) patients: 21 (20.0%) patients showed complete contrast opacification in LAA (complete LAA patency) while 14 (13.3%) patients showed contrast opacification only in the distal LAA (distal LAA patency). Among patients with residual LAA patency at 45 days, the rate of LAA sealing at 1 year was significantly higher in the distal LAA patency group than in the complete LAA patency group (75.0% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.019). Increased depth oversizing was associated with both distal LAA patency and complete LAA patency.

CONCLUSION

Postprocedural CT at 45 days detected patent LAA in one-third of patients after LAA closure. LAA sealing was more frequently observed at 1 year among the distal LAA patency group than the complete LAA patency group.

Residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and outcomes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Residual leaks are not infrequent after left atrial appendage occlusion. However, there is still uncertainty regarding their prognostic implications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of residual leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted until 19 February 2023. Residual leaks comprised peri-device leaks (PDLs) on transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or computed tomography (CT), as well as left atrial appendage patency on CT. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the clinical impact of residual leaks.

RESULTS

Overall 48 eligible studies (44 non-randomized/observational and 4 randomized studies) including 61 666 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion were analysed. Peri-device leak by TEE was present in 26.1% of patients. Computed tomography-based left atrial appendage patency and PDL were present in 54.9% and 57.3% of patients, respectively. Transoesophageal echocardiography-based PDL (i.e. any reported PDL regardless of its size) was significantly associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism [pooled odds ratio (pOR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-2.74], all-cause mortality (pOR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.08-1.24), and major bleeding (pOR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22), compared with no reported PDL. A positive graded association between PDL size and risk of thromboembolism was noted across TEE cut-offs. For any PDL of >0, >1, >3, and >5 mm, the pORs for thromboembolism were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.35-2.47), 2.13 (95% CI: 1.04-4.35), 4.14 (95% CI: 2.07-8.27), and 4.44 (95% CI: 2.09-9.43), respectively, compared with either no PDL or PDL smaller than each cut-off. Neither left atrial appendage patency, nor PDL by CT was associated with thromboembolism (pOR 1.45 and 1.04, 95% CI: 0.84-2.50 and 0.52-2.07, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-device leak detected by TEE was associated with adverse events, primarily thromboembolism. Residual leaks detected by CT were more frequent but lacked prognostic significance.

Prognostic Value of Galectin-3 after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Predicting Peri-Device Leakage

Echocardiographic detection of residual peri-device leakage (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is crucial for managing anticoagulation. Galectin-3, a protein involved in tissue-foreign body interactions, may hold significance in understanding PDL and cardiac tissue remodeling after LAAO. This study aimed to analyze galectin-3 serum levels in relation to PDL using a novel echo-morphological classification. LAAO eligible patients were included in the study. Galectin-3 serum levels were measured before LAAO, at 45 days (45D), and at 6 months (6M) after the procedure. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to assess LAAO success. A new echo-morphological classification categorized the degree of LAAO into three different types (A: homogenous echodensity, indicating completely thrombosed device; B: inhomogeneous echolucencies (<50% of device); and C: partially thrombosed device with echolucencies > 50%). Among 47 patients, complete LAAO was achieved in 60% after 45D and in 74% after 6M. We observed a significant increase and distribution of serum levels of galectin-3 [ng/mL] after 45D among the three types (baseline: 13.1 ± 5.8 ng/mL; 45D: 16.3 ± 7.2 ng/mL (Type A) vs. 19.2 ± 8.6 ng/mL (Type B) vs. 25.8 ± 9.4 ng/mL (Type C); p = 0.031), followed by a drop in galectin-3 for Types A and B after 6M toward and below the baseline levels (6M: 8.9 ± 3.1 ng/mL (Type A) vs. 12.4 ± 5.5 ng/mL (Type B)), whereas Type C persisted in showing elevated galectin-3 levels compared to all other types (6M: 17.5 ± 4.5 ng/mL (Type C); p < 0.01). Increased galectin-3 serum levels after LAAO likely reflect the transition from thrombus formation to fibrotic scar development in the LAA lumen. Successful occlusion is associated with a time-restricted decrease in galectin-3 levels after 6 months, while relevant PDL leads to persistently elevated levels, making galectin-3 a potential predictor of occlusion success.

Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Peri-Device Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. Peri-device leak (PDL) after LAAC may affect the subsequent risk of thromboembolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PDL after LAAC. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies reporting outcomes of PDL after LAAC from inception through October 2022. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, and device-related thrombus. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. We used I2 statistics to assess statistical heterogeneity; I2 >50% considered significant heterogeneity. This study included 54,279 patients from 11 studies (6 observational, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials [non-RCTs] primary results, 2 RCT post hoc analyses, and 1 analysis combining 2 RCTs data). PDL was associated with a significant increase in the composite outcome of stroke, TIA, or SE (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.52, p = 0.03, I2 = 43%) as compared with cases with no PDL. There were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, or device-related thrombus. In conclusion, PDL after LAAC is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (composite stroke, TIA, or SE) without impacting mortality.

Safety and efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation in combination with left atrial appendage occlusion in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) combined with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a feasible approach for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Its role in octogenarians with AF is unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

In AF patients over 80 years, CA combined with LAAO is a feasible way in restoring sinus rhythm and preventing stroke.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients who underwent CA and LAAO in a single procedure between March 2018 and December 2020 were included. Efficacy endpoints included procedural success rate, AF recurrence rate, and thromboembolic events. Safety endpoints included pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, device-related thrombus (DRT), all-cause death, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Five hundred and five patients (mean age 69.5 ± 7.7 years; 230 [45.5%] female) were included, with 46 (9.1%) patients aged ≥80 years old (octogenarian group). Prevalence of paroxysmal AF (25 [54.3%] vs. 207 [45.1%], p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2VASc score (4.1 ± 1.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001) were higher in octogenarian patients. There were six cases (1.2%) of pericardial effusion (all in nonoctogenarian patients). At 3 months postprocedure, 437 patients underwent TEE/CT. Thirty-two (80%) octogenarian patients and 308 (77.6%) nonoctogenarian patients had no peri-device leak. After a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 9.1 months, AF was documented in 10 (21.7%) patients in octogenarian group and in 103 (22.4%) patients in nonoctogenarian group (p = 0.99). The annual thromboembolic risk was 2.1% and 0.8% in the octogenarian group and nonoctogenarian group, respectively. Death occurred in 16 nonoctogenarian patients. One major bleeding was recorded in the octogenarian group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CA and LAAO in a single procedure is a feasible treatment option in octogenarians with comparable efficacy and safety profile.

Peri- and Post-procedural Anticoagulation with Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Devices

In patients with atrial fibrillation and high stroke risk, anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists is the standard of care for stroke prevention. The benefit of anticoagulation is driven by attenuating the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion offers an alternative therapeutic strategy for stroke prevention in patients with high bleeding risk or contraindications for long-term anticoagulation. This review of the current literature delineates the standard protocols of peri- and post-procedural anticoagulation/antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion, the complications of the procedure, and the risk of device-related thrombosis and of incomplete occlusion of the appendage. Finally,the limitations and gaps in the literature are identified.

Focal Anticoagulation by Somatic Gene Transfer: Towards Preventing Cardioembolic Stroke

