Left atrial appendage occlusion with the AMPLATZER Amulet device: periprocedural and early clinical/echocardiographic data from a global prospective observational study

Clinical Value of CT-Based 3D Computational Modeling in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An In-Depth Analysis of the PRECISE LAAO Study

BACKGROUND

Standard of care (SoC) assessment based on computed tomography (CT) and/or transesophageal echocardiography is suboptimal for adequate preprocedural evaluation for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). This can be improved through CT-based 3D computational modeling of the LAA-device interaction using FEops HEARTguide. This study aims to assess the decisional impact of FEops in preprocedural planning for LAAO.

METHODS

The PRECISE LAAO is a prospective multi-center self-controlled study evaluating the use of FEops in LAAO with Amulet. Preprocedural device size selection and degree of certainty (scale 0-10) were registered before (Decision SoC) and after accessing FEops (Decision FEops), followed by device implantation. Concordance was compared between the Decisions and the final implanted device. After the procedure, clinicians rated the subjective value of FEops on a scale from -3 (futile) to +3 (most helpful).

RESULTS

One hundred two patients were included. Decision SoC was concordant with the implanted device in 61 patients (59.8%), whereas Decision FEops was concordant in 92 (90.2%, p < 0.0001). FEops induced a size change in 35 patients, which was correct in 33 (32.4%). Certainty SoC was 6.7 ± 1.3 and increased after FEops assessment to 7.6 ± 1.3 (p < 0.0001). In the 33 patients with FEops-induced positive corrections, Certainty SoC was lower (6.2 ± 1.5, suggesting a more complex procedure) and increased to 7.2 ± 1.2 with FEops (p = 0.004). Clinicians rated FEops as helpful (subjective score ≥ 1) in 90.2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-based computational modeling using FEops has a positive decisional impact in LAAO, inducing a change in Amulet size selection in almost one out of three patients and increasing procedural confidence. Trials Trial Registration: NCT04640051.

Remote Tamponade After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

The use of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at high thromboembolic risk and contraindication to or high risk for bleeding with oral anticoagulation is increasing.

CASE SUMMARY

The authors present a case of acute hemorrhagic tamponade 7 months after LAAC. Intraoperative findings showed device-related microperforation of the LAA and erosion of the adjacent pulmonary artery.

DISCUSSION

Remote tamponade after LAAC has been reported with an incidence <1%, occurring more frequently in nitinol plug devices than in nitinol cage devices. Management ranges from conservative with cessation of antithrombotic agents to invasive with surgical repair.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGES

Remote tamponade after LAAC is a rare but potentially fatal complication. Routine use of cardiac computed tomography in addition to transesophageal echocardiography for preprocedural planning, especially for nitinol plug devices, can identify patients at risk of delayed tamponade and can guide device selection, modified implantation technique, or alternative management strategies.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Supporting Evidence, Limitations and Future Directions

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising intervention for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are contraindicated for long-term anticoagulation therapy. Despite its growing adoption, a comprehensive review of the LAAO procedure is essential to consolidate the supporting evidence, identify limitations, and outline future directions. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAAO, drawing on clinical trials and real-world studies to provide a balanced perspective. Additionally, we address the limitations of current research, including variability in patient selection, procedural techniques, and follow-up protocols. By highlighting gaps in the knowledge and areas for improvement, this review aims to guide future research efforts to optimize and expand the therapeutic potential of LAAO.

Pulmonary Ridge Coverage: a Two-edged Sword in Left Atrial Appendage Closure With LAmbre

BACKGROUND

The LAmbre occluder, available in 2 versions, allows for selective coverage of the pulmonary ridge (PR) during left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). In this study we evaluated the effects of PR coverage on imaging and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LAAC.

METHODS

Imaging data and clinical events were retrospectively analyzed for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who successfully underwent LAAC using the LAmbre device at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between October 2018 and May 2022. The primary composite endpoint was thromboembolic (TE) events and device-related thrombus (DRT).

RESULTS

In total, 259 patients were evaluated using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at median intervals of 52 days (short term) and 385 days (long term). Patients were divided into a PR-covered group (n = 109) and a PR-uncovered group (n = 150). PR-uncovered patients showed a trend toward higher DRT incidence (8 of 150 vs 1 of 109, P = 0.056, log-rank test). The primary composite endpoint of TE events and DRT was significantly lower in the PR-covered group (14.0% vs 6.4%, P = 0.046, log-rank test). Any peridevice leak (PDL) was more frequent in the PR-covered group during both short-term (45.9% vs 28.7%, P = 0.004) and long-term (49.5% vs 25.3%, P < 0.001) follow-up, but no differences were observed for significant PDLs (> 3 mm). PR coverage was identified as an independent predictor of any long-term PDL (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.64-6.18, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PR coverage during LAAC with the LAmbre device was associated with a reduced risk of the primary composite endpoint of TE events and DRT, albeit with an increased incidence of nonsignificant PDL (≤ 3 mm).

Safety and efficacy of a light antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage occlusion: Insights from the LOGIC (left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) international multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has the purpose of preventing device related thrombosis (DRT), avoiding embolic events; nevertheless, the correct antithrombotic regimen after LAAO is still under debate.

AIMS

Aim of this substudy of the observational LOGIC registry was to describe the efficacy and safety of a light antithrombotic regimen, comprising single antiplatelet therapy or none, compared to a standard antithrombotic regimen, after a successful LAAO.

METHODS

Patients with NVAF that underwent LAAO were previously included in the LOGIC registry. Patients receiving single or no AT were considered as light therapy group, while other regimen were considered as standard regimen group. Outcomes of interest were death from any causes and cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack and systemic embolization, any bleeding and major bleeding at 12 months.

RESULTS

Six hundred and twenty-eight patients were considered in the analysis, 31.4 % received a light antithrombotic regimen. There were no differences in overall and cardiovascular mortality (5.1 % Vs 6.7 %, p = 0.426 and 2.0 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.553 respectively). Cerebrovascular stroke and transient ischemic attack were similar between the two groups (1.5 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.898 and 1.5 % Vs 1.3 %, p = 0.847). Light regimen was not associated with an increased rate of systemic embolism (1.0 % Vs 0.7 %, p = 0.447 and HR 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.34-2.27; p = 0.79]). A light AT regimen did not affect bleeding events being not different between the two groups (HR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.33-1.59; p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

An AT regimen based on single or no antithrombotic therapy after LAAO seems to be safe in patients with high-bleeding risk, without increasing cerebrovascular or peripheral ischemic events.