Cardioembolic stroke (CS) has emerged as a leading cause of ischaemic stroke (IS); distinguished by thrombi embolising to the brain from cardiac origins; most often from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Contemporary therapeutic options are largely dependent on systemic anticoagulation as a blanket preventative strategy, yet this does not represent a nuanced or personalised solution. Contraindications to systemic anticoagulation create significant unmedicated and high-risk cohorts, leaving these patients at risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Atrial appendage occlusion devices are increasingly used to mitigate stroke risk from thrombi emerging from the LAA in patients ineligible for oral anticoagulants (OACs). Their use, however, is not without risk or significant cost, and does not address the underlying aetiology of thrombosis and CS. Viral vector-based gene therapy has emerged as a novel strategy to target a spectrum of haemostatic disorders, achieving success through the adeno-associated virus (AAV) based therapy of haemophilia. Yet, thrombotic disorders, such as CS, have had limited exploration within the realm of AAV gene therapy approaches-presenting a gap in the literature and an opportunity for further research. Gene therapy has the potential to directly address the cause of CS by localised targeting of the molecular remodelling that serves to promote thrombosis.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Strengths and Weaknesses of the Lobe-Only Occluder Concept in Theory and in Practice

Left atrial appendage closure aims to eliminate the stasis component of Virchow triad by eliminating a cul-de-sac that favors thrombosis, particularly when atrial contractility becomes inefficient, such as in atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure devices have a common objective of sealing the appendage completely, with device stability and avoidance of device thrombosis. Two main device designs have been used to perform left atrial appendage closure: those that use a pacifier design (lobe + disk) and those that use a plug (single lobe) design. This review highlights the potential features and benefits of the single-lobe devices.

Follow Up imaging After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion-Something or Nothing and for How Long?

Routine postprocedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography angiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for follow-up surveillance usually performed 1 to 6 months after the procedure. Imaging enables recognition of well-suited and sealed devices in the left atrial appendage as well as of potential harmful complications such as peri-device leaks, device-related thrombus, and device embolization, which may lead to further surveillance observation with recurrent imaging, reinitiation of oral anticoagulants, or additional interventional procedures.

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the LAA Covering Disc Occluders-Conceptually and in Practice

Endocardial left atrial appendage (LAA) occluders with a covering disc encompass a wide range of devices that share the common feature of a distal anchoring "body" and proximal covering "disc" design. This unique design feature has potential advantages in certain complex LAA anatomies and challenging clinical scenarios. The current review article summarizes the different features of established and novel devices, preprocedural imaging updates, intraprocedural technical considerations, and postprocedural follow-up issues specific to this category of LAA occluders.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer

Background

The prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer is challenging because patients are at increased bleeding and thrombotic risk.

Objectives

The authors sought to assess left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a safe and effective strategy for reducing stroke at no increased bleeding risk in cancer patients with AF.

Methods

We reviewed patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent LAAO at Mayo Clinic sites from 2017 to 2020 and identified those who had undergone prior or current treatment for cancer. We compared the incidence of stroke, bleeding, device complications, and death with a control group who underwent LAAO without malignancy.

Results

Fifty-five patients were included; 44 (80.0%) were male, and the mean age was 79.0 ± 6.1 years. The median CHA2Ds2-VASc score was 5 (Q1-Q3: 4-6), with 47 (85.5%) having a prior bleeding event. Over the first year, ischemic stroke occurred in 1 (1.4%) patient, bleeding complications in 5 (10.7%) patients, and death in 3 (6.5%) patients. Compared with controls who underwent LAAO without cancer, there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.10-1.97; P = 0.28), bleeding complication (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.28-1.86; P = 0.19), or death (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.73-2.64; P = 0.32).

Conclusions

Within our cohort, LAAO in cancer patients was achieved with good procedural success and offered a reduction in stroke at no increased bleeding risk similar to noncancer patients.

Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Incidence, Mechanisms, Clinical Impact, and Management

Left atrial appendage occlusion is an increasingly adopted stroke prevention strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, peridevice leaks after the procedure are not infrequent and have recently been shown to confer a higher risk for subsequent ischemic events. In this paper, the authors review the available research on the frequency, mechanisms, clinical significance, and management of peridevice leak after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

Comparison of different quantitative evaluation protocols for peri-device leak detection using cardiac computed tomography angiography after left atrial appendage closure

This study seeks to propose and compare different quantitative evaluation methods for identifying patients with peri-device leak (PDL) using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Patients who had undergone left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and both transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and CCTA were enrolled. Hounsfield units (HU) were measured in the proximal and distal regions of the left atrial appendage (p-LAA, d-LAA) on the CCTA, and the average of the two was determined (a-LAA). The relative HU ratios of the LAA to the center of the left atrium (LA) were calculated (p-LAA/c-LA, d-LAA/c-LA, a-LAA/c-LA). The area under the curve (AUC) for the LAA HU and the LAA/LA HU ratio were analyzed and compared. Fifty-one patients were included in this study. Pairwise comparisons showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.029) in diagnostic performance between the d-LAA (AUC = 0.868) and a-LAA (AUC = 0.972). There were no significant differences between the a-LAA and p-LAA (p = 0.549) or between the d-LAA and p-LAA (p = 0.053). At the optimal cutoff for a-LAA of 115.5 HU, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity was 88%. At the optimal cutoff for p-LAA of 109 HU, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity was 84%. The LAA/LA HU ratio did not exhibit better diagnostic performance than HU attenuation in the LAA (p > 0.05). The a-LAA > 115.5 is useful in identifying PDL. Due to its convenience and intuitiveness, p-LAA > 109.0 can also be used as an alternative protocol for a-LAA.

Stand-Alone Left Atrial appendage occlusion for throMboembolism prevention in nonvalvular Atrial fibrillatioN DiseasE Registry (SALAMANDER): protocol for a prospective observational nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent disease considerably contributing to the worldwide cardiovascular burden. For patients at high thromboembolic risk (CHA₂DS₂-VASc ≥3) and not suitable for chronic oral anticoagulation, owing to history of major bleeding or other contraindications, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is indicated for stroke prevention, as it lowers patient's ischaemic burden without augmentation in their anticoagulation profile.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Stand-Alone Left Atrial appendage occlusion for throMboembolism prevention in nonvalvular Atrial fibrillatioN DiseasE Registry (SALAMANDER) will be conducted in 10 heart surgery and cardiology centres across Poland to assess the outcomes of LAAO performed by fully thoracoscopic-epicardial, percutaneous-endocardial or hybrid endo-epicardial approach. The registry will include patients with nonvalvular AF at a high risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications (CHA2DS2-VASc Score ≥2 for males, ≥3 for females, HASBLED score ≥2) referred for LAAO. The first primary outcome is composite procedure-related complications, all-cause death or major bleeding at 12 months. The second primary outcome is a composite of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism at 12 months. The third primary outcome is the device-specific success assessed by an independent core laboratory at 3-6 weeks. The quality of life (QoL) will be assessed as well based on the QoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Medication and drug adherence will be assessed as well.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Before enrolment, a detailed explanation is provided by the investigator and patients are given time to make an informed decision. The patient's data will be protected according to the requirements of Polish law, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and hospital Standard Operating Procedures. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the local Bioethics Committee of the Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice (decision number KNW/0022/KB/284/19). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented during national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05144958.

Clinical Impact of Residual Leaks Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry

BACKGROUND

Data on the impact of residual peri-device leak after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to explore the association of peri-device leak with adverse clinical events.

METHODS

The National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry was queried to identify patients undergoing LAAO between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Patients were classified according to leak size on echocardiography at 45 ± 14 days (0 mm, no leak; >0-5 mm, small leak; and >5 mm, large leak).