An International Consensus Practical Guide on Left Atrial Appendage Closure for the Non-implanting Physician: Executive Summary

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are in need of stroke prevention are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue treatment shortly after its initiation. Despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such undertreatment has improved somewhat but is still evident. This is due to continued risks of bleeding events or ischemic strokes while on DOAC, poor treatment compliance, or aversion to anticoagulant therapy. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favored for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF patients who cannot have long-term oral anticoagulation. This article is an executive summary of a practical guide recently published by an international expert consensus group, which introduces the LAAC devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. This practical guide, aligned with published guideline/guidance, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of LAAC.

Cerebral Embolic Protection: Is There a Benefit for Left Atrial and Mitral Valve Procedures?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to highlight the current evidence on the use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures. It also aims to summarize the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing such procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ischemic stroke is one of the most devastating complications of structural heart procedures. The manifestation of periprocedural stroke can range from asymptomatic and detectable only through brain imaging to major stroke with neurological deficits. CEP devices were initially developed to mitigate the risk of stroke associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the efficacy of such devices during different cardiac interventions is yet to be fully demonstrated, especially in left atrial appendage closure (LAAO), and mitral valve interventions. Few studies demonstrated that the risk of periprocedural strokes after LAAO and mitral valve interventions is not negligible and is highest during the periprocedural period and then falls. The majority of patients undergoing those procedures have cerebral ischemic injuries detected on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). Moreover, a reasonable number of those patients had debris embolization on the filters of the CEPD. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is crucial and should be tailored to each patient's risk of bleeding and ischemia. Close monitoring that includes a full neurological assessment and frequent follow-up visits with cardiac echocardiography are important. The risk of periprocedural stroke in left atrial and transcatheter mitral valve procedures is not negligible. Pharmacological therapy with antithrombotic agents before, during, or after structural heart interventions is important to mitigate the risk of stroke, especially the long-term risk. More prospective studies are needed to assess the efficacy of CEPD in such procedures.

Device-Assisted Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: From Basic Sciences to Clinical Applications

Device-assisted left atrial appendage exclusion plays a crucial role in the prevention of fatal ischemic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation treatment. Various devices with different safety profiles and device-related complications are available in daily practice to perform this procedure. In this review, the anatomy, physiology, and functions of the left atrial appendage were detailed, and all available devices used for epicardial and endocardial exclusion of the left atrial appendage and their clinical outcomes were discussed. Future research should aim to further investigate the long-term effects of left atrial appendage exclusion on body homeostasis, blood coagulation, and cardiac function.

Antithrombotic Therapy in High Bleeding Risk, Part I: Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a valid alternative to oral anticoagulation to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.The devices approved in Europe and United States for percutaneous LAAC contain metal and temporary antithrombotic therapy is strongly recommended following implantation to prevent thrombus formation on the atrial device surface. There is still uncertainty regarding to the optimal antithrombotic drug regimen after device implantation for several reasons. Thus, this review aims at summarizing the available evidence and the remaining challenges related to the management of antithrombotic therapy in the context of LAAC procedure.

1-Year Clinical Outcomes and the Impact of Procedural Configurations in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Patients

Background

The clinical performance of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a procedure and the long-term impact of its varied implantation configurations and anticoagulation regimens remain unclear.

Objectives

This study sought to provide data in routine practice from a prospective multicenter registry.

Methods

A total of 3,096 consecutive patients from 39 Chinese centers undergoing LAAO were enrolled between April 1, 2019, and October 31, 2020.

Results

The baseline CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.0 ± 1.8 and 2.4 ± 1.2, respectively; mean age was 69 ± 9 years. One-year follow-up was completed in 3,013 (97.8%) patients. The ischemic endpoint of death, stroke, and systemic embolism occurred in 133 (4.51%) patients, and life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding occurred in 71 (2.36%) patients. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, no significant association was found between anesthesia type (moderate sedation vs general anesthesia) or image guidance (transesophageal/intracardiac echocardiography vs fluoroscopy) and ischemic or bleeding events. In 1,295 (42.0%) cases, LAAO combined with catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower rate of death, stroke, or systemic embolism than LAAO only (3.5% vs 5.2%, inverse probability of treatment weighting HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-0.99). The most common post-LAAO antithrombotic regimen was warfarin/direct oral anticoagulant monotherapy for 45 days, followed by single-/dual-antiplatelet therapy (38.1%).

Conclusions

In Chinese centers, patients undergoing LAAO had low rates of ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year. Combining LAAO with catheter ablation was associated with a lower rate of ischemic events than LAAO only. (Registry to Evaluate Chinese Real-World Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology [RECORD]; NCT03917563).

Risk factors, clinical implications, and management of peridevice leak following left atrial appendage closure: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a treatment modality for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). One of the potential complications of LAAC is a peri-device leak (PDL), which could potentially increase the risk of thromboembolism formation.

METHODS

This systematic review was done according to PRISMA guidelines. Using four databases, all primary studies through April 2022 that met selection criteria were included. Outcomes of interest were studies reporting on PDL characteristics, risk factors and management.

RESULTS

A total of 116 studies met selection criteria (97 original studies and 19 case reports/series). In the original studies (n = 30,133 patients), the weighted mean age was 72.0 ± 7.4 years (57% females) with a HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc weighted means of 2.8 ± 1.1 and 3.8 ± 1.3, respectively. The most common definition of PDL was based on size; 5 mm: major, 3-5 mm: moderate, < 1 mm minor, or trivial. Follow up time for PDL detection was 7.15 ± 9.0 months. 33% had PDL, irrespective of PDL severity/size, and only 0.9% had PDL of greater than 5 mm. The main risk factors for PDL development included lower degree of over-sizing, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, device/LAA shape mismatch, previous radiofrequency ablation, and male sex. The most common methods to screen for PDL included transesophageal echocardiogram and cardiac CT. PDL Management approaches include Amplatzer Patent Foramen Ovale occluder, Hookless ACP, Amplatzer vascular plug II, embolic coils, and detachable vascular coils; removal or replacement of the device; and left atriotomy.

CONCLUSION

Following LAAC, the emergence of a PDL is a significant complication to be aware of. Current evidence suggests possible risk factors that are worth assessing in-depth. Additional research is required to assess suitable candidates, timing, and strategies to managing patients with PDL.