RESULTS

A total of 51,333 patients were included, of whom 37,696 (73.4%) had no leak, 13,258 (25.8%) had small leaks, and 379 (0.7%) had large leaks. The proportion of patients on warfarin at 45 days was higher in the large vs small or no leak cohorts (44.9% vs 34.4% and 32.4%, respectively; P < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, anticoagulant utilization decreased but remained more frequent in patients with large leaks. Thromboembolic and bleeding events were uncommon in all groups. However, compared with patients with no leak, those with small leaks had slightly higher odds of stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolization (adjusted HR: 1.152; 95% CI: 1.025-1.294), major bleeding (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.029-1.120), and any major adverse events (HR: 1.102; 95% CI: 1.048-1.160). There were no significant differences in adverse events between patients with large leaks and patients with small or no leaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Small (>0-5 mm) leaks after LAAO were associated with a modestly higher incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events; large leaks (>5 mm) were not associated with adverse events, although higher proportions of these patients were maintained on anticoagulation. Newer devices with improved seal might mitigate the events associated with residual leaks.

Temporal changes and clinical significance of peridevice leak following left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer devices

Background

The natural history of peridevice leak (PDL) following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is unknown. This study sought to investigate changes of PDL from 2 until 12 months after LAAO, using cardiac computed tomography (CT), and to assess the potential association between persistent PDL and clinical outcomes

Methods

Single‐center observational study of Amplatzer LAAO implants between 2010 and 2017 (n = 206). Patients with 2 and 12 months cardiac CT were included in the study (n = 153). Images were blindly analyzed. PDL was characterized by frequency and size at the device disc, lobe, and left atrial appendage contrast patency. Patients were followed for the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or all‐cause death. Median follow up from LAAO was 3.1 (2.3–4.3) years.

Results

Contrast patency was present in 101 (66%) and 72 (47%) (p < 0.001) at 2 and 12 months, respectively. PDL was identified at the disc in 103 (67%) patients at 2 months versus 93 (61%) at 12 months (p = 0.08), and at the lobe in 29 (19%) at both time points. PDL area at the disc did not change significantly over time, ∆ area: −8.95 mm (95% confidence interval [CI]: −18.9; 1.01) p = 0.08. Permanent atrial fibrillation was independently associated with persistent PDL. Persistent versus no PDL was associated with a 62% worse clinical outcome, however not statistically significant, hazard ratio (HR): 1.62 (95% CI: 0.9–2.93), p = 0.11.

Conclusion

Persistent PDL was frequently observed following LAAO with Amplatzer devices. The PDL frequency and size appeared unchanged between 2 and 12 months. Persistent PDL was not significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes, yet this needs further delineation in future studies.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Strengths and Weaknesses of the Lobe-Only Occluder Concept in Theory and in Practice

Left atrial appendage closure aims to eliminate the stasis component of Virchow triad by eliminating a cul-de-sac that favors thrombosis, particularly when atrial contractility becomes inefficient, such as in atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure devices have a common objective of sealing the appendage completely, with device stability and avoidance of device thrombosis. Two main device designs have been used to perform left atrial appendage closure: those that use a pacifier design (lobe + disk) and those that use a plug (single lobe) design. This review highlights the potential features and benefits of the single-lobe devices.

Follow Up imaging After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion-Something or Nothing and for How Long?

Routine postprocedural imaging with transesophageal echocardiography or cardiac computed tomography angiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for follow-up surveillance usually performed 1 to 6 months after the procedure. Imaging enables recognition of well-suited and sealed devices in the left atrial appendage as well as of potential harmful complications such as peri-device leaks, device-related thrombus, and device embolization, which may lead to further surveillance observation with recurrent imaging, reinitiation of oral anticoagulants, or additional interventional procedures.

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the LAA Covering Disc Occluders-Conceptually and in Practice

Endocardial left atrial appendage (LAA) occluders with a covering disc encompass a wide range of devices that share the common feature of a distal anchoring "body" and proximal covering "disc" design. This unique design feature has potential advantages in certain complex LAA anatomies and challenging clinical scenarios. The current review article summarizes the different features of established and novel devices, preprocedural imaging updates, intraprocedural technical considerations, and postprocedural follow-up issues specific to this category of LAA occluders.