Single antiplatelet therapy following Amplatzer left atrial appendage occlusion

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic therapy following left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains debated. Ideally, this therapy should effectively prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT) while minimising the associated bleeding risk.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of a postprocedural single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) strategy following Amplatzer LAAO in a large consecutive cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre, observational study included all patients discharged on SAPT after LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amplatzer Amulet between March 2010 and December 2021 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Baseline, procedural, and imaging data were obtained locally, while clinical outcomes and medication data were extracted from the Danish national health registries.

RESULTS

A total of 553 patients underwent Amplatzer LAAO during the specified time frame. Of these, 431 (77.9%) high bleeding risk patients were discharged on SAPT with either acetylsalicylic acid (n=403, 72.9%) or clopidogrel (n=28, 5.1%). At 6 months, 173 (41.7%) patients were not on any antithrombotic therapy. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.9±1.5 and 3.4±1.1, respectively. DRT was detected in 6 (1.5%) patients on 8-week follow-up imaging using cardiac computed tomography (n=386, 89.6%) or transoesophageal echocardiography (n=27, 6.3%). The 1-year ischaemic stroke rate was 2.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.2). One-year rates for major bleeding and cardiovascular death were 5.9% (95% CI: 4.0-8.9) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.6-5.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SAPT following Amplatzer LAAO displayed rates of DRT and stroke comparable to those reported with more intensive antithrombotic regimens. Meanwhile, we observed low rates of major bleeding.

First Experience With Amulet in the United States: Early Insights From EMERGE LAA Postapproval Study

BACKGROUND

The Food and Drug Administration approved the Amulet occluder (Abbott) after demonstrating safety and effectiveness in the Amulet IDE (AMPLATZER Amulet LAA Occluder) trial.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the EMERGE Left Atrial Appendage study is to evaluate early postapproval outcomes of the Amulet occluder in the United States using data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry.

METHODS

Patients with a commercial Amulet occluder implant attempt between Food and Drug Administration approval (August 14, 2021) and December 31, 2022, were included. The safety composite endpoint included all-cause death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device/procedure-related events requiring open cardiac surgery or endovascular intervention between device implantation and 7 days or hospital discharge (whichever is later). Major adverse events through 45 days were also reported and stratified by operator experience (early [<10 cases], moderate [10-29 cases], and high [30+ cases]).

RESULTS

A total of 5,499 patients underwent attempted Amulet occluder implantation. Implant success was 95.8%, and complete closure was 97.2% post-left atrial appendage occlusion and 87.1% at 45 days. A safety composite endpoint event occurred in 0.76% patients. Any major adverse event occurred in 2.9% and 5.7% of patients in-hospital and through 45 days, respectively, driven by major bleeding and pericardial effusion (PE) requiring intervention. PE requiring surgery or percutaneous intervention decreased significantly with increasing experience both in-hospital (early vs high operator experience 1.8% vs 1.1%; P = 0.006) and at 45 days (2.3% vs 1.5%; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The EMERGE Left Atrial Appendage study demonstrates favorable safety and effectiveness of the Amulet occluder in the real-world setting. More experienced operators had improved implant success and fewer PEs, suggesting a learning curve effect implanting this dual occlusive mechanism device.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and the cause of thromboembolic events in elderly patients worldwide. AF is associated with a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to cardiac emboli, primarily from left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Oral anticoagulation therapy is the standard treatment to effectively reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with AF. However, anticoagulation treatment increases bleeding risk. LAA closure (LAAC) has recently been introduced as a feasible mechanical preventive intervention for thromboembolic events while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Transcatheter LAAC devices have evolved in the past decade, and several ongoing trials have demonstrated the improvements of safety and outcomes in newer generation devices. This review summarizes the current perspectives and outcomes regarding LAAC as an alternative to pharmacologic therapy.

The role of CT in arrhythmia management-treatment planning and post-procedural imaging surveillance

Several interventional treatment options exist in patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmia. Cardiac CT is routinely performed prior to occlusion of the left atrial appendage, pulmonary vein isolation, and cardiac device implantation. Besides the evaluation of coronary artery disease, cardiac CT provides isotropic, high-resolution CT images of the cardiac anatomy with the possibility of multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional reconstructions which are helpful to guide interventional treatment. In addition, cardiac CT is increasingly used to rapidly evaluate periprocedural complications and for the routine post-procedural imaging surveillance in patients after interventions. This review article will discuss current applications of pre- and post-interventional CT imaging in patients with arrhythmia.

Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter heart interventions

Stroke remains a devastating complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with the incidence of clinically apparent stroke seemingly fixed at around 3% despite TAVR's significant evolution during the past decade. Embolic showers of debris (calcium, atheroma, valve material, foreign material) are captured in the majority of patients who have TAVR using a filter-based cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD). Additionally, in systematic brain imaging studies, the majority of patients receiving TAVR exhibit new cerebral lesions. Mechanistic studies have shown reductions in the volume of new cerebral lesions using CEPDs, yet the first randomised trial powered for periprocedural stroke within 72 hours of a transfemoral TAVR failed to meet its primary endpoint of showing superiority of the SENTINEL CEPD. The present review summarises the clinicopathological rationale for the development of CEPDs, the evidence behind these devices to date and the emerging recognition of cerebral embolisation in many non-TAVR transcatheter procedures. Given the uniqueness of each of the various CEPDs under development, specific trials tailored to their designs will need to be undertaken to broaden the CEPD field, in addition to evaluating the role of CEPD in non-TAVR transcatheter heart interventions. Importantly, the cost-effectiveness of these devices will require assessment to broaden the adoption of CEPDs globally.

An Updated Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

The availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with known lower bleeding risk compared with warfarin have raised questions about the role of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes for LAAC versus DOACs. All studies directly comparing LAAC with DOACs up to January 2023 were included. The outcomes studied included the combined major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events outcomes, ischemic stroke and thromboembolic events, major bleeding, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence interval were extracted or estimated from the data and pooled together with a random-effects model. A total of 7 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 6 propensity-matched observational studies) were finally included, with a pooled population of 4,383 patients who underwent LAAC and 4,554 patients on DOACs. There were no significant differences between patients who underwent LAAC and patients on DOACs in terms of baseline age (75.0 vs 74.7, p = 0.27), CHA2DS2-VASc score (5.1 vs 5.1, p = 0.33), or HAS-BLED score (3.3 vs 3.3, p = 0.36). After a mean weighted follow-up of 22.0 months, LAAC was associated with significantly lower rates of combined major adverse CV event outcomes (HR 0.73 [0.56 to 0.95], p = 0.02), all-cause mortality (HR 0.68 [0.54 to 0.86], p = 0.02), and CV mortality (HR 0.55 [0.41 to 0.72], p<0.01). There were no significant differences in the rates of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.12 [0.92 to 1.35], p = 0.25), major bleeding (HR 0.94 [0.67 to 1.32], p = 0.71), or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 1.07 [0.74 to 1.54], p = 0.74) between LAAC and DOAC. In conclusion, percutaneous LAAC was found to be as efficacious as DOACs for stroke prevention, with lower all-cause and CV mortality. The rates of major bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke were similar. LAAC has a potential role to play in stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in the era of DOACs, but further randomized data are needed.

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

SCAI/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

SCAI/HRS expert consensus statement on transcatheter left atrial appendage closure

Exclusion of the left atrial appendage to reduce thromboembolic risk related to atrial fibrillation was first performed surgically in 1949. Over the past 2 decades, the field of transcatheter endovascular left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded, with a myriad of devices approved or in clinical development. The number of LAAC procedures performed in the United States and worldwide has increased exponentially since the Food and Drug Administration approval of the WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific) device in 2015. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) has previously published statements in 2015 and 2016 providing societal overview of the technology and institutional and operator requirements for LAAC. Since then, results from several important clinical trials and registries have been published, technical expertise and clinical practice have matured over time, and the device and imaging technologies have evolved. Therefore, SCAI prioritized the development of an updated consensus statement to provide recommendations on contemporary, evidence-based best practices for transcatheter LAAC focusing on endovascular devices.

Preprocedural Multimodality Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. In current medical practice, multimodality imaging is routinely used in the management of AF. Twenty-one years ago, the ACUTE trial (Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography) results were published, and the management of AF changed forever by incorporating transesophageal echocardiography guided cardioversion of patients in AF for the first time. Current applications of multimodality imaging in AF in 2022 include the use of transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography before cardioversion to exclude left atrial thrombus and in left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. Transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance are clinically used for AF ablation planning. The decision to use a particular imaging modality in AF is based on patient's characteristics, guideline recommendation, institutional preferences, expertise, and cost. In this first of 2-part review series, we discuss the preprocedural role of echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in the AF, with regard to their clinical applications, relevant outcomes data and unmet needs, and highlights future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Left atrial appendage closure with the II generation Ultraseal device: An international registry. The LIGATE study

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility and safety of second-generation left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) Ultraseal device in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

BACKGROUND

LAAC with first-generation Ultraseal device (Cardia, Eagan, Minnesota) has been shown to be a feasible therapeutic option in patients with NVAF. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the novel second-generation Ultraseal device.

METHODS

All patients with NVAF undergoing second-generation Ultraseal device implantation between February 2018 and September 2020 were included in a multicenter international registry. Periprocedural and post-discharge events were collected through 6-month follow-up. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were device success and technical success while primary safety endpoint was in-hospital major adverse event (MAE) occurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were included: mean age 75 ± 8, 30.8% women, mean HAS-BLED 3 ± 1. The device was successfully implanted in all patients. Technical success was achieved in 50 patients (96.1%). In-hospital MAEs occurred in three patients (5.8%). The incidence of 6-month all-cause death and major bleeding was 11.6% and 2.1%, respectively. No strokes, transient ischemic attacks, systemic embolisms, or device embolization were reported after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-generation Ultraseal device implantation was associated with high success rates and a low incidence of peri-procedural complications. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further evaluate the safety and the efficacy of this device, especially at long-term follow-up.

Left atrial appendage exclusion in atrial fibrillation

Although oral anticoagulants (OACs) are first-line therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), some patients cannot be treated with OACs due to absolute or relative contraindications. Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion techniques have been developed over the years as a therapeutic alternative for stroke prevention. In this paper, we review the evolution of surgical techniques, employed as an adjunct to cardiac surgery or as a stand-alone procedure, as well as the recently introduced and widely utilized percutaneous LAA occlusion techniques. Until recently, data on surgical LAAO were limited and based on non-randomized studies. We focus on recently published randomized data which strongly support an add-on surgical LAAO in eligible patients during cardiac surgery and could potentially change current practice guidelines. In recent years, the trans-catheter techniques for LAA occlusion have emerged as another, less invasive alternative for patients who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulation. We review the growing body of evidence from prospective studies and registries, focusing on the two systems which are in widespread clinical use nowadays: the Watchman and Amulet type devices. These data show favorable results for both Watchman and Amulet devices, setting them as an important tool in our arsenal for stroke reduction in AF patients, especially in those who have contraindications for OACs. A better understanding of the different therapeutic alternatives, their specific benefits, and downfalls in different patient populations can guide us in tailoring the optimal therapeutic approach for stroke reduction in our AF patients.

Peri-device leakage not CHA2DS2-VASc is associated with post-left atrial appendage closure cardiovascular event

OBJECTIVE

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) is an alternative treatment for stroke prevention. However, thromboembolic event still occur, and the predictors are unknown.

METHODS

The first Asian long-term follow-up study consisted of 308 patients with mean age 71.9±9.5 years, mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.1 ± 1.8 since 2013. Primary outcome was defined as any type of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolization and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

There was no procedural-related TIA or stroke. After a mean follow-up of 38±16 months, the ischemic stroke/TIA rate was 1.9 and cardiovascular death rate 0.3 per 100 patient-year. The rate of peri-device leak (PDL) was 11.9% and device-related thrombus (DRT) 2.6%. In the multivariable analyses, PDL was the only independent predictor of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio 5.5, p=0.008). CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, prior history of stroke, DRT and post-procedural anti-thrombotic regimen/duration were not associated with outcomes. Implantation of Watchman was associated with PDL (odds ratio 4.35, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PDL is the only independent predictor of post-LAAO stroke. The risk of stroke for patients with NVAF may be controllable after LAA is occluded, because PDL is preventable and treatable.

Safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer amulet and watchman2.5 for left atrial appendage occlusion: a Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) to decrease the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, certain complications remain a concern. Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman are the two most popular used devices for preventing stroke in patients with NVAF. We assessed the safety and efficacy of LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy outcomes associated with the use of the Amplatzer Amulet and Watchman 2.5. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale has been utilized to assess the quality of study.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis includes seven studies involving 2,926 patients (1,418 patients with an amulet and 1,508 with a Watchman 2.5). Generally, adverse event rates for both systems were minimal. No significant differences between the two devices were found in safety (pericardial effusion, device embolization, and cardiac tamponade) or efficacy outcomes (death, TIA, stroke, major/minor bleeding, device leak, and thromboembolic events).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest LAAO is a safe procedure, regardless of which device was used. LAAO devices generally have low complication rates. Outcomes were comparable between the two groups with no significant differences in their safety or efficacy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Complex transcatheter left atrial appendage closure using a tailored trans-jugular approach simulated by 3D printing: a case report

Background

Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAc) is less feasible in patients with unusual LAA anatomy.

Case summary

A 65-year-old woman with persistent atrial fibrillation was referred for LAAc. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed spontaneous contrast in the LAA without formation of a thrombus; the LAA shape was tortuous and difficult to assess. A first LAAc procedure was unsuccessful given the unsuitable sheath position. Therefore, a soft three-dimensional (3D) model printing was performed by laser sintering and revealed excessive sheath kinking with an inferior approach, but successful deployment would be feasible using a superior approach. Successful trans-jugular implantation of a Watchman FLX 31 device in stable position without residual leakage was achieved during the subsequent procedure. At 3-month follow-up, and after cessation of oral anticoagulation, the patient’s symptoms improved. Imaging demonstrated complete LAA occlusion and correct placement of the device along the LAA superior axis.

Discussion

This is the first-reported clinical case of a complex transcatheter LAAc through a trans-jugular approach. Simulating the patient’s anatomy with a laser sintering 3D-printed model showed why the transfemoral approach failed, validated the trans-jugular procedure, enabled selection of the simple curve access sheath that had the most direct trajectory towards the LAA, confirmed that transseptal puncture was possible, allowed determination of the angle of puncture, enabled selection of the most appropriate LAA device and had a very low cost compared with planning software or other printing methods.

Impact of HAS-BLED Score on outcome after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: insights from the German Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Registry LAARGE

AIM

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has been established as alternative stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and high bleeding risk. However, little is known regarding the outcome after LAA closure depending on the HAS-BLED score.

METHODS

A sub-analysis of the prospective, multicenter, Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Register-GErmany (LAARGE) registry was performed assessing three different groups with respect to the HAS-BLED score (0-2 [group 1] vs. 3-4 [group 2] vs. 5-7 [group 3]).

RESULTS

A total of 633 patients at 38 centers were enrolled. Of them, 9% (n = 59) were in group 1, 63% (n = 400) in group 2 and 28% (n = 174) in group 3. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year composite of death, stroke and systemic embolism was 3.4% in group 1 vs. 10.4% in group 2 vs. 20.1% in group 3, respectively (p log-rank < 0.001). The difference was driven by death since stroke and systemic embolism did not show a significant difference between the groups. The rate of major bleeding at 1 year was 0% vs. 0% vs. 2.4%, respectively (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The present data show that patients had similarly low rates of ischemic complications 1 year after LAA closure irrespective of the baseline bleeding risk. Higher HAS-BLED scores were associated with increased mortality due to higher age and more severe comorbidity of these patients.

Left atrial appendage occlusion vs novel oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicenter randomized occlusion-AF trial

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing globally, which is a major clinical and public health concern due to the 5-fold increased risk of stroke. Oral anticoagulation with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is the current primary option for stroke prevention in patients with AF, although it increases the risk of major bleeding. Patients with prior ischemic cerebrovascular events are at particularly high risk of both recurrent ischemic events and major bleeding. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative option for stroke prevention in high-risk patients, however, with currently limited evidence. Thus, randomized trials comparing LAAO to NOACs are needed.

OBJECTIVE

The Occlusion-AF trial is designed to assess whether LAAO is non-inferior to NOAC therapy for reduction of the combined endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3) and all-cause mortality in patients with AF and a recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Investigator-initiated multicenter, multinational, randomized open-label non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design). Patients with documented AF, and an ischemic stroke or TIA within 6 months will be eligible for enrollment. Major exclusion criteria are modified Rankin Scale > 3 at enrollment, glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min, and life-expectancy less than 2 years. A total of 750 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either a NOAC or LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet (Abbott, MN, USA) or Watchman FLX (Boston Scientific, MN, USA) with subsequent life-long aspirin 75 mg daily. Follow-up will be based on in-office and telephone follow-up in combination with long-term follow-up (10 years) through national hospital discharge registries in the individual Nordic countries. The primary outcome will be a composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) and all-cause mortality at 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The Occlusion-AF trial is designed to compare LAAO to NOAC therapy for secondary stroke prevention in AF patients with a high risk of recurrent thromboembolic events, i.e. with previous ischemic stroke or TIA, and otherwise eligible for anticoagulation. The results are expected to contribute significantly to the understanding of the effects of LAAO compared to the standard contemporary pharmacological treatment in these patients.

Prevalence, mechanisms and impact of residual patency and device-related thrombosis following left atrial appendage occlusion: a computed tomography analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) appears to be an appropriate imaging technique for device surveillance after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, the available experience is limited.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, mechanisms and clinical impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency and device-related thrombosis (DRT) following LAAO utilising a novel CCTA-based classification.

METHODS

Consecutively enrolled patients who underwent LAAO with an AMPLATZER device were followed up with CCTA. Mechanisms and frequency of residual patency were evaluated and correlated with clinical events. Atrial-side device thrombus, device positioning and presence of signs of device stability were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included. LAA patency was observed in 56.9% (n=78). Mechanisms and frequency of patency were: malapposition of proximal segment of the device lobe (55.1%), peri-device leak (PDL, 34.6%) and fabric permeability (5.8%). Lobe-LAA axis misalignment was the only independent predictor of device patency after LAAO (HR 38.3, 95% CI: 13.6-107.0; p<0.001). After a median follow-up of 638 days, patency was not associated with an increased risk of death (all-cause or cardiovascular death) or cerebral/peripheral embolism regardless of its mechanism. Any degree of hypo-attenuated thickening (HAT) was found in 16.8% (n=23) of patients, of whom 16 (11.7%) had low-grade HAT and 7 (5.1%) had high-grade HAT or definite DRT. Complete sealing was associated with increased rates of low-grade HAT.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA patency on CCTA follow-up is a frequent phenomenon due to malapposition of the proximal segment of the device lobe, PDL or fabric permeability. Patency was not associated with adverse outcomes. Low-grade HAT may be related to a benign, uneventful, endothelialisation process favoured by complete LAAO.