A Novel Echocardiographic-Based Classification for the Prediction of Peri-Device Leakage Following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Implantation

(1) Background: The assessment of residual peri-device leakages (PDL) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains crucial for post-procedural management. Our study aimed to verify a novel echocardiographic classification for the prediction of PDL. (2) Methods: Echocardiographic data of 72 patients who underwent percutaneous LAAO were evaluated. All echo images were analyzed by two independent investigators using standard analysis software (Image-Arena IA-4.6.4.44 by TomTec^®, Munich, Germany). A total number of 127 studies was evaluated. Forty-four patients had baseline studies, at 45 days and at 6 months post-implantation. We propose a morphological classification of LAA devices based on the amount of echodensity inside the devices into three types: type A showing complete homogenous thrombosis, type B incompletely thrombosed device with inhomogeneous echo-free space <50% of device, and type C with partially thrombosed device in which the echo free space was >50% of device in various planes, which we called the “ice-cream cone” sign. Each type was matched to the degree of PDL and clinical outcome parameters. (3) Results: Patients with type C had the highest percentage of PDL at 45 days follow-up (type A: 24%, type B: 31%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001) and at 6 months follow-up (type A: 7%, type B: 33%, type C 100% PDL, p < 0.001). Notably, device size in patients with PDL was larger than that in patients without PDL at 6 months follow-up (25.6 ± 3.5 mm vs. 28.7 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.004). Device size in patients with type C appearance was the largest of the three types (type A: 25.9 ± 3.6 mm, type B: 25.8 ± 3.4 mm, type C 29.8 ± 3.0 mm, type A vs. C; p = 0.019; type B vs. C, p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, PDL are common post-LAAO, and their frequency is underestimated and under-recognized. PDL are much more common in patients with larger LAA ostial sizes and likely lower longitudinal compression. Type C appearance of the LAAO devices (“ice-cream cone sign”) has a high positive predictive value for PDL. Further studies are needed for better delineation of the clinical importance of this proposed classification.

Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Residual peri-device leakage (PDL) is frequent after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Little is known about management strategies, procedural aspects and outcomes of interventional PDL closure.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of PDL closure after LAAO.

METHODS

Fifteen centres contributed data on baseline characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent PDL closure after LAAO. Outcomes of interest included acute success and complication rates and long-term efficacy of the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included and a cumulative number of 104 leaks were closed. The majority of PDLs were detected within 90 days (range 41-231). Detachable coils were the most frequent approach (42.3%), followed by the use of the AMPLATZER Vascular Plug II (29.8%) and the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II (17.3%). Technical success was 100% with 94.2% of devices placed successfully within the first attempt. There were no major complications requiring surgical or transcatheter interventions. During follow-up (96 days [range 49-526]), persistent leaks were found in 18 patients (18.9%), yielding a functional success rate of 82.7%, although PDLs were significantly reduced in size (pre-leak sizemax: 6.1±3.6 mm vs post-leak sizemax: 2.5±1.3 mm, p<0.001). None of the patients had a leak >5 mm. Major adverse events during follow-up occurred in 5 patients (2 ischaemic strokes, 2 intracranial haemorrhages, and 1 major gastrointestinal bleeding).

CONCLUSIONS

Several interventional techniques have become available to achieve PDL closure. They are associated with high technical and functional success and low complication rates.

Cardioform Septal Occluder for the Closure of a Peri-Device Leak After Initial Watchman Implantation

Left atrial appendage occlusion has become a safe and effective alternative for stroke-risk reduction among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Although complete closure is ideal, residual peri-device leaks (PDL) are not uncommon and have been associated with an increased residual risk of stroke. PDL closure has been proposed as an alternate strategy to allow for the safe discontinuation of oral anticoagulation. We describe the safety and feasibility of successful PDL closure using a non-fenestrated Cardioform (Gore Medical, Flagstaff, Arizona) septal occluder after initial Watchman (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) implantation.

Leaks after Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Ignored or Neglected?