Long-term outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: Asia-Pacific experience

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), the left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) is an alternative treatment for stroke prevention. However, the long-term outcomes in Asia was generally unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective longitudinal study and a total of 124 patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants or stroke despite under anticoagulants had been enrolled since 2013. Primary efficacy was defined as any type of stroke/systemic embolization and adverse event as any procedure or anti-thrombotic related complications. Twelve patients were excluded due to thrombus in the LAA or oversize LAA. Watchman was successfully implanted in 55 patients (98%) and ACP/Amulet also 55 patients (98%). During follow-up, the ischemic stroke rate was 1.9 in the Watchman and 1.4 per 100 patient-year in the ACP/Amulet group. There were 2 Watchman patients experiencing intracranial hemorrhage. Device-related thrombus (DRT) was noted in 3 patients (2.7%).There was no patient with peri-device lead ≧5 mm. In those patients receiving only local anesthesia, the follow-up echocardiography showed no significant peri-device leak, malposition of LAAO and DRT.

CONCLUSION

This long-term follow-up study shows that percutaneous closure of LAA is a safe and technically feasible procedure with satisfactory outcomes in Asia. The procedure success rate, efficacy and adverse event were similar to those reported in the Caucasian populations.

Atrial appendage closure in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: industry-independent single-centre study

AIMS

To evaluate outcomes of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) in a consecutive, industry-independent registry associated with periprocedural success and complications during long-term follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For this analysis, we included patients who underwent transcatheter LAAC from January 2014 to December 2019 at the University Heart Center in Lübeck, Germany, and compared patients with presence of CHF defined as patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%), patients with a mid-range LVEF (LVEF 41-49%), patients with diastolic dysfunction and preserved LVEF (LVEF ≥ 50%), and patients with right-sided heart failure and impaired right ventricular function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion < 17) to patients undergoing LAAC with no CHF. Primary endpoints were defined as periprocedural complications, and complications during long-term follow-up presented as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). A total of 300 consecutive patients underwent LAAC. Of these, 96 patients in the CHF group were compared with 204 patients in the non-CHF group. Implantation success was lower in CHF group in comparison with non-CHF group (99.5% vs. 96%, P = 0.038); otherwise, there were no differences in periprocedural complications between groups. Patients with CHF showed a significantly higher incidence of MACCE rate (31.9% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.002) and more deaths (24.2% vs. 7%, P ≤ 0.001) during long-term follow-up. In Cox multivariable regression analysis, CHF was an independent predictor of mortality after LAAC implantation at long-term follow-up (hazard ratio 3.23, 95% confidence intervals 1.52-6.86, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of LAAC devices in patients with non-valvular AF and CHF is safe. The increased mortality in patients with CHF compared with patients without CHF during the long-term follow-up is mainly attributed to comorbidities associated with CHF.

Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging for left atrial appendage closure: prime time for fusion imaging?

BACKGROUND

Real-time echocardiography-fluoroscopy fusion imaging (FI) merges real-time echocardiographic imaging with fluoroscopic images allowing intuitive anatomical spatial orientation during structural heart disease interventions. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of FI during percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

METHODS

34 consecutive patients before (-FI) and 121 patients after (+FI) the introduction of FI for LAAC were included in a single-centre study. In-hospital safety parameters were analysed according to adverse event (AE) definition of the Munich consensus document and procedure-related parameters were assessed for efficacy. An ANCOVA was performed to investigate the influence of a learning curve.

RESULTS

Time until successful transseptal puncture was significantly reduced as well as total procedure time and the amount of contrast agent used (+FI/-FI:17 ± 6.35 min vs. 22 ± 8.33 min, p = 0.001; +FI/-FI: 50 min IQR 43 min - 60 min vs. 57 min IQR 45 min -70 min; p = 0.013; +FI/-FI: 70 mL, IQR 55 ml-90 mL vs. 152 mL, IQR 107 mL - 205 mL; p < 0.001). However, fluoroscopy time and dose-area product did not differ between both groups. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of in-hospital adverse events (+FI/-FI: 2.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.596). The ANCOVA revealed that the learning curve does not affect procedural efficacy parameters such as procedure time, time to transseptal puncture, amount of contrast agent and dose-area product.

CONCLUSIONS

FI for LAAC reduces the total procedure time, the time to successful transseptal puncture and periprocedural amount of contrast agent.

Comparison between Amulet and Watchman left atrial appendage closure devices: A real-world, single center experience

Background

Data reporting a head-to-head comparison between Amulet and Watchman devices are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the Watchman™ versus Amulet™ left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices in a consecutive, industry-independent registry.

Methods

Patients who underwent LAAC using Watchman or Amulet devices from January 2014 to December 2019 at the University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany were included in the present analysis. Primary endpoints included periprocedural complications (in-hospital death, pericardial tamponade, device embolization, stroke, major bleeding and vascular access complications), and complications during long-term follow-up (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, thromboembolism, device thrombus, bleeding and death).

Results

After matching the patients for age (±5 years), gender, CHA2DS2Vasc score (±1) and HASBLED score (±1), each of the Watchman and the Amulet groups included 113 patients. Patients in the Amulet group had significantly more periprocedural complications (2.7% vs 10.6%, p = 0.029; respectively) and more major bleeding complications (0% vs 5.3%, p = 0.029; respectively). During long-term follow-up, the rate of events was comparable between the Watchman and Amulet groups (18.3% versus 20.8%, p = 0.729; respectively).

Conclusion

Amulet LAAC device was associated with increased periprocedural complications as compared to Watchman LAAC device. On long-term follow-up, both devices showed comparable efficacy and safety.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Interventions for Structural Heart Disease

Contemporary evidence supports device-based transcatheter interventions for the management of patients with structural heart disease. These procedures, which include aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure, profoundly differ with respect to clinical indications and procedural aspects. Yet, patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac interventions require antithrombotic therapy before, during, or after the procedure to prevent thromboembolic events. However, these therapies are associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. To date, challenges and controversies exist regarding balancing the risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications in these patients such that the optimal antithrombotic regimens to adopt in each specific procedure is still unclear. In this review, we summarize current evidence on antithrombotic therapies for device-based transcatheter interventions targeting structural heart disease and emphasize the importance of a tailored approach in these patients.

[Left atrial appendage closure : Current data and future developments]

Catheter-based left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is currently a potential treatment option for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk for stroke/embolism as well as high bleeding risk. Due to improvements in LAAC devices, advances in implantation techniques and growing experience of the interventional teams, the safety profile of LAAC has significantly improved in recent years. These developments have led to a currently comprehensive exploration of novel indications for LAAC, such as patients with atrial fibrillation and a low risk of hemorrhage, patients with atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation or patients after electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage. The treatment principle of closure of the left atrial appendage is supported by new data, which show the effectiveness of surgical closure of the left atrial appendage with respect to a reduction of the risk of stroke, at least partly in conjunction with oral anticoagulation during cardiological surgical interventions. Currently, the application in the clinical practice is reflected by a high degree of active studies. These randomized studies are testing the use of LAAC in new fields of application and together with the new developments in implantation techniques should define the optimal future use of the methods for the clinical practice. The current potential indications for the LAAC procedure, ongoing randomized clinical trials and advances in device development, implantation planning and technique as well as future developments in the field of LAAC treatment are summarized and discussed in this review article.

Length of stay following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Data from the prospective, multicenter Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study

Aims

To evaluate factors influencing the length of stay in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

Methods and results

Patient characteristics, procedural data and the occurrence of serious adverse events were analyzed from the Amplatzer^TM Amulet^TM Occluder Observational Study. Patients were divided into three groups: same day (S, 0day, n = 60, 5.6%) early (E, 1day, n = 526, 48.9%), regular (R, 2-3days, n = 338, 31.4%) and late (L, ≥4days, n = 152, 14.1%) discharge and followed up for 60 days. Procedure and device related SAE during the in-hospital stay (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 2.1% vs. L: 23%, p<0.0001) were a major trigger for a prolonged in-hospital stay. Of the 37 subjects in the late discharge group with an SAE prior to discharge, cardiac or bleeding complications were the most common underlying conditions, occurring in 26 subjects. Multinomial logistic analysis only identified HAS-BLED score as an independent influencing factor (p = 0.04) for a late discharge. After 60 days, mortality tended to be greatest in the late discharge group (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 1.2% vs. L: 3.3%, p = 0.1066).

Conclusion

Over half of the subjects receiving an Amplatzer Amulet occluder were discharged within 1 day of the implant procedure. Serious adverse events were a major trigger for a late discharge after LAAO. Increased HAS-BLED score was associated with a prolonged in-hospital stay.

Peridevice Leak Following Amplatzer Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Cardiac Computed Tomography Classification and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) peridevice leak (PDL) assessments, and the clinical relevance of PDL.

BACKGROUND

PDL assessment is integral during follow-up after left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion. Comparative studies of TEE and cardiac CT are sparse, and the clinical relevance of PDL is uncertain.

METHODS

This was a single-center observational study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA occlusion with Amplatzer devices (Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet) between 2010 and 2018 (N = 415). Patients with both 8-week CT and TEE were included for analysis (n = 346). Images were analyzed by blinded investigators (K.K. and A.S.). PDL on cardiac CT was classified from grade 1 to 3, based on PDL at the device disc, device lobe, and LAA contrast patency. Primary clinical outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, or all-cause death.

RESULTS

PDL was present in 110 patients (32%) by TEE, with 29 (8%) >3 mm. By cardiac CT, 210 patients (61%) had PDL at the disc, with contrast patency in 204 patients (59%). A grade 3 PDL (gap at disc, lobe, and LAA contrast patency) was present in 63 patients (18%). Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement between CT and TEE for leak sizing. CT and TEE detected PDL was not significantly associated with worse outcome, hazard ratio: 1.82 (95 % confidence interval: 0.95 to 3.50); p = 0.07 and hazard ratio: 1.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.74 to 2.76); p = 0.28, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PDL occurrence is substantially higher with CT compared with TEE, with a large discrepancy between modalities in leak quantification. A novel CT-based classification is proposed, yet PDL was not associated with worse clinical outcome.

Interventional occlusion of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation. Gender-related outcomes in the German LAARGE Registry

INTRODUCTION

Gender-based differences in atrial fibrillation have been identified, but limited data exist for patients undergoing left atrial appendage occluder (LAAO) implantation. This study reports gender-related periprocedural and 1-year outcomes of the prospective, multicenter German left atrial appendage occlusion registry (LAARGE).

METHODS

LAARGE enrolled 641 patients who were scheduled for LAAO implantation from July 2014 to January 2016 in 38 hospitals in Germany. The data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, details of implantation, and outcome. Efficacy and safety at 1-year follow-up were assessed by the occurrence of thrombembolic and bleeding events, as well as mortality.

RESULTS

Of 638 patients undergoing LAAO implantation 38.9% were female and 61.1% male. Females were older (76.4 ± 8.2 [females] vs. 75.6 ± 7.7 [males], p = .042) and had a higher stroke risk (CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score: 4.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.5, p < .001). In contrast, males suffered more often from coronary artery (33.1% vs. 53.8%, p < .001) and vascular disease (18.5% vs. 31.0%, p < .001). Technical success was high and similar for both genders (98.4% vs. 97.2%, p = .33). Severe periprocedural complications (6.9% vs. 3.1%, p = .032) occurred more often in females. At 1-year follow-up the rates of all-cause stroke (0.5% vs. 1.3%, p = .65) and severe bleeding (0.0% and 1.0%, p = .29) were low and comparable between the genders. Also, one-year all-cause mortality (9.2% vs. 13.1%, p = .14) did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

LAARGE documented in this elderly patient population undergoing LAAO implantation a higher rate of severe periprocedural complications in females. At 1-year follow-up similar efficacy and safety outcomes were observed for both genders.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate clinical outcomes associated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF).

BACKGROUND

LAAO has been shown to be noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF. However, anticoagulation with DOACs is now preferred over warfarin as thromboprophylaxis in AF.

METHODS

Patients with AF enrolled in the Amulet Observational Registry (n = 1,088) who had successful LAAO with the Amplatzer Amulet device (n = 1,078) were compared with a propensity score-matched control cohort of incident AF patients (n = 1,184) treated by DOACs identified from Danish national patient registries. Propensity score matching was based on the covariates of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol) scores for predicting stroke and bleeding. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3), or all-cause mortality, and follow-up was 2 years.

RESULTS

AF patients treated with LAAO had a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome as compared with patients treated with DOACs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.67). Total events and event rates per 100 patient-years were (LAAO vs. DOACs) 256 vs. 461 and 14.5 vs. 25.7, respectively. The risk of ischemic stroke was comparable between groups (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.75), while risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.79) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.64) were significantly lower in patients treated with LAAO.