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has recently been approved as an alternative management for stroke prevention in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have difficulties with long-term oral anticoagulation. The various shapes and sizes of LAA and orientation of the atrial ostium may contribute to the incomplete LAA closure from circular design devices and orientation of the non-steerable delivery catheter. Incomplete closure of LAA leads to a high-velocity blood flow through the peri-device gap, resulting in peri-device leak (PDL). Residual leaks are frequently diagnosed after LAA closure procedures, regardless of closure methods. There is a controversy in the clinical significance of the leaks, particularly about its association with thromboembolic events. PDL <5 mm was not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism. Current literatures with small study population have not been sufficient to clarify the role of the leaks after LAA closure. Nevertheless, management of severe leaks has been a challenging concern for cardiologists. Leaks after epicardial LAA closures are at the neck of the incompletely closed LAA and have shown to increase the risk of thromboembolism. Percutaneous closure of the leaks after LAA closure has been attempted with good safety and success, but long-term safety and efficacy remains unclear. Further large long-term studies which aim to assess the role of leaks or PDLs in predicting thromboembolic events and management strategies are warranted.

Combination of ablation and left atrial appendage closure as "One-stop" procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: Current status and future perspective

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is a major cause of stroke and systemic embolism. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been proved to be noninferior to traditional Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as well as novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which is becoming an important alternative to prevent stroke in non‐valvular AF. Catheter‐based AF ablation (CA) is recommended to be a standard of care in patients with AF refractory to drug therapy due to a better rhythm control and improvement of life quality than antiarrhythmic drugs. Theoretically, the one‐stop combination with LAAC and CA tends to bring more benefits in patients with AF, as it not only relieves symptoms, but also reduces the risk of stroke significantly. However, several important questions still need to be considered in the combination procedure although quite a few attempts have already been made in clinical practice. This review provides a comprehensive update on the concept, technique, perioperative management, benefits and other critical issues of the “one‐stop” procedure.

Remaining Challenges With Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure has emerged as a feasible stroke prevention strategy in selected patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Since its commercial approval in the United States in 2015, the use of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has witnessed a substantial growth. However, certain issues remain unresolved with the technology. Knowledge of these issues, their significance, and the current and future efforts to resolve them is key for proper informed decision making by physicians and patients.

Comparison of fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiogram for intra-procedure device surveillance assessment during implantation of Watchman

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate intraprocedural assessments using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the WATCHMAN device.

METHOD

A total of 208 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAO were included in this study[101 standard procedures (retrospective cohort) and 107 with fluoroscopy-alone approach (prospective cohort). Individual device position, anchoring, compression and peri-device leak (PDL) were successively analyzed based on TEE and fluoroscopy in the retrospective cohort to summarize detailed fluoroscopic assessments for prospective application. Clinical outcomes were assessed between two cohorts.

RESULTS

For retrospective cohort, TEE and fluoroscopy agreed on device position and anchoring. Compression upon fluoroscopy was well correlated with 2D-TEE (r = 0.908) and the difference in overall detection of PDL was not statistically significant between two imaging modalities (p = 0.304). For the prospective cohort with fluoroscopy-guidance alone, implantation success was similar to that of the retrospective cohort (98.13% vs 100%, p = 0.498). The incidence rate of major clinical adverse events was relatively higher in prospective cohort during hospitalization and follow-up but did not reach significant difference (5.61% vs 1.98%; 0.99% vs 0.93%, p > 0.05). Moreover, the prospective group presented with shorter procedural duration, shorter in-hospital stay and lower total hospitalization cost than retrospective group.

CONCLUSION

LAAO performed by experienced operators in large volume centers is feasible under fluoroscopy guidance. However, there is still a trend in favor of TEE for greater procedural safety and more complete LAA seal. We suggest that this minimalist approach could be proposed in cases with contraindication to general anesthesia and/or TEE.

Incidence and characteristics of left atrial appendage stumps after device-enabled epicardial closure

OBJECTIVES

High success rates for left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion with the AtriClip (Atricure, USA) device have been reported in the literature. This study evaluated the presence and characteristics of residual LAA stumps after AtriClip LAA exclusion using postoperative short- and long-term computed tomography angiography (CTA).