CONCLUSIONS

Among high-risk AF patients, LAAO in comparison with DOACs may have similar stroke prevention efficacy but lower risk of major bleeding and mortality.

Clinical Impact of Preprocedural CT-Based 3D Computational Simulation of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with Amulet

Aims

Standard of care (SoC) device size selection with transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and computed tomography (CT) in LAAO can be challenging due to a certain degree of variability at both patient and device levels. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical impact of 3D computational modelling software in the decision-making of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with Amplatzer Amulet.

Methods and Results

SoC preprocedural assessments as well as CT-based 3D computational simulations (FEops) were performed in 15 consecutive patients scheduled for LAAO with Amulet. Preprocedural device size selection and degree of confidence were determined after SoC and after FEops-based assessments and compared to the implanted device. FEops-based preprocedural assessment correctly selected the implanted device size in 11 out of 15 patients (73.3%), compared to 7 patients (46.7%) for SoC-based assessment. In 4 patients (26.7%), FEops induced a change in device size initially selected by SoC. In the 7 patients (46.7%) in which FEops confirmed the SoC device size selection, the degree of confidence of the size selection increased from 6.4 ± 1.4 for SoC to 8.1 ± 0.7 for FEops. One patient (6.7%) could not be implanted for anatomical reason, as correctly identified by FEops.

Conclusions

Preprocedural 3D computational simulation by FEops impacts Amulet size selection in LAAO compared to TOE and CT-based SoC assessment. Operators could consider FEops computational simulation in their preprocedural device size selection.

What Does the Future Hold?: Ideal Device, Newer Devices, and More

Please verify if "pigtail guided" should be "pigtail catheter-guided": Recent design changes for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices have led to significant improvement by facilitating the procedural workflow (no need for pigtail guided LAA intubation), moving the workspace from distal LAA to the landing zone (closed distal end design), and improving device stability (different anchor design). The availability of different device types (plug vs disc-lobe design) offers an option to tailor a device type to a patient's anatomy; thereby, sealing results have improved substantially. The issue of device-related thrombus has not been resolved and deserves future research, with the goal of eliminating postprocedural antithrombotic medication without increasing risk for stroke.

The use of cardiac computed tomography angiography in the assessment of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure - Review and experts recommendations endorsed by the Société française d'imagerie cardiaque et vasculaire diagnostique et interventionnelle

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cause of arrhythmia which is responsible for over 15% of ischemic strokes, most of these being secondary to migration of a left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. In patient with contraindication to anticoagulant therapy, percutaneous closure system placement may be indicated. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography plays a central role in the initial assessment as well as in the follow-up. The purpose of the pre-implantation cardiac CT angiography is to evaluate the anatomy of the LAA in order to select the most suitable prosthesis and check for any contraindication to device implantation. Image analysis is divided into four steps that include analysis of the approach; search for a thrombus in the LAA; investigation of the anatomy of the LAA (morphology of the LAA, dimensions of the LAA and choice of device) and cardiac and thoracic assessments. Follow-up involves CT examination to check for correct placement of the device and to detect any complications. On the basis of the results of currently available published research, a panel of experts has issued recommendations regarding cardiac CT angiography prior to percutaneous LAA closure device placement, which were further endorsed by the Société française d'imagerie cardiaque et vasculaire diagnostique et interventionnelle (SFICV).

Amplatzer left atrial appendage closure: Single versus combined procedures

OBJECTIVES

This study compares procedural and late clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with Amplatzer devices as a single versus a combined procedure with other structural or coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND

Multiple cardiac conditions are frequent among elderly patients and invite simultaneous treatment to ensure a favorable patient outcomes.

METHODS

559 consecutive patients (73.3 ± 11.1 years) underwent LAAC with Amplatzer devices at two centres (Bern and Zurich university hospitals, Switzerland) either as a single procedure or combined with other interventions. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of major peri-procedural complications and major bleeding at follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular/unexplained death. All event rates are reported per 100 patient-years.

RESULTS

In 263 single and 296 combined procedures with percutaneous coronary interventions (47.6%), closure of an atrial septal defect (8.4%) or a patent foramen ovale (36.5%), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (10.1%), mitral clipping (4.1%), atrial fibrillation ablation (8.8%), or another procedure (3.0%) were analyzed. Device success (96.6% [single] vs. 99.0% [combined], p = .08) did not differ between the groups. After a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.5 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 years and a total of 1,422 patient-years, the primary efficacy (40/677, 5.9% [single] vs. 37/745, 5.0% [combined]; HR, 1.2, 95% CI, 0.8-1.9, p = .44), as well as the primary safety endpoint (25/677, 3.7% vs 28/745, 3.8%; HR, 1.0, 95% CI, 0.6-1.8, p = .89) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LAAC with Amplatzer devices combined with structural, coronary, and electrophysiological procedures offers procedural feasibility and safety, as well as long-term efficacy.

Left atrial appendage occlusion in chicken-wing anatomies: Imaging assessment, procedural, and clinical outcomes of the "sandwich technique"

OBJECTIVES

To describe imaging assessment, procedural and follow-up outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) using a "sandwich" technique.

BACKGROUND

The presence of a LAA with chicken wing morphology constitutes a challenge that sometimes requires specific occlusion strategies like the "sandwich" technique. However, procedural and follow-up data focusing on this implanting strategy is scarce.

METHODS

This multicenter study collected individual data from eight centers between 2012 and 2019. Consecutive patients with chicken-wing LAAs defined as an early (<20 mm from the ostium) and severe bend (>90°) who underwent LAAO with Amplatzer devices and using the "sandwich" technique were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 190 subjects were enrolled in the study. Procedures were done with the Amulet device (85%) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (15%). Successful implantation was achieved in 99.5% with ≤1 partial recapture in 80% of cases. Single (46.2%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (39.4%) were the most used antithrombotic therapies after LAAO. In-hospital major adverse events rate was 1.5% with no deaths. One patient (0.5%) had cardiac tamponade requiring percutaneous drainage. With a mean follow-up of 19.6 ± 14.8 months, the mortality and stroke rates were 7.7%/year and 2.5%/year, respectively. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 2-3 months showed device-related thrombosis in 2.8% and peri-device leak ≥3 mm in 1.2% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large series of patients with chicken wing LAA anatomies undergoing LAAO, the use of the "sandwich" technique was feasible and safe. Preprocedural imaging was a key-factor to determine specific measurements.