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 43 of 291 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with concomitant LAA occlusion using the AtriClip device were identified with available postoperative short- and long-term follow-up by CTA. LAA patency and the absence or the size of a present residual LAA stump were assessed on 2-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions, on maximum intensity projection images and on volume-rendered 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. Based on current recommendations, the threshold for a significant LAA stump length was defined <10 mm.

RESULTS

The LAA was successfully occluded in all 43 patients (100%) as confirmed by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography and CTA imaging with a mean follow-up duration of 7.1 ± 0.8 years post-implant. The absence of blood flow in the excluded LAA was confirmed in all cases. In 31 of 43 patients (72%), no residual stump (0 mm) was observed creating a smooth endocardial surface, CTA revealed residual LAA stumps in 11/43 patients (26%) with a length <10 mm and a significant residual stump with a depth of >10 mm (12 mm) in 1 patient (2%). The mean length, width and depth of the residual stumps were 5.8 ± 2.1, 4.4 ± 1.2 and 7.3 ± 2.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated the incidence of residual stump formation (>10 mm) after LAA closure with the AtriClip device based on CTA imaging data obtained during short- and long-term follow-up. While no LAA stump was detectable in the majority of patients, a non-significant LAA stump (<10 mm) was present in 26% of cases, indicating a favourable LAA occlusion profile for the AtriClip device. However, although a LAA stump length <10 mm is currently considered clinically safe, this definition needs further attention in future studies with regards to its potential clinical implications.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Prevention and Management of Periprocedural and Postprocedural Complications

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is noninferior to oral vitamin K antagonist therapy for the reduction of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-related stroke risk. Currently, the procedure is most widely accepted in patients who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulants. This patient population is generally comorbid, making any reduction in procedural complications paramount. LAAC has important complications described in the periprocedural and postprocedural periods. The prevention and management of complications regarding vascular access, transseptal puncture, pericardial effusion, device embolization, stroke, air embolusperidevice leak, device-related thrombus and device erosion/ late pericardial effusion are discussed.

Left atrial appendage occlusion simulation based on three-dimensional printing: new insights into outcome and technique

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of simulation based on 3D-printed models before left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for peri-device leaks (PDL) and the impact on procedural outcomes compared to conventional imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-six patients referred for LAAO with double disc device underwent construction of a 3D-printed LA model using flexible photopolymer resin. An implant simulation was performed retrospectively in Group 1 (55 patients), blinded to implanted device size, and prospectively in Group 2 (21 patients). In Group 1, an off-axis device position occurred in 14 patients (25%) and the incidence of PDL was 27% (15 patients); mismatch between model and device size was the best predictor (area under the curve 0.88, CI: 0.77-0.99). When using 3D simulation prospectively, mean prosthesis number per patient (1.05±0.21 vs. 1.20±0.52, p=0.04) and incidence of leaks (5% vs. 27%, p<0.01) were reduced compared to conventional imaging alone, as well as fluoroscopy time (19 mins [13.4-23] vs. 13.5 mins [11.1-15], p=0.012) and total fluoroscopy dose (7,291 [1,811-12,734] vs. 1,978 (1,548-4,800) mGy·cm2, p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

3D-printed patient-specific adaptive and flexible LA models improve LAAO double disc device sizing. This can potentially reduce procedure time and the number of prostheses employed per patient.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for The Unmet Clinical Needs of Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation is the dominant strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, lifelong oral anticoagulation is associated with major issues including inappropriate dosing, nonadherence, and adverse effects. Therefore, efforts have been made to develop site-specific therapy aimed to occlude the left atrial appendage, the anatomical site accountable for more than 90% of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation-related ischemic strokes. This review focuses on the growing literature to put into perspective the risk-balance ratio of left atrial appendage occlusion